Well I do not know.What answers to the questions did they add to 2-3 films that would not have been included in the first film.Still not for 3 hours of the series)))There was still a place to turn around. And that means there were no different endings in the history of cinema.Have you heard anything about the director's version and the version for cinemas on TNT?) If they radically broke the plots in each part from 15-20 minutes, then yes, it would be cool, but so...Well, that's it.
Then they light up the CSKA logo, then they forget - the brakemen) I liked the finale, but the creators somehow talk too pathetically about it. Three different movies! Seriously? All the differences are different ways of death of the same characters, the ending is the same happy ending, but in different ways. But there were so many options! It was possible to make an ending in the reality of season 1 (in ours), in the reality of the USSR, well, in the one where they do not have parents. It was possible to make a happy ending in one, a bad ending in the other and an open ending in the third version. It was possible to make one film almost comedic, the second hardcore (as they did with the erotic scene, you could add deaths to this series, mate), the third philosophical. Or an interactive movie, where the plot would change from our choice, which is self-evident. In these cases, it would be possible to talk so grandiloquently about your creation. But they did it on the sidelines, obviously they didn't make it.
I liked. They would also show the questions that journalists asked the actors and creators. But in principle, along the way it became clear what was being discussed. It was interesting to find out how this film was shot, what conditions the actors were in, and much more
In general, the Chernobyl project as a whole. The exclusion zone" is excellent (both TV series and films). There are flaws (an absurd beginning in the form of a party), but in general it is a fascinating universe about cause-and-effect relationships, which in this film about the film they tried to explain to us a little bit
The way the creators themselves talk about three different films and different universes is just ridiculous, they changed a couple of things and that's it. Everyone just wanted to say, "Have you really watched these movies?" Absolutely wasted time on two films that don't differ from the first one at all. One could still exist as a good ending, although there are questions in general about filming and dialogues.
PS was laughing a lot from the grave of friends at the very beginning. Like Gosha, Anya, etc., not even full names? Just a cringe
And that means there were no different endings in the history of cinema.Have you heard anything about the director's version and the version for cinemas on TNT?)
If they radically broke the plots in each part from 15-20 minutes, then yes, it would be cool, but so...Well, that's it.
In general, the Chernobyl project as a whole. The exclusion zone" is excellent (both TV series and films). There are flaws (an absurd beginning in the form of a party), but in general it is a fascinating universe about cause-and-effect relationships, which in this film about the film they tried to explain to us a little bit
PS was laughing a lot from the grave of friends at the very beginning. Like Gosha, Anya, etc., not even full names? Just a cringe