Mission: Impossible III (2006)

Philip Seymour Hoffman is the perfect and probably the best villain in the universe of the Impossible Mission, simple and at the same time brilliant, because he is a real sadist, ready to give a chance to the hero and leading his unique game, I would probably compare him to a Saw Constructor mixed with the exact opposite of Ethan Hunt, a man threat, real terrorism in the flesh. And Michelle Monahan fits in coolly as a victim, she is so drawn to torment and save, Tom Cruise raises the stakes and goes all out for the sake of fulfilling the contract and revenge.

The group gathers briskly and a serious game of cat and mouse begins with elements of hyperbolization of action and with tense denouements. Here, what's in the second, what's here - everything suits to a similar extent, what is required, then it turns out, although it's as if the main character is brighter than his teammates again, and they don't get a chance to prove themselves.

Bright memory to Seymour Hoffman for such a unique experience and for the challenge of acting for Cruise, because Ethan was given a new role, and Tom was able to infect the character with even more soul.

Whoever noticed Aaron Paul in the movie, hello to him.

Visual: 11/15
Atmosphere: 12/15
Soundtrack: 8/10
Main characters: 17/20
Minor characters: 7/10
Plot: 23/30
Total Score: 78 (Green Zone).

They started the third part illiterate.
After all, this is a series of films about the same character.
And if in the previous part Ethan Hunt had a lot of love with the heroine of the 2nd part, then it would not be here. No explanation is logical. Still, in 2006, the directors already adhered to some norms of logic, consistency, if they filmed the story of one person.
And here Ethan lives with a girl, he's engaged, he's retired. WTF?

Well, Hoffman is handsome. Such is the colorful antagonist. The best three-part antagonist.
Actually, thanks to him, the film is very interesting.

Plot 7/10
Shooting 8/10
Acting 8/10
Music 8/10
Atmosphere 8/10

Total: 7.8/10 🕶️

Near-top spy action)

It's a film with holes in the plot. It started out quite briskly right up to the moment when the drone began to attack and no one from the agency had any questions about why this all happened? Can I find out what Fishburne's character gets paid for? Further down the list, there are even more absurd plot twists. It's good that the tanks haven't started flying yet. The benefit of fast and furious. It will make up for everything. The example of this series of films clearly shows the degradation of spy fighters and the transition into a superhero.

The movie is good! Fascinating, exciting, with cute characters. Cruz is doing great too. I like that his character is evolving and changing. It was interesting to watch. I would call a terrible visual a big disadvantage for myself: a dark picture, an annoying color scheme and stupid camera angles.