No Country for Old Men

One of the exciting films. Excellent acting from Javier Bardem, Woody Harrelson, Tommy Lee Jones and many others. Cool color coding, cool camerawork. The plot is confusing in many ways, but this makes the film even more interesting. Definitely a good movie!

I liked the film despite its timing, but the director, in my opinion, did his best. Bardem in the film: A typical stone-faced killer, with a cold calculation of what is happening, thinking through the little things, understanding people from the category of "Hu of Hu?". A kind of quiet guy with his inner demon that can whisper in his ear about doing something bad.

But how Javier played Chigurh is very good, of course! All the shooting, music, acting - wow! Personally, I was delighted and I liked the film. Yes, not everyone likes villains, yes, of course they have some charm, but again, I repeat - not everyone likes them. Personally, villains give me genuine interest, I want to understand them most of all. Yes, not everyone likes it, but I do the opposite. Therefore, I personally liked the film very much, there is really something to catch on to, I want to understand exactly why this one did it, but the second one did not do it. I don't know about the second time to watch the movie, but it's still worth thinking about) IMHO.

It's a good movie, but for me, the ending is weak, it doesn't compare in any way with the beginning of the movie.

The idea that Chigurh is actually the alterego of the main character is very interesting)

Without special effects, the plot and shooting style were simply attracted to themselves and did not let go until the end. I've seen few such paintings, but for some reason I've only reached this one now.

A very cool movie

Javier Bardem is incredible here..

A typical Cohen movie about the banality of evil and chance
Only their trademark humor is missing
It's a good movie, but the ending is a little weak
I wanted some kind of point

The best serial killer in the history of cinema!

When the movie ended, I thought, is that it? I still have a feeling of understatement, I don't like open endings. And so the film is not bad, especially Bardem who played Chigura is good

A friend strongly advised me to watch this movie. I finally looked at it. As for me, it's overrated. 4 Academy Awards, and a Golden Globe. The top place according to estimates on KP. And as for me, it's a boring stretched movie.

Yes, Bardem in the Role of Anton Chigura is great, this is certainly the top villain, on a par with Hannibal Lecter, Misery, the Joker of the Langer, well, and Ratched's sister (from the original. the movie)

Tommy Lee Jones' acting is great. That's right through the screen you feel like his character is all fucked up.

The first half of the film is like an excellent western, a confrontation between two worthy heroes. Well, then it's boring. Merged behind the scenes. The understatement with the wife of the The open final with Chigura.

I read the book, surprisingly the movie is as good as the book…

After the ending, the first thought is: Doubtful, but okey.

Oscar 2008

As far as I'm concerned, it's not about anything. It was shot perfectly, but as if that's enough for the picture to be considered cool?

Great atmosphere, charismatic protagonist, psycho antagonist and third side cope with existential issues:
Open final , no clear conclusion.

What is the movie about?.. A man stole the money, and a second man started hunting for him. Two hours of running. The end
Maybe I don't understand something...