Why weren't they imprisoned, at least for trying to kill one of their daughters?
The couple were found guilty only in a civil lawsuit and they only owe money to Gary's daughters??? What the hell!
And really, how can you give a child to a woman against whom the daughter - mother of this child was going to testify in the murder. (She could live with her out of desperation, but still - to be honest, Lina is strange that after all she allowed her mother to babysit). And she wanted to kill the other one with her man, plus the woman changes these men and places of residence, it's bad for the child, why not give one of those two daughters (maybe they didn't try, but I think they tried). Then custody does not allow good families because of trifles, but here I do not want to take it. Insanity!!!!!!
How will they prove Gary's death now if there is no evidence anymore, and even then there probably wasn't - they burned everything and scattered it in different places. But the gun that Gary gave to his friend and the words of his daughter - it seems to me very strong evidence. Sometimes they really put innocent people in prison for life because of stupid and illogical evidence, and then a person comes out at the end of his life and is told I'm sorry, we made a mistake. And here...
Why didn't she just leave him like the others? Why kill? Perhaps it was her new rich boyfriend who came up with it, because he was even ready to kill her daughter!!! It's strange that they both broke up and didn't kill each other yet.
It's a shame that here she is a creature and there seems to be evidence, but she walks free and still raises a boy from whom she took away a loving mother.
According to the rating, probably so:
1st place - French family (episode 3)
2nd place - this 6th episode is about a creepy mom
3rd place - Episode 4 about a black guy
4th place - Episode 2 - Creepy Husband
5th place - episode 1, a really strange death, the reason is clear, who needs it, but how is not clear
6th place - 5th episode about UFOs (on the one hand, you believe them a little, but somehow you don't)
Как жалко ребенка, интересно, пытались ли сестры его отнять через суд. При хороших адвокатах наверняка ведь это реально, тк не может быть у бабушки ребенка прав на него априори больше, чем у сестер, там побороться явно можно. А то прям кощунство какое-то.
Да и у мальчика травма будет на всю жизнь, когда он это все узнает, просыпаешься так, а твоя мать - это оказывается твоя бабушка, которая убила твою настоящую мать и свою дочь.
С большой долей вероятности от тела своей дочери эта женщина, которую язык не повернётся назвать матерью, избавилась так же, как от тела своего мужа - сожгла. Если первый раз "прокатило", то к чему бы ей менять подход. Под деревьями разве что прах закопала из сентементальных 🤬 соображений. А вот мальчик не факт, что поверит в эту историю. Он 14 лет жил с мыслью, что мать его кинула и свалила на морюшко с любовником, а бабушка героически подняла и воспитала. А Сэнди, похоже, из тех женщин, кто умеет присесть на уши и залезть в голову - целых три мужика без тени сомнений повели под венец мать с шестью дочерьми. Да и из контекста кажется, что остальные три сестры остались с матерью.
The couple were found guilty only in a civil lawsuit and they only owe money to Gary's daughters??? What the hell!
And really, how can you give a child to a woman against whom the daughter - mother of this child was going to testify in the murder. (She could live with her out of desperation, but still - to be honest, Lina is strange that after all she allowed her mother to babysit). And she wanted to kill the other one with her man, plus the woman changes these men and places of residence, it's bad for the child, why not give one of those two daughters (maybe they didn't try, but I think they tried). Then custody does not allow good families because of trifles, but here I do not want to take it. Insanity!!!!!!
How will they prove Gary's death now if there is no evidence anymore, and even then there probably wasn't - they burned everything and scattered it in different places. But the gun that Gary gave to his friend and the words of his daughter - it seems to me very strong evidence. Sometimes they really put innocent people in prison for life because of stupid and illogical evidence, and then a person comes out at the end of his life and is told I'm sorry, we made a mistake. And here...
Why didn't she just leave him like the others? Why kill? Perhaps it was her new rich boyfriend who came up with it, because he was even ready to kill her daughter!!! It's strange that they both broke up and didn't kill each other yet.
It's a shame that here she is a creature and there seems to be evidence, but she walks free and still raises a boy from whom she took away a loving mother.
According to the rating, probably so:
1st place - French family (episode 3)
2nd place - this 6th episode is about a creepy mom
3rd place - Episode 4 about a black guy
4th place - Episode 2 - Creepy Husband
5th place - episode 1, a really strange death, the reason is clear, who needs it, but how is not clear
6th place - 5th episode about UFOs (on the one hand, you believe them a little, but somehow you don't)
Да и у мальчика травма будет на всю жизнь, когда он это все узнает, просыпаешься так, а твоя мать - это оказывается твоя бабушка, которая убила твою настоящую мать и свою дочь.
А вот мальчик не факт, что поверит в эту историю. Он 14 лет жил с мыслью, что мать его кинула и свалила на морюшко с любовником, а бабушка героически подняла и воспитала. А Сэнди, похоже, из тех женщин, кто умеет присесть на уши и залезть в голову - целых три мужика без тени сомнений повели под венец мать с шестью дочерьми. Да и из контекста кажется, что остальные три сестры остались с матерью.