Blade Runner (1982)

"I've seen things that you people never dreamed of... Attacking ships blazing over Orion; Si rays piercing the darkness near the Tannhauser Gate... All these moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain. Time... to die".

If someone does not know and is confused about the versions: The version of The Final Cut (released in 2007, there is no voice-over narration of Ford's character, you can see in his first scene) is the version preferred by the director and which the sequel made canon.

The origins of cyber punk, this is where it began to originate!

This painting needs nothing, unsurpassed harmony. To produce such a thing in 82 is, in a sense, an amazing phenomenon in itself.

The film has excellent vibe, visual, idea, but at the same time it is clear why it failed, because it is clearly not designed for the mass audience due to its slowness and meditativeness of the narrative.

The indescribable atmosphere of the future. A real Cyberpunk. Surprisingly, it was only in 2019 that I watched it for the first time.

I watched it 8 times. A movie for all time.

Adore.
Love is forever.
Everything is perfect - 5/5.

..all these moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain...
damn, because all our actions in life will just be lost, like tears in the rain... and death will come

visually it looks very good! even after 42 years, and it's just incredible!
but you need to get into the meditative flow of the plot, because at first it can be quite difficult without special activities

Ford's hero literally forced the replicant into intimacy with himself, and here it's kind of normal
about the times! About morals

I caught the whole movie of the Detroit vibe and Cyberpunk, just a delight for the eyes. Ford is just a handsome guy. From the beginning, the film was hard to watch because of the slow pace of the narration, and then she even got involved somehow. Well, I would like to note the quality of the shooting and graphics, well, you can't even say that it's 82 years old.

I didn't understand the movie the first time. The acting and dialogue are great, but the plot is simple. The narration is not slow at all, the film looks in one breath. Despite a lot of illogical moments of simplicity of the plot, there are more positive emotions from the film, and there is something to think about after watching it.

A film with an incredible atmosphere and deep philosophy. Visually impressive, and leaves a lot of food for thought.

The film plunges into the dark and beautiful world of the future, where the boundary between man and machine is blurred. Very atmospheric, leaves a lot of food for thought.

It's a pretty deep film where everyone can wonder who I really am. Rutger Hauer's monologue is always simple!

After 40 minutes, I started to feel really sleepy. Not my movie. It's very sluggish and banal.

I'm honestly shocked, shocked that this movie is 82 years old.. I've been putting it off for a long time, but I recommend it to everyone, there's something to think about)

I really liked the book, I decided to watch the film adaptation, although I knew that the plots were different. But it doesn't matter! The film is completely self-sufficient. I love the science fiction of the 80s, and here the atmosphere is just a cannon. Cyberpunk, a bit noir in terms of lighting, very cool visual in general, and wonderful, slightly pretentious dialogues. I don't say anything about Batty's monologue at the end, watch it a hundred times and love Rutger Hauer even more. I caught my next child crash. Of course, it's not a modern action game, but it's enough. I recommend watching it for those who want to immerse themselves in the atmosphere of old cool fiction. It's a worthwhile thing.

The following thought haunts me: Replicants live for 4 years, mental problems begin after 3. They live an ordinary life, disguise themselves as people…

Why not wait half a year until they die on their own 🤔🤷♂️

"A candle burning brightly burns out earlier"

I think Rutger Hauer easily outplayed Ford, charisma of incredible power.

A timeless masterpiece! Amazing job!

The visual is cool , for an 82-year-old it 's a shock , but it 's an average film , not a masterpiece in terms of plot .