Who was bored - so the traffic arrived. I think that the killer, as always, will be either a child from a foster family or someone who experienced violence in childhood, and apparently with some kind of mental defects, because little men like those from chestnut trees, an adequate adult would not do. I don't know how to stop watching
@Hername: there was also such a thought, I thought about the girl from the very beginning of the series. Although judging by the way the murder of the 2nd woman was shown, the killer is a strong man, rather a man
I'm just sure that Detective Naya Tulin will soon become the target of the killer, about a couple of episodes before the end, an anonymous warning will come to her. And Rosa Hartung is that girl who survived the massacre.
@Painio: It makes perfect sense. But that would be too easy. I'm more interested in whether the killer's face was shown to us or is it really anonymous?
but it was absolutely necessary to take them to hell in the middle of nowhere, wasn't it? to a quiet place, so that there would be no obstacles for the maniac at all. Any hotel with security is so dangerous, isn't it ?
@RinaDasler: it sucks to choose somehow, considering that men were to blame in both cases (in the second, the mother could cover, okay, but with men, everything is fine).
@the_player: well, his foster mother did not help him, but on the contrary, she filmed all sorts of perversions on camera. That's what got him hooked. It's typical for all serial killers to blame women for everything because of problems with their mother or the 1st woman in their lives.
@the_player: it's the men's fault, yes, but anger at mothers happens in such cases, because mothers can know what violence is happening, but do nothing about it, either ignore it, or simply do not believe their children when they are not afraid and tell. well, it turns out "she did nothing, did not protect the child, so she is guilty and deserves punishment"
@maria_kennedy: and it's easier for a healthy man to kill women than men. It is very rare for maniacs to kill men, the victims are always women - she looks like her mother, has a short skirt, looked at him the wrong way, and anything can be thought up to justify her violence.
@SemperAdMeliora: I didn't really understand who the foster mother didn't help and filmed? If it was Magnus, then where was it that the mother even knew about the violence? or who are we talking about or are these spoilers?
why spoiler the series, are you even adequate? here is a discussion of the third series, please discuss it. Delete the comments, there is such a function like
Something I have flashbacks to the bridge, at least for the first season. A similar format of events and relationships (I don't want to list them, they won't throw spoilers).
Damn, a harsh investigator aunt who is not capable of a personal life is such a cliche of these "noir" series that it is already boring. The assistant minister seems kind of muddy. He is too sympathetic and always looms in the background.
damn, it's so stupid, to send all the police officers to the apartment of a potential victim, and send her herself to the wilderness with only two, some kind of stupid negligence
@maria_kennedy: Why would a murderer take such a risk and kill a man under guard? Batman damn it. He could have just waited until the police stopped guarding her.
@iamaaanb: and it seems to me that more attention is paid to Gentz. They have one for all of them, and a criminologist, and an IT specialist, and a master of laboratory affairs. I think it should be different people. Besides, since he works for the police, he has access to all the case materials, if it is necessary to fabricate something, then it is easier for him, as well as to find out where the alleged victim was taken. And he's also about the right age for the role of a kid whose sister was raped. He has grown up now and wets unborn mothers, who are either kosyachny themselves, or turn a blind eye to violence, although they should protect
The main character, the investigator, is also not particularly fused with the mother's mission, so it is likely that she will also become the target of the killer
@iamaaanb: but it seems to me that an anonymous letter will be sent to Rosa. The situation with the son is wildly sad, as if both the mother and the father do not care about the boy
Well, there are no ideal mothers in principle. Gg if he quits his job and is with his daughter 24/7, it's also like that. Who will feed then. Paying bills is a double-edged sword. She tries her best and does what she does best. But yeah, as always, mothers are to blame for everything…
in addition to all of the above, I also thought that there was a good story about the investigator's parents, they said something had happened, but so far it was sooo casual when she and Hess discussed a retired cop who helps her and her daughter
It feels like Tulin is the girl from the basement at the beginning of the series, they just said that she doesn't have any parents, i.e. she must have a brother who was found in the bathroom. Maybe he's a murderer 🤔
Yeah, logic. To cheat on his wife and blame it not on himself, but on his mistress. And the killer doesn't do anything for these children except anonymous, and as soon as the woman starts acting on her own, he kills her.
So, it's all clear, but I remember Tulin asked the car to punch the number. For some reason, I can't get it out of my head. They never explained what kind of car was there.
I understood it was the car of my stepfather, who ended up in the basement and then ran away. And when the detective found out whose car it was, she went to check if everything was OK
Some kind of murky boyfriend of the main character, a detective, was too obsessively interested in her daughter. I'm afraid she might get her little brown man because of that, too. And I also don't understand the moment how they figured out exactly the one out of a thousand anonymous ones, somehow too far-fetched
I hope Sebastian has nothing to do with all the murders, otherwise his question is 'where is your daughter?' it sounded extremely doubtful, with such a suspicious intonation, and then their parting in raised tones, uh
The killer is a security guard who works for Rosa. He and Varick have to stick their noses into cop business and, along the way, he has views on Rose (or a tooth - that would be a normal turn), so it was a thrill to arrange a leak to the press in order to quarrel with her husband / destroy her career / otherwise.. In short, 100% he has some murky motives. For me, he is still a prime suspect.
And Hess also lied about his wife. There's something there, too, but the hut didn't catch fire.. Well, let's see.)
Yeah, it's not such a good idea to send a possible victim into the wilderness with a two-person guard. The investigator is also not an ideal mother, and apparently, she is already being watched. An interesting version here was about the boy from the first murder. It seems to me that there is only one killer and everything points to this, probably has connections with the police and the media.
Please remind me, is there any connection at the moment with the episode in the first series, about how a policeman entered the house and was killed there?
This series gave me some kind of boost. Now the police know and understand that this is not some fanatic, and that he was not afraid of the presence of the police in the case, and went to the end. The motive, of course, is peculiar. And logically, then there should be a connection with his childhood. I hope that they will sum up the finale beautifully, and not in the last episode they will find a brother of the third tribe of my mother's family, who just wanted to make a chestnut man out of a human man. I understand that the killer is someone from the house that was shown to us in the first episode, because there were also these little men, and children who had quite managed to grow up to psychopathic killers
Логика покинула чат: выходить из дома в глуши, когда потенциально за тобой охотится убийца. Да и охранник тот еще балбес, сигналка сработала и он сразу выбежал…
Какая-то поразительно идиотская спецоперация, и это притом, что личность следующей жертвы была вычислена каким-то совершенно невероятным образом. Реалистичность происходящего стремительно снижается( Может, в книге это было как-то более логично обставлено..
Трахнуть девицу в подвале, а потом дать ей пощёчину и крикнуть "Это было в последний раз! Я вообще-то женат!" Какая сознательность!
Тоже подумала, нахрена увозить охраняемого человека так далеко в глушь? Уж спрятали б в квартире какой-то съемной, где за ней было бы такое же наблюдение как за Туллин.
Как-то смазали момент с тем, как они вышли на след новой жертвы(( В книге этот процесс был более длительный и описан, соответственно, более детально. Там Тулин и Хесс запросили письма за последние полгода, в которых фигурируют девушки определенного возраста и в которых требуется изъятие детей из семьи, а затем искали схожие по стилю написания. Когда оба отобрали по несколько штук, Хесс предположил, что убийца скорее всего мог намеренно изменить стиль, чтобы сбить их со следа. Тогда их выбор пал на письмо с миллионом орфографических ошибок, которые, очевидно, были сделаны специально. Почему в сериале нельзя было обосновать выбор схожим образом? Выбрали по сути ничем не примечательное письмо, ткнув пальцев в небо
He can't delete comments anyway. Write to the admins, they can, as far as I know)
The assistant minister seems kind of muddy. He is too sympathetic and always looms in the background.
Shipko is young...
And he's also about the right age for the role of a kid whose sister was raped. He has grown up now and wets unborn mothers, who are either kosyachny themselves, or turn a blind eye to violence, although they should protect
Gg if he quits his job and is with his daughter 24/7, it's also like that. Who will feed then. Paying bills is a double-edged sword.
She tries her best and does what she does best.
But yeah, as always, mothers are to blame for everything…
He and Varick have to stick their noses into cop business and, along the way, he has views on Rose (or a tooth - that would be a normal turn), so it was a thrill to arrange a leak to the press in order to quarrel with her husband / destroy her career / otherwise.. In short, 100% he has some murky motives. For me, he is still a prime suspect.
And Hess also lied about his wife. There's something there, too, but the hut didn't catch fire.. Well, let's see.)
The investigator is also not an ideal mother, and apparently, she is already being watched.
An interesting version here was about the boy from the first murder. It seems to me that there is only one killer and everything points to this, probably has connections with the police and the media.
I understand that the killer is someone from the house that was shown to us in the first episode, because there were also these little men, and children who had quite managed to grow up to psychopathic killers
Тоже подумала, нахрена увозить охраняемого человека так далеко в глушь? Уж спрятали б в квартире какой-то съемной, где за ней было бы такое же наблюдение как за Туллин.
Почему в сериале нельзя было обосновать выбор схожим образом? Выбрали по сути ничем не примечательное письмо, ткнув пальцев в небо