The Same Old Faces: How Everyone Got Tired of Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, and Jacob Elordi This Year

05 August 2026
Eristea
Eristea
MyShows Author | 405 articles
Why look for new talent when you can put together a “lineup” of proven stars who guarantee viewership and sold-out theaters? It seems like Hollywood is following this formula. Let’s figure out whether this approach is a winning one or a losing one after all.
The Same Old Faces: How Everyone Got Tired of Zendaya, Robert Pattinson, and Jacob Elordi This Year
A still from the movie *The Drama!*. Source: A24

If you watch any recent blockbuster, flip through a glossy magazine, or check social media, you get the impression that there are officially only about ten actors left in the film industry. Zendaya, Tom Holland, and Robert Pattinson are passing the torch to Timothée Chalamet, Sydney Sweeney, and Pedro Pascal, who, in turn, are making way for Florence Pugh and Jacob Elordi. Viewers are once again seeing the same faces—just in different settings and costumes.

Critics and journalists have been discussing this phenomenon more and more in recent years—it’s even been dubbed the “Pedro Pascal effect.” Following the success of the series *The Mandalorian* and *Some of Us*, the actor found himself in high demand for a wide variety of projects: from major franchises to arthouse films. In just a few years, Pascal has appeared in films such as*Gladiator 2*, *Fantastic Four: First Steps*, *Material Girl*, and other high-profile releases, and his face has been appearing in the news, memes, and advertising campaigns almost constantly.

The phenomenon lies not only in the actor’s own popularity but also in how the industry works with successful performers: once a name begins to attract the audience’s attention, studios try to capitalize on that resource as quickly as possible. As a result, a single actor can simultaneously represent several genres—superhero movies, drama, comedy, and science fiction—creating the impression that viewers are seeing the same faces over and over again.

Why does this happen?

One of the main reasons is the changing economics of the film industry. Producing big-budget films has become significantly more expensive: blockbuster budgets often exceed $200–300 million, so studios try to minimize risks. A familiar name in the lead role becomes part of the marketing strategy.

If an actor has already proven their popularity with audiences, it’s easier for studios to entrust them with a new project. This is how Hollywood’s “versatile stars” emerge: they can play a comic book hero, a sci-fi character, or a dramatic role—all while remaining in demand for advertising.

In 2026, it’s not even about individual actors, but about the same star pairings. Zendaya and Robert Pattinson appear together in two major projects—“What a Drama!” and “The Odyssey”. In *The Odyssey*, they’re joined by Tom Holland, who is also starring alongside Zendaya in the new *Spider-Man* film. As a result, the sense of repetition comes not only from the faces themselves, but also from the constantly recurring acting duos and ensembles.

Zendaya in 2026

“What a Drama!” is a romantic comedy with elements of satire directed by Kristoffer Borgli. Zendaya plays Emma—a young woman whose relationship with her fiancé is threatened on the eve of their wedding. Her co-star in the film is Robert Pattinson.

*The Odyssey* —an epic film based on Homer’s poem, directed by Christopher Nolan. Zendaya played the goddess Athena. The film also stars Matt Damon, Tom Holland, and Robert Pattinson.

*Spider-Man: A New Generation* is a Marvel film starring Tom Holland as Peter Parker. Zendaya reprised her role as MJ. The film continues the story following the events of *Spider-Man: No Way Home*.

“Dune: Part Three” is the highly anticipated sequel to Denis Villeneuve’s franchise. Zendaya will once again play Chani.

*Euphoria* —the third season of the popular HBO series. Zendaya returns as Rue Bennett, a high school student struggling with drug addiction and trying to find her place in life.

“Euphoria” has become a factory for new stars. Following the series’ success, Sydney Sweeney and Jacob Elordi found themselves in the spotlight—both have also begun landing roles in major Hollywood films. As a result, a single series has effectively shaped an entire generation of actors whom viewers now regularly see in the most high-profile releases.

The era of new stars is now being shaped on social media

Hollywood has always operated in cycles. In the 1990s, Tom Hanks, Julia Roberts, and Brad Pitt were everywhere; in the 2000s, it was Leonardo DiCaprio, Johnny Depp, and Angelina Jolie. The difference is that audiences used to see stars less frequently: a single movie could become the main event of the year, and actors didn’t appear simultaneously across all media channels. Today, the situation has changed: the same person can release a movie, appear in a TV series, become the face of an advertising campaign, feature in viral videos, and constantly pop up on social media—all within a few months.

As a result, not only has the frequency of celebrities’ appearances changed, but so has the very perception of celebrity. Whereas an actor’s image used to be shaped around a few major roles, audiences now receive a continuous stream of information about them. Stars no longer disappear between premieres—they remain in the public eye constantly. This is precisely why it feels as though Hollywood is using the same faces more often than ever: the problem may not lie in the number of actors, but in just how visible they’ve become in today’s media landscape.

Robert Pattinson in 2026

“What a drama!” —Robert Pattinson plays the fiancé of the main character, Emma, portrayed by Zendaya. On the eve of their wedding, their relationship is threatened.

“The Odyssey” —here, Pattinson played Antinous, one of Penelope’s most influential suitors.

“Dune: Part Three” —the actor joined the franchise as Skytale, one of the key characters in Frank Herbert’s book series.

“Prime Time” —a crime drama by Lance Oppenheim. Pattinson played journalist Chris Hansen, host of the show *To Catch a Predator*. The film is based on real events related to investigations of crimes against minors.

*The Flood Is Coming* is a crime thriller by Fernando Meirelles about an unusual heist. Denzel Washington and Daisy Edgar-Jones co-starred with Pattinson in the film.

Have real movie stars disappeared?

Film critics believe the problem isn’t just the frequency with which the same actors appear. The star system itself has changed. In the 1990s and early 2000s, an actor’s name was often the main reason to buy a ticket. Tom Cruise, Julia Roberts, Brad Pitt, and Leonardo DiCaprio were brands in their own right. Their involvement could draw an audience even to a film without a well-known franchise.

Today, audiences are more likely to choose a familiar universe—such as a Marvel movie, an adaptation of a popular book, a sequel to a successful series, or a project by a well-known director—rather than a specific actor. Even the most in-demand actors are increasingly becoming part of a major brand rather than its main driving force.

Why aren’t studios looking for new faces?

Another reason is the decline in the number of original projects. Following the rise of streaming services and changes in the film market, companies have become more cautious about films that don’t have a well-known title from the start.

Creating a new star is difficult and expensive: it takes years, several successful roles, and projects capable of attracting a mass audience. It’s much easier to cast an actor who’s already in the spotlight. This creates a vicious cycle: the more often studios cast the same actors, the more recognizable they become—and thus, the more profitable it seems to cast them again.

Jacob Elordi in 2026

*Wuthering Heights* is a film adaptation of Emily Brontë’s novel directed by Emerald Fennell. Jacob Elordi played Heathcliff, and Margot Robbie starred opposite him.

*The Dog Stars* is a post-apocalyptic sci-fi film by Ridley Scott, based on the novel by Peter Heller. Elordi played the lead role of pilot Higg, who tries to survive in a world after a deadly pandemic. He starred alongside Josh Brolin and Margaret Qualley.

*Euphoria* —Elordi once again played Nate Jacobs, one of the show’s most controversial characters.

Everything’s Blurred in Real Life and on Screen

The more often the same actor appears in major premieres, the harder it is for viewers to see him as a new character. Robert Pattinson is actively fighting this—to many, he remains the vampire Edward Cullen, even though he has already played numerous excellent supporting roles. Zendaya is criticized for her “broken teenager” persona, which “follows” her from role to role. And when watching *The Odyssey*, viewers are outraged that Spider-Man doesn’t intervene in the film’s final battle.

Critics are increasingly talking about “star fatigue.” It’s not that the actors have started acting worse, but that their public image is beginning to overshadow any character they play. Every new movie is inevitably compared to the previous one, and the discussion quickly shifts from the plot to the actor himself: “him again,” “that same look again,” “yet another similar role.” As a result, even successful projects risk being perceived as a continuation of a single, overarching on-screen persona.

Anne Hathaway in 2026

“The Devil Wears Prada 2” is the sequel to the 2006 cult comedy. Anne Hathaway reprises her role as Andy Sachs, who returns to the world of fashion journalism years later. Her co-stars in the film are once again Meryl Streep, Emily Blunt, and Stanley Tucci.

"The Odyssey" — Hathaway played Penelope, Odysseus’s wife, who waits many years for her husband’s return.

“Mother Mary” —a musical drama by David Lowery. Anne Hathaway played a world-famous pop star who is preparing for a new tour and reuniting with her former designer.

*At the End of Oak Street* — a story about a mysterious street that is transported to a new place filled with wonders. Hathaway played the mother of the family.

"The Secret Diary of Verity" is a film adaptation of the novel of the same name by Colleen Hoover. Anne Hathaway plays the writer Verity Crawford, whose manuscripts reveal her family’s dark secrets. The actress stars alongside Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett.

 

For the actors themselves, this situation isn’t always beneficial either. Popularity brings more offers and higher fees, but at the same time it can become a trap: the more often viewers see an actor in major projects, the harder it is for them to perceive that person separately from the image they’re already familiar with. For example, after the “Harry Potter” series ended, Daniel Radcliffe deliberately sought out unconventional films and experimental productions to prove that he was capable of playing more than just one type of character.

In a few years, other names will take the place of today’s favorites. But for now, as Hollywood continues to rely on familiar faces, audiences can only guess who will be next on the list of actors invited to star in literally all the most anticipated projects.

What do you think of this acting season? Aren’t you tired of seeing the same faces over and over again?

Join the Discussion

103
It's just that someone is too lazy to work. The only thing that everyone wants now (not just the filmmakers) is to make as much money as possible, while spending as little of their personal resources as possible. This principle will work for another couple of years, until all the "top" actors are tortured to the point of impossibility, and then you still have to turn on and look for new faces.

The audience is not stupid either, it seems to me that now there is no such madness with a fixation on one particular actor, as in our youth, for example, today's youth is focused on a greater coverage of "what / who is interesting to me"
Dori_Grey
Dori_Grey
PRO
05 Aug 13:38 #
@Liyuuuuunder:
As for my younger sister, nothing has changed: she has her idols on the wall just like me... It was even more amazing for me, but she had the same curly hair. So the fixation on identical faces, at least among young people, works.
@Dori_Grey: of course, I could be wrong, I don't have many friends in the younger age group, but even on social media.networks and recommendations in them, young bloggers (I'm not talking about some super famous ones right now, but more about local guys) You look at them, they're doing one thing today, another tomorrow, and you get the impression that they're interested in a lot of things. It's like they're "music lovers of life." And of course everyone has favorites😅
Dori_Grey
Dori_Grey
PRO
05 Aug 13:58 #
@Liyuuuuunder: Well, I'm not saying that either, I'm just making up my mind about my sister and her friends... And that curly hair has been hanging for the second year.🤣
They just go through all the stages of maturation earlier. My transition age was around 15, my sister is now 12 and she is already going through the same period...
id266661899
id266661899
05 Aug 11:22 #
Personally, I'm tired of the same faces))) It's becoming similar to our Russian cinema that no movie or TV series is also the same person... That's
why when I choose a movie, I try not to focus on the actors at all, because his participation is no longer the key to a good movie, as before ...
P.S. for example, I don't watch films with Anya Taylor, I have no complaints about the actress, but she is being pushed everywhere, and the role becomes so much the same, that the film seems secondary in advance
@id266661899: with Anya Taylor_Joy just hasn't had much lately (I don't count Mario's voice acting). Furios' last major project was in 2024, at the same time the Gorge. Lucky's upcoming TV series has been released and will appear in Dune at the end of the year, while the Lord of the Rings will not be released for a while. It's very modest, and in general, she doesn't have a lot of superhypic jobs in her career, maybe even one hand can be counted on the fingers.
id266661899
id266661899
05 Aug 11:58 #
@alexeyfalko: Well, maybe... It's just that there was a period when I watched a movie with her, and then there were commercials and trailers everywhere with her, too, maybe that's why I got the impression... Well , I just took her for example ... it is more appropriate as an example of Pascal, as in the article - that's really everywhere you can find it)))
@id266661899: But Pascal is a sweet bun.🥹🫶🏼
id266661899
id266661899
05 Aug 12:13 #
@Liyuuuuunder: 😂
I like him too, but not to the point of overdose)))
Cheryl
Cheryl
05 Aug 17:58 #
@alexeyfalko:
She's generally kind of media-oriented, even if there aren't many projects with her, I usually come across some kind of exits/photo shoots every couple of days. It's the same with Sydney Sweeney, who has no films this year except Euphoria, but her "promo" with Scooter Braun has already filled her teeth.
@Cheryl: Anya Taylor-Joy and Sidney Sweeney are deservedly media, but not over-hyped. Anya has only 12 million followers on the social network, Sydney has 26 million. That's still pretty small, considering they're really cool. But Zendaya has 177 million, I don't understand how at all, that is, the following audience is 15 times more than Taylor-Joy and 7 times more than Sweeney.

I won't call Zendaya a completely incompetent actress, she has some level to be more or less confident in the frame and not cause a facepalm, but so far I haven't seen a single role where she would show something special. And it's certainly not normal that she was pushed into almost all the most popular films of the year, except the Avengers.: Judgment Day, and you could have taken Holland there if you wanted.
Алексей26
Алексей26
Yesterday, 09:43 #
@alexeyfalko: Holland doesn't seem to be in this movie)
Farma313
Farma313
Yesterday, 14:42 #
@Алексей26: where will they put him, a hundred pounds with one of the other spiders will appear at the end of the film
It looks like in a couple of years we'll be saying the same thing, only about other stars. Hollywood has always worked in cycles, it's just that they're changing faster now.
@Serialkiller_402: we are still sick of the endless Petrov, Bortich, Kozlovsky, Priluchny and others like them))
FrozenRose
FrozenRose
05 Aug 11:26 #
After being saturated with Pascal, I'm glad to see Pattinson at least for now.
@FrozenRose: by the way, out of the whole list of the same ones, Pattinson raises the least questions, he still turns out to be somehow different. And this year it was nice to look at him in the promo companies, he opened up or blossomed. I've changed my mind about him a lot.
_Chipmunk
_Chipmunk
05 Aug 11:27 #
To be honest, I don't even really want to watch with the same actors, so a lot of new products are skipped, well, in 5 years you can watch them, remembering, but there was a time that Zendaya and Elordi were shown from each iron)

There is a feeling that this HYPE is for 3-5 years, during which time new ones will catch up and so on in a circle.
Even after mentioning the Hollywood ones: Banderas, Aniston, Roberts, then they go down anyway, (they cost more) and appear once or twice a year and don't come back like that anymore)

My imho. But at the moment of reel, it's hard to watch different scenarios and sets with the same ones, I always need different faces, so I don't watch :(
I agree that there is an overkill with the invitation to the HYPE projects of Zendaya and Robert Pattinson, you can do it a little less actively. But for the rest, everything is pretty normal.

Jacob Elordi has finished work on Euphoria, plus two films. Moreover, the creation of the dog is unlikely to garner any kind of powerful cash register and will be actively discussed, rather another pass from Ridley Scott is planned. I would say that Elordi is still quite a bit on the screens.

Anne Hathaway was actively filming before she went on maternity leave, so she had a lot of projects. Of these, only Odyssey and the Devil wears Prada 2 are the biggest hype. This is normal for an actress who, for me personally, is in the top 5 or even the top 3 of the best of our time.
_Chipmunk
_Chipmunk
05 Aug 11:34 #
@alexeyfalko: it seems to me that Ann often does this, 3-4 projects at once, then you can't see or hear) I'm ready to watch everything with her, but it's still hard for young actors
Roman1ch
Roman1ch
05 Aug 11:35 #
You can congratulate Zendaya at all. Not only have two films with her participation now grossed 2 billion, but Dune 3 has not been released. And this drama has collected 140 million with a modest budget. How can you not chatter on her name + she chooses her outfits well and behaves precisely with paparazzi and photoshoots.

Pattinson also successfully moved from project to project with her.

And Hathaway has done a lot of acting in the past years, so films with her participation are now coming out one by one.
br1ella
br1ella
05 Aug 11:41 #
To a certain extent, a lot depends on how good these people are at acting, but of course sooner or later everyone will come across.
In the case of Zendaya, with her one facial expression for all occasions, this phenomenon is completely incomprehensible to me.😂
@br1ella: It worked for Kristin Stewart)) Why not?)
@br1ella: I came across a thematic picture today
Do new good actors have any chance of making it into a big movie? 😔
Farma313
Farma313
06 Aug 10:44 #
@lantan_kois: Nah, either zayuzannye faces, or nedetki, now you're going to break through, what's in the movies, what's in modeling
taras_sidyi
taras_sidyi
05 Aug 11:55 #
To be honest, yes. They got fucked up by the same faces
lady_kana
lady_kana
05 Aug 12:19 #
The main thing is that the roles should be diverse !

On the one hand, it's good when you know what an actor is capable of and go to watch a movie for him, but on the other hand, you want more new faces)

P/S : I demand more Gyllenhaal
Okay, they're always on the radar, the social media feed.The social media is filled with the same content with their faces, so I go to the VK feed to watch the first 5-10 news, then update and if there is nothing interesting, I leave the page (it takes about 3-5 minutes). I don't watch movies very often, so I'm not too tired of the recurring actors in every project. Quit movies and switch to TV series.
zyyfff
zyyfff
PRO
07 Aug 06:35 #
@marlenad_13: Wow, how gray and plain you've become 🤭

Now it's hard to pick you out in the comments, you merge with the text.
@zyyfff: Ahahah, I'm training the eyes of readers 😂
zyyfff
zyyfff
PRO
07 Aug 06:51 #
@marlenad_13: That's a great idea, of course, I'll train.
Hidji
Hidji
07 Aug 06:59 #
@marlenad_13: you're doing the same thing here, get the fuck out of the movie slogans). So down!🙀
@Hidji: No no no, this is not a call, this is a suggestion 😂
Hidji
Hidji
07 Aug 07:07 #
@marlenad_13: no, this is a cunning provocation).
@Hidji: I'm sad that you have this opinion, but still, I insist that this is a SUGGESTION, not a call to action. It's just that you watch at least one movie a day and you find it provocative. 🤷♂️😂
Hidji
Hidji
07 Aug 07:27 #
@marlenad_13: Take it higher, two at a time. One is when the series is caught, you just can't come off at all and you don't have the strength to wait until tomorrow). But maybe it really should be reduced to one, anyway, most of them are below 5/10. Only there is no reliable filter. Sometimes it's like the same 5 on aggregators and it's interesting, and sometimes 7+/10 bullshit.
driveshaft
driveshaft
05 Aug 12:37 #
So, where is the article about the dominance of Kologrivy?
SvD-Serg
SvD-Serg
06 Aug 15:44 #
@driveshaft: and Priluchny
karaspunk
karaspunk
PRO
06 Aug 19:21 #
@SvD-Serg: That's right, absolutely a bastard actor.
GoroheS
GoroheS
Yesterday, 01:19 #
@karaspunk: Yes, yes, not like the hostesses zundeya and Hohland, the geniuses of acting, yes karapuzik 🤣
karaspunk
karaspunk
PRO
Yesterday, 07:02 #
@GoroheS: Yes, these two are clearly more pleasant to look at.
wsmiller26
wsmiller26
05 Aug 12:38 #
Damn, I really like this constant selection of actors at the moment, all my favorites are here, except for Elordi, he was enough for me in euphoria. But I myself am not the kindest person in the world, so I also have a bad attitude towards actors who suddenly fly into a big movie. I like to see people who play well and whom I have known for a long time.
ettinger_24
ettinger_24
05 Aug 12:57 #
Due to information bubbles, film studios are spinning as fast as they can, and the chance that their excerpt of the film will get into Tiktok and go viral works like a lottery. But these chances increase if there are actors who are well-known.

On the one hand, this is a sad trend, on the other hand, it has always been like this, just at different times, they tried to promote their films in different ways.

After reading this post, the first thing I thought about was Andreasyan, and his love of shoving Lisa the Sailor into all the movies. I hope Hollywood doesn't have its own Lisa the Sailor after all.
Andrea_zuz
Andrea_zuz
PRO
05 Aug 13:06 #
@ettinger_24: if Hollywood doesn't have its own Andreasyan, then its own Lisa Seaman won't appear either. Although, "nepotism" exists there too.
mrbradshaw
mrbradshaw
PRO
05 Aug 13:25 #
If anything, of all the listed ones, I got tired of Elordi, and after "Frankenstein" I still looked at him differently, but still all this teenage hype around spoils the impression. In the last season of Euphoria, his potential was drained. But the same Zendaya dragged the series again along with Sydney and Alexa.

But I'm ready to look at the same Hathaway in any project. And she'll be on maternity leave soon, that's all.

As they say, let's remember how in previous years I got a Pascal, and I also started talking nonsense.
ghettoboy
ghettoboy
PRO
05 Aug 14:12 #
In "Mickey 17", "Die my Love" and "What a drama!" (the last films that came to mind) Pattinson is completely different, so I'm not tired of him, let him keep shooting)

I'm ready to look at Ann forever, just because it's Ann.

Actually, it will take a couple of years, and someone new will take the place of these actors. A few years ago, Vikander, Lawrence and Margot Robbie had movie after movie coming out, but now they have almost disappeared from the screens. Chalamet is also smaller than a couple of years ago.
Eduarty
Eduarty
05 Aug 14:20 #
A wonderful article, gives you the opportunity to reflect)

Thanks to streaming and TV series, new actors and future stars still appear) Sandy Sink, Margaret Quali, Emilia Clarke and many others.

Alas, the age of artists is too short, so the motives of the actors mentioned in the article are clear to get everything, everywhere and at once) Well, it's a great opportunity to see the full range of actors playing)
ebanygeek
ebanygeek
05 Aug 14:58 #
Speak for yourself
Pattinson has been brilliant this year.✨
ebanygeek
ebanygeek
05 Aug 14:58 #
@ebanygeek: I also never understood the indignation at Elordi, when else do I have to start working hard, if not at the beginning of my career?
Cool article🫶🏼

But by the way, I don't feel tired of the same faces yet.
And Zendaya and Ann X are very much loved by me, I'm ready to watch everything.

But I remember how tired we were of Sasha Petrov and Pavlik Priluchny, I'm not really into domestic projects, but it's all about combo movies, TV series, commercials, and voila - there was an oversaturation.
Hamali666
Hamali666
05 Aug 15:36 #
I'm ready to look at Ann endlessly, but I somehow don't care about the rest, although Pattinson is not bad in Batman, of course not Bale, but still.

Where's Sydney Sweeney by the way, why isn't she in this news?
exSqq
exSqq
PRO
05 Aug 16:00 #

@Hamali666:

Where's Sydney sweeney by the way, why isn't she in this news?

Forgot to specify it in the promt))

sh_zefirki
sh_zefirki
05 Aug 15:59 #
It's always more interesting to look at new faces, and the phenomenon of Zendaya is completely incomprehensible to me.
llllllllllex
llllllllllex
05 Aug 17:03 #
Juicy, young and talented - when should they shoot, if not now, especially if the offers are A-level
Cheryl
Cheryl
05 Aug 17:49 #
We'll have to wait half a year and we won't see Zendaya for a long time.
kronenberg
kronenberg
05 Aug 18:02 #
@Cheryl: залетела?
Cheryl
Cheryl
05 Aug 18:09 #
@kronenberg:
No, the films for rent will come to an end, new ones will disappear in order to infuriate us all with renewed vigor in 28-29.
eternity888
eternity888
05 Aug 17:53 #
nothing new. It's all happened before. There used to be Burton and Taylor, or Pitt and Jolie. and these will be moved. imho there were no stars like Zendaya before.
Cheryl
Cheryl
05 Aug 18:07 #
@eternity888:
By the way, yes, I remember Jen Lawrence hesitated at the time :)
spokyloky
spokyloky
05 Aug 18:48 #
Maybe it wouldn't be a problem if the actor was multifaceted. Zendaya is just Zendaya in every movie, only her name and outfit change.
elena_pandora
elena_pandora
06 Aug 13:45 #
@spokyloky: 1,000,000%, I basically don't watch movies with her. Holland is normal, it's a pity that he got stuck in one role, he could have become something more. I started watching old movies with normal actors, not with this bunch of people.
A person's emotions are the competence of the person himself. So all the questions about the reasons for dissatisfaction with the assortment of stars are just for yourself.
Odysseyus
Odysseyus
PRO
05 Aug 21:24 #
I think it's not about the number, but about the quality of the projects with their participation. In my opinion, all the projects mentioned in the article deserve attention. When quantity begins to prevail over quality, we can talk about fatigue.

In fact, it's not so important who plays the role, the main thing is that the actor does his job well. For example, if Pattinson has proved that he has grown out of the role of Edward the vampire, and proves it more and more with each new role, I will gladly continue to watch films with his participation.

If the project is interesting, the actors play well and maintain a high level of quality, then it doesn't matter who exactly appears in the frame.

As a viewer, it will be useful for us to learn how to see an actor not just as a performer of a role, but as a living character. Especially if the actor does not repeat the same images from film to film, as "some" of our stars do.
North_Art
North_Art
05 Aug 21:46 #
It seems to me that Anne Hathaway and Samara Weaving took on so many projects at once because they were preparing for maternity leave.
Meowser
Meowser
05 Aug 23:40 #
So many good things have been shot over the past hundred years that you can only get tired of some faces if you don't look up from new releases, ignoring what was previously released.
Dori_Grey
Dori_Grey
PRO
06 Aug 00:03 #
@Meowser: By the way, yes. I can watch something recently released today, and tomorrow, for example, a movie from the 60s. I choose a year like wine according to my mood. Therefore, in general, I can only notice the hackneyed nature in the news feeds. 🤣
natalieatem
natalieatem
06 Aug 00:35 #
It's always been like this, there were some actors who were in a bunch of movies at the height of their fame. They were also constantly shown on TV, in magazines/newspapers, tabloids. It's just that the era of information was a bit different. There was a lot of that back then, too, given that the average person didn't have social media and so much content. But now there is a choice, and there are many actors, there are fandoms, there is a large Asian stratum, Turkish. And before all this, in general, the media dictated who you would watch and who you would follow.
Examples of Patison-Twilight and Redcliffe-GP from the time when social networks were not so developed, but for some reason the effect of "one role" turned out. Although, again, it was always the case if someone played an iconic role, for example, Christopher Lee.
EverSunday
EverSunday
06 Aug 00:55 #
"Sho? Again?". That's why I don't want to watch these movies at all. You can add more Volumes here. On the one hand, there aren't many movies, but there's news about his girlfriend Z. And their endless trips back and forth, that's enough. Thanks for just switching over. Tired, very tired.
WildWildWest
WildWildWest
06 Aug 01:39 #
Zendaya, to put it mildly, is an actress of the same role (like Bortic). And it would be nice to have some kind of direct charm, and you can forgive a few films a year with such an actor/actress, but she doesn't have it. She's "coming too fast."
Elves
Elves
06 Aug 02:04 #
Who's to blame for people rushing to names?
Hidji
Hidji
06 Aug 07:02 #
I see that I'm not the only one who is annoyed by Zendaya on this list. It is precisely by its colossal overestimation. Well, this is not the kind of actress to have so much hype. That's real, if you remember the past "queens of the screen", who were talked about for several years from every iron, and the crowds broke into films with them, and compare. Scarlett Johansson was quite deservedly an actress, whose films brought maximum profit. Or the actress who earned the most. Zendaya is not that level. She's average. I even have fewer questions about Sidney Sweeney, who is missing from the list, and there are at least two reasons.

And Patissonich, by the way, has never annoyed me in recent years and, rather, on the contrary, pleasantly surprised me. That's really how he managed to get rid of the image of an actor in one role after Twilight.
Art_station
Art_station
06 Aug 07:31 #
It has always been so. There are many great movies, and not only blockbusters and American novelties. Most viewers miss a lot just because of the lack of familiar faces, and then complain that there are too many of them.
karaspunk
karaspunk
PRO
06 Aug 08:59 #
Well, the list doesn't fall into my circle of interests here.
Patinson was appreciated in Batman and drama. That's where I saw Zendaya for the first time, she's quite a nice girl, she seems to be playing well. I saw Pascal in the movies with Cage and, of course, some of us.
PianoOnTheLake
PianoOnTheLake
06 Aug 12:57 #
I have a feeling that it was always the same faces in the old movies (for example, the ubiquitous Jean Marais in the 1950s and 1960s), but now the variety is just much greater. Maybe I'm watching the wrong movie. ))
mari_freeme
mari_freeme
06 Aug 14:23 #
In my opinion, it's not difficult to find new faces, which is worth the girl from the movie "Marty the Magnificent". She is very charismatic and beautiful, plays well, has a special charm, almost like Margaret Collie. I would be thrilled to see her in new projects! Sorry, I don't remember the name of the actress.
natalieatem
natalieatem
06 Aug 16:46 #
In general, it's funny to watch how every decade people "choose" an actress who will be called overrated and that she is just "shoved" everywhere, nothing changes.
natalieatem
natalieatem
06 Aug 16:49 #
For example, Kristen Stewart, she was fucked by people who saw 2 movies with her and both of them Twilight.
There are a lot of films coming out with different actors, but people themselves only watch what's inside the trends, and then complain that it's the same thing.
Hidji
Hidji
06 Aug 18:00 #
@natalieatem: Kristen is not at that level. Take it higher). Megan Fox. A very mediocre actress who suddenly became a top actress after Transformers. But at least she's a great model at the same time, you can't argue with that.
karaspunk
karaspunk
PRO
06 Aug 19:21 #
@Hidji: It's as scary as an atomic war.
Dori_Grey
Dori_Grey
PRO
06 Aug 19:37 #
@natalieatem: Listen, I agree with your first statement... But as for Stewart, her acting skills haven't really improved over the years. If Pattinson has been working on himself and has really grown a lot, then she has remained the Bella from Twilight. And yes, I've watched other movies with her. In general, I think the best examples of an actor exiting a single role are Pattinson and Radcliffe. They literally gnawed themselves out of the roles of "the boy who survived" and "the shining vampire."
Hidji
Hidji
06 Aug 19:43 #
@karaspunk: beauty is subjective. They're always writing about Anya Taylor-Joy, too, that she's scary. But I like it). You can't please everyone. You don't like it, but most people have a different opinion)))
Art_station
Art_station
06 Aug 21:51 #
@Hidji: how did she become a top model? Since then, she hasn't done anything on the level of Transformers, and she hasn't starred with interesting directors.
karaspunk
karaspunk
PRO
06 Aug 21:59 #
@Hidji: I like Anka too.
It's just that Fox was normal before plastic surgery, and now it's a silicone thing that's been redone.
AweSerg
AweSerg
PRO
06 Aug 18:41 #
And which is better, to be an actor of the same role or a familiar one? I don't usually choose films based on the actors, I only get to know someone in the process.
And I'm not tired of my favorite actors at all. It's always nice to see those you've known well since childhood.
PianoOnTheLake
PianoOnTheLake
09 Aug 14:33 #
@Ruslan_Sekaev: The key word is "beloved".
Evittta
Evittta
06 Aug 20:01 #
Hmm, so it's the same with actors as with movies, and ideas in general. Everything new that could potentially fail the fees and the cashier is blocked on the way. No one wants to invest money in risky, albeit promising projects. Why? Because movie makers have long understood what people need to cut down the box office, and it's easier to create a product with deliberately minimized risks. It's the same with the faces: new faces are risks, and the old ones who collect the cash register are no guarantee to leave at least on the fan base if the product turns out to be shoddy.
In general, the prime of the same faces is not durable, but the approach is for centuries, new faces will take the place of the old ones. God forbid, interesting and talented people will pop up from time to time.
Impending_Sky
Impending_Sky
06 Aug 22:37 #
It is for this reason that I did not even have the desire to watch the Odyssey - all the same tired faces that, with all their desire, Homer's heroes can no longer be perceived, especially when they are stuffed with such cabbage)
Doctor_13
Doctor_13
06 Aug 23:34 #
Sydney and Pedro are stupidly cool, beautiful, charismatic, and very much like actors. And Zendaya, well, neither fish nor meat, good acting was really in the Drama, she doesn't infuriate there, and this is already an achievement. Hollywood casting directors have forgotten what the type of actor / actress is, and somewhere their face is appropriate, and somewhere not so much. There are zero complaints about Ann, she has long been established as an actress, she can afford to play in high-profile films, provocative ones, sequels, and something low-budget like Eileen.
DmitriyPetrov
DmitriyPetrov
07 Aug 01:27 #
We have our own incompetents, such as Kalogrivy, Kurtsyn, Petrov and a million of them.
zyyfff
zyyfff
PRO
07 Aug 06:34 #
I don't get tired of the same actors in films, I watch projects from different years, not just the acclaimed recent ones.

But I'm really tired of the same names in the news! And this is despite the fact that I read the news only and exclusively on MyShows.
SaburovaG
SaburovaG
07 Aug 15:47 #
Dadada, aren't you tired of Gosling in every third movie?)
Hidji
Hidji
08 Aug 01:01 #
@SaburovaG: Gosling makes 2-3 films a year.
albulka_
albulka_
07 Aug 19:11 #
Judging by the numbers, it looks like all the "hype" starred in the Odyssey :D
Nolan that's how the "master" could try to find some interesting new actors, because in this case, people go to the director's name even more than to the actors)
webchillout
webchillout
08 Aug 09:00 #
It's a good thing I didn't watch it and they didn't bother me at all.
1234lolo
1234lolo
08 Aug 11:39 #
Daniel Radcliffe is a legend and so are his roles💪
E770
E770
08 Aug 23:46 #
I don't understand why everyone is so outraged...
Hollywood has been working like this for a hundred years, as if only now everyone has noticed it...
free_Elfo
free_Elfo
09 Aug 16:22 #
The value of a movie and a character is lost when the same person is constantly present, as for me. L.D. is an exception, and he didn't flash around that often, 90% of his projects are top.
uaSolare
uaSolare
09 Aug 18:32 #
It's always been that way. If you look at any ten-year-old, he has his own list of the highest-grossing actors and it works for some 6-7 years, then the popularity subsides or the actors get tired and take a break themselves. And many of them say that filming is not the most difficult thing for them in their profession, rather the opposite, because that's why they chose this profession, but press tours...they are exhausting because you have to travel endlessly around the world and be at premieres, create a sense of joy, even if you feel tired, and so on. Then there will definitely be a bunch more interviews or Q&A press rolls with journalists. They get tired of this much more than they do from filming the movie itself.
And in the case of Zendaya, Anne Hathaway, and Robert Patissonov this year, they'll need that extra vacation after this year. Maybe Rob will be here next year, but Zee and Ann will definitely go on hiatus, Ann already has a baby on the way. Well, I wish Z and Tom that too, they are a wonderful couple. Although we, the public, see what they show us and what we ourselves want to see and imagine about them.
Afrobatuco
Afrobatuco
09 Aug 19:33 #
Pattinson is generally a handsome man, after twilight, he went to an author's cinema, where, obviously, they didn't pay much, and there were fewer hypes, I'm sure he had more options to act in some similar projects, but no, the handsome man worked like crazy, he fully deserved it.
GoroheS
GoroheS
09 Aug 21:36 #
Zundeya and Hohland are rare, absolutely untalented actors💯
Sukub21
Sukub21
Yesterday, 07:22 #
Just like we used to get tired of Petrov, and now we're tired of Kologrivy.
Leave a Comment: