s01e04 — A Rare Breed
My rating
4.556
MyShows(322)
| Duration: | 25 min. |
| Released: | 01.11.202001.11.2020 16:30 |
| Watched by: | 3 76460.15% |
Ads
Sign In
My shows
My movies
Calendar
Friends
Favorites
Recommendations
Ads
Best TV show tracker © 2024 18+
en
Ads
| Duration: | 25 min. |
| Released: | 01.11.202001.11.2020 16:30 |
| Watched by: | 3 76460.15% |
You can go on like this forever. It's not that I don't like anime, but rather the opposite. But the questions are gradually snowballing...
They got something mixed up. One could understand the murder of a local doctor who, for example, refused to accept a dying child because he was drunk at his daughter's wedding (although this would also be a very controversial moment). . . diseases are not avenged if it is not causing harm to health... there are more questions for the mother, who is watching the child, than for the grandfather, who did not call his personal doctor in the rain in the middle of the night.
That is, they threw a grudge at a man who, personally not being a doctor, simply refused to call another person in order for him to examine the boy of an employee who simply asked for it as a matter of course?
If you don't even think about the context of the early 19th century, where medical services were not even a rarity and a very expensive service, then the father is the main trash character! Not only was he with the sick ego of an elite gardener, but he also shut up his wife.
To the question "What's that to me?" it was necessary to answer either "I will sell the house, I will return the money and then for another century together with my son we will weed your tomatoes" or "My son will die - I will burn the greenhouse."
In short, the grandfather of the core was killed for not doing a favor, it turns out. It would have been fairer for him to accidentally set fire to the greenhouse.
In this case, I would compare it to the fact that when you saw a car hit a man and drove away, you passed by, they say, it's none of your business, and did not call an ambulance. Is it worth considering that you would be innocent, because you could have helped, but did nothing? And then think about it, would you like someone else to pass by if you yourself were in such a situation?
I sincerely wish you happiness and hope that nothing like this will happen to you or your loved ones. And also my comment is subjective and does not have the purpose to offend or offend you.
Criminal inaction is not applicable in the situations considered(((
In the example you have given, the concept of guilt and responsibility is not applicable under any article of the NPA of the Russian Federation (let's limit the country, for example), because the criminal inaction in question does not fit the legal factors necessary to determine it - for example, professional activity, family relationships, etc.. Assistance in this situation is exclusively moral in nature, and, for example, if a witness to a crime was in a state of passion (in particular, an insurmountable fear for his life in case of assistance), he is only obliged to preserve his own health, so to speak. Take care of yourself first.
It seems to me purely fair to approach controversial cases with a formal presumption of innocence... Especially the victims, as it were
My grandfather is nasty, but they haven't even been imprisoned for this before. But the parents of another person accused them of their oversight, and then killed them.
Well, such a thing