Greenland 2: Migration (2026)

Unexpectedly!

Fitting the bill of lading!
The most anticipated disaster movie of 2026🔥
The first part went very far, maybe the effect of watching on the "big screen" also played, but the film is decent.

Already in cinemas today

The movie turned out to be too exhausting. It was possible to put an end to the first part.

to some extent, I like disaster movies and they have their own special vibe. and then there's the good cast, but this sequel didn't turn out quite as expected.

the logic of what is happening is lost in many moments, it looks ridiculous and has its own questions.
The film is simply overloaded with unnecessary plot threads that don't make much sense.

but the visuals and effects still look cool. on the big screen, it adds as much atmosphere and excitement as possible.

of course you can watch it. in any case, it looks +- worthy, although it has some jambs and looks weaker than the first part, in my opinion.

Not bad. 👌

For half the film, I was worried about the question of where the guy got the insulin and even had 15 years of supplies in the bunker, given that it was not supposed to take patients into bunkers there?
How did those outside survive if there are constant storms in Liverpool and London?
But most importantly, why was the film released in the wake of the popularity of news about Greenland?😁

what a mess, worse than the first episode. This is really some kind of neural network slop. If you want a disaster movie with Butler, you'd better watch geostorm, at least the plot is lively and the picture is juicy.

Sometimes it's better not to shoot than to shoot this. There are a lot of plot holes, as well as just illogical idiotic decisions. No movie has ever caused as many facepalms as this one.
Script nonsense:
- there is radiation all around and debris is falling, but not where and not where the first stone fell.
- there's a war going on around the hole, but a minibus goes there regularly
- fuel does not deteriorate, there is no shortage of it, every homeless person has a lot of weapons, everyone has plenty of food except the heroes
- a ferry with ladders, some are crawling in one direction, others in the opposite direction for some reason
- on the way, people got out and used minibuses and went home
- the guy lived 15 years without insulin, apparently recovered, etc. etc.

Based on the situation in the world, the name of the film sounds like two things)

It turned out to be pale and boring. And I don't believe that the main impact zone in just 15 years will look like it is shown here, for the life of me). Especially considering the situation in the two-thousand-mile zone and beyond, like Greenland.

I didn 't admire it , of course .

Outright shit!!!

The movie is boring and not interesting

It's so terrible that I'm sorry to those who go to the cinema for it. Even Butler asked to cut it down, so that God forbid they decided not to create the 3rd part. Have a good trip!

It's like a solo series about Daryl Dixon, but without zombies. A salad of a lot of barely developed concepts with television cinematography. You didn't have to take it off.

many people here write about 15 years in a bunker for some reason... It's been said more than once in the film that 5 years have passed. Where did you get 15 from?

Nothing to worry about

Against the background of the box office success of the first part, the creators decided to give us a sequel that no one had asked for.

It's a pretty dull and gray road movie, and even though I love disaster movies, there's no chemistry here. Probably because the disasters have already receded into the background, and the fate of the Garrity family has not attracted me.

Nothing is clear from the plot, what kind of coalitions are running and shooting at the trenches there, if everyone can live in the "promised land" in the crater and sing Kumbaya)

Boring! Everyone is tired! The actors, their characters, the screenwriters, the audience.
Everyone is fighting. They're shooting. but gg always comes across exceptionally kind people: they feed, water, give cars and supplies. The fragments fall exclusively nearby, in 5 years everyone should have died from floods, earthquakes, radiation and other troubles, but no: everyone is trying to help. It feels like everyone survived just for them ...
and yes, the minibus to the crater is something..

Great movie! no worse than the first part. Spoiler: I feel sorry for Butler

I really liked the first part, but the second one let me down. Perhaps the reflection of the heroes was not enough, after all, 5 years underground without personal space and in restrictions should have made themselves felt. The plot is jumping, for me there was no pronounced plot and climax-everything is very messy. But it's not a bad movie to spend time with a vivid picture and special effects.

Very boring. It really should have been limited to the first film.

I am very sorry for the time spent, I advise you not to watch.

Utter nonsense and nonsense! :(

Somehow it is not clear, a fragment of the comet fell into the Mediterranean Sea, where at least half the world should have been demolished by fire and a powerful explosive wave + seismic activity, as the burnt-out Sydney, for example, showed us, BUT Liverpool, located not so far from the crater, for some reason survived, the houses are almost not destroyed, only with knocked out with glass, plus they show us trees along the way that are at least 50 years old, why weren't they blown away by the blast wave and burned down? It wouldn't have grown that much in 5 years.
The film could have been great if it hadn't made sense in almost every line of events, there's drama, and that's a plus, but a lot of minor inconsistencies spoil the impression.🥲

the impressions are as average as possible. Not to say that it's bad, but there's zero enthusiasm. The strangest feeling is that some kind of law of meanness is working: as long as the characters live without the main character, everything is more or less calm for them. As soon as GG appears, everything starts to crumble. And this happens more than once. At some point, you start to catch yourself thinking that the characters really could have survived more peacefully if they had stayed away from him. Such a scenario "pattern" is a bit alarming.
Overall, the film feels almost the same as the first part, only without the novelty effect. At least there was a freshness of the idea, a sense of impending disaster, and anxiety. All this is already familiar here, the formula is clear, the stakes seem to be lower, even if they try to show us the opposite. There is tension, but it is more artificial — it does not cling as it should.
The characters are normal, the actors are trying, but the drama is lame in places. Some decisions look far-fetched, and conflicts sometimes arise simply because "we need to move the plot." And this feeling that the script controls the characters, and not the other way around, prevents you from fully immersing yourself.
Visually, everything is neat, sometimes even spectacular. The disaster looks decent, but there aren't many wow moments. You look, you realize that everything is done normally, and that's it. It doesn't break through emotions.
As a result, "Greenland 2" is such a plus or minus replay of the first part, maybe even a little weaker. You can watch it, it doesn't get boring, but you probably won't want to review it either. A one—night stand movie-no revelations, no powerful scenes, just a sequel for the sake of a sequel.

Wasted time...... the creator of this masterpiece is a neural network????? It's just a horror, an illogical horror

A sample of the introduction of artificial intelligence in cinema

At first, the film said that they stayed for 9 months and got out, but they said that- well, fuck it, let's go back to the "house".
Then they say 5 years have passed, and at the table the child says that I have been here for 15 years.
What is 5 years old, what is 15 years old, where does the insulin come from? In the first movie, the nurse gave him a machine for a week and they had a month's supply. But 5 or 15 years after the apocalypse, in one shot, the mother says:  Nathan, take the insulin!
The emphasis was on this! What the hell?
It's better not to do anything than to do it haphazardly.
- we talked about water and food supplies in the boat, but we didn't think to check the gasoline reserves. And this is provided that no one was taken into the bunker.
The woman is running around with this son, every second - how are you, how are you, you're okay - they've been through so much, and she treats him like a 3-year-old.
What kind of substances was the screenwriter under that wrote this?
Why is it safe in the crater?! Why doesn't a meteorite fall there? Magic or the fuckedness of the scriptwriter?

I will not delay the review, but I will only say that the film is average. My rating of the film is three out of five. You can decide for yourself whether to watch this mess or not, but I'm sure that if you miss this game, you won't lose anything.

I was genuinely trying to finish watching. The first time I fell asleep, the second time I caught myself thinking that I was no longer following the plot, but sticking to my phone.
As boring as possible. The first part, although it raised questions, was at least exciting.

A hack!

Fabulous nonsense, I'll give you 2 for some kind message at the end about building a world without wars and blah blah blah, but everything else is just terrible.

such a good cast, and such a terrible movie came out
, there are zero questions for the actors. Butler, as always, is on top
But the movie...
Bunker for billionaires looked more logical.

Compared to the first part, everything has become more illogical here. Throughout the film, they forgot about diabetes in one of the main characters, the near-death state does not look like it, and the like. As in the first part, the emotional intensity plays a bigger role here. But the first part was still better than the second. I still recommend it as a complete story. I liked the ending, which is both good and not so good.

I liked the first part more than the second. There, the plot of the movie made you worry about the characters. And here the main character himself said - sooner or later I will die from a dose of radiation. When he went outside, he wore a super cool suit. As a result, it turns out that you can safely move around without it. In the second half of the film, they forgot about this radiation altogether. Everything was mixed up: radiation, meteorites, tsunamis, wars between people. In general, the actions of the heroes were very strange ... they are going towards France, a family friend warns - it's dangerous there. They drive slowly, as if on purpose. And how many such moments were there?… Well-armed bandits are being killed, and their weapons are not being taken away. In the end, they were looking for a reason to kill the main character, which they did because they didn't have guns.

A question for everyone who watched this movie. How did you even stand it in this pseudo-sound of the studio UltraDox?

It seemed to me that the atmosphere of the film is similar to the Walking about Daryl. But at least there are zombies walking around. But here it's just an empty movie with plot holes, zero logic, some incomprehensible actions and stupid dialogues.

Funny thing about the stairs, I still didn't understand why everyone was crawling in different directions.

Very boring. It's like a shooting game, go through all the levels and get to the crater...

The script has a lot of problems, but Gerard Butler is always a plus.

And I liked it. Besides, the dubbing came out)
It's quite as good as the first part, well, maybe a little.

Turned on the background. Honestly, I didn't expect anything good, based on my impressions of part 1. But, here everything is much worse with the logic and actions of the main characters. It's also a creepy, emotionless translation. In short, a tight three. It will work for 1 time, if you look at it briefly)

Well, shit, the first part wasn't bad, we should have stopped there, Gerard was very good, but Morena, how could she even agree to this mess 🤦♀️

— Help us
— No
— Well, please
— Well, okay


In short: it's illogical, implausible, and absolutely not catchy.

Is dubbing worth the wait?

Before watching this part, I enjoyed watching the first one again. Now I want to forget the same movie and never remember it...

It's very boring, predictable, and illogical. No empathy for the characters. Damn, I felt more empathy for Butler's character in Naked Truth than I do here. He goes and tells me that he is dying, he promised, and everyone is helping him. You bastard, you spent 5 years in a safe bunker when people on the surface were experiencing meteorite impacts, debris, radiation, storms, looters, etc.

Alas, they have forgotten how to make disaster films. Take for example the same "Armageddon". There's humor, and tears, and tension, and intrigue. Where did everything go?

I don't recommend it to anyone, don't waste your time!

What nonsense! You need to watch this movie with your brain completely turned off, since the plot and events are the stupidest, absolutely everything is implausible. They also introduced AI graphics.
And the most annoying thing is that the people around this family die in batches throughout the movie, but they don't have scratches. I don't feel sorry for my father, he was dying anyway. Yes, and the main characters laugh after 5 minutes, well, they died and died.

The actor who plays his son seems to have been taken from a school drama club somewhere, his antics are absolutely not in the subject.

It was a nightmare, at least the first part was watchable.