Description
In an American desert town circa 1955, the itinerary of a Junior Stargazer/Space Cadet convention is spectacularly disrupted by world-changing events.
Released: | 08 June 2023 |
Country of origin: | US |
Genre: | Comedy, Drama |
Production companies: | American Empirical Pictures, Indian Paintbrush |
Watched by: | 1 651 of 865 198 |
Runtime: | 1 hour 44 minutes |
IMDB rating: | 6.5 of 10 112 830 |
Impressive cast
That's all the advantages
Extremely boring movie
From the actors of the game zero
I absolutely did not see the deep meaning of the film, I will have to watch the analysis on YouTube...
I fell for a bunch of laudatory reviews about the director and warm expectations of the film from users, in vain...
Jokes on the topic we are showing you a film about how a film was shot about how a theatrical production was staged... well, or something like that. Strange alien and damn, but I do not know how it was possible not to laugh at the end of the film. It feels like the whole movie is not a very funny anecdote, which is told by a rather boring narrator with a rich imagination. He fills the whole story with an abundance of interesting plot twists, unexpected heroes, strange details... And then the denouement. And all this volume of information leads to something so small that it really becomes ridiculous. And God, thank you for this director. Without him, I would hardly have experienced these feelings.
A wonderful movie, but strictly for an amateur.
And in general, whoever said anything there - a great job and just a feast for the eyes, as the picture is as juicy as possible.
What is this movie about? Who was it taken for? Which of the arches is the main one and what should it lead us to? All these questions could be answered in a simple way: "Bro, well, it's Wes Anderson..."
And I would probably even agree, if not for the fact that previous works, if they did not come to me, at least did not cause obvious rejection. In the case of the Asteroid City, it's just some extremely stuffy sketch that was stretched to a full-fledged movie
The work itself is extremely weak, as for me. I had enough patience for an hour and a half, then I just knocked it out without finishing it.
Therefore, honestly putting my hand on the electric grill, my rating is 2/5
It is clear that the film was in production much earlier. Therefore, it's not a matter of cause-and-effect relationships, but that you take the information too seriously 🥴
Here, there is nothing but a picture for the sake of a picture, which you mentioned above, in general, there is not. Wake me up in 100 years and ask me what this movie is about, and I still won't be able to answer you, because I have absolutely no idea
You are probably right, and this work is really shot in the spirit of previous films. But only this does not contradict the thesis that the picture as a whole turned out to be weak and boring. In confirmation of this, there are a lot of ambiguous reviews, both on Russian-language resources and abroad
I don't want to talk about millions of flies and their ability to make mistakes, nor do I want to continue our conversation with you. Absolutely without irony, I am glad that you were able to enjoy the film. Unfortunately, I do not share your feelings, and I adhere to a different point of view
P.S. Although Wes Anderson has always shot like this. In vain, probably, I suspect him.))
No
And he is🤣🤣
This movie was made to make people morons half-witted
But the story seems to throw a bridge to Oppenheimer
Beautiful as always. Although perhaps I liked the picture even more here than before, everything somehow looks better against the background of the desert.
Well, the rest is about as usual, yes, a simple story of acceptance against a background of cozy absurdity.
The level below, the one about the reflection of illusory and dream (you don't really think that it was a p-stmodern about shooting?), I didn't quite think so, but I'm a fool, I don't really need that.
What can I say about actors, no one gathers the best like that. Well, except for Jarmusch, the Cohens and Tarantina, and so yes, no one. But no one really lets them have fun and flourish. But I would like to note separately that Maya certainly has a brilliant agent, such a filmography at such an age, but it is well deserved.
It's been a rich year, I'm already watching the third best movie.
A beautiful picture, very narrow-cut, there is a favorite move of the director with the narrator, but alas, the rest does not cause such pleasure as in the Grand Budapest or even the French Herald
I don't know if these are high expectations, but the most interesting part seemed to me the first arrival of an alien, from the outside I looked exactly like the people in the frame
I hope that these are temporary difficulties and then there will be something not only beautiful, but also more interesting plot