| Original Air Dates: | — |
|---|---|
| Country: | Japan |
| Genre: | Drama, Romance/Dating |
| Network: | MBS |
| Watched by: | 2 196 997 495 |
| Total running time: | 5 hours 23 minutes |
| Episode duration: | |
| Episodes: | 10 |
Found incorrect info?

| Original Air Dates: | — |
|---|---|
| Country: | Japan |
| Genre: | Drama, Romance/Dating |
| Network: | MBS |
| Watched by: | 2 196 997 495 |
| Total running time: | 5 hours 23 minutes |
| Episode duration: | |
| Episodes: | 10 |
What is tiring is the inadequate heteronormativity of the viewers. Instead of assessing the psychology of the situation, for some reason people are still most concerned about who is a "liability" and who is an "asset". Moreover, conclusions about the roles are made on the basis of a ragged scene between two fully clothed people who have never had sex before, lying on a desk at school. And the default asset, of course, should be the one who shows more initiative and/or lies on top.
For those who received sexual education on lacorns instead of normal training materials, research or real life, here is useful information:
- a relationship between two men is not a copy of a relationship between a woman and a man. If a man does not plan to make a transition, he will not behave like a woman either in life or in a relationship. Therefore, it's time to stop designating one of the partners as a "girl";
- activity in life in different situations and initiative in bed are not the same thing;
- some gay couples never have penetration sex, or do it rarely;
- some gay couples switch roles in bed;
- teenagers who have just started dating are 99% likely to lie dressed on a desk and just kiss for an hour, or jerk off to each other at most. Penetration sex in such conditions and with such a level of training would be super traumatic for both, and it is very doubtful that they took everything they needed with them.