Overview
After being laid off and humiliated by a ruthless job market, a veteran paper mill manager descends into violence in a desperate bid to reclaim his dignity.

| Release Date: | |
|---|---|
| Country: | South Korea, France |
| Genre: | Comedy, Crime, Thriller |
| Production Companies: | CJ ENM Studios, Moho Film, KG Productions |
| Watched by: | 2 712 of 1 007 389 |
| Runtime: |






































P.S. I wonder why he put on so many gloves in the first "murder", but the whole scene is so staged that I applauded the absurdity.
P. P. S The title would be better translated as "There is no other choice."
the plot seems to be loud and on the rather popular topic of social inequality, which causes problems of unemployment and moral concepts.
everything gets tied up long and dreary. all the tin and fun starts closer to the second half and it was probably worth the wait.
as a satire, it turned out cool. as a thriller, it's also quite good and intense.
, but
you can't watch the movie about that, but it won't stick in your memory.
Absolutely everything passed by)
And the film is good from all sides, you just need to understand in advance who the director is and what it's about.
And if you wait for a killer vacation, then yes, it will probably be a disappointment.
Well, the film doesn't really have any humor or meat, but rather a mediocre drama.
You see, everything is passing by.
You have to watch this movie with your eyes and delve into it with your mind from the first second to the last. This is more an intellectual than an entertaining movie, although there are such motives.
In the end, this is a presentation of very difficult topics (not only for Koreans) in a very funny, funny, and towards the end - frightening form, and it's interesting to watch because everyone plays great here.
So if you don't like Korean movies, just don't watch them. You'd be surprised, but even Hindus have good movies by modern standards.
For everyone, this is not a classic festival spit of the Sirate type and Sentimental value - it is a film that is quite balanced in all aspects. More drama, a little comedy. But you can watch it, it's interesting and necessary. Unlike what I mentioned
as far as I'm concerned, this is the dumbest possible problem with the dumbest possible solution, which at the same time does not turn into absurdity. and that's the absurdity of the film. he himself can't say what he wants to be: a drama? A thrasher? A comedy?
In the end, neither a tense thriller nor a black comedy in the spirit of Parasites (I understand that it is incorrect to compare, but my expectations were at this level)
It's a one-man movie, and unfortunately Lee Byung-hong didn't take it out. I was missing something.
It's a very funny movie, although I expected drama. It was beautifully shot.
That's what happens when you're on xx for more than three months.
Thanks to Chang-wook Park, I got to know South Korean cinema. Why, I fell in love with him. Back in 2003, it was his "Oldboy" (so-called "Classmate", but that's not what I'm talking about now) who revealed to me a wonderful stylistic and genre mix of American (entertainment), European (art-house) and Russian (soul? Let's call it that for simplicity) approaches to making movies. Plus, of course, the Asian flavor, but without the replays that have been confusing me for a long time, say, in Japanese films. Behind "Oldboy", "Sympathy for Mr. Revenge" and "Sympathy for Mrs. Revenge" were viewed, which together formed a triptych called the "Revenge Trilogy". And for almost a quarter of a century now, I have been watching the development of this film market with interest, and I am glad to popularize it thanks to the same "Squid Game" (and not only). And not once during this time have Korean films failed me.
Of course, Chang-wook Park himself did not disappoint this time. However, as it turned out, American writers did not disappoint either. It's funny that just recently I wrote in a review of "Bugonia" in the sense that such an independent Lanthimos shot one of his best films, which is a remake of a South Korean tape. But here it's exactly the opposite. Chang-wook Park became interested in the tabloid fiction of American Donald Westlake, in particular the crime novel called "The Axe" and its European adaptation by Frenchman of Greek origin Costa-Gavras. But, in general, who cares if the final result has its own unique voice.
I won't say it's Park's best movie. ("Oldboy" is forever in my heart), but one of the best films of last year for sure. And at the upcoming Oscars, I will definitely be rooting for him... Oh, and he wasn't nominated. Those bastards!
Anyway, it has everything that has always attracted me to Korean projects. It's a dark story, but there's always humor in it. A life situation, but full of absurdity. Charismatic characters who commit very heinous, but at the same time understandable and somewhat forced acts. By the way, I'll mention separately that I started watching the "Method of Elimination" without knowing absolutely anything about it, except for the name of the director and the performer of the main role. Therefore, I will not say anything about the plot once again - if you are in the dark, then this is how you approach the film. It is enough to know that this is a film about a man who lost his job some time ago and cannot find a suitable place again. As for Lee Byung-hong (the same "Squid Game", among other things), I once again became convinced for myself that, firstly, he is, of course, a master and does not eat his bread in vain, and secondly, well, he is a natural Korean Mads Mikkelsen! There are external similarities, and the manner of the game, and the ability to handle both dramatic and comedic scenes equally coolly, using similar techniques. And they both look hilariously cool in their uniforms (and both wore them last year)!
In general, not a single minute was wasted. He stared, afraid to look away. I have shamed several songs in the soundtrack and added them to the playlist with pleasure: Korean ballads! It's all beautifully shot. The visual range is gorgeous. The master's strong work on a relevant topic. I advise you not to skip it.
While writing the review of "Five Nights with Freddy 2," I freaked out, and canceled the ten-point scale, replacing it with a five-point scale. Yes, with half points. But still! So, for the "Exclusion Method" I make an exception (tu-dum-shh ...) and specifically for it I return 10 points.
RATING: 10 Dunder Mifflin out of 5 (yeah, out of 5, with a slide, so to speak)
And what a montage!
And yes, it's about love.
P.S. the girl came up with funny notes
P.P.S. the logs were just begging to fall
@SilveriaW: I also remembered. Still, this scene from the second "Point" is the most vivid in the franchise.
It's tempting to write off Pak for self-repetition, because he's always giving his classic social commentary here. Imho, in vain: here he does not forget, of course, about the soulless Korean conglomerates (offhandedly touching on both the name and the abbreviations), but here the criticism is directed more towards people whom he used to protect more, enters the territory of Zvyagintsev's "Elena" (or discusses with his Kent Bon and his "Parasites"). And here it's interesting - he so convincingly justifies and justifies the logic of the hero's actions, as if shouting "there is no choice", convinces us of this, nominally not even condemning the hero, as if even arguing with Dostoevsky about the need for punishment, as the creators of "Ozark" recently did. And it's clear that he's shouting this proof - there was a choice. At every single step.
Pak goes even a little further here, somewhere in the direction of Nicholas Luhmann - that social systems are separated from psychological ones and the bearer of the will himself is not so much important in a vacuum, but important in the environment. The choice is determined at the level of relationships, that is, it is no longer so important whether the subject is free to choose, but how (and by whom) the decision is prescribed in the communication system. And Puck is deliberately misanthropic here, but I saw this evil sting as a useful provocation. You feel it without this whole conceptualization above, but purely at the level of "x%y you will do something, you are all so good, tomorrow the big guys will come - and you f%al your principles in principle." And at this moment, it's not despair that lights up with a vengeance, but the thought of returning my own agency.
In my opinion, this is the essence of the tragedy.
Of course, I've narrowed the kinch down to one issue-it's much broader than that. And if you forget about all this and perceive it as a cheerful thriller, it holds up quite well, the stakes are high, and in some places it laughs out loud.
I always fall for the pipe of the Korean pied piper Park Chang Wook - and I can't, and I don't want to leave the film until the very end of the end credits.
How subtly and at the same time vividly the director reveals to us the depths of the soul of the handsome, in general, main character and his sweet wife, and at the same time the companions of those poor devils who also unwillingly said goodbye to their life's work!
And scary, and funny, and very, very vital. Instead of looking for work, does the husband wander around at night, taking rubber overalls, a shovel, work gloves and his grandfather's trophy "trunk"? A hundred pounds, he's cheating! So, you need to dress up to the nines at a club party and light up on the dance floor with a handsome young colleague, so much so that sparks fall from your husband's eyes.
This is about the same logic that guides the beloved spouse in his relentless attempts to regain his job. No wonder husband and wife are one Satan.
It's a great movie, this is the third one I've seen from the director. But the aftertaste, as always, is that now we will see each other in 10 years with his next creation.