Even everything is too obvious and simple. White and black. Aristocrats are bad! Ordinary people are good! The author simply presses on emotions with the help of these tools, and then gives a sense of relief in the person of Moriarty himself... And how is he going to change the country at all, if all he does is execute "retribution"? Getting one aristocrat after another out of the way. But after all, for the place of some, others will come. What will he do then? Killing again? And then, behind the scenes, being content with yourself, to utter beautiful music is the Perfect crime!
You can go on like this forever. It's not that I don't like anime, but rather the opposite. But the questions are gradually snowballing...
What was that just now? They got something mixed up. One could understand the murder of a local doctor who, for example, refused to accept a dying child because he was drunk at his daughter's wedding (although this would also be a very controversial moment). . . diseases are not avenged if it is not causing harm to health... there are more questions for the mother, who is watching the child, than for the grandfather, who did not call his personal doctor in the rain in the middle of the night. That is, they threw a grudge at a man who, personally not being a doctor, simply refused to call another person in order for him to examine the boy of an employee who simply asked for it as a matter of course? If you don't even think about the context of the early 19th century, where medical services were not even a rarity and a very expensive service, then the father is the main trash character! Not only was he with the sick ego of an elite gardener, but he also shut up his wife.
To the question "What's that to me?" it was necessary to answer either "I will sell the house, I will return the money and then for another century together with my son we will weed your tomatoes" or "My son will die - I will burn the greenhouse."
In short, the grandfather of the core was killed for not doing a favor, it turns out. It would have been fairer for him to accidentally set fire to the greenhouse.
You can go on like this forever. It's not that I don't like anime, but rather the opposite. But the questions are gradually snowballing...
They got something mixed up. One could understand the murder of a local doctor who, for example, refused to accept a dying child because he was drunk at his daughter's wedding (although this would also be a very controversial moment). . . diseases are not avenged if it is not causing harm to health... there are more questions for the mother, who is watching the child, than for the grandfather, who did not call his personal doctor in the rain in the middle of the night.
That is, they threw a grudge at a man who, personally not being a doctor, simply refused to call another person in order for him to examine the boy of an employee who simply asked for it as a matter of course?
If you don't even think about the context of the early 19th century, where medical services were not even a rarity and a very expensive service, then the father is the main trash character! Not only was he with the sick ego of an elite gardener, but he also shut up his wife.
To the question "What's that to me?" it was necessary to answer either "I will sell the house, I will return the money and then for another century together with my son we will weed your tomatoes" or "My son will die - I will burn the greenhouse."
In short, the grandfather of the core was killed for not doing a favor, it turns out. It would have been fairer for him to accidentally set fire to the greenhouse.