The Menu

@Mrspotatohead: Oh my God yes)

@karaspunk: that's for sure :z cheeseburger with you please

@FRFD: the main problem of the film is the lack of any logic in the actions of the characters and hence the lack of a plot. only in general terms, someone came somewhere for some reason and there was some chef with some cooks for some reason did what they did. It feels like I watched perhaps the last, but far from the first episode of the series, and in previous episodes all this was explained in detail, who what why why)

@ZRaoulDuke: Hmm..I understand your displeasure, but I believe that this is absolutely not a problem of the film.
Could they, in accordance with the pace and intimacy , show, for example, a representation of the chef or who of the chefs came to him why или what is their name and did they beat them up in childhood ? We could, but it would be worse.
Here , as it seems to me, a sufficient context is given, and here and there Mini-details of the characters ' characters are sketched. So much so that the story can happen and that no unnecessary details are needed. We were even given characters rather than characters. And this is correct, in the context of the film. At all, it does not matter what and who was called there and from what magazine who came. It is important that this is someone who is a critic who closes entire restaurants because of the wrong color of food served. Someone is the wildest fan of the chef's creativity, who sees ultra-symbolism in everything, even if it's just seaweed on a rock. Someone for the sake of status goes there for the tenth time and does not even remember what and when he ate, because he does not pee in this topic and for him it is just a meal. Someone is a former half-star who somehow pushed herself here for the sake of hype. And so on. Well, someone Anechka (pisechka =*) , who even accidentally got there and she basically does not understand around what such a rush is, if food is such a thing that is thrown into the head, so that the belly does not hurt and the legs go :)

@ZRaoulDuke: there is logic and plot here. If you take exactly the first , surface layer.
We were shown the most fashionable restaurant. So fashionable that even an island has been allocated under it, where everything and everything works only for the good of the island. Even food is grown there only for the needs of the restaurant. Do we need his background? I don't think so. It was probably made on"otshib & # 34; only so that there would be fewer questions from people saying that everything did not escape the first moment.
The plot (at first glance) is that the chef's Superultrasexy is enough that he creates magic outside of Hogwarts and makes food a whole cult and representation, whiplash than in the theater, and people don't even understand it and just come to eat a little food. Well или to beat the show-offs. Or something else. So he gathered a bunch of such people that they would play their play for the last time, Oh, in the sense that they would serve their last menu, where the main dish was all of them. Everything. That's the whole story. There's just as much ego here as you need for a movie.
Slashers sometimes have less and nothing, people watch for years and many people like it.
You just ate this movie and you didn't like it. This is normal. You didn't understand the taste of the dish. And judging by the ratings (and my personal opinion), the second Ed liked it :)

P.S. And in general, I believe that the film is not about food, but about films / theaters. All characters are viewers. To whom to watch the film\play for the sake of show-offs, to whom just to write a review, who is not at all in the topic, and someone Anechka (pisechka =*) and just came to pohavat\watch the film for the campaign :)

@FRFD: well, it seems that such films are in demand since they are being filmed en masse, Do not look up, the Triangle of Sadness, this is a creation, and these are only positive examples)

@ZRaoulDuke: maybe :)

@FRFD: oh, those pussies))

@anabeltesfaye: now for Anechka (pisechka) will they explain ?)))

@FRFD: it's not worth it, I was just passing by))

@ZRaoulDuke: Your comparison is like putting a dick, a cucumber and a vibrator on a plate. And start comparing them. They seem to be similar, but the purpose and functionality are different.

You seem to write everything logically, but just one word - and your comment is repulsive