s01e03 — Episode 3
My rating
4.277
MyShows(849)
Duration: | 22 min. |
Released: | 28.01.202228.01.2022 15:00 |
Watched by: | 11 96372.42% |
Subscription
Description
No description yet.
Duration: | 22 min. |
Released: | 28.01.202228.01.2022 15:00 |
Watched by: | 11 96372.42% |
HOW could a man in handcuffs, chained to a table, kill and eat a child? It's so crazy that there are no words.
I also wonder where the heroine got such a gorgeous house and who pays for everything?
If only it didn't turn out to be one big hallucination of Anna.
How am I yelling, the series is just something))
it seems to me that many people take it all absolutely seriously and criticize it like it's unrealistic)))
Micro-Spoiler: Now I'm watching the sixth series and still don't understand what I'm smelling at all :)
That there is even the name of the series in the spirit of the absurd type "don't be a menace to South Central while drinking your juice in the hood" . Although the very first thought, at the sight of the name, I had: "hmm, the semi-comic fashion for long and funny anime and manga titles has already reached Netflix?)))"
P.S. And, here's the fact that the series was originally declared as banter - I didn't know.
"To love is to suffer. In order not to suffer, you must not love, but then you will suffer from what you do not love... To be happy, one must love, so one must suffer, but suffering makes a person unhappy, therefore, to be unhappy, one must love, or love, in order to suffer or suffer from an excess of happiness. It's a pity you're not recording!"
- Yes, I understand.
- No.... Autoerotic asfi... asphyxia."
The scene with the polygraph is delightfully meaningless, it goes through typical interrogations in TV series) The dialogue at the airport also plays out the classic stamp, when the hero, who was visited by an epiphany, rushes to confirm his hypothesis to a random character with questions like "This is urgent! Tell me, was it Thursday a week ago too?"
The neighbor's wife drowned in the lake, the book that the heroine is reading - "The Woman opposite the Lake" - after all, are we not looking at her fantasies on the subject of the book?) So much has already been mixed up that it is difficult to understand where the reality is at all, if there is.
If we assume that there was a murder, just in case, I bet on the classic "gardener killer", or rather, a mailbox repairman, fits into the parody concept)
And it is, yes, written "person of interest". Netflix translates it in subtitles as "could be interested". Dear Netflix, don't you watch detective stories at all?
It's stupid that the whole plot breaks down on a video call. 21st century, though. If Lisa had called someone, there would have been no doubt.
However, I started to look at it seriously, but then it turned out that it was banter
Но, судя по комментариям, это стеб((
Конечно, нужно было так оказаться, что детектив знала убийцу ее дочери 😀
….
– Anna, you know I love you
- Oh my God, you don’t believe me either
АААААА 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣