Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (2024)

Very weak and tedious. There are no new actors, only Phoebe likes it more or less. Criminally little time has been given to the main villain, and the battle with him is in no way. The only thing is a well-developed ent of the ice god.
In general, the script is too primitive.
I repeat my comment to the 2021 film that the 2016 remake is much more interesting, and if it weren't for the crazy aunts starring with dumb jokes, then this film adaptation was much more worthy.

Very weak... The last 20 minutes are still nothing when evil appears. And it wasn't even particularly funny. Well, never mind, there will be a new planet of the apes soon...I can't wait

The first film continues quite well, it's nice that most of the actors from the first two take part in it, including Annie Potts. Of course, there are small logical joints, but now not a single movie can do without them at all. But the most important jamb, in my opinion, is the way that the horned one was released from the poster. It's not a thought-out situation at all. But it is quite dynamic, there is a Lizun and a new comical character Nadim (Kumail Nanjiani) has been added. And Patton Oswalt in the role of the "book library worm" performed quite well. The film runs for almost two hours and the time flies by unnoticed! But it's better to start watching from the "Heirs" anyway, because half of the characters have migrated from it and it will not be easy to immediately figure out who is who and what connects them. I also liked the new traps, in the spirit of the times, but I didn't understand why Winston didn't tell the Spanglers about his business as soon as they arrived. It seemed strange. I recommend watching it, if you like this franchise at all

And I really liked it) humor everywhere got into me

Not as dynamic as Afterlife, but quite watchable. I would like more action. Yes, there are weaknesses in the script, but it's an entertaining movie!

not wow, of course, compared to the classics, but not so bad either. and so in general it looks good and spectacular. a simple plot, an old cast and pretty good special effects. well , the Lizun actually 🙃

All the ghosts are flying to New York

I agree with the comment by the author Gordey, I really liked it, took a lot of pictures, shot qualitatively, an excellent continuation of the original of the 80s

Such a movie, to whom as well as to me personally, did not go. 4/10

I tried to treat the third film with restraint, because they didn't try to spoil the original, but I can't do it anymore. It's boring, the characters are not interesting, no one is revealed. What's the point of shooting a scene at the beginning, recreating an era, telling the legend of Gattaca, coming up with a sphere and wall design to reduce everything to a five-minute tedious standing of a sad Indian clown against a shadow with claws? Yes, the old characters are organically inscribed, but a reference for the sake of a reference in the library is superfluous. And all the new characters are empty, no more than replicas and faces, without characters. It would really be better to make a film about Extreme Hunters. The Hunters were too outrageous, but they were not too lazy to experiment with the world. And here it feels like the Negro founded some kind of corporation of hunters and now instead of personalities there are all minions. The drone trap is the maximum fantasy of the creators, and even then I barely remembered it at the end. I hope that this storyline will not be filmed further.

There are only two normal movies. 1984 and 1989. The rest is all dull guano.

To be honest, I once got more pleasure from all the hated Hunters than from this movie.

Not a fountain, but there are splashes.. Well, if you compare it with the 1989 sequel, in principle, that film is much inferior to the original. It's basically the same here, a mind-blowing restart and a tedious sequel

The main villain is dull, not interesting, and in terms of design is not even remembered.

Catching ghosts - shown only at the beginning and at the end. And so the whole movie blah blah blah.

I didn't quite understand Phoebe's motivation for leaving the body, what she wanted to do with it, but they hinted a little at the agenda

But a lot of humor was brought into the film, marshmallow men are the main decoration of the picture

It's nice to see the old characters, the environmental protection official, but now the mayor of NY, Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd. I liked the new character, who also had a great sense of humor

In terms of the plot, there is no dynamics, everything is somehow boring, and in principle logic is lame.

In terms of visual, everything is fine, although in our age this is more likely not the dignity of the film but the quality. But I liked the picture. Juicy colors, and this is basically the same in the image as in the original painting.

I have not seen the previous new films about ghostbusters, which is why I often caught myself thinking that here, apparently, is either a reference to the oldest films, or to the previous new ones.

In general, it was interesting to watch, 2 hours flew by very unnoticed. Apart from Phoebe, the flame god and the old actors from the first parts of the Hunters, the rest seemed to not fit into the story at all.

A normal continuation .
You can also laugh in places .
Annie Potts is such a beauty, age suits her very well!

It's worse than the last part, but it'll do

And I really liked the movie, I just remembered my childhood and this song is nostalgia!!!The actors are wonderful!!!All 2 hours in one go!!I liked McKenna the most, an amazing actress!!She changed so much, she played beautifully, And in general all the actors are super, an interesting idea!!Lizun and the lord of the flame 🔥And the marshmallow men are just awesome 😂😍

The film is a little weak, but you can watch it.

Will go. It's interesting, it looks easy. The old actors, the old guard are pleasing) But still, I thought that Gurak* would be more poetic, he himself is more or less, but they dealt with him very quickly, at first I thought that was it, he won and then they will make a sequel, under the type of blazing flame, fire and ice", "rebirth of fire ", "burning flame ", well, something like that. And then, but no, they still dealt with him in 5 minutes, it was a shame that it was so fast. They ran around guessing, solving and searching for information on it more than they extinguished it. And all in the same circle, everyone is trying to break their ghost prison, in almost every hunter movie. Well, new actors need to pump up a little, not everyone pulls. Phoebe more or less) It is not as simple as it seems.. Well, it seems to me🙂
Well, I'm waiting for more films about hunters. In any case, the film is worth watching and attention)

Alas, no matter how sad it was to admit it, but the second part could not keep the bar of the first part of the sequel. And, to be honest, I can't say that this tape is bad. They just really wanted to repeat the success, "stuffed" all sorts of stuff, and the output turned out to be a cabbage patch, in which there is nothing to talk about.

Of the advantages that bribed me:

1) Filling the world. They finally left Gozer the Destroyer alone and pulled up the Garrak freezer. I would like to see their tandem with Gozer.

2) There is a laboratory and a new technology for studying ghosts.

3) Talking about a parallel, ghostly world, I love such things. Although it could have been more, I will wait in the future.

4) Many different ghosts.

5) Ernie Hudson has a decent time on the screen, in the original films it seems to me that he was not deservedly deprived.

In memory of the great director and his brainchild, they made a terribly boring film

An hour and a half of some kind of fuss about how no one wants to understand a genius girl and 15 minutes of a real movie.
The villain was not revealed.
The Hindu line is for the sake of the Hindu.
I put 3 with a huge stretch.
With bitterness in my heart, I admit that the film loses even to the female version.

Well, it's fine for once. Similar to the first part. Not worse, not better, just on the level

I liked the atmosphere of the old movies the most. This can be read in the specific design of the ghosts, in the clothes, the scenery and the shooting. I didn't like a lot of things. A one-time movie.

It's not even bad

Hunters is just a typical movie of the series, moderately funny, slightly chaotic, very nostalgic.
A controversial movie. On the one hand, it is completely passable, on the other hand there are fascinating and interesting moments.
The graphics, the drawing are at a good level, all the shooting is of high quality, all the ghost characters are absolutely alive.
No one was particularly remembered for the actors' performance. They were all just for show. We talked through our roles and went on with our business. You don't really worry about anyone.
As a fan of the original series, I will be waiting for the sequel.

the first film of the reboot "Heirs" was very good, a working idea for the reboot + warmed the soul with numerous references and Easter eggs to the cult trilogy.
In the second part, there is also a completely canonical plot, humor has been sketched, interesting ideas: the ghost research laboratory alone is already a gold mine... But in the end, everything turned out to be chaotic, chaotic, everyone is running from location to location.

Minor characters are quite useful for the plot, but there are so many of them for the total duration of the film that they end up taking up so much screen time that it just isn't enough for the main characters....
And yes, who are the main characters now? The Spangler family or the old guard? Or both? No, I'm incredibly glad to see the old men, Bill Murray alone, appearing in the frame, sometimes gives out more charisma than some of the main characters, and this despite the fact that he obviously does not get much pleasure from filming.

The family drama against which the events of the film develop is also good, it has the right to exist in order to influence the motivation of the characters... but why is everything so clumsily molded, which causes Spanish shame in places.

Because of all this confusion, the impression of the film was as if the script was for a mini-series, but everyone overplayed and made a 2-hour film .., but at the same time they really did not want to give up all their ideas and ideas... In the end, it turned out not bad, but, unfortunately, this is clearly not the kind of movie that you want to review in a year or two.... or accidentally catching it on one of the TV channels, leave it and watch the rest...

The first half is so boring, I liked that the style of old films is present, it will go for once.

There are too many characters crammed in. As a result, there are no normal dialogues, no normal interaction.
Humor is very weak.

I categorically demand a spin-off about marshmallow men!

The movie is 10/10, and Finn is so handsome and plays 🤩

I liked it, a good family movie, already the second in the sequel franchise

2024 is the year of some empires🙂 - Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, Godzilla x Kong: New Empire, Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes, The Fall of the Empire (well, in the original, of course, Civil War)

"Who is trapped in the ball?" Gandalf is the "Demon of the ancient world". And only a fire magician can stop him
😂 The Hindu lord of fire - Shyamalan would be pleased😆

I'm watching Sheldon's Childhood after the series closes. where Annie Potts played Sheldon's "famous" granny. And McKenna Grace was his girlfriend, to whom he was not indifferent... I mean, he couldn't stand her.😁

I liked it.

The previous film was great, so there were high hopes for a sequel. But alas, they failed miserably even though they assembled the entire original line-up. The stupid behavior of teenagers, endless family squabbles... it's like I turned on a sitcom.
The real hunters in the film are about 20 minutes late, everything else could be thrown out. We were waiting for the wrong thing, the wrong thing!

The distinctive feature of this film was the impressive special effects and atmospheric shooting. In places, the film really makes you shudder from surprises and tension. The acting is also on top: all the characters convey their emotions sincerely, and this helps to immerse themselves in the plot.
The plot of the film is quite interesting, although not particularly original. It easily fits into the already well-known ghostbusters universe, but adds new elements that make the story fresh and relevant. The mixing of humor and horror is done competently, so that you are both scared and having fun at the same time.
However, there are several disadvantages. In places, the pace of the film seems to be a bit delayed, and some scenes could have been shortened to maintain a more dynamic narrative. Also, by the end of the film, some moments began to seem predictable, although they do not lose their appeal.

it seems that initially there were no expectations, but for the film to be so tedious, I definitely did not expect this. for the first time, I probably can't find any advantages in the film, as if the film is for the sake of the film. even beloved Paul Rudd and the old cast of hunters did not smooth the impression. Yes, I can say with confidence that the 2016 version is much better and funnier. although it would seem.

The first part was better, but this one is not bad either. And compared to almost all the blockbuster sequels of this year, it's so gorgeous. Although, if you evaluate the movie by itself, it certainly has drawbacks. The plot is slightly delayed and sometimes sags. And also in places, including in terms of revealing the main villain and fighting him, he is too childish. But these are quibbles about a good movie.) Overall, I liked it. It was easy and interesting to watch. There is also a lot of humor in hunters, and not quite primitive, some jokes were, in my opinion, even quite intellectually elegant. In general, I would like to see the sequel.

The insertion of some problems and family squabbles into a genre film hinting at something else is just the latest trend... And this one was no exception)
Well, as it is, I really like that they continued the original branch. There would be fewer teenagers, more adults. Apparently, they were betting on the rejuvenation of the franchise. Although we grew up with adult characters. But this also applies to the massive phenomenon of film sequels in recent years.
In short, I like this franchise in general. Of course, I won't go through the holes like the first two films, but I'm also watching them with interest. 😁
It was a joy to see the marshmallow men Topchik And the green ghost again )
So far, this is the most successful resurrection of old idols in recent years. )

The first film of this reboot caused me more negative emotions. The kids liked this one...

This film is far from the original hunters of the 80s.