Overview
After his life is turned upside down when his wife is killed in a London terrorist attack, a brilliant but introverted CIA decoder takes matters into his own hands when his supervisors refuse to take action.

| Release Date: | |
|---|---|
| Country: | US |
| Genre: | Thriller, Action |
| Production Companies: | 20th Century Studios, Hutch Parker Entertainment, Joel B. Michaels Productions, TSG Entertainment |
| Watched by: | 3 250 of 1 008 819 |
| Runtime: |






























Although the plot has interesting moves and intrigue, in most cases it's a bit boring to watch. there is no special highlight in the film, but I didn't want to leave the hall either.
the only thing that pleases me the most is the caste. Malek and Fishburne are good. Malek is once again portraying a kind of Mr. robot.
I probably won't recommend it. I don't have any special emotions from the movie.
if you are not annoyed by the bad Russians, or you like films with a spy theme, then you can get acquainted.
P.S. I smiled when Bernthal's character said, "My wife wasn't killed."
It's funny how they all decided that Malek's character wasn't the real killer. Well, yes, well, yes, just a terrorist 🤡
One thing is, Bernthal is not enough 🤣
Apparently, so that the hero would tell you about his motivation again before the final boss . 🤷♂️
It feels like Rami Malek's character watched some kind of trailer, some kind of movie, where a man, in revenge for his wife's death, went all out and started zeroing in on the people who killed his wife, in the spirit of SAWING with his prodigy175s, but it didn't work out at all......
In short, I was waiting for a LAW-ABIDING A CITIZEN , and received 2 episodes from the X-files...
1) What was the essence of the London operation in general?
2) Why does the plot even need Bernthal's character (with all the love for him)
3) Why was the main character's whole plan with the CIA at all, if he really could just go on vacation and do the same thing? In one day, he didn't learn anything except making bombs, which he could look up on the Internet. The forged documents did not give him anything.
4) Why would he kill the first victim in a public place if he knew where she lived and could do anything?
5) Why would they try to figure out where the second target is from the photos if they have access to cameras from all over the world
6)Why does the main character's assistant, to whom anonymity is so important, use the pseudonym of her husband, which is in the databases
7)Even knowing who she was, how did the CIA track her down so quickly, given that they took all possible measures to protect her from being found
These are just the basic plot problems that came to mind. It's really a pity, because it could have been quite an exciting movie. Where instead of ultra-violence, as according to the canons of John Uvik, there would be head work, as in the movie Killer (Fincher). And so it just turned out to be a long-drawn-out picture with a lack of logic and senseless murders.
P.S.: Have a delicious meal in clean inns!
It's nice to see a like-minded person.
When did they get to know Laurence Fishburne? Which movie did Jon Bernthal visit from? Why does some Gojko Mitic, a native of Belarus, prefer to hang out in Moscow?
In general, this film reeks of an unofficial and maximally simplified remake of the French film Boite Noire. It's better to watch it and not torment yourself with Rami Malek's film career that never took off.
Although the trailer was very promising.
In general, the analogy of a cross and underpants is best suited here. Cognitive dissonance in its purest form. On the one hand, they seem to be telling all this in all seriousness, but on the other hand, what? A super-mega genius who pukes with excitement after a serious conversation and manages to kill so many people?
I sat and watched not the movie, but how two wolves were fighting inside me: the wolf "rolling with chips" and the wolf "we are getting further and further from God." The winner was probably the first... Well, as soon as I won, they got fucked up and went to bed. Me too.
The entourage of the room at the Chaika Hotel in the glorious city of Primorsk in 2024 is so thoroughly modern. It's like Russia is some kind of black hole in which time has frozen and doesn't exist after the collapse, at least in the eyes of the Armerican cinema. It amused me.
In the end, I had the thought that I would like to see the second chapter of the story of this character. This "see you later" by Fishbourne seems to be making an unobtrusive invitation there. There have been no announcements, but if there are, I will definitely be in the forefront!
When I started watching, I thought, "Well, Morpheus can't be bad."
Well, how about the Punisher, I laughed when he said that his wife was not killed😅
I also smiled when they said that Charlie needed to get lost in the crowd in Istanbul. The actor is Egyptian, it's easier to do that. 😂
Everything is crooked, there is zero chemistry between the characters, the script is crumpled from the series, and there is a certain comedy going on. Here the hero is beaten by the woman he came to kill, runs away from him for some reason (she has already beaten him, why run?) and gets hit by a car. The hero happily goes to drink in Marseille, where he is caught by a very large Morpheus, but the hero escapes with the help of such a clever trick that I stopped watching at this point. Moreover, an hour had passed, there was another one ahead and it obviously wouldn't get any better. The villains will continue to die in the Destination-style plot, the hero will continue to bulge his eyes, and Maisel will continue to see things. Thanks, without me
I liked the movie, it's a good thriller. Rami perfectly played a man who, with a cool head, having no combat training, but possessing high intelligence and skills in handling equipment, gets his wife's killers, along the way exposing the darkest secrets of the special services.
It was interesting for me to watch, so please accept my recommendations)