Overview
Scientists have discovered how to 'hop' human consciousness into lifelike robotic animals, allowing people to communicate with animals as animals. Animal lover Mabel seizes an opportunity to use the technology, uncovering mysteries within the animal world beyond anything she could have imagined.
I'm glad that in our time, it's still very pleasant to have someone filming this!
I thought that if they don't do it, they do it very little.
Don't miss the 2 scenes after the credits
1 at 35 minutes
2 at 42 minutes
This is a direct sequel to the cartoon
1 scene with words - conversations
2 the scene is without words but it looks important
I'm glad that I decided to take a look at it in the place of some series for the evening, as usual, some new episodes.
I want the Jumpers to collect a normal cash register and Pixar to continue making such cartoons, rather than milking Toy Story and others.
🦫🦫🦫🦫🦫🦫🦫🦫🦫🦫🪵🪵🪵🪵🪵🪵
The "green" activist and negligent student Mabel, trying to disrupt the plans of the mayor of her hometown to build a ring road through her beloved meadow, finds herself in the body of a beaver. Hussars, be silent! Now she must establish relations with the local fauna, uncover a couple of conspiracies and find unexpected allies.
Daniel Chong took a moment off from his three favorite colorful bears (the TV series and the feature "The Whole Truth about Bears" are his handiwork) and produced a variation of Cameron's Avatar story at the Disney-Pixar production facilities, but not somewhere out there in the depths of space, but on Earth. Moreover, even the authors themselves do not hide the similarity, giving one of the characters to ask a clarifying question: "Is this like in the Avatar?". Yes, exactly.
Moreover, there are similarities in several ways at once. First of all, in some places everything here is too illogical and improbable. Even by cartoon standards. No, of course, [not] the expected eating of some animals by others in the middle of the monologue of the king of all flying, Beaver George (it's a pity that they didn't translate him as George - it would have been funnier that way), about how everyone in his kingdom lives in peace and harmony, it's funny, but this world will come to an end pretty quickly taking into account the royal decree, "predators eat when they want." Well, that is Pixar, in his best works, if he talked about any worlds, he thought everything through thoroughly, especially when introducing talking animals into the "real" world. Right here in the brain, a red alarm goes off. That's it, I'm stopping suffocating.
Another unifying point with Avatar is the very beautiful graphics. And not just everything (although the cartoon, of course, is made of high quality), but everything about fur and grass. What kind of grass is here! Drug-addicted Hussars, keep quiet too! It's like you can touch every blade of grass. At one time, I remember how people were blown away by drawing the fur of monsters in the "Monsters Corporation" - here a similar effect is felt.
Otherwise, it's a very cheerful cartoon - even too cheerful, for the characters, Mabel and George (a great duet! George is a really cool beaver... Well, that's enough, Hussars!), as if a little more joint scenes are needed for their friendship to play out in full force, just as there is not enough time for a sudden villain - here he was and now he is gone, as it is sung in a famous song. Well, there are some really great jokes. The same shark or the transition from one group of animals to another, depending on who is looking at them. Those beady eyes made me laugh every time.
Not a masterpiece, but which of the latest Pixar cartoons can be called a true masterpiece? - but this one is pleasant and not boring for children and adults, even taking into account some logical inconsistencies.
RATING: 4 Bobruisk out of 5
Sincere? Yes.
Instructive? Yes.
Delight? Well... no. Lizard raised the hype, but the cartoon itself does not reach her level of humor.
My opinion: I looked and forgot.
And there are enough jokes here. From beaver, beaver, logs, potatoes, and including some kind of meta-narrative style: We're not arguing! And a half-minute argument scene. A joke with "beady eyes" and "anime eyes" is also a good one. In short, the film, in my opinion, deserves to be watched. There is a holiday in the current not-so-active animation glade.
Well, the potato smile was meant to be
But what are we part of?
Total. We are a single entity. (c)
Oh.
I really liked the cartoon.
Great story, great idea, great execution.
The theme of eco-activism and concern for the environment, belonging to the world, the desire to become a part of something bigger.
Bright, kind and touching, funny at times.
Mind migration, just like in Avatar😅
Trust is like a dam, it can leak sometimes, but that's how we patch it up. 😊
It seems she has become the leader of the rebellion. Like Joan of Arc.
In short, I liked everything, I watched it with great pleasure. 🦫 🪵
Yes, it's a cartoon full of jokes and lightness. But if you look deeper, you get the feeling that Mabel is drawn to her grandmother more than to her family, and it's not just that her grandmother supports and understands her. It's like there's something more traumatic here than just a nature protection story.
Even at the time of the move, the family quite easily leaves their daughter with her grandmother, and this does not look like a forced measure, but almost like a natural choice.
Hence the second thought: if the mother is shown to be cold or distant, is it possible to assume that the grandmother herself once raised her in a bad way? Then the question arises, at what point did she become the calm, accepting figure that we see her as? Did it come with age? Or with guilt and rethinking?
And finally, the third. I was repelled by the idea that the past should be held at all costs, not let go. Mabel clings to the place associated with her grandmother, who has already passed away, and this is presented as the right choice.
The result is a strange feeling: to restore the lake and the nature around it. The gesture is both noble and deeply selfish.
As for "clinging" to the past, Mabel realizes towards the end that her obsession with the place is harming her friends. And on the whole, on the contrary, it refutes the idea that you need to hold on to the past.
I liked it, I watched it with great pleasure.
and in all its details, this is the same Pixar, taking the best of its ideas and mixing it all together once again: funny humor, sometimes even slightly black and with more adult jokes; dynamic plot; sentimental and kind moments; and juicy graphics, of course.
It's a very light and instructive story in many ways. ideal for family viewing.
The post-credits scene with Grandpa
And the lizard is very cool.
from the child's point of view... It's very loud in some places, the characters shout too much. There are quite a few sharp loud moments that frighten a child.
(I would like to see the second part, but it is unlikely that it will be, since the story has a logical ending)
So even before the credits, that professor teacher of hers is showing the same layout where the dog is drawn and that it's like a hint that she wants to create a robot dog now and move into it and talk to other dogs and find out how their world works
But if our main character is already there, maybe only the professor and her colleagues will be there, and she will be shown as a cameo,
and then who knows
People are destroying nature, increasingly seizing land for roads and buildings, depriving animals of homes.
I shed a tear at the moment when all the animals were breaking the dam to save the city from the fire.
It's a great cartoon.
what Pixar cartoons are good for, they have a global everyday meaning, but cartoons are for children, and it's too early for children to understand this. and now, reviewing those cartoons that I watched as a child, they have found meaning.
funny, funny mutie, with a serious message and as if they realized a childhood dream, to understand animals)))
. It's a pity that the moral of the cartoon is not that memories of loved ones live in the heart. The girl did more harm than good for fear of losing her grandmother's memory.
I liked.
🦫❤️
Of course, if you put all this aside, then the cartoon is quite good, sometimes even very cute, funny and so crazy in a good way.
I am delighted with the trinity in the form of a bear, a beaver and a gecko! They made this cartoon. As well as the beautiful king
JulianGeorge.The scene in the fresh green forest in the last shots has also gone very far: flowers are blooming, beavers are swimming and two people who do not know each other's language are sitting side by side. It has a good message.
And yes, if we look at the cartoon from all these angles, then it came to me. He's funny, and as always handsome, and rich in cool characters. However, at the same time, it seems to be more childish (compared to other PIXAR works, that's for sure). There is that bit of absurdity here that is more typical of a more childish rating (the shark was too much for me personally).
P.S. The birds!