@imisteria: She never has cash with her. All in checks. It seems to me that the ex-husband is paying, perhaps out of guilt, because his daughter was killed because of his fault.
Apparently, the daughter is really dead, it can't be such a massive psychosis. But still a lot is unclear. If only it didn't turn out to be one big hallucination of Anna.
"To get to the truth, sometimes you need to remind yourself that without risking anything, you risk everything, and most of all you risk when you risk nothing, and if you risk nothing, you risk not getting to the truth, and without getting to the truth, you risk everything." How am I yelling, the series is just something))
@FRFD: that's it, I really like that the banter is not emphasized in the ahaha style. Look, we made a great joke here, you saw, and everything happens absolutely, as they say, on serious occasions. it seems to me that many people take it all absolutely seriously and criticize it like it's unrealistic)))
@Ali_kolli: It feels like there's too much banter here, that it's not clear at all whether it's banter or the stupidity of the screenwriters)) Micro-Spoiler: Now I'm watching the sixth series and still don't understand what I'm smelling at all :)
@FRFD: it seems like initially (before the release of the series themselves) they declared it as banter. well, damn, it still seems to me that eating a child by a criminal in the FBI could not be done seriously)))
@Ali_kolli: That's it)) In the same of the matter is that there is direct slivkami sliced completely serious, like the passage of a mother losing a child, and specifically frankly exaggerated folly : the baby dragged into the camera to psycho (by the way there's even some funny nickname he ahah) and leave her there to be eaten, while her father and the head of the prison peacefully shit literally behind a wooden door =) That there is even the name of the series in the spirit of the absurd type "don't be a menace to South Central while drinking your juice in the hood" . Although the very first thought, at the sight of the name, I had: "hmm, the semi-comic fashion for long and funny anime and manga titles has already reached Netflix?)))"
P.S. And, here's the fact that the series was originally declared as banter - I didn't know.
@Ali_kolli: This beautiful text reminded me of the same parody monologue from Woody Allen: "To love is to suffer. In order not to suffer, you must not love, but then you will suffer from what you do not love... To be happy, one must love, so one must suffer, but suffering makes a person unhappy, therefore, to be unhappy, one must love, or love, in order to suffer or suffer from an excess of happiness. It's a pity you're not recording!"
A woman in deep depression, sitting on alcohol and pills, always has perfect makeup, styling (even bangs!), clothes with a needle :) It's all a great parody.
@AliceRadova: this is probably some kind of character and similar stories, who may then suddenly turn out to be a necessary witness or something else, but yes, it's funny))
"It was difficult for me to talk about it. - Yes, I understand. - No.... Autoerotic asfi... asphyxia." The scene with the polygraph is delightfully meaningless, it goes through typical interrogations in TV series) The dialogue at the airport also plays out the classic stamp, when the hero, who was visited by an epiphany, rushes to confirm his hypothesis to a random character with questions like "This is urgent! Tell me, was it Thursday a week ago too?" The neighbor's wife drowned in the lake, the book that the heroine is reading - "The Woman opposite the Lake" - after all, are we not looking at her fantasies on the subject of the book?) So much has already been mixed up that it is difficult to understand where the reality is at all, if there is. If we assume that there was a murder, just in case, I bet on the classic "gardener killer", or rather, a mailbox repairman, fits into the parody concept)
@Arrivera: Maybe someone didn't notice, but the mailbox repairman is played by actor Cameron Britton, he also played a maniac in "Mind Hunter", who helped the FBI in prison to understand the inner world of maniacs. And he also played in the TV series "The Hunt" that famous security guard who found a bomb at the Olympics, and then he was accused of terrorism. I think such a notable actor was invited here for a reason.
I do not know yet what the glitches are, and what is real, but still... If there was a murder, it's 100% this guy who's been fixing the mailbox for a week)
The fact that her daughter was killed is still acceptable, but the fact that she was killed and devoured on the spot does not enter my head. As I understand it, this is all some kind of banter, so this is how it should be?! Although there are a lot of questions about GG and everything that is happening, so I hope they will be answered in the next episodes
I have one question: who does she work for, for a second?
And it is, yes, written "person of interest". Netflix translates it in subtitles as "could be interested". Dear Netflix, don't you watch detective stories at all?
I was upset when the detective also started talking about the eaten child. I hoped that this was a fiction of the main character, so as not to admit the truth.
It's stupid that the whole plot breaks down on a video call. 21st century, though. If Lisa had called someone, there would have been no doubt.
However, I started to look at it seriously, but then it turned out that it was banter
What kind of guy repairs a letter box for 3 consecutive episodes? Why doesn't Anna suspect him of anything? 3 series to repair the mailbox. Then anyone will start to suspect him of something
I started watching the series, not knowing that it was a parody, I was surprised by the title, I was amazed at the nonsense every episode, then I decided to read it. It's a funny series. The telephone directory and the FBI documents pleased
Не могу отделаться от впечатления, что это поехавшее продолжение отчаянных домохозяек, такие интерьеры, одежда, персонажи, приятно очень смотреть! Но, судя по комментариям, это стеб((
Какие восхитительные "штампы" подобных фильмов: героиня-"детектив", которая спокойно звонит в ФБР (как удачно ее муж там работал!) и находит ответы в Гугле)) Жаль, что не все понимают уровень стёба, судя по некоторым комментам)
Сарказм и клише в высшей степени, как очень страшное кино или супергеройское кино, но смотрится легко даже интересно что там дальше. Конечно, нужно было так оказаться, что детектив знала убийцу ее дочери 😀
Massacre Mike и детектив Лейн - клишированная angry black woman очень порадовали :) Мне кажется, или Майк - это отсылка к Эду Кемперу из Mindhunter, которого... пам-пам-пам... играл Бьюэл, чинящий почтовый ящик уже третью серию! И Нил просто безумно похож на Джо Голдберга, героя ещё одного Нетфликсовского сериала, и дочка какая-то мутная, так невзначай упомянула, что у папки проблемы с гневом...
Похоже ковид таки влияет на головушку. Рад, что всем весело. А я все еще ищу в этом юмор, намек на юмор. Пока что самым смешным местом в сериале было то, где я вспомнил от скуки анекдот про кота и гречку.
HOW could a man in handcuffs, chained to a table, kill and eat a child? It's so crazy that there are no words.
I also wonder where the heroine got such a gorgeous house and who pays for everything?
If only it didn't turn out to be one big hallucination of Anna.
How am I yelling, the series is just something))
it seems to me that many people take it all absolutely seriously and criticize it like it's unrealistic)))
Micro-Spoiler: Now I'm watching the sixth series and still don't understand what I'm smelling at all :)
That there is even the name of the series in the spirit of the absurd type "don't be a menace to South Central while drinking your juice in the hood" . Although the very first thought, at the sight of the name, I had: "hmm, the semi-comic fashion for long and funny anime and manga titles has already reached Netflix?)))"
P.S. And, here's the fact that the series was originally declared as banter - I didn't know.
"To love is to suffer. In order not to suffer, you must not love, but then you will suffer from what you do not love... To be happy, one must love, so one must suffer, but suffering makes a person unhappy, therefore, to be unhappy, one must love, or love, in order to suffer or suffer from an excess of happiness. It's a pity you're not recording!"
- Yes, I understand.
- No.... Autoerotic asfi... asphyxia."
The scene with the polygraph is delightfully meaningless, it goes through typical interrogations in TV series) The dialogue at the airport also plays out the classic stamp, when the hero, who was visited by an epiphany, rushes to confirm his hypothesis to a random character with questions like "This is urgent! Tell me, was it Thursday a week ago too?"
The neighbor's wife drowned in the lake, the book that the heroine is reading - "The Woman opposite the Lake" - after all, are we not looking at her fantasies on the subject of the book?) So much has already been mixed up that it is difficult to understand where the reality is at all, if there is.
If we assume that there was a murder, just in case, I bet on the classic "gardener killer", or rather, a mailbox repairman, fits into the parody concept)
And it is, yes, written "person of interest". Netflix translates it in subtitles as "could be interested". Dear Netflix, don't you watch detective stories at all?
It's stupid that the whole plot breaks down on a video call. 21st century, though. If Lisa had called someone, there would have been no doubt.
However, I started to look at it seriously, but then it turned out that it was banter
Но, судя по комментариям, это стеб((
Конечно, нужно было так оказаться, что детектив знала убийцу ее дочери 😀
….
– Anna, you know I love you
- Oh my God, you don’t believe me either
АААААА 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣