In the last episode, the cat was saved, in this one - the legs! Apparently, the next one is already Khan, it is very strongly hinted that the stepfather is still guilty.
The lawyer girl is just a paw. Especially when she was drinking.
@Nikquest: Apart from the elongated faces of dudes with eczema, the thumping Chandra is the best thing in the series :) Well, another one, which (it seems?) during the night call, he almost blurted out to his lawyer that he liked her.
Of course, the fact of finding a suspect with a rich past and a clear pragmatic motive cannot but please, as, by the way, the misunderstandings with that creepy guy who works in a funeral home, but someone will explain to me what's wrong with Naze? After the last episode, I justified him myself to some extent, saying that he adapts to an aggressive environment and all that, but now his "self-awareness" is becoming more and more expressive. It seems that the guy has found a great place for himself. Beating of a prisoner who ended up in intensive care, drug smuggling, telephone "business"... Yes, he got three (!) tattoos in one episode! Two of them on the first phalanges of the fingers - so that everyone can see? And he didn't choose any "piece" or "love", no, give him "bad" and "sin". In general, even if a miracle happens and the case is returned to the police, because new evidence / suspects will appear, or he will even be acquitted, I think that the experience of being in prison will still have a noticeable effect on the character of our big-eyed GG.
p.s. the topic of advertising Chinese medicine has been revealed! Turturro was finally able to put on his shoes! :)
@Kseniia_xx: Yes, Naz is already so deeply involved that even if he is acquitted, apologized and released, it is unlikely that Freddy will leave him alone at large. Besides, all of a sudden, maybe as a result it turns out that Naz is just the killer. On the other hand, the series has already given us a happy ending for the cat and the lawyer's legs. You can't ask for more :)
@Phalaenopsis: "Freddie is unlikely to leave him alone at large"
Oh yes, long-term planning is always more difficult for us than short-term benefits
I would like to see the end of the season exactly like this: "big-eyed SinBad" returns home to his family, hugs, smile, happiness, a breath of fresh air, melodramatic music and then the bell rings, Naz steps aside, picks up the phone
NAZ: Yes, I'm listening, who is this? Freddy: Naz, buddy, have you forgotten me?
I don't understand how much time has passed since Naz has been in prison, because he is plunging too deeply and rapidly into this whole prison life. A tattoo on his fingers is a tin, he would also make a bloody tear. Well, I started using drugs for some reason. In general, I'm sad for him. It would be fun if they let him out, but it turns out that he killed her, or that he was pretending to be some kind of sociopath or even a serial killer, or he has some kind of split personality. Or on the contrary, it will be clear to everyone that, for example, his stepfather killed, and Nazir will be sitting and everyone will watch him fall into the abyss.
@Vilgelmster: In general, yes, but the creators said in an interview that they do not rule out a sequel. But whether a possible sequel will be direct or whether it will be an anthology in the spirit of "True Detective" has not been decided, it seems.
I have the impression that I missed a piece of the series. What happened to the guy the lawyer was chasing at the end of the last episode? It's like he's been forgotten in this one. And why didn't you mention the 4th bag of drugs? If it wasn't important, then why mention it at all?
I think that in the end gg will be killed in prison and after that he will be acquitted. According to the general atmosphere, such an end would fit in best
How they skillfully select the sound for the end credits :) the series pleases with each new episode. But I hope, nevertheless, to see the end of this story this season.
the work of the investigation on the part of the prosecution is somehow clumsily shown, there is no sensible search for witnesses, no different versions, but the detective was announced as a pro.
@dikobraz: and they showed us that even the "pros" go the easiest way and do not try to find the killer, but take the one who is most suitable for this job, like any other, gets bored and people start to hack and work with their sleeves down to please their superiors or colleagues . It's wild for us, ordinary people, to hear about the mistakes of doctors and security forces And they can also get tired, stupid, and be incompetent, even if literally other people's lives depend on them
@Alina2007: Yes, the problem here is not so much in indifference, as in the fact that the system itself is built in such a way that closure of the case is encouraged at any cost. It doesn't matter if the suspect is really to blame. If there is normal evidence, we plant it. The prosecutor's office and investigators receive a "+" to the statistics. If the family of the accused had money, then the defense side would have been motivated - the opportunity to earn.
It seems to me that this is because the prosecution has ironclad arguments. There is already too much evidence against Nasa. So no one is really worried. After all, they don't even have the thought to assume that it's someone else.
That's what they said, that the series is basically about American justice. While they were figuring out whether the guy was guilty or not, he became the very criminal they wanted to see in him so much. A very cool criticism of the system - nothing is directly commented on, the authors simply show all the shortcomings of judicial red tape, during which suspects are forced to sit in prison with criminals and, for the sake of survival, go to real crimes. The justice system turned a law-abiding citizen into a gang member - such a bitter irony.
@CaprichoMonstro: You would be a lousy parent if you "hammered the bolt" on a child because he sometimes takes drugs and has sex. That's the mother's biggest disappointment.
@empsokol: If a child has grown up having sex and smoking weed, then he can take care of himself. And even more so, he must be responsible for his own actions. Even more, I will say that I am such a lousy parent that I will make my kid wash his trousers and socks by hand, wash the dishes and scrub the floors as soon as he takes his first confident steps. Parents should teach their children to work and responsibility. A child should understand the value of things and actions. But I don't impose my parenting model on anyone. Especially for modern mothers, who have a wedding on credit, an iPhone on credit, but did not have enough for rubber. :) Minus on health.
@CaprichoMonstro: I didn't say he shouldn't take care of himself. Yes, he should be responsible for his actions. All this is true, I agree with all this. But a parent should also not abandon a child in a difficult situation. Why would they get involved and "pay a lot of money for a lawyer, since my son went out"? Because they are his parents, they love him and will not leave him in a difficult situation. And to say "oh, no, you messed up something there, I don't know what and how, get out on your own" can only be a lousy parent.
@empsokol: I repeat, I don't mind being a lousy parent in anyone's opinion. My opinion is this: The task of parents is to prepare a child for independent life, surrounding him with care, attention; giving the necessary education, providing the necessary material benefits. What do they need it for, besides the breeding instinct? - In order to count on the help, care, and support of your beloved child in the future. If a child grows up to be a person who believes that only he is owed by default, and he will live for himself, then for such there is the concept of a "cut slice". As for Nazir, it is made clear to us that we will not see Bambi again, no matter how many chances, love and support we give him. And my line is based on WHAT I know as a spectator. The parents don't know what's going on with their boy in prison. But when they visited him, didn't they realize that there was another person in front of them? That it is necessary not to leave the younger one in a difficult situation? Especially since both of them have doubts about his innocence.
@CaprichoMonstro: And who said that they abandoned the youngest? We are not shown much of their life outside of contact with Us, it is so difficult to judge this. And it's not surprising that he's changed, he's kind of in prison, it's hard to stay the same there. But this is not a reason to abandon it. And where does the conclusion about "everything should be by default" come from? What should I charge a student for about 25 years? He has no means of his own, there is no way to protect himself, of course his parents will help him.
@CaprichoMonstro: "Mowing lawns, weeding flower beds, handing out flyers, delivering newspapers, cleaning streets, frying potatoes and burgers" Yes, this is certainly enough to raise 50,000 for a lawyer. And this is if there is no student loan. I really don't understand people who condemn parents for helping a child. In such a situation, it is normal to pay for a lawyer and try to help your son in every possible way. That's why he's their son. Besides, his guilt has not been proven. That is, he is an unfairly imprisoned son. And it is not necessary to draw conclusions about my life based on comments, I have never talked about sympathy or my own motherhood. It's just that my views on the relationship between parents and children are quite definite.
@CaprichoMonstro: Oh, well, an honest person can't get into a situation where he is accused of something he didn't do. Ahem. I was saying that the desire to help a child is normal, and not something that, by definition, someone owes someone. I'm not judging, I'm rather surprised.
@CaprichoMonstro: You can always find time to relax. Even with the toughest regime. And you can get into a situation by following the route home-study-work.
@CaprichoMonstro: It's not that I'm justifying his behavior, but rather I can understand it. Yes, taking my father's car without permission is far from the best solution, no matter who argues, but from the point of view of the parents (and the viewer in the first episodes), who saw nothing from Naz except good studies, diligence and responsibility, this is not a criminal offense. A mistake, but not so big as to put an end to it. And it is difficult to call the further development of events even a mistake. I met a girl, we liked each other. We rode, talked, and everything ended very pleasantly for both of us. Drugs are a minus, but they abused them in the apartment and were not going to leave until sobriety. None of these actions are criminal in nature. But Naz is not to blame for the fact of "waking up" with a dead girl. Neither from his own point of view, nor from the point of view of his parents. He might as well have gone to a friend's house to study and woken up with his corpse in the next room in the morning. The plot is just about the fact that everyone can get into a conditionally similar situation when they are accused of something they did not do, and end up in the millstones of a justice machine that, in principle, does not care about you. And a person will be lucky if he has at least someone who will believe and support him.
@CaprichoMonstro: Well, yes, rather about what this system does to a person, as can be seen from this series. Tattoos on fingers and smoking drugs are hardly from a good life. And this would hardly have happened if Naz had not been imprisoned. But this does not change the essence. "Wash your face with tears"? Uh...
I had three suspects: a black bandit at the entrance, but the house was not robbed (although they could have hired), a Black religious fanatic (then everything fits) and relatives. Well, as I expected, relatives are involved in the murder, at the moment, the stepfather (but this is not accurate). There is a clear hole in the scenario: why the investigation did not find out who is the beneficiary of Andrea's death. And this despite the fact that the investigation was conducted by an experienced (?) Detective Box plus a bunch of prosecutor's stuff. They probably just wanted to close the case faster. It's a pity, but everything started well, one hope is that they will all be put in a puddle at the trial. A very annoying female lawyer who doesn't listen to Stone at all.
@Domenika: and this is still waiting for the court, they haven't even given a deadline yet. I don't like that it's like plasticine. But on the other hand, it may be difficult to refuse there. But Bambi is not the same anymore.
I feel incredibly sorry for many people: my mother, who now cleans floors (having previously worked in trade), my father, who now works as a courier (a very strong episode, in fact)... A black boy who is being exploited as a sex slave by Freddy's henchman. The plot is very well worked out, you fully immerse yourself, you sympathize. Don't break away.
The lawyer girl is just a paw. Especially when she was drinking.
John Turturro's Eczema RIP
how cleverly Freddie manipulates Khan, very skillfully and cool, straight from science
I got him hooked on drugs, handed him the phone - still, it's not for nothing that he has authority
p.s. the topic of advertising Chinese medicine has been revealed! Turturro was finally able to put on his shoes! :)
Besides, all of a sudden, maybe as a result it turns out that Naz is just the killer.
On the other hand, the series has already given us a happy ending for the cat and the lawyer's legs. You can't ask for more :)
Oh yes, long-term planning is always more difficult for us than short-term benefits
I would like to see the end of the season exactly like this: "big-eyed SinBad" returns home to his family, hugs, smile, happiness, a breath of fresh air, melodramatic music and then the bell rings, Naz steps aside, picks up the phone
NAZ: Yes, I'm listening, who is this?
Freddy: Naz, buddy, have you forgotten me?
close-up
titles
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinbad_the_Sailor
Well, I started using drugs for some reason.
In general, I'm sad for him.
It would be fun if they let him out, but it turns out that he killed her, or that he was pretending to be some kind of sociopath or even a serial killer, or he has some kind of split personality.
Or on the contrary, it will be clear to everyone that, for example, his stepfather killed, and Nazir will be sitting and everyone will watch him fall into the abyss.
P.S. I hope this drug, fucking Chinese medicine, does not turn out to be from the gallbladder of the Amur tiger, otherwise it will break Jack's heart.
Someone else has already told him this, whom he beat up... not?
for this job, like any other, gets bored and people start to hack
and work with their sleeves down to please their superiors or colleagues
. It's wild for us, ordinary people, to hear about the mistakes of doctors and security forces And they can also get tired, stupid, and be incompetent, even if literally other people's lives depend on them
LEGS, hooray comrades
While they were figuring out whether the guy was guilty or not, he became the very criminal they wanted to see in him so much. A very cool criticism of the system - nothing is directly commented on, the authors simply show all the shortcomings of judicial red tape, during which suspects are forced to sit in prison with criminals and, for the sake of survival, go to real crimes.
The justice system turned a law-abiding citizen into a gang member - such a bitter irony.
But a parent should also not abandon a child in a difficult situation. Why would they get involved and "pay a lot of money for a lawyer, since my son went out"? Because they are his parents, they love him and will not leave him in a difficult situation. And to say "oh, no, you messed up something there, I don't know what and how, get out on your own" can only be a lousy parent.
My opinion is this: The task of parents is to prepare a child for independent life, surrounding him with care, attention; giving the necessary education, providing the necessary material benefits. What do they need it for, besides the breeding instinct? - In order to count on the help, care, and support of your beloved child in the future.
If a child grows up to be a person who believes that only he is owed by default, and he will live for himself, then for such there is the concept of a "cut slice".
As for Nazir, it is made clear to us that we will not see Bambi again, no matter how many chances, love and support we give him. And my line is based on WHAT I know as a spectator. The parents don't know what's going on with their boy in prison. But when they visited him, didn't they realize that there was another person in front of them? That it is necessary not to leave the younger one in a difficult situation? Especially since both of them have doubts about his innocence.
Yes, this is certainly enough to raise 50,000 for a lawyer. And this is if there is no student loan.
I really don't understand people who condemn parents for helping a child. In such a situation, it is normal to pay for a lawyer and try to help your son in every possible way. That's why he's their son. Besides, his guilt has not been proven. That is, he is an unfairly imprisoned son.
And it is not necessary to draw conclusions about my life based on comments, I have never talked about sympathy or my own motherhood. It's just that my views on the relationship between parents and children are quite definite.
I was saying that the desire to help a child is normal, and not something that, by definition, someone owes someone. I'm not judging, I'm rather surprised.
The plot is just about the fact that everyone can get into a conditionally similar situation when they are accused of something they did not do, and end up in the millstones of a justice machine that, in principle, does not care about you. And a person will be lucky if he has at least someone who will believe and support him.
"Wash your face with tears"? Uh...
The plot is very well worked out, you fully immerse yourself, you sympathize. Don't break away.