Superman (2025)

After the final moments, it's hard not to love this Superman. The first hour of the film is very chaotic, they show everything and a lot, you don't even know how to feel about it. It's as if we missed a lot of important moments for an emotional connection with Clark, as if we should immediately love him in absentia. And he often doesn't behave like that either (hysteria with Lois is terrible), but what James Gunn knows is how to hit the right emotions at the right moments. The conversation with the earthly father on the farm, Clark's speech about being Luther's man, it all works as it should. Otherwise, the film is quite cartoonish, for some it will be a plus, for others it will be a minus. For me, the conflict looked frivolous against the background of this Boravia, some kind of stupid ambitions and Lex's envy (although Holt gave his best), the girl from the trailer who stands with her back and does not notice the monster from 5 meters away from her, a pocket dimension with hundreds of monkeys in social networks, But after the smile of this Superman against the background of moments with REAL parents, you don't want to think about anything anymore.

Mr. Terrafiq is 10 out of 10, he stole every scene, my favorite character in this movie.

As for me, the world without Superman was not shown much. Yes, there was an example of a conflict between two countries, but it was a problem of these two countries specifically. The reaction of Americans and the other world to all this was not enough. So that they understand that it's bad without Superman. But Lex was given a ride with normal motivation, unlike Eisenberg's version.
Overall, it turned out to be such a strong Marvel movie. In a good way.
P.S. I will miss the pretentious and epic version of Snyder, but what about now...

It's a strange feeling after watching a movie.
On the one hand, it's funny and fun, but not at all what it used to be before this reboot. It seems to me that it will fail at the box office.
It's fashionable to look at it once, but no more. They lied when I would watch this copy of the film again.
In order to laugh at some moments, it's worth watching - but it's NOT worth it!

It was a great movie, I was really looking forward to it, the expectations were high and I was not disappointed. It's definitely WORTH watching

It's a pretty good restart, as far as I'm concerned. Gunn was able to take matters into his own hands and give a cool, fresh version of the story.

although the plot itself is slowly swinging at the beginning, it already lacks many points for the introduction, as is usually the case in restarts. the characters are immediately endearing, they are well spelled out, which are the main ones, which are secondary. yes, and played by the way too. you just believe them and feel their emotions and drama.

The film is fascinating. The music, visuals, and dialogues are good. I want to believe that DiSi will also succeed with the relaunch of the cinematic universe.

A great movie without too much plot overload, without too much pathos and seriousness. 😎
I was pleased with the actors' performance:
Nicholas Hoult, David Kornsvet, Rachel Brosnahan, Edi Gathegi, Nathan Fillion - they look great in their roles.
The action sometimes looked strange.
Gunn handled the restart with a bang 🎉

I was really looking forward to this movie and believed that I would not be disappointed. Spoiler alert: I wasn't disappointed.

In two moments, it almost made me cry: when Clark was sitting with Lois and said that he needed to turn himself in to the authorities, because Crypto was alone there and very scared. The second was when Clark's "earthly" father said he couldn't be more proud of him than he is now. I don't know about the others, it got to me.

Guy is a funny comic relief, nothing more, the Eagle seems to be superfluous in this movie. Terrefik carries the whole movie, now he's my favorite character in this universe. The engineer somehow falls short of an interesting character, you can safely cross out like the Eagle. "This is a twist" with Ultraman was readable from the first second (I hadn't read the comics), when Clark said "how did they get into my hideout, because they need my dna?". Holt, in the role of Lex, carries the role of a spoiled billionaire, sometimes overplays, but on the whole looks more convincing than the same Eisenberg. Crypto is good (hopefully we won't see a superhero version of John Wick in the future).

The only thing that killed me the whole movie was the onlookers. When a monster the size of a skyscraper walks around the city, they act as if they all have Superman's invulnerability. They don't run from danger, they don't scream, they don't panic like normal people. Many are standing there filming on their phones, while others are just standing there looking at the disaster, as if they are sure that Superman will be able to save everyone in time. They start running and screaming only when something falls on them. And if some kind of danger is just nearby, it's okay for them, they watch the show. It was unnerving, unnatural, and made it difficult to immerse oneself in what was happening.

Otherwise, it's a good movie, surprisingly even better than the latest Guardians of the Galaxy and Suicide Squad, although the director seems to be the same. 9/10, I'm thrilled.

To put it simply: Definitely worth watching. This is James Gunn. The atmosphere is more like a Suicide Squad than Guardians of the Galaxy. I couldn't squeeze out a tear, but I had a good time.
In some centuries, the villain is competent with a normal motivation, a la LF from the Age of Ultron or Batman from BpS.
Humor is at a high level. Especially all the scenes with Nathan Fillion. I was so glad I didn't look at the trailers or the cast. I just got high from seeing the character.
There wasn't enough drama. She was. The scene with the father is one of them, but Cavilla's Superman has tamed us to the great 3.14 compassion of the protagonist. Or maybe it's for the best? James Gunn shows a naive but simple truth - you don't have to be afraid to be a person who makes mistakes. Rather than trying to be a moral tuning fork.

An up-to-date path for all time or the Hero's Path. A direct hint at the current state of the world. There is a global twist on the classic "good old superhero movie" (= no agenda, no clumsy game of inclusivity, etc.).

It's nice to immerse yourself in a world where everything is clear, where there is obvious good and evil, where good wins and the world is saved, evil is punished and peace and joy come to the whole world. Oh, we would like that.

This world needs a Superman too! Psychology would answer us here in the spirit that Superman is in each of us, we must also fight our dark copy, which is guided by trauma / prejudice/ blinders (insert your own version). Super Man, he's super HuMAN, right? Is it possible for us to become more human, to become supermen? I hope so.

A pretty passable superhero, not much different from the latest DC and Marvel movies.
It turned out to be about the same as Black Adam. The same vague villain, the same justice team, only in this movie they are on the side of GG.
But it'll do for one movie.

I came out of the cinema with the thought of emptiness, there were no special emotions left to experience. It was interesting at times, boring at times, as always, people were surprised that they were standing and filming everything on their phone a meter from the monster, and then waiting to be rescued. I would have bet 6/10 anyway, and this sister of his in the end is also not clear why there were robots that did not protect the base at all, why not make a normal program to protect against intruders. Well, this…

Mixed feelings. It seems cool, but something is missing.

This is our Superman. Either accept it and have fun, or continue to stink all over the Internet, but know that in the end it won't change anything. Now it's your Superman too! Don't thank me!

James Gunn is still worthy! It's not perfect, but it's very strong and comic.

After Zack Snyder, it's very difficult to watch this masterpiece, the cast is very weak, everything is very colorful and uninteresting from the first to the last moment. The only bright spot in this movie is the dog, nothing else. But it's a must for all comic book fans, because this is a new look at the Superman universe and maybe someone will come in and be delighted, but I'm passing it by.

The movie is cool. I liked the actors and the plot itself. And now the beginning has been made, let's see what Gunn will do next.

Crypto is the most rabid dog you can think of.

It's weak, unfortunately, and there are no questions about the actors - everyone plays perfectly. But this is too frivolous a creation about an alien in red underpants :)

PS: I expected Supergirl to get more screen time...

It's a teen movie, lacking the seriousness, realism, bleakness, and heavy themes that DC is famous for. It's not a failed film, and I think it will find its audience. It's also a base for future films with its own atmosphere, physics, pitch, and growth prospects. Let's keep an eye on the growth of the league!

PS: When Gunn was at Marvel, his films were perceived as an entertainment series (fanservice), in a series about Marvel super heroes, which gave him a chance to take a breath away from the series. They looked good in this stream of superheroics. Now, in the future, there will all be such series as Superman, but there is hope that they will be diluted with dark episodes. Given that heroics are dying, I hope Gunn has a plan and the new universe doesn't die after the first failure!

I looked at it... Well, what can I say. Mr. Terifik is his movie.
Superman seemed a little boring. I didn't have enough seriousness. It's like he's still a teenager here.
The screaming eagle was constantly infuriating.
Guy Gardner, well, as I remember him from comics and animated series, is similar.
Metamorpho, the appearance pleased. +- canon, first bad, then good.

But in the end. A passer-by. To watch this movie, you have to be immersed in the DC universes. And there is no time to reveal the normal characters.
You're looking purely at nostalgic flashbacks.

P.S. It still bombs that the theme of the bat tribe in the series Gotham was ignored. At least dark nights are metal in this lineup of restarts.

It's amazing how Snyder's film and Gan's film absolutely don't get into me emotionally at the time of their release. In 2013, I just wanted something light and fervent, but they gave me gloom and seriousness, seriousness and gloom. And now, probably due to cynicism, it's also difficult for me to perceive such a Superman. Although kind and bright heroes are very much needed at the moment, I'm not sure that Superman is a good option for this. It was as if his time had passed after all and there wasn't much that could be done about it. But it's interesting to see where it all goes next.

I watched it at the cinema yesterday with almost no spoilers. I can say with confidence that this is the best superhero project that has been shot so far, if you are at least a little interested in superheroes, you can't help but love this movie, only if there is a complete lack of taste. It couldn't have been better, but maybe it's better, Gunn has proven that he's improving with every film he makes.

So the first movie and 3.5 project came out (Squad S seems to be there, but only the assassination of Flag Jr. is canonical, Peacemaker is completely canon – except for the League, and Squad M) of the new DC universe. This is a completely different Superman, it makes no sense to compare him (although they will, and there is a comparison going on in his head) with Cavil's Superman. They vary in everything from character, to music, to color palette.
This Superman lives in a world in which there have been superhumans for at least 300 years and humanity has a taste for them. This Superman is as kind and naive as possible. He is trying to save absolutely any living being (or stop it, and if it doesn't work out painlessly, put it to sleep). Because of this, the main conflict of the film occurs. Superman wants to save people and thereby intervenes in the conflict between the two countries. Not thinking about anything but saving people. After all, he wants to help and do what he thinks his parents from Krypton sent him to do. But here is the first surprise, he was sent not to help, but to subdue people and with their help breed as many Kryptonians as possible. Kal-El himself did not know this, the message was damaged and what he did not hear, he thought up. What Luthor uses.
Lex Luthor is good. Despite his mistakes, he is quick-tempered and sometimes stupid. He still looks like an interesting character driven by envy and fear. The turn with Ultraman is predictable, I hope he returns as Bizaro, otherwise it will be a stupid drain. The engineer is fine, does his job, is devoted, and it's hard to call her a dummy.
The justice gang. There are few of them in the film, but it's not about them either. The trific character who aroused the least interest before the film has the most time and arouses interest. The lantern is funny – now I want to look at it in the series, otherwise the PG-13 rating does not allow it to be fully shown. It's a shame for the Eagle, she's almost gone and speaks 3-4 phrases, I want more and not in a minor role. Well, the musical accompaniment is gorgeous, especially at the end.
The environment of the Superman is interesting. I want to highlight the earthly parents, especially the dialogue with the father. The relationship with Lois is alive, the chemistry is present. Krypto is a mischievous dog who doesn't piss you off, and in one 30-second scene they showed you why he is like that. Supergirl also appears in this scene, a movie that I've been waiting for more than a Superman movie, and this scene has increased my expectations (there will also be another character who doesn't look like the CW, not the DCU).
The film is not perfect, though. There are questions for him. There are not logical points. But this movie brought emotions. This film has given you a full-fledged entrance into a new universe, which you want to return to and look at this new world and the characters who live in it. 8/10.

I really love Cavill and Snyder, but Gunn made a much better film where the story of superman is presented with humor, but at the same time filled with drama! David was given a lot to play, a lot to show emotions and say cool dialogues, unlike the silent Superman of previous films! Of course Nick Holt is the icing on the cake of everything that is happening😍😍Well, Crypto is love! How much anger is in the hearts of the viewers who write here that the dog was infuriating! Let's be kinder, friends!

Not a single joke about red underpants over pants. I didn't expect this from Gunn…

The movie is good!
Not without question, but it really turned out to be good.
We clench our fists and hope that Gunn will be able to open the DC normally.
We'll be watching and waiting.

I'm like someone who's been disappointed in superheroes for a long time, and all the recent Marvel movies are a complete failure. I was pleasantly surprised by this superman.

In my opinion, it's much better than the Thunderbolts, even though everyone praises them, but I didn't like them at all...

I give the super 7 out of 10.

It was a little scary after the first reviews, but the movie is *super*, and the universe already has more texture than anything DC has done before. Here's the Justice Gang (working title), here's Peacemaker watch in August, here's Supergirl watch next year. At the same time, their presence doesn't feel like just a silly cameo in a post-credits scene with promises that won't come true, they're part of the story. Everyone already has a clear character, and I will go to the Supergirl movie with great enthusiasm.

Anyway, I'm on Hopium. Superheroics come to life in 2025

#Gunnycharged by the fighting

Does crypto really look a bit creepy 😅 Or are we just overindulging in anticipation of high-quality graphics? )

I liked the movie. Finished beautifully, Especially liked the musical design.
After the end of the serial Soup, I felt nostalgic.

I may not be expressing a popular opinion, but the film left behind some twofold feelings. On the one hand, I liked him, a new look at the hero for a new generation + the soup was always bright, kind, and so on, not gloomy like Snyder's. On the other hand, I was sitting in dissonance while watching, as this was the first time I didn't feel that superman was an omnipotent being. He is too kind, naive, as if he has not lived with people for 30 years, but only arrived on the planet yesterday. He is weak, not decisive - he is beaten by literally everyone who is in the frame, even a woman with nanorobots.... Well, how's that? Where is that all-powerful hero, at the sight of whom people lost their fear and they knew that they would be saved? Of course, Gan made a good interpretation, he got a great Clark Kent, a great reflection between a man and a hero, his path of becoming, etc., but as Superman.... Uh, well, that. He relied on "kindness" and "anyone can be a hero" - his Superman is learning to be a hero. But is a teenager on the path of self-discovery a symbol of Hope? Still, I personally prefer Snyder's more realistic style. And also, no offense to the fans, but these red underpants are getting in the way. Gan himself did not want to insert them, but to leave a monolithic blue suit - but alas, the fans pressed on.
I really liked the music, the visual (yes, yes, it's too bright, but it's good), the cast (just fine, everything was perfect, Lex Luthor, Green Lantern, Mr. Terrible, and even Lois Lane ... and Supergirl)
)

I liked the movie, it's a good start to relaunch the DC franchise. James Gunn coped with his task. The cast is good. There are emotional moments as well as funny ones in the film, and there are enough action scenes.

I looked at it and didn't understand... I'll make a reservation right away, Superman is my favorite superhero and has been for a long time. Of course, my expectations could have been too high.
and I don't plan to compare it with any other Superman movies, except with a picture forming in my head.

there are moments that I didn't get. for example, it's a shame for the ancestors from Krypton. this is, of course, a straight greasy minus from me.

There was probably a lot more that I didn't have enough of. the development between the characters, not right off the bat. Clois is cute in itself, there is chemistry, as in principle and generally between all the characters. but I think it was worth focusing more on Superman than adding the Justice League/gang to it. as a result, it's too much porridge. I've had enough movies in recent years, where there's a lot of this mess, I'm tired of it.

one of the advantages is Superman himself. This is my superman. kind, naive, who is against killing. And so is Lex. With Lex, it was perfect too. Oh, how Holt played this super-crazy psycho. This is also my Lex Luthor. I'm thrilled.
Lois is good, but I was still hoping for some different behavior towards Clark. but considering that time has passed, and let's say I'm watching the 90th episode about Superman, yes, this is the case. It just doesn't look right in the movie.
Cat Grant is perfect, Jimmy Olsen is perfect, and so is Perry. but there are too few Daily planets and Clark Kent actually.
There are also scenes that hit my heart. For example, when Clark talks about crypto, he's the only one there. and at this moment, I literally automatically project this situation onto Clark himself, who was left all alone in this world, who was often misunderstood, and is not understood now, this topic has always broken my heart. He really was always alone on this planet. The alien. and Lois's hugs at that moment, when he's talking about the dog, made me burst into tears.
and also the music, the music is creepy, I cried every time with the theme of super, and in general, the inserts in many places are beautifully made.

the result is fine. but I definitely need a revision in the original. most of the time, dubbing spoils everything for me. I want to hear the voices and the acting. so I'll wait for the original, maybe I need a certain mood as well. yes, I was looking forward to superman and ran at the first opportunity, but I was walking and I was sure I wouldn't get in, I don't even know why such a thought formed in my head. maybe after a while I'll look at it a little differently. I don't know. it looks pretty average so far.

It's a great movie. When I went to the cinema, expectations were low, the best movie of the year, definitely.

The scene with the parents on the screens at the end under Punkrocker is something with something.

I liked James Gunn's version better than Snyder's gloomy pseudo-philosophical universe. In my opinion, this is what was missing to restart the DC.

At the beginning of the film, I thought that it would be my main disappointment of the year, I watched the finale with pleasure, I will definitely review it! Both the movie itself and the hero are the exact opposite of the previous "Superman", well, in general, that says it all. I assume that radically different audience ratings will be based on this.) I liked almost everything, although there are 3 buts that almost pushed me away at the very beginning. 1. A long, tedious and inappropriately serious conversation-an interview with Lois. 2. The fact that the plot began as if from the middle. No introduction, no explanation, no eyeliner. Apparently, the creators decided that everyone already knows everything. But not all viewers are such fans of DS. It was uncomfortable for me to immerse myself in history in this way. 3. The most important disadvantage. There was no need to kill, and so brutally, a monster in the city. You just don't need to. Yes, getting to know new characters, revealing the character of Superman. But... there was no need! Don't do that anymore.
P.S. I didn't expect it from the trailers and posters, but the new Superman suddenly turned out to be such a charismatic handsome man!) Ironically, a bit like Cavill.

It's just a delight🥰

The ideal cast of absolutely all actors.

Clear, logical, and sometimes tearful dialogues.

Gorgeous cameos of all Gunn's friends.

As always, the sound is amazing.

Cool characters that haven't been shown before.

The chemistry between Clark and Lois😍

And of course, Crypto, a dog worthy of his mistress.

I'm looking forward to Supergirl and the second season of Peacemaker. As much as I love the Snyder universe, Gunn is a wizard. Keep up the good work!🙏🏻

It seems like it's not bad, but I personally prefer Snyder's look..

You know, I liked it. Yes, this is not the usual and beloved gloomy DC — it's the exact opposite. Cheerful, simple-minded, naive... in the spirit of Gann. I've loved and read DC since I was a kid, I adore these comics for their darkness, but we already have Man of Steel with dark vibes. So why do we need a second one? The new "Superman" is a great movie with its own joints, but it's definitely a pleasure to watch. I was touched by the moments with Crypto, when Clark said that he was alone there and he was scared, and the conversation with his father (it would seem so banal, but damn it, it made me cry). I really liked Supergirl, and now I'm waiting for a movie with her. I would like to go straight to the cons, some of which are not so critical.:

• a messy beginning, we are not introduced to the hero, immediately immersed in all the fuss, then all this confusion settles down. But it's like watching a movie from the middle. On the one hand, yes, there is no smooth immersion into Clark's life, but on the other hand, why? Everyone knows what we haven't been shown. These are some basic facts that, I think, are also known to those who have not watched the films.

Well, it's too predictable a move with an Ultraman clone (even for those who are not familiar with comics). As if we would like something different, something that we have never seen on television about Superman... I didn't like it.

• quite a lot of characters, on the one hand, it's cool, they superficially introduce new characters, and on the other, I want to learn more about them, but you realize that in this film it's inappropriate to stretch the timing for them. That's what happened to the Eagle. I don't know if she really looked superfluous to me. And I missed the story about the Engineer: what exactly was her motivation to help Lex like that? It would be interesting to know about it. It's clear that her character is much deeper and more tragic than we were shown. At some point, I thought she was capable of going over to the side of good. At the same time, I can't say the same about Guy or Teriffik. I really liked them! For some reason, it seemed that Guy would be a bit cringe-worthy, but the actor is insanely cool, and they prescribed him well.

• I absolutely did not like what was done with the parents' message, although I understood why they did it: to show that Superman acts of his own free will, helping people is solely his choice. But damn it, it hurts me so much for changing the tone of this message... Gunn summed it up well in the end to the fact that Superman asked to show childhood memories with earthly parents (by the way, they turned out like this... real ones). This is very nice!

• the robots at the base turned out to be cool (funny guys), but so defenseless. It looked silly and weird. Don't they have any superpowers? They were scattered like dumb pieces of iron. Some kind of unconvincing Cryptographic technology. Well, maybe because they're purely medical... I don't know, maybe I'm being mean.

• people who are in no hurry to run away from danger. A huge Luntik is coming at them, and they are like turtles, barely moving. In fact, it seems a little natural to me for our time, well, it can be explained by a banal stupor. Each of us reacts to danger in a completely different way: someone has the strength to immediately react and run away, while someone is just in full swing...

I liked that we were connected with other characters. I am incredibly happy about the appearance of the Green Lantern, and even such a fun one! Yes, so far these characters are just an interesting wrapper for the central Superman, but this is a cool foundation for their personal stories in future films. Holt's Luthor is wonderful (although my favorite is still Michael Rosenbaum), he has his own vibe that differs from previous actors in this role. The moments when he stood coolly in front of the emotional Superman are very cool. But there just wasn't enough clarity for those who don't know the universe, what exactly his motivation was, why he was so angry at Superman. I'm sure it was left for a treat, like his canonical costume. We will definitely see in the future. Lex seemed caricatured in places, but damn, he's a charismatic devil.

I also liked David Korensvet, he turned out to be very lively and bright, albeit with such naive vibes. For his hero, saving the squirrel is just as important as stopping the war in the countries. And it's catchy. A Kryptonian with a human soul. The true embodiment of goodness. Yes, and I like how weak Superman was shown here. He always annoyed me a little with his image, because against his background, people like Green Arrow and others didn't look serious at all, but with Gunn everything is different. Rachel Brosnahan and her Lois Lane were not enough for me, I don't know, as if she was in some distant, distant background, perhaps because of so many characters. The actress herself has potential, but it doesn't seem to be fully revealed...

Well, I'll conclude with a good one: a great movie with pleasant humor, self-irony and such easy naivety (which may be considered too ridiculous and childish, but these are comics, guys, for such a movie it was within acceptable limits). Without the usual superhero pathos. I really liked that humanity is at the center of the film, not stupid action. Superman Gunn is not a superhero from an unknown planet who gives people hope; it's about a MAN who values the life of every creature, even that unfortunate Lunatic who almost killed hundreds. It's very comic. As for me, a cheerful and good start to the restart. Yes, at first glance it may look trivial and simple, but the characters and their actions make the plot richer and deeper. As a result, it catches on! I laughed, I cried, I was happy, I was happy. Honestly, I missed movies like that.

Now I love both the Snyderverse and Gunn's "Superman." You won't believe it, but it's really possible. It's not an ideal movie, not like the DC movie we're used to, but it's a very good one. I'm betting 8 Crypto out of 10! 🙌🏻 And yes, Crypto is not stupid or infuriating! He's just a playful schoolboy... 🥺 Do not insult Crypto!

Well, it's very simple, Gunn knows how and proves how to shoot superheroics. DS is really in good hands and the start is great, although there have already been 3 projects of his. Marvel, bite your elbows)

As for me, the movie is so-so, I only liked the ending, but the Zack Snyder universe is better for me because DS should be dark and violent, and not copy Marvel. Oh, it's a pity that such a universe died and all because of the piss-soaked Warners.

I've finally been given the superman I've always wanted!
Lively, humane, funny, and sometimes clumsy.

Yes, you can scold the film for a lot of banal moves, sometimes silly dialogues and occasionally inappropriate humor, but this is Gunn's style.
Amazing emotions from watching!
Thanks to everyone involved, it was great!
Finally, they really showed us a real Comic Book Movie.

If Zack Snyder's "Man of Steel" was gloomy, then Gunn's turned out to be a bright, kind and funny film. Superman is now played by little-known actor David Korensvet. It's a pity it's not Henry Cavill anymore, but I understand why he was replaced. Superman Korensvet is a naive, not too strong and humane hero who even saves animals. I don't see Cavill in this version of Superman, although for me personally he will always remain the best Superman. Rachel Brosnahan plays Lois Lane, and Nicholas Hoult plays Lex Luthor. And so I liked them much more than the previous performers of these roles, Holt is especially good. In general, the whole trio creates a pleasant impression and evokes sympathy. So, in my opinion, the cast was successful. It was also a great idea to add Crypto the dog to the movie, he's cool. The action turned out to be spectacular, especially the scenes with Mr. Terrific and his T-spheres. I was also pleased that the film has a couple of strong dramatic scenes that are memorable. And, in general, the film turned out to be quite life-affirming, so it leaves a pleasant impression. We can only hope that the next projects will be no worse.

James Gunn, my honor, you've made an amazing movie.
I wasn't the least bit bored, the jokes, the jokes of rzhak. The actors are superbly chosen, Holt played Luthor the coolest, he wanted to drag him right to disgust.😄
Korensvet also performed Superman coolly, I initially thought that some kind of actor was not very suitable for this role, I confess there are many third-party characters from the DCU that I did not expect to see.
Marvel hasn't done anything like this for a long time, at least in Phase 5 for sure.

The new Superman is truly beautiful!
I take back all my words that kringe will fail at the box office)))

Well, even an old woman can have a hole!
According to the trailer, it seemed to me that this was some kind of ridiculous mess and a hodgepodge of robots, dinosaurs and superheroes.
But James Gunn is smart, he just shuts up commentators like me.😅🙈

Anyway, the new Super - super!
It's bright, stylish, funny, and has a good plot, and Korensvet is wonderfully good!
Holt shines in the role of a tyrant technomillionaire.
There are a lot of minor characters, and they've all been given a bit of time, and there are a couple of cameos.
I liked Mr. Terrible too.

In general, I want to watch such a film universe of DS, I look forward to seeing you again.👌🏼

James Gunn is just great, and he's brought the good stuff to the cinemas again)

What I particularly liked was how the director once again treats the secondary characters, who sometimes turn out to be more interesting than all the central characters. The justice gang breaks into the cinematic universe with two legs, immediately adding volume and laying bridges to future stories. And Gunn gives the most creative battle scene to Mr. Terrific, who, in synergy with music, deals with opponents – his biospheres strongly resemble Yonda from Guardians of the Galaxy. But the main thing is that David Korensvet himself, played by Superman, does an excellent job with both the human and superhuman sides.

It was a good movie in some places, but definitely weaker than "Man of Steel".
I expected the Guardians of the Galaxy to appear at any moment, especially when they were trying to defeat the bug)

I liked it, I didn't doubt Ghana for a second. Especially in music. There's no way for the soundtrack to be bad. And I liked that there are finally colors. I can't remember the last time I saw a superhero movie and the colors were bright instead of muted. And so that the characters are not gloomy people with a difficult past and no one understands them, they become characters with gray morals, and you need to feel them, you don't understand, they are so complicated. It's everywhere. To review the comedies of recent years, TV series and so on, everyone rushed to make them serious. There is a good execution, but most of it is just carbon copy.

Superheroics is now overflowing with "grey" heroes. Naturally, everything will start to change in order to show the new - the well-forgotten old.

But it's a shame when they start hating a movie just because it's not what Snyder did. Man of Steel and Batman vs Superman are good, but there are a lot of comics written about Superman. And not everything is in the spirit of "injustice." If Snyder's version has not gone far in terms of box office receipts, and such films are shot precisely for the sake of money, it is natural that they will try to shoot something else.

And this superman doesn't look like Marvel movies, just because he's relatively light, he doesn't look like either the old movies or the new ones.

There's really nothing, I really liked it. 👍

Well, I want to say that this is Gan's film and that's it, his handwriting is everywhere and it's both good and bad at the same time. It looks as easy and casual as Guardians of the galaxy, jokes, absurdity, nonsense, but it all looks laconic and natural within the framework of the film.) You will not get out of your head the idea that Zack Snyder once made his superman with Henry Kavel and you will compare them throughout the film, but there is no point in comparing them, Gan has his own narrative, more fun, which will suit all categories, and Zack has his own, heavier. If you are not thinking of going to this movie just now, then do not compare these two films, they are different!! I liked the movie, even though I expected something serious and dynamic, but what I got was not nearly worse, I'm even glad to some extent that I got something else. I advise everyone to take a lot to chew, it will be a worthy sight. Enjoy watching it :)

Naive, stupid, and ridiculous. If you turn off your brain and don't think about it, it's not bad.
A beautiful children's fairy tale with interesting moments and caricature characters. It can be revised to amuse the inner child.

I really missed kind, optimistic movies and heroes like that. That was amazing.

Another version of the adventures of Superman from director and screenwriter James Gunn looks pretty good, especially considering that Superman here is quite so soulfully slapping his cheeks, and there is no Justice League as such. There is a small gang of Green Lantern (Nathan Fillion), Lady Hawk (Isabela Merced) and Mr. Terrible (Edi Gathegi). Everything is drawn perfectly, Kornsvet played the role of both Superman and Clark well. I didn't really like Brosnahan, she didn't play very well, but Nicholas Hoult was inimitable and beat everyone in acting! Fillion was responsible for the humor and he was good at it, and Crypto added funny moments. The plot itself is interesting, the drama is minimal, there is enough action, as well as adventures, it's never boring to watch. Zack Snyder made a much darker movie, and here it's just a crazy mochilovo, well, James Gunn knows how, you can't take it away! I watched it with pleasure and will probably review it again. I recommend it!

It feels like I've watched a Superman parody. Or what our "creators" decided: Why don't we take Superman off? Or Mom, I want Superman - we have Superman at home. 🤦♂️ It's not DC, it's some kind of joke. The dialogues were like half a movie written by a neural network, a computer dog, and an alcoholic sister… There's no chemistry between Clark and Lois-if it's chemistry, then no thanks, my tea is stronger. The character's arch - what is it? The man of steel, compared to this craft by a second-grader (apparently designed for someone), is simply the height of cinema (although this is not the case). A primitive, mediocre movie. It's a pity, it's a pity - I love the Gan Suicide Squad, the Peacemaker is great, give me two! It's not even worth talking about Guards - they have a separate place in the heart, but it's just ridiculous, like underpants over pants. In this case, "simplicity is worse than theft." Two stars or one ... I don't know, it's difficult for me in such a coordinate system, I put 4 out of 10 on Kinopoisk only because of the codes - they were always excellent for Gan, Guy Gainer played by Nathan Filion (he's funny as he should be) and the villain's motivation, more or less prescribed, not Thanos, of course.

It's a very weak movie that looks like Marvel. Almost everywhere, something was missing, I wanted to believe in the best, but alas.

That's what I mean by comeback! The new "Superman" really pleased me. You can see right away that they tried and put their soul into it, and not just cut the dough on the cult name. The visual is fat, the special effects finally don't cause a facepalm, the flights and the action are shot properly, and the city rescue scene is really impressive.
Superman turned out to be not only a pretentious god, but also a normal dude who can be empathized with. Less pathos, more humanity, that was cool. New Actor (Korensvet) there is no sucker charisma, the villains are not made of cardboard, and the final fight is not a disgrace, but a cheerful mess where you really feel the stakes.
There is humor, but without the cringe, the drama is not pulled by the ears, romance with Lois works (and does not infuriate, as usual), the plot is not stupid, although it is rustic in places. The atmosphere is classic, but modern — and not boring, and nostalgic.
4★ — because it's a strong superhero movie that you really want to revisit. It's not a masterpiece, but after the recent comic book failures, it's a real breath of fresh air. If DC goes on like this, Marvel's balls will start itching.

Yes, the worst Superman movie in the last 30 years, although the second half of the movie is relatively watchable. Gunn apparently decided to take a look at the old super movies, but now it looks pretty funny. The villain didn't work out at all, the timing was ruined for every little thing, the Lantern might have been funny, but nothing more, the dog only irritated, as well as the poor graphics straight from the C DUB series. For a 200+ million film, this is a complete disgrace, it's a pity for the time spent. Although Snyder's films were dumb and pretentious, they had a certain charm, and this is a huge step back.

I join the ranks of those who are satisfied with the result of Gann's work. He proved that, although he is not the best among the directors of film comedies, he is certainly good in this genre). Diski degraded in cinema, though not as rapidly as Marvel, but for longer, and here there is clear progress. Again, you can recall the cartoon Hanoverian Monsters, which is also a credit project. The cast is really great again, there's not even a desire to find fault. Especially the one with the Flashlight). And now I also want to watch a Superhero movie. But Crypto is a rabid dog, may animal lovers forgive me. The troll monkeys smiled heartily, by the way, if you're talking about animals))). In general, we have a completely different Superman here, a light one, almost unlike the old ones and not causing a desire to compare with them. I do not advise you to do this either, as well as many who commented.

But for me, there are also obvious annoying oddities. The very first fight struck me to the core). Luthor dictates the numbers of the commands and they are entered for execution, and Superman, who seems to be not much inferior to the Flash in speed if desired, does not have time to do anything). It was as if they had forgotten about it, having already remembered by the end on the stage of the raptors' scolding. Next, the townsfolk. As we wrote above a couple of times, it's just freezing that they are standing two steps away from the showdown and shooting videos, eating, kids playing, and so on. Until something starts falling on them, that's when they scream and run))). Okay, you trust Supsa so much that you don't even look for a shelter to make his job easier, but then why is it so easy to fall for the first dirt on him and turn away? And if that's the case, then really take a break for a longer time, go on a long-term vacation to your parents' farm instead of being captured, let them do without you). Crypto, again, is dumber than all previous appearances on the screen, even though he has already written about it. Come on, I don't want to talk about flaws, it's a good movie comic. 4🌟 well deserved).

A movie is like a movie. The villain's motivation is so-so. It was the same in the comic book, though.

It was so bad.
I refuse to understand the internet with rave reviews about the return of classic Superman. Those who write this have obviously never seen this classic Superman in their eyes.

A stupid, naive cartoon, with a couple of good jokes, in which a modern political agenda was shoved for some reason.
I don't want to write anything about the local action either, because not only Snyder's number is fresh in my memory, but also the Hanoverian Guards, and the Squad, where the action was much more inventive and dynamic.

Complementing all this is a set of caricatured and not the most charismatic characters. Starting with Superman, who is desperately being portrayed in the script as a kind-hearted man rescuing dogs, children and squirrels, or crying over the murder of a little-known fast food vendor on the street.In fact, the local Superman is an infantile, hysterical and nervous fool. Who, moreover, is being beaten and thrown by everyone who is not lazy. Needless to say, if the dog in the movie is more Superman than Superman himself. We have never seen such a Man of Steel anywhere else. Lex, a calculating and cold-blooded businessman with a clear motivation, stood out against his background, until he was abruptly turned into a villainous villain with sadistic tendencies and a maniacal desire to get rid of Superman at any cost.

The worst caste for the Kents, the worst presentation of the Els, who, it turns out, sent their son to enslave the Earth and breed half-blood bastards.

Perhaps except for the local Justice League, and Lois has no one to mention here. But they are just empty shells without a background and interesting characters. The last thing you expect from a man who shot the same Guardians of the Galaxy.

Art design, scenery, costumes, music, camera crew - there are complaints about bad taste about everything in this film.Something that I couldn't reproach myself with before. .
A sterile, soulless movie with a vague message. This is no longer a dark, almost ancient epic about new gods from Snyder, but it's not even close to the Superman that many people who grew up watching comics and old movie adaptations fell in love with.

Finally, a comic book movie has been shot, the age rating of which corresponds to the original source... for children under 5 years old. Anyone who is older, before viewing, it is advisable to go through a simple procedure. It's called a lobotomy. Or better yet, cut out ninety-eight percent of your brain altogether, and then you can safely rate the film ten out of ten.
And if there is no humor (what a movie, such humor), then it was as if I went to a children's play that the children themselves staged: monsters like plasticine toys; graphics and the visual itself would fit perfectly in the fifties; villains alternately copy the mimicry of Dr. Evil, and the humor here is the level of Austin Powers, it's flat there too (but at least there was that humor); the plot is kindergarten, pants with straps; the acting (see above).
And judging by the reviews, it is these comic book adaptations that fans of these comics like the most. And then someone else will prove that comics are adult entertainment.
Or maybe I misunderstood something and it was just a parody of Superman? Then, yes, it turned out mediocre, but still not bad...

Expectations were not disappointed) Two hours flew by unnoticed!

We need an alternative Soup with a secret harem

Well, there are already a lot of good and true reviews here without me. A lot of right words.
And I'll just briefly repeat that the film has an excellent visual, a good plot, a good cast and, of course, Crypto!

It's time to introduce a rating for viewing "Strictly for children under 10 years old." The film is very consistent with this rating.
I can't help thinking that the script was written by a neural network that rewrote John Wick's script with a dog for Superman.

The creators of "Superman 2025" clearly decided to prove to the whole world that even with hundreds of millions of dollars in budget, it is possible to make a film of the "fan project on the knee" level. It feels like the script was written by schoolchildren after a labor lesson: "let's see Superman in red underpants again, that's so cool!" No, guys, that's not cool. It's a shame.

Judging by the result, the director did not realize at all that he had been given a cult character in his hands. He shot the film as if it were a pilot for the new Superman for Preschoolers show. Apparently, his main task was to make everything sparkle and glow and for the children to clap their hands. But Superman is not a clown in a circus. It's a symbol. But for the creators, it seemed like it was just a guy in tights who could be exposed in a ridiculous costume and collect a cash register.

I would like to say a special "thank you" to those who approved the final design. Red underpants? In 2025? Is this nostalgia for the days of VHS? Maybe then it was worth returning the plastic logo on the chest, as from the costume at the children's matinees? Or should I give him a cape with sequins to completely bring the image to circus clowning?

And the finale: the creators clearly wanted to repeat Snyder's success, but it turned out that "Man of Steel" looks like a divine masterpiece against their background, and "Superman 2025" is a pathetic fan craft. Seriously, after Henry Cavill, this new Superman looks like his TikTok stand-in, shot for a free burger.

Looks like Gann's style isn't my thing after all. The Guardians were an exception. Some kind of confusion, complete caricature and unfunny humor. I honestly wanted to give the movie a chance, but no. Even Snyder, with his pseudo-biblical references, was better (I really didn't think I'd say that)

As a matter of fact, James Gunn did not disappoint, the movie universe is in safe hands, he always wanted Disney to compete with Marvel, and it looks like now everything is going to that.

With this film, they dramatically lowered the age limit of the watching audience. Well, they probably see the point in it.

Personally, I didn't get it at all, fierce game.

Where is the film industry going, like cockerels in prisons?
At one time, everyone omitted Zack Snyder for his film: Man of Steel. Which had a lot of alleged biblical references.
Just look at the uniform (clothes) of the Man himself and these Three clowns

TERRIBLY TERRIBLY, AND ONCE AGAIN TERRIBLY. ONLY FOR CHILDREN UNDER 13 YEARS OF AGE

It's strange, of course, that in the Superman movie, Mr. Terrible had the coolest scene.

Man of Steel is cooler than Superman

although I like the general atmosphere of this Superman many times more than the eternal decay of the previous one (despite all my love for Henry in the role of Clark), in general, the film let me down. a lot was mixed in for the first relaunch movie. the plot is generally a bit dumb. I didn't like Hawkgirl and her costume at all - it looked like an outfit from fixprice. James Gunn's humor was too much - even in the serious Clark and Lois scene, there is a battle in the background in order to lighten the atmosphere. reduces the importance of what is happening, which is not clear why it was done. Liked it very much: 1) Perry is a gorgeous actor with the perfect vibe for this role; 2) Lois - I've seen this actress more than once and was confident in her acting. and she didn't let me down; 3) I liked Jonathan Kent, I really liked him; but Martha somehow didn't. There wasn't enough interaction with her, and the ones that were there somehow didn't touch her. 4) Olsen and Terrifik are both good; 5) Guy??? I do not know how I feel, but overall it is better than I expected. 6) Lex is not bad, but he was not intimidating enough, in my opinion, the biggest disadvantage is the confusion of events and their number. The dialogue is sometimes kindergarten-style and the jokes are the same.

I liked Mr. Terrible and Lex, the former surprised me with his skillful handling of weapons. The scene with him and Lois was somewhat reminiscent of the scene where Yondu and Rocket captured the ship, there were very similar vibes. At the same time, the only experience I had with the character was in Arrow (lol), so I was a little skeptical. But no, it turned out to be much better than I imagined.

Lex is also very good, I would even say that I like Holt's version more than Eisenberg's version.

The film did not cause any special emotions, although Gunn's style is recognizable, of course. Maybe, of course, it's about Superman as such, he's never bothered me. There are some good moments, but generally no excitement.

This relaunch of superman definitely won't leave anyone indifferent. First of all, I would like to thank Gan for not writing the characters as outright morons. Marvel movies have been full of them lately. In Thunderbolts, for example, it was the former Captain America, and Belovoy's dad was always kicking.
Secondly, I was catching vibes of my beloved Smallville all the way. Korensvet is somewhat reminiscent of Welling, plus the picture is so sunny. And it was nice to know that one of the sources of inspiration was this series.
The picture has a very dynamic editing, I didn't feel any obvious sagging at all, plus the effects came out quite well, and this has been rare lately, even in expensive films.
The controversial point in my opinion is the camera, or rather its wide-angle lens. It is very unusual to look at this perspective with large zooms. I didn't like this style of trading, but I even appreciated it in the full movie. This definitely makes the painting stand out from the others.
And now the downside is that we got a second Marvel. For my taste, the last disi was just distinguished by its gloom and serious tone (before the managers got into the editing room). And the main mistake there is that the universe tried to catch up with Marvel by presenting characters not in separate films, but in crossovers at once. The film itself is not outstanding. Yes, there are no super repulsive moments in it, but over time it definitely won't become a classic, and it's easy to forget it right after watching it. The best Marvel films (even solo films) were more epic, more logical, and more inventive. And here it's just a smooth movie. Will there be a sequel? I'll take a look. No, I won't be too upset. And I have questions for Ghana. I thought he knew how to work with hero teams, but for my taste, the Guardians of the Galaxy game copes much better than the movies. And Drax doesn't make a complete idiot of himself, by the way. The disi universe didn't end up with the worst author, but on the whole, I think Gan is a craftsman. He has his own style, but he is not a visionary, like Cameron and Villeneuve. But there is a chance

What a cringe. Moreover, if you take each character, what is the main one, what is secondary in isolation from the plot, then they will be fire. They are well chosen, characteristic and interesting. But if you look at them in the proposed circumstances, all the charm disappears, they seem to either become dumb or just become some kind of caricature. I'm not a fan of Man of Steel, but even it had a much kinder and more humane message than this colorful attraction. Although there are no complaints about the picture, because despite the fact that DC is a graveyard, Superman is just bright and colorful. I don't know, most of the humor passed by, I liked the references, but Bizarro wasn't named Bizarro.(I've read reviews that say you come out after the movie hoping for the best and believing in the best. Well, XS, we obviously watched different movies.
Crypto - shabaka-babaka, the best.

The movie is amazing) very much in the spirit of comics) 5/5

It turned out to be a bit of a long film. The picture is beautiful, the antagonist is clear, the element of comedy is present. The film is about how to stay kind no matter what: parents, the environment, upbringing, the influence of social media. A very simple message in a series of paintings with sophisticated content. It looks easy, the ending is certainly predictable. In general, there is no need to continue. You can watch it once.

There was no such bullshit under Snyder ☝️

Overall, I liked it. Only in places it is slightly crumpled, which is not very justified with such timekeeping.
Superman is like Superman, he's fine. The dog cheers, I don't like ill-mannered animals.

There was a funny animal that grew up.
Lex, I somehow missed the motivation, but it doesn't matter. The actor played just great, I didn't even realize at first that this was a beast from the X-men. These are the last shots with him, and the activity during the battles with superman.
Monkeys with comments are cool) Haters really look like that.
I gave a high rating purely because of Lex. If it wasn't for him, it would be boring to watch.

It's a good movie, an action movie on the level, thanks to Gunn, it was very nice to watch, they made fun of the analogies on the modern Internet, and it's vital and funny)

But, God, what a dumb dog, how I felt better when this mutt turned out not to be Superman, but Supergirl's drunkard (it's a shame that they made her like that, but what), God, the whole movie infuriated me, after the cartoon, Crypto seemed to me very smart and insightful, and then...
the very bark that He runs around my yard and throws himself periodically (I was very upset by this moment, in general.

But this is a small drawback, otherwise the file is very cool, I recommend it)

Damn, James Gunn, what's so cool? I didn't think there would be such a good movie. You can immediately see the director's handwriting, well, he knows how to play superheroics, and that says it all. Now I'm waiting for new projects, I'm already wondering what they did in Peacemaker.

The actors playing Superman, Lex, and Lois didn't come in at all.

Viewed. Just for once. Of all the versions of Superman, and I've seen a lot of them, this one has the least resemblance to the character. Actually, it seemed like it was someone else. Not Superman. More like a Superboy. He behaves and reacts to external stimuli like a teenager. Superman's return was more interesting to watch, but there's practically no action.

Well, that. You can take a look once, of course, but you don't really need to.
On the one hand, it's funny that people are already reacting to all sorts of monsters, sitting in offices drinking coffee. On the other hand, it's like watching an episode from the middle of the series.
It's amazing, but they managed to fuck with this dog. Lois was what she wasn't.
And what's the joke with Jimmy Olsen, the terrorist fucker? I would understand if there was a sexy alpha model, so it's some kind of schmuck. If this is a joke, it's as strange as possible.

This is GARBAGE.. you know that Superman we all know and love.. guess what, his Kryptonian Parents are "evil" they sent HIM to earth so he can CONQUER it, let that sink in..

No offense to ALL the Actors and Actresses BUT.. You know Diane Lane (Clark's Mother), Russel Crowe (Kalel's Father) etc and all the other actors/actresses that portrayed Superman's "Human" parents.. well in this show those Actors and Actresses are EXTRAS THAT NO ONE KNOWS ABOUT.. Imagine Superman's parents as NOBODIES???? hello..

Remember that Supergirl that cousin of Kalel that is HIS family.. guess what, in this movie she is a drunk that parties in different planets, talk about a SUPERgirl, more like your TYPICAL TRASH WOMAN IN THIS DAY AND AGE..

oh i can go on and on, why this movie does NOT FEEL "SUPERMAN".. this is an absolute travesty and disappointment.. ABSOLUTE TRASH..

It's a very childish film, with a primitive, even delusional script and the same characters. I didn't understand the general jubilation, this is a standard movie comic of which there are hundreds, nothing original, I barely watched it in 2 days. Although, what else can you squeeze out of one of the most depressing soups, you should leave it alone and forget. The score is 2.5 out of 5.0.

It's a good movie. I liked the humanized Superman. Of the other characters, I really liked how Mr. Terrible was shown.

After 15 years, Fillion finally landed the role of Green Lantern. I never thought this would happen.

An amazing actor playing Superman, a kind of mix of Tom Welling and Henry Cavill.

Not surprised

Still, "Man of Steel" is better. Yes, Gunn got a juicy picture, but the plot was disappointing, imho. As many have already written: a wild mess, some kind of weak Soup, They took a Flashlight (but as they wrote above, Guy Gardner specifically should be like that, but I don't like him like that, I'm used to serious and reasonable things), the Eagle is not visible at all, only the Terrain was slightly opened. The conflict of the countries is also some kind of political joke.
In short, there are enough disadvantages, I expected a little, but more 😔 3.5/5

It makes fun of those who don't read comics. What the fuck are metahumans, robots, a magic dog. There is none of this in the previous N TV series.

If you give a fuck about all this pseudo-nonsense, which both DC and Marvel turn on the organ as they want, then the film is generally cheerful. Although the scene with Luther's sixes is a kindergarten. They hate Superman SO much, well, they hate him SO much that they're even ready to hate him. It's a very cool motivation. A flip instead of a U-turn is pathos for the sake of pathos and a budget for special effects.
Robots are dying - well, hello, have you come up with anything dumber?
An evil secret prison where the powerful of the world keep all kinds of bloggers. eternity. without food. Well, very villainous mba haha. Have you tried to kill it?

It's probably even good that they're trying to make Superman a little more adept than he's always been. Now he is not an omnipotent god, but just a pumped-up alien who can hit a cradle. It is already possible to work with such a concept and develop it further. In fact, he's being groomed to the level of characters from other universes, trying to humanize something.

Well, apparently now I'm a Crypto fan.🤣
And what is the Punishment, I don't even know now Melissa Benoist or she
And Fillion (Reynolds nervously smokes on the sidelines, although he now has a Deadpool) from the Gate ... my respects) The terrain was very pleasing, especially in the post-credits scene.
As for Clark and Lois, I'll probably be honest and stay on Cavill's side.. And I didn't like Lois at all, not at all.
But in general , it turned out well . 👌

So, first of all, I'm not a dc fan at all, I've always preferred Marvel, but I really liked this movie and if it goes like this, maybe I'll even like their universe. Good cast. Nicholas Hoult is very good at playing the villain. It's funny that the actor from the editorial office (Skyler Gizondo) usually plays such geeks/freaks that no one likes, but here there's some kind of sex bomb. I really liked Green Lantern, I hope there will be a separate film. Monera flashes before my eyes more and more often, very beautiful, and I hope for her further appearances. But Eddie Gathegi is especially into my soul, Mr. Terrific is just amazing. The film turned out to be humorous and with tearful moments and very epic, the only feeling at the very beginning was that you need to watch some kind of prehistory, as if something was missing. And so the new superman was very pleased.Now we are waiting for Supergirl (quite an interesting game).

The movie is complete crap. What was Superman there for? Fall, whine, get treated, get cradled and fly with a crooked face?Thanks, but it's another nail in DC's coffin.Thank you Gunn, you've done your job.
Only Crypto and Terrefic came
in And, well, Lex was gorgeous.
Anything is better than Superman

Yes, I am a punk rocker, I am like that.

I usually start a review with a synopsis of the reviewed tape, but here I'll skip the introductory one, but then, as the play progresses, I'll remember certain moments.

So James Gunn's full-length "Superman" officially launched "Gods and Monsters," the first chapter of the relaunched DC cinematic universe, leaving behind a mess brewed by Warner Bros. bosses who wanted the here and now like Disney/Marvel. Well, as they say, dream in one palm, shit in the other - and see which one fills up faster. Supercaville, Batfleck, Chudogadot, AquaMomoa, InadequatEsraMiller, Cyborg, and others went to waste. And only John Cena and his team survived the relaunch, safely making it to the second season of Peacemaker.

Honestly, the image of Superman (his various film incarnations) has never really inspired me. He's too strong, he's flawless, it's hard to empathize with him (even despite the drama that Snyder has been trying to catch up with in the last few films). That's why I think James Gunn performed a miracle. The second comic book marvel of his career. The first is to get millions of people to fan out on the space scum of the third league of Marvel comics, making the Star-Lord team universal favorites. The second is to get DC off his knees after years of banging his head against the wall.

Yes, in terms of the overall plot, "Superman" may seem like such a standard comic book overcomplicated, especially at the end, muddle. On the other hand, it is necessary to understand what a global and responsible task Gunn faced and what, in fact, Gunn did.

Gunn quickly immerses the viewer in an already formed world. We are not being shown another dreary story of formation. Superman has not only established himself as a crime fighter, but has also become overflowing (more on that later). Not just his alter ego Clark Kent (God, thank you for explaining about the hypno-glasses that don't recognize him! I've always found this moment annoying in Superman stories. Let there be at least hypno-glasses, yes) meets with the journalist Lois Lane, but Lane already knows who Kent is. Moreover, Lex Luthor is not a potential main antagonist of Superman, but has already studied Superman inside and out in order to fight back. That is, we skip over all these key and supposedly obligatory moments. Everyone already knows these fragments of history, why waste time on them? Well, if you don't know something, it quickly becomes clear from the context. Plus, Gunn came up with a funny introductory text tied to the number 3, which gives almost all the necessary information.

By the way, the film begins literally from the moment when Superman lost in battle for the first time in his entire history of superheroism. It's already good - Superman is in a vulnerable position. But not only physically. Gunn comes up with a great trick: Superman became overweight and intervened in the international conflict between Boravia and Jarhanpur. I don't know which countries Gunn was referring to in his head, but the president of Boravia (played, by the way, by Zlatko Buric, the huckster from Nicolas Winding Refn's "Pusher" trilogy) looks very much like Netanyahu, and the situation itself and its background resembles the genocide of Palestine. Although, it would seem, Boravia... However, at the same time, the recent Hanoverian "Monster Commandos" was stolen from him, which, despite the name, smacked of Eastern Europe. Anyway, none of the governments on Earth, including the United States, were satisfied with Superman's escapade, and now there is psychological pressure on him. And even Lois doesn't approve of his actions. And the decryption of the "broken" recording posted online, which was left by Superman's biological parents (the father is played by Bradley Cooper, and the mother is Angela Sarafyan from The World of the Wild West), not only adds fuel to the fire, but becomes the final straw in the plot "The People against Larry Flint", sorry, "Earthlings against Superman." And here it's really one cool move after another on the part of Gunn, the screenwriter. I was really excited about the recording - I don't remember anything like this in the past variations of the story of Kal-El's relationship with his parents (well, maybe in some "What if?" variations). and there was a similar thing), let Gunn be here and openly fucked up, composing the text of the message, but the recording causes the required shocking effect, when even Lex himself remains at a loss, in the style of: "And what about me? I'm all right!". In general, wherever you throw it, Superman has a wedge everywhere, he has to fight back on several unexpected fronts at once - and that's why Gunn manages to create a humane, vulnerable Superman who wants to empathize with. Then, of course, the casting is very successful. Based on the promotional materials, I wouldn't say that David Korensvet is a good fit, but the hit turned out to be perfect. Yes, Korensvet is better than Cavill in this case. Sorry. And he even looks good in red underpants over tights. Perhaps, personally, I am already tired of these gloomy DISH superheroes, I want something and someone more optimistic.

Next up: Gunn has laid a solid foundation for future DC projects. Well, take the illustrations on the walls at the Metahuman headquarters. There's three hundred years' worth of history in there. Or the metahumans themselves. Two of the three are beautifully revealed-sorry, Hawk Girl, it's not your time yet. But the local representative of the Green Lantern Corps, Guy Gardner (Nathan Fillion is finally a real superhero! Well, almost) with a moronic but canonical hairstyle, and Mr. Terrible, a tech genius, performed for all the money. And here, again, we can feel this world that has already existed for some time. They are good both in a team with Superman and in a fight with him, and individually, too, everyone can set the heat. And there is a feeling that there is a story between them all.

But at the same time, no one steals Superman's screen time throughout the film. It doesn't seem like he's here in the background, but someone is sending Kent into the shadows. I repeat, Superman is interesting, and this is his solo album. Gunn somehow did everything very carefully, despite a lot of things: characters, heroes and villains, side lines, jokes and special effects.

As for the graphics, with the exception of the deliberately gaudily drawn baby son of Metamorpho, everything looks very decent. Yes, even flights. The action scenes are diverse, epic, and there are many of them. There are also a lot of jokes. Who would be on the same wavelength as Gunn to appreciate the bickering, visual gags, and more in his trademark style: monkeys typing angry comments on social media; mega-brute metahumans against the background of a calm conversation between Clark and Lois; and, of course, the dog Crypto - yes, wrong, that's who constantly steals scenes, so it's her.

In general, I could write a lot more good things - for example, Nicholas Hoult in the role of Luthor is also beautiful, at the same time treacherous and pathetic, as only Holt can play it - but nevertheless I will restrain myself and limit myself to the last thought.

"Superman" is the best Clark Kent movie. It is bright, colorful, driving, stylishly staged. He is moderately dramatic, but at the same time optimistic. He may be a little silly in places, but he doesn't go beyond the genre. It's a great solo album, but it's also full of intriguing concepts and characters that inspire hope for a bright future for upcoming DC films. This is a great combination of the past and the present, nostalgia for the uncomplicated films of the past - it's not for nothing that the soundtrack uses the title theme from the seventies by John Williams for the first time in a long time - and all the modern developments of comics of the last quarter of a century. In the end, the new "Superman" is just interesting and fun to watch from start to finish - during his two hours I never wanted to look at the clock, they say, when it's over. James Gunn completed his task one hundred percent in his hooligan manner, causing children's delight.

Rating: 9 supergirls drunk from the Sun out of 10

David Korensvet looks like Dougray Scott's son. The whole movie did not leave this thought.

What did I learn from this film?
1. Peace enforcement and intervention in general are good things. People may doubt this, but by the end they will definitely understand that it is necessary.
2. Musk is a pencil-throwing villain who is friends with dictators.
3. Negative comments, of course, are written only by macaques, UHUUHUU, sorry, it escaped
4. And most importantly: the aliens are your main friends, why don't you want to agree with this simple truth?

At first, for about 20 minutes it seemed that they had done something. But then everything got really cool.)

Very decent and cool. I'm not an ardent fan of the whole DC thing, but I really liked it. It's a great movie, I don't understand why the rating is so low. No, I understand. When I see a movie, the majority of the gray mass usually don't like it.

I had no hopes for this film at all, I didn't even go to the cinema for it, like all my friends. But everyone on the Internet was very hotly discussing it, especially the foreign audience, almost praised it as the best DC movie, and of course I was curious. And indeed, the film came out bright, colorful, interesting and it is radically different from other films of the studio. David Kornesvet did a great job with the role, although it was hard to compete with Henry Cavill, but it still turned out that they were completely different characters in terms of atmosphere and essence (different vibe ahaha). I liked that they showed new characters, and also made references to other DC projects. The only thing I had a complaint about was Lois, I didn't like her behavior at the beginning of the film and it wasn't clear, it didn't smell like a couple in love, but everything seemed to be fine by the end, and the appearance of the Eagle leaves much to be desired, I would like to see it like in the comics (well, it's just super subjective ) . As a result, I can say with confidence that the film is worth 100% of the time spent, I want a sequel and new films about other heroes of the cinematic universe.

In general, the connection between Kent and Lois did not catch on, the relationship scenario failed, there was no sympathy for them

This movie belongs to that category of superheroics: I've seen a couple of superhero movies, so I've seen everything.

It's a Superman movie. But this is a different Superman movie. This is James Gunn's Superman, and at the right moments, he works on all 8 out of 10 cryptos! He makes fun of modern trends very well and is not as rude and ridiculous as it was in "28 months later." Everything that doesn't work there works here. And this is precisely the merit of the famous director, who knows how to properly present superheroics, which will at least be interesting to watch. The first movie of its kind in a long time, which really amused and gave those same emotions of the heroics of the best years of Marvel.

And I wonder if I'm the only one who saw an analogy here between "bloody" Israel and "peaceful" Palestine? Well, it was pushed right into the movie. Why only? A rhetorical question.

I think Woody Harolson would fit perfectly into the role of a Green Lantern.😂😂😂 I liked the movie.

Lex wants to kill Superman the whole movie, but he doesn't kill him every time.
How can Ultraman be faster than Superman if he is controlled on a computer? What about the delay in commands?

I watched the movie and forgot.

The whole movie is a rofl 😁

This Gunn made a rare mess, Cavil looked much better like Superman than this misunderstanding!

The movie that I went to the cinema and didn't regret.
Lex is great, Terrific is gorgeous, Kent is good, Lois is wonderful.
Well, I hope that the Engineer will appear in the future, the character is cool, although it differs a bit from the comic version.

I'll never get tired of watching this universe

Well, so I watched the first movie in the updated DC universe and I can say that I liked it.

Personally, I would bet 8/10. And I want to share my opinion in honor of watching.

Positive

1) I like the image of Superman in this movie. If Snyder's soups is a god who tries to live among people, then Gunn's is a man who
tries to live with the power of God. Simply put, if Snyder preferred the alien part of superman, Gunn, in turn, focuses on the human part of the hero. And personally, I like the second option better.

2) Lex Luthor - he is literally the best lex of all those who came before him in the movies. Reeve's is a typical cartoon villain, Singer's is about the same level, the moment with the granny and the wig from the beginning of the movie is fucked up, I'm surprised those moments didn't become memes. Snyder's character is anyone but Luther, he reminded me more of the joker or the riddler, but what can I say if the actor himself admitted that after this role he had problems in his career. Holt played the fierce superman hater one hundred percent, it was nice to watch his scenes together with Korenswett.

3) Lois Lane is by no means a damsel in distress or a filthy mother who leads her son to gangsters. In fact, it is she who saves Supsa by coming to the gang. And the chemistry with David turned out to be good.

4) Jimmy Olsen- he's finally not a character in the background or an extra, and it was because of his actions that Lex was defeated, but that's debatable.

5) Mr. Terrible and Guy Garner turned out to be good and memorable. The first is due to the fact that he is one of the main supporting characters, and the second is due to some of his scenes and thanks to the charisma of Nathan Fillion.

6) Good action- I've heard a lot of people like the action scene with the Horror (it's good), but for me, the juice was at the end when Clark started dealing with Ultraman and Luthor's henchmen.

7) Slightly unusual defeat of the villain- in fact, sups defeated Luthor physically, but Lex's reputation was completely destroyed, and his friends from the Daily Planet whitewashed the Kryptonian, maybe I forgot over the years, but I just don't remember the villain being finished off by the friends of the main character.

Cons / didn't like it very much

1) In the first couple, the film has a rather fast and slightly chaotic pace, which calms down and levels out at the moment of Lois and Clark's conversation with the beetle in the background.

2) The moment with Jimmy Olsen is strange, well, firstly, Lex was exposed because Jimmy was lucky to have met his girlfriend once, and secondly, the film shows that she took compromising photos before Olsen called, and Luthor did not take care of it. If the movie had shown that she was taking pictures in important places, and Luthor then checked and found nothing like that, and he was calm about it, there would have been much fewer questions.(I understand that Lex chose her most likely based on the fact that she is not particularly smart and she alone will not be able to oppose him, but the fact that he did not hedge his bets puts him in a bad light)

3) Nondescript music- while I was watching the movie, the music was perceived normally, but I remember Williams' reworked theme, especially at the moment when people raised the flag and called out to superman, I personally got goosebumps, but in general the music is simple... Well, it's normal, but nothing outstanding.

4) Although the action is good, it's not enough, I wanted the action segments to be a little more (this is not even a minus, but more of a quibble)

5) The eagle, compared to other members of the justice gang, turned out to be pale. It's like she didn't have enough screen time, her most memorable scene is the elimination of the dictator, and that's basically it. I hope it will be revealed in further Dc projects.

To summarize, this film differs from previous versions of Superman in that, unlike others, it does not tell the origin of Superman, it primarily shows through Superman the universe that exists around him. For this reason, the film copes with its task of presenting a first look at the DC universe and getting interested, but as a complete film, it is lame. And my future attitude towards the film will be based on what kind of universe it turns out to be after. But from what I see, at least right now, it gives me hope that they will succeed. As an example, Peacemaker appeared in the film, season 2 is coming out, green lantern is being made, a TV series is being made, supergirl has appeared, there will be a movie based on her. Even the clay-faced one, which was in Kreacher Commandos, is also being made into a film. And looking at this, I'm looking forward to these DCU projects, just as I once waited and watched the KVM projects until they turned into an incoherent mess.

That's when I realized that I was too old for such films.

I wasn't sure if Gunn would bring in Superman and a DC reboot, but it's a good movie and an interesting foundation for the universe.

Well, damn it. The actors seem to be playing great, but they're playing what they've got stuffed into their mouths. Luther is moronically motivated, hysterical about being without. At the same time, Holt is a great actor, and it's clear that he can show the character to anyone, but Gunn needed it... I agree with everyone that the Terrain is good. The best character in the movie, after Pesel. Otherwise, it's a cartoon passing comic. Superman is not a character where you can shoot like that. Suicide squad, peacekeeper, yes. But not here

After Zack Snyder, this movie seems a little funny. But if you think about it that way, then this movie is more close to the classic cartoons about Superman, in style.

I'm just in shock. It's very bad, it's for kids, it's not funny. James Gunn is everything.

Trash... The program code for closing the spatial rift- are they Neo? Lots of questions. One of them is this scarecrow, which can become literally every element in the universe - he could have carried them all alone with such force. And since when has matter (and superman, as far as I know, consists of material atoms) just floated in an antiproton river? It's kind of a joke, I'm just shocked, it's all some kind of farce, not a movie...

Terribly

The film turned out to be one hundred percent perfect for me, because it's a simple story that tells us a beautifully written plot and an excellent implementation.

I'll like it, you can watch it. Nicholas Hall as Lex is great.
I did not look at the description and was surprised to see a Terifika, an Eagle and a Green Lantern.

The film, of course, is very different from the gloomy one that we are used to seeing in DC, but I liked it, it was interesting and not boring to watch.

Low ratings, considering that the film is very good.
The new Superman is not a product of mass consumption, but a real movie suitable for fans of comics and superheroes.
Personally, I'm thrilled with the relaunch. This is exactly the kind of project I've been waiting for. You get a little tired of gloomy pictures and eternal depression and you want something bright and cheerful like the new Superman.
And I also really like how they revealed their all-encompassing love for all living things, that he feels sorry for everyone, even monsters, and whose help he wants to be to all living things.

Despite the low rating of the film, it must be borne in mind that this is a banter film, and as for me, it just completely coped with its task, they managed to ridicule the whole cringe of the original quite well.

My six-year-old child was delighted with the film.
But as a fan of DC comics, I really ask you to strap Jake Gunn to the battery and let him out of the basement only under supervision. This director needs the reins!!

Guardians of the Galaxy for the poor. DS does everything wrong, when everyone wanted Guardians, they made a cloudy movie, now that everyone is tired of these syrups from Marvel, now DS decided to make syrups too. Cavill was a cooler superman.

Well..
I love James Gunn..
It's a great movie, even if it's a bit too much with silly jokes.
Rachel Brosnahan is a tough cracker!
Well, what a wonderful girl Millie Alcock is...
I'm excited to see what Gunn does next!

I won't say too much, I really liked it, for me it was a successful restart of the universe. DC♥️

Superduper sho from Gan Sho from Snyder, worse than in the cartoons of the 90s

I'm one of those who genuinely doesn't understand how you can give out all this comic superheroics on serious topics. Therefore, Gann's view of the industry is much closer to me than Snyder's. It's nothing personal, it's just that I have the cards right in my head)) That's why I really liked this movie. I was even somewhat surprised by the very serious acting, not only of the main and secondary characters, but almost all of them. There are still questions about the graphics, and sometimes quite serious ones, but on the whole it is colorful, spectacular, and emotional. Great entertainment!

I was very pleased with the movie! I like the canonical superman much more, because in this movie Clark was shown as an ordinary inhabitant of the Earth, who can make mistakes or someone doesn't like him. I am glad that Clark Kent, although with abilities, is an ordinary person.

And I liked the movie, it's so light, funny and colorful. If you want a dark DS, you can always return to the Man of Steel with the beautiful Henry Cavill.

I'm also sorry that Snyder wasn't allowed to create the universe we deserved, but I'm already hoping that at least James Gunn can do it. ✨

At the end, Teddybears feat iggy pop Punkrocker plays. The movie is great!!!

DC beauties, the movie turned out well

This Superman didn't seem permanent to me. One minute he gets involved in a war on the other side of the world because "they were going to kill people there," the next he drinks cocoa while the Metropolis outside the window is being destroyed by a monster. Sometimes he feels sorry for the monsters that are destroying the city and persuades the villains to stop, then in the excitement of battle he cuts a crowd of enemies with a laser and throws his clone into a black hole without regret.
And I didn't understand why Lex was branded a traitor in the media. He also handed over weapons to a US ally in order to attack a country that is not friends with the United States and take their oil. This is a standard foreign policy.

we watched, laughed and forgot) 3.5 only for the good game of the dog!

"Do it like Guardians of the Galaxy" - "Do it"

And guys, the antiprotonic river in which Superman swims? Well, you should have Googled it at least.

I was very pleasantly surprised by Nicholas Hoult. I didn't expect such a strong performance from him.

The film is cozy, bright and leaves a pleasant feeling after watching. I really missed such a kind Superman. Now waiting for the Superhero movie

The tin, what was that!
At the beginning of the film, I thought I had included some kind of parody of a superhero movie, I even looked at the declared genres - there was no comedy. Nevertheless, this is some kind of farce with a freak show, and many people even have costumes here for the sake of ridicule. The jokes are completely inappropriate for this universe, but surely the lightness will appeal to those who have never loved DC.

But then I realized that this was another brainchild of supporters of the US Democratic Party or their punishment under the sauce of superheroics, simply propaganda - here Palestine is clearly read in the image of Jarhanpur, and Israel is under Boravia, and the image of Netanyahu is clearly visible in its leader, well, Lex Luthor is a collective image of a kind of fusion of Elon Musk and Trump, even They talk about the desire to grab a piece of Jarhanpur and become king there (a reference to Trump's investment project in Gaza). Everything would be fine, but I am sure that the creators and the Democratic Party of the United States do not care deeply about the Palestinians and other "Papuans" and they use this "card" exclusively for inter-party internal struggle, in this case also with Trump. It's amazing, of course, how much content and ideas members / supporters of the US Democratic Party generate when they feel threatened - they've already made so many films / TV series since Trump's first term, including "The Fall of the Empire," just a ton of books, I've read some, for example, about discussions about the threats of modern corporations, technologies, including social networks and all of course with a proposal to introduce restrictions, regulation or ban. And most importantly, many of the thoughts are correct, but they didn't care when it worked in their favor. And it is often explicitly stated that the result of these fabrications is Trump's rise to power. Republicans can't do that, of course, because when they lose, they don't generate such a lot of content and different ideas about how to solve some problems. Perhaps that was my main impression of the film.

Of course, it's difficult to take the place of Henry Cavill, but the actor did a good job. On the downside, I really didn't like the fact that they made Superman look very clumsy, Clark Kent is clumsy, but not Superman.
This CGI dog is a terribly boring addition to the movie, you could have left it in the comics.

But the secondary characters are Top, Jimi, Eve, and the beautiful rock'n'roll Louis!! And, of course, the villain Nicholas Hoult. 🫶
In general, it's watchable