Who cares what's in the series and why there are so many comments: a moment in the style of "Violent Games" and the racial issue was raised. We spent more time on other story lines.
I'm looking at this, there are the most comments under this series, I was wondering what they decided to discuss there... and here it turns out nothing interesting))
How pretty Charlotte is and how ugly she is constantly squinting and grimacing, horror. :'(One could decide that it's because of the wind or from the very bright sunlight, but nothing bothers the other actors, so this is hardly the reason.
The further I look, the less I like it. I've read all of Austen's novels, and I can tell you for sure that she wouldn't have written it even at gunpoint. To begin with, she definitely wouldn't have a revolutionary hero. She felt she had no right to write about politics because she didn't really understand anything about it. Naked assholes, incest... The characters are rude to each other all the time, rather than exquisitely disguising their disdain. There are no refined conversations with a layer of subtexts. The monotonous hysterical performance of the main actress with a contorted face has already been mentioned, she wrinkles and crumples it like paper in her hand, it is unpleasant to look at. In the first episodes, she somehow had better control of her face. A girl from a decent family was weaned from this by the age of 10 at that time! That's why she looks like a cook. Actually, now I understand why literary experts on Jane Austen reacted badly to the series, as well as British viewers in general. And I perfectly understand why the series was shown in the USA with great success.
@eternity888: In the first episode, I was also very annoyed by how Lady Denham greeted the guests in her luxurious house. As if she wasn't the lady here. But then this impression was erased by her behavior at dinner.
@Exquisite: I absolutely agree! So at first I liked her appearance, but from her antics it begins to seem that she has some kind of problems with the nervous system. :/
Something in the series has lost the spirit of Austin. There are no incest, revolutions, or politics in Austen's novels. It's interesting to watch, if we consider the series a modern interpretation of Victorian England, but not to tie it to Jane Austen. Romanticism and promiscuity do not go together in any way.
By the way, the relationship between the Dunhams cannot be called incest, since they are not related. Although, of course, this format of relations is not welcome in a society, even modern with a creak, and even more so in a society, modern Austin. But still, it's not incest, but rather... obscenity or something like that.
so she had a fight with Mr. Parker, and then it turns out that he is right, and the reasons for his ban on communication between lovers are very reasonable)) I can see it right now😅
@E770: yes, in any case. The girl saw the two looking at each other in love and started to flow. But it turns out to be an ordinary inheritance hunter.
myshows.me is an informational TV & movie catalog and watch-tracking service. We do not host, store, stream, or distribute any video content, and we do not provide download links. All information is reference material only.
Discussion: Season 1, Episode 4 Join the Discussion
30But no, people just don't have to use Google.
Well, as for the series, it's typically one step forward, then five steps back in the relationship of the characters.
Actually, now I understand why literary experts on Jane Austen reacted badly to the series, as well as British viewers in general. And I perfectly understand why the series was shown in the USA with great success.
There are no incest, revolutions, or politics in Austen's novels.
It's interesting to watch, if we consider the series a modern interpretation of Victorian England, but not to tie it to Jane Austen. Romanticism and promiscuity do not go together in any way.
The girl saw the two looking at each other in love and started to flow.
But it turns out to be an ordinary inheritance hunter.