Superman

After the final moments, it's hard not to love this Superman. The first hour of the film is very chaotic, they show everything and a lot, you don't even know how to feel about it. It's as if we missed a lot of important moments for an emotional connection with Clark, as if we should immediately love him in absentia. And he often doesn't behave like that either (hysteria with Lois is terrible), but what James Gunn knows is how to hit the right emotions at the right moments. The conversation with the earthly father on the farm, Clark's speech about being Luther's man, it all works as it should. Otherwise, the film is quite cartoonish, for some it will be a plus, for others it will be a minus. For me, the conflict looked frivolous against the background of this Boravia, some kind of stupid ambitions and Lex's envy (although Holt gave his best), the girl from the trailer who stands with her back and does not notice the monster from 5 meters away from her, a pocket dimension with hundreds of monkeys in social networks, But after the smile of this Superman against the background of moments with REAL parents, you don't want to think about anything anymore.

Mr. Terrafiq is 10 out of 10, he stole every scene, my favorite character in this movie.

As for me, the world without Superman was not shown much. Yes, there was an example of a conflict between two countries, but it was a problem of these two countries specifically. The reaction of Americans and the other world to all this was not enough. So that they understand that it's bad without Superman. But Lex was given a ride with normal motivation, unlike Eisenberg's version.
Overall, it turned out to be such a strong Marvel movie. In a good way.
P.S. I will miss the pretentious and epic version of Snyder, but what about now...

It's a strange feeling after watching a movie.
On the one hand, it's funny and fun, but not at all what it used to be before this reboot. It seems to me that it will fail at the box office.
It's fashionable to look at it once, but no more. They lied when I would watch this copy of the film again.
In order to laugh at some moments, it's worth watching - but it's NOT worth it!

It was a great movie, I was really looking forward to it, the expectations were high and I was not disappointed. It's definitely WORTH watching

It's a pretty good restart, as far as I'm concerned. Gunn was able to take matters into his own hands and give a cool, fresh version of the story.

although the plot itself is slowly swinging at the beginning, it already lacks many points for the introduction, as is usually the case in restarts. the characters are immediately endearing, they are well spelled out, which are the main ones, which are secondary. yes, and played by the way too. you just believe them and feel their emotions and drama.

The film is fascinating. The music, visuals, and dialogues are good. I want to believe that DiSi will also succeed with the relaunch of the cinematic universe.

A great movie without too much plot overload, without too much pathos and seriousness. 😎
I was pleased with the actors' performance:
Nicholas Hoult, David Kornsvet, Rachel Brosnahan, Edi Gathegi, Nathan Fillion - they look great in their roles.
The action sometimes looked strange.
Gunn handled the restart with a bang 🎉

I was really looking forward to this movie and believed that I would not be disappointed. Spoiler alert: I wasn't disappointed.

In two moments, it almost made me cry: when Clark was sitting with Lois and said that he needed to turn himself in to the authorities, because Crypto was alone there and very scared. The second was when Clark's "earthly" father said he couldn't be more proud of him than he is now. I don't know about the others, it got to me.

Guy is a funny comic relief, nothing more, the Eagle seems to be superfluous in this movie. Terrefik carries the whole movie, now he's my favorite character in this universe. The engineer somehow falls short of an interesting character, you can safely cross out like the Eagle. "This is a twist" with Ultraman was readable from the first second (I hadn't read the comics), when Clark said "how did they get into my hideout, because they need my dna?". Holt, in the role of Lex, carries the role of a spoiled billionaire, sometimes overplays, but on the whole looks more convincing than the same Eisenberg. Crypto is good (hopefully we won't see a superhero version of John Wick in the future).

The only thing that killed me the whole movie was the onlookers. When a monster the size of a skyscraper walks around the city, they act as if they all have Superman's invulnerability. They don't run from danger, they don't scream, they don't panic like normal people. Many are standing there filming on their phones, while others are just standing there looking at the disaster, as if they are sure that Superman will be able to save everyone in time. They start running and screaming only when something falls on them. And if some kind of danger is just nearby, it's okay for them, they watch the show. It was unnerving, unnatural, and made it difficult to immerse oneself in what was happening.

Otherwise, it's a good movie, surprisingly even better than the latest Guardians of the Galaxy and Suicide Squad, although the director seems to be the same. 9/10, I'm thrilled.

To put it simply: Definitely worth watching. This is James Gunn. The atmosphere is more like a Suicide Squad than Guardians of the Galaxy. I couldn't squeeze out a tear, but I had a good time.
In some centuries, the villain is competent with a normal motivation, a la LF from the Age of Ultron or Batman from BpS.
Humor is at a high level. Especially all the scenes with Nathan Fillion. I was so glad I didn't look at the trailers or the cast. I just got high from seeing the character.
There wasn't enough drama. She was. The scene with the father is one of them, but Cavilla's Superman has tamed us to the great 3.14 compassion of the protagonist. Or maybe it's for the best? James Gunn shows a naive but simple truth - you don't have to be afraid to be a person who makes mistakes. Rather than trying to be a moral tuning fork.

An up-to-date path for all time or the Hero's Path. A direct hint at the current state of the world. There is a global twist on the classic "good old superhero movie" (= no agenda, no clumsy game of inclusivity, etc.).

It's nice to immerse yourself in a world where everything is clear, where there is obvious good and evil, where good wins and the world is saved, evil is punished and peace and joy come to the whole world. Oh, we would like that.

This world needs a Superman too! Psychology would answer us here in the spirit that Superman is in each of us, we must also fight our dark copy, which is guided by trauma / prejudice/ blinders (insert your own version). Super Man, he's super HuMAN, right? Is it possible for us to become more human, to become supermen? I hope so.

A pretty passable superhero, not much different from the latest DC and Marvel movies.
It turned out to be about the same as Black Adam. The same vague villain, the same justice team, only in this movie they are on the side of GG.
But it'll do for one movie.

I came out of the cinema with the thought of emptiness, there were no special emotions left to experience. It was interesting at times, boring at times, as always, people were surprised that they were standing and filming everything on their phone a meter from the monster, and then waiting to be rescued. I would have bet 6/10 anyway, and this sister of his in the end is also not clear why there were robots that did not protect the base at all, why not make a normal program to protect against intruders. Well, this…

Mixed feelings. It seems cool, but something is missing.

This is our Superman. Either accept it and have fun, or continue to stink all over the Internet, but know that in the end it won't change anything. Now it's your Superman too! Don't thank me!

James Gunn is still worthy! It's not perfect, but it's very strong and comic.

After Zack Snyder, it's very difficult to watch this masterpiece, the cast is very weak, everything is very colorful and uninteresting from the first to the last moment. The only bright spot in this movie is the dog, nothing else. But it's a must for all comic book fans, because this is a new look at the Superman universe and maybe someone will come in and be delighted, but I'm passing it by.

The movie is cool. I liked the actors and the plot itself. And now the beginning has been made, let's see what Gunn will do next.

Crypto is the most rabid dog you can think of.

It's weak, unfortunately, and there are no questions about the actors - everyone plays perfectly. But this is too frivolous a creation about an alien in red underpants :)

PS: I expected Supergirl to get more screen time...

It's a teen movie, lacking the seriousness, realism, bleakness, and heavy themes that DC is famous for. It's not a failed film, and I think it will find its audience. It's also a base for future films with its own atmosphere, physics, pitch, and growth prospects. Let's keep an eye on the growth of the league!

PS: When Gunn was at Marvel, his films were perceived as an entertainment series (fanservice), in a series about Marvel super heroes, which gave him a chance to take a breath away from the series. They looked good in this stream of superheroics. Now, in the future, there will all be such series as Superman, but there is hope that they will be diluted with dark episodes. Given that heroics are dying, I hope Gunn has a plan and the new universe doesn't die after the first failure!

I looked at it... Well, what can I say. Mr. Terifik is his movie.
Superman seemed a little boring. I didn't have enough seriousness. It's like he's still a teenager here.
The screaming eagle was constantly infuriating.
Guy Gardner, well, as I remember him from comics and animated series, is similar.
Metamorpho, the appearance pleased. +- canon, first bad, then good.

But in the end. A passer-by. To watch this movie, you have to be immersed in the DC universes. And there is no time to reveal the normal characters.
You're looking purely at nostalgic flashbacks.

P.S. It still bombs that the theme of the bat tribe in the series Gotham was ignored. At least dark nights are metal in this lineup of restarts.

It's amazing how Snyder's film and Gan's film absolutely don't get into me emotionally at the time of their release. In 2013, I just wanted something light and fervent, but they gave me gloom and seriousness, seriousness and gloom. And now, probably due to cynicism, it's also difficult for me to perceive such a Superman. Although kind and bright heroes are very much needed at the moment, I'm not sure that Superman is a good option for this. It was as if his time had passed after all and there wasn't much that could be done about it. But it's interesting to see where it all goes next.

I watched it at the cinema yesterday with almost no spoilers. I can say with confidence that this is the best superhero project that has been shot so far, if you are at least a little interested in superheroes, you can't help but love this movie, only if there is a complete lack of taste. It couldn't have been better, but maybe it's better, Gunn has proven that he's improving with every film he makes.

So the first movie and 3.5 project came out (Squad S seems to be there, but only the assassination of Flag Jr. is canonical, Peacemaker is completely canon – except for the League, and Squad M) of the new DC universe. This is a completely different Superman, it makes no sense to compare him (although they will, and there is a comparison going on in his head) with Cavil's Superman. They vary in everything from character, to music, to color palette.
This Superman lives in a world in which there have been superhumans for at least 300 years and humanity has a taste for them. This Superman is as kind and naive as possible. He is trying to save absolutely any living being (or stop it, and if it doesn't work out painlessly, put it to sleep). Because of this, the main conflict of the film occurs. Superman wants to save people and thereby intervenes in the conflict between the two countries. Not thinking about anything but saving people. After all, he wants to help and do what he thinks his parents from Krypton sent him to do. But here is the first surprise, he was sent not to help, but to subdue people and with their help breed as many Kryptonians as possible. Kal-El himself did not know this, the message was damaged and what he did not hear, he thought up. What Luthor uses.
Lex Luthor is good. Despite his mistakes, he is quick-tempered and sometimes stupid. He still looks like an interesting character driven by envy and fear. The turn with Ultraman is predictable, I hope he returns as Bizaro, otherwise it will be a stupid drain. The engineer is fine, does his job, is devoted, and it's hard to call her a dummy.
The justice gang. There are few of them in the film, but it's not about them either. The trific character who aroused the least interest before the film has the most time and arouses interest. The lantern is funny – now I want to look at it in the series, otherwise the PG-13 rating does not allow it to be fully shown. It's a shame for the Eagle, she's almost gone and speaks 3-4 phrases, I want more and not in a minor role. Well, the musical accompaniment is gorgeous, especially at the end.
The environment of the Superman is interesting. I want to highlight the earthly parents, especially the dialogue with the father. The relationship with Lois is alive, the chemistry is present. Krypto is a mischievous dog who doesn't piss you off, and in one 30-second scene they showed you why he is like that. Supergirl also appears in this scene, a movie that I've been waiting for more than a Superman movie, and this scene has increased my expectations (there will also be another character who doesn't look like the CW, not the DCU).
The film is not perfect, though. There are questions for him. There are not logical points. But this movie brought emotions. This film has given you a full-fledged entrance into a new universe, which you want to return to and look at this new world and the characters who live in it. 8/10.

I really love Cavill and Snyder, but Gunn made a much better film where the story of superman is presented with humor, but at the same time filled with drama! David was given a lot to play, a lot to show emotions and say cool dialogues, unlike the silent Superman of previous films! Of course Nick Holt is the icing on the cake of everything that is happening😍😍Well, Crypto is love! How much anger is in the hearts of the viewers who write here that the dog was infuriating! Let's be kinder, friends!

Not a single joke about red underpants over pants. I didn't expect this from Gunn…

The movie is good!
Not without question, but it really turned out to be good.
We clench our fists and hope that Gunn will be able to open the DC normally.
We'll be watching and waiting.

I'm like someone who's been disappointed in superheroes for a long time, and all the recent Marvel movies are a complete failure. I was pleasantly surprised by this superman.

In my opinion, it's much better than the Thunderbolts, even though everyone praises them, but I didn't like them at all...

I give the super 7 out of 10.

It was a little scary after the first reviews, but the movie is *super*, and the universe already has more texture than anything DC has done before. Here's the Justice Gang (working title), here's Peacemaker watch in August, here's Supergirl watch next year. At the same time, their presence doesn't feel like just a silly cameo in a post-credits scene with promises that won't come true, they're part of the story. Everyone already has a clear character, and I will go to the Supergirl movie with great enthusiasm.

Anyway, I'm on Hopium. Superheroics come to life in 2025

#Gunnycharged by the fighting

Does crypto really look a bit creepy 😅 Or are we just overindulging in anticipation of high-quality graphics? )

I liked the movie. Finished beautifully, Especially liked the musical design.
After the end of the serial Soup, I felt nostalgic.

I may not be expressing a popular opinion, but the film left behind some twofold feelings. On the one hand, I liked him, a new look at the hero for a new generation + the soup was always bright, kind, and so on, not gloomy like Snyder's. On the other hand, I was sitting in dissonance while watching, as this was the first time I didn't feel that superman was an omnipotent being. He is too kind, naive, as if he has not lived with people for 30 years, but only arrived on the planet yesterday. He is weak, not decisive - he is beaten by literally everyone who is in the frame, even a woman with nanorobots.... Well, how's that? Where is that all-powerful hero, at the sight of whom people lost their fear and they knew that they would be saved? Of course, Gan made a good interpretation, he got a great Clark Kent, a great reflection between a man and a hero, his path of becoming, etc., but as Superman.... Uh, well, that. He relied on "kindness" and "anyone can be a hero" - his Superman is learning to be a hero. But is a teenager on the path of self-discovery a symbol of Hope? Still, I personally prefer Snyder's more realistic style. And also, no offense to the fans, but these red underpants are getting in the way. Gan himself did not want to insert them, but to leave a monolithic blue suit - but alas, the fans pressed on.
I really liked the music, the visual (yes, yes, it's too bright, but it's good), the cast (just fine, everything was perfect, Lex Luthor, Green Lantern, Mr. Terrible, and even Lois Lane ... and Supergirl)
)