Description
The defense and the prosecution have rested and the jury is filing into the jury room to decide if a young Spanish-American is guilty or innocent of murdering his father. What begins as an open and shut case soon becomes a mini-drama of each of the jurors' prejudices and preconceptions about the trial, the accused, and each other.
The film is interesting. The main emphasis is on emotions, but the detective component is also given enough attention. I like how the film shows that not everything is what it seems at first glance.
Interestingly, the aspects that would now be called the agenda are shown. The accused is a migrant from the slums and one of the jurors considers him guilty more because of the negativity towards such people, rather than because of the facts.
If you want to watch a movie with good acting and directing, this movie is what you need.
A detective? Instructions for writing a script? A couple of characters? Dialogues? It's all there
Although other names could be suggested, for example - "11 men are angry at one man", "pereobuvochnaya", "sweating sprats in a jar " etc.
The black and white atmosphere does its job. You literally become the thirteenth participant in the process, only you don't sweat and uncles in rumpled shirts don't shout at you.
This is a movie that would not be shown on Netflix today. There are no women or African Americans here. Given the current trends, it was difficult to get used to it at first, but then the dialogues captured all your attention. Dialogues... There are very juicy conversations between the participants, both during the discussion and during the tie-break. Every sentence, every word, falls into the frying pan of the plot and, beautifully fried, gives us a nice dish at the exit, which you listen to more than you eat. But without good actors and delicious dialogues, they can lose touch with the tongue papillae. But don't worry! The actors here are very good. Literally everything. You believe everyone who thinks the kid is guilty or not. It's a very good, emotional swing.
So friends, if your party is not like this, don't even think about inviting me. After all, what could be better than to gather in good company, shout, argue, argue, sweat, and at the same time decide the fate of an eighteen-year-old kid. Classic.
But they would have shown it on Max (see Juror #2)
The moral of the film is that you always need to have your own opinion based on real facts and stand by it until the very end if it can really save someone's fate.
We need more geniuses!