Description
A woman is suspected of her husband's murder, and their blind son faces a moral dilemma as the sole witness.
Released: | 23 August 2023 |
Country of origin: | France |
Genre: | Thriller, Mystery, Crime |
Production companies: | Les Films de Pierre, Les Films Pelléas, France 2 Cinéma, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Cinéma |
Watched by: | 1 565 of 866 792 |
Runtime: | 2 hours 31 minutes |
IMDB rating: | 7.7 of 10 123 301 |
kinopoisk.ru rating: | 6.85 of 10 104 519 |
At first it was boring, and everything seems to be clear, but at the moment of the quarrel (the one from the recording) everything went very cheerfully.
And the scene of that quarrel is just a tower of scenic skill.
I would like to mention the Prosecutor separately. A person just does his job, but it really pisses me off)
P.S I don't know what dubbing I watched, but lipsink was amazing
No morals
No plot
Boredom
Why is there no sense of completeness?
The recorded quarrel is just great.
And yes, as they wrote, it looks like the Peterson case (https://myshows.me/view/30887 / - documentary 13 episodes) (and I kept waiting for the owl at the end)
In general, in such films I always feel like I'm on the jury, and the prosecution could not convince me of guilt. Well, plus the investigator, who answers the question with "or " not with one of the options, but gives his assessment to the defendant.
And if there are some movies, I can pause and continue after sleep - I watched this one continuously.
And here they had to answer the main question, what happened after all. And then somehow two and a half hours were wasted, without an answer to the main question.
If your work does not evoke any feelings, this does not mean that it is the same with all viewers
It sounds like a good illustration that if water is frozen, it will turn into ice...
As if it's not clear enough. Why spend 2-3 hours of your life for this
I wasn't particularly hooked on the film, but that doesn't stop the finale from being open
in general, I thought that there would be a topic such that someone specially glued the tape to confuse the kid. well, there was an idea that six months ago a man also stuffed a dog with aspirin, and passed off the vomit as his own. I do not know what people in France eat in such a way that the smell is the same as from the vomit of a dog.
SPOILER ALERT
the husband committed suicide, but arranged it in such a way that the wife he hated would definitely fall under suspicion. He provoked her into a scandal by secretly recording everything on a dictaphone, bruised his wife so that it resembled the last futile attempts to grab his killer on the edge of the window. And when she didn't hit him seriously in return, he began to beat himself on the head and against the wall, trying his best to take revenge on her in this way. This explains his excellent attitude as a psychiatrist's patient, because thinking about a plan, a brilliant plan, brings so much pleasure and euphoria, which now will certainly be able to annoy the very scoundrel who ruined his life!
I want the Oscar to be given to the dog 🥺🥺
The finale is open, but personally I do not see this heroine capable of committing murder, everything that we have been shown about her is yes, she is not an ideal and not the most supportive wife, but hardly the murderer of her husband. And any "perversions of the plot " in the style of " and in the end we will find out how she did it, which tapes she glued and where she hid the weapon" would negate the whole tragedy of this family.
If you want films with a twist at the end in the genre of judicial drama, you can look at the old primitive fear with Richard Gere or The Fracture with Anthony Hopkins, or The Life of David Gale.34;, or a more comedic version of My cousin Vinnie. For those who are not afraid of old school "Witness for the Prosecution" - there are already several plot twists. Although I can not guarantee that they will not seem boring to you, despite their more dynamic plot, compared to the Anatomy of a fall.
Then just accept the fact that the genre of "judicial drama" is not for you.
But if you look at the plot: we have a man who really wanted to write a novel, which was very difficult to progress, and then his son got sick and he was able to write again, but he took pills for depression and again it did not work.. and then I just couldn't, even without the pills. Yes, his wife probably wasn't attentive and supportive enough, but it wasn't her fault that she was able to write and was successful, and he couldn't. Plus, apparently there was not enough help from a specialist who did not understand the situation deeply and fueled some kind of resentment of the husband against his wife. And infidelity is usually resolved by divorce, if such a situation does not suit.
There is a feeling of guilt for the story with my son + a feeling of deep dissatisfaction with myself. And "drove to suicide" - this is a rather dubious thesis, rather " did not save from suicide and did not help to avoid it". The man canceled the medication for depression, which, apparently, he had quite a strong one, no matter how the therapist protected himself.
There are people who just tend to blame everyone around them and be a victim, there are people who are prone to bad thoughts, including suicidal ones (and no matter how much you help them, there is already a huge wormhole somewhere in the depths that destroys. The words of the father in the car show that he had already decided everything a long time ago, he was just choosing the time. And even the fact that he would hurt his son did not stop him), but there are more persistent ones who, even under terrible circumstances, continue to live.
And the fact that you have completely shifted the blame to your wife is most likely an indicator that you also tend to blame others more than yourself.
But, I admit, part of me also expected a twist in the style of a wow detective, like that the dog ran to the attic for a ball, bit her husband's ass, he lost his balance and fell :)) I got revenge for the aspirin, so to speak :))
Someone will definitely succeed