Description
Twenty-eight days after a killer virus was accidentally unleashed from a British research facility, a small group of London survivors are caught in a desperate struggle to protect themselves from the infected. Carried by animals and humans, the virus turns those it infects into homicidal maniacs -- and it's absolutely impossible to contain.
and the action itself is pretty dull, though. a couple of encounters with zombies and the last batch.
what's a plus for the film I'll write down - zombies look like a real danger, they run and jump, so it definitely turned out better than the notorious walkers (who, it seems to me, just licked the first scene in 28 days), but the rest of the content seems to be better in walkers
For its age, the film was probably a landmark, but now it looks very naive. We have already seen many post—attacks in different time intervals, and 28 days is a scanty time to fold your paws and put the muzzle in your mouth. But apparently enough for aunt pharmacist Selina to turn into a Rambo and a survival expert. We believe it.
Walkers are more realistic, but on the other hand, they have more time to show the details of the apocalypse, and then gallop across Europe