It's already more interesting to watch. But Nagiyev is infuriating with his facial expressions. It's a pity that another actor wasn't cast for this role
Yes, but the fact is that Chikatilo was not like that. Nagiyev plays beautifully, but he plays some kind of a perverted maniac fool who shits at everything.
@Komandor89: precisely because in this series Nagiyev looks like the spitting image of a maniac, it turns out to be very unconvincing, which so easily attracts not only adults, but even children.
Oh, what a good episode, I watched it in one go. The first two did not arouse interest, I looked at the background. It's getting interesting to watch again.
I was also skeptical of Nagiyev at first, but for the sake of interest I watched several documentary videos about Chikatilo, how he behaved on ships, and after Nagiyev fully justified my doubts, he plays great....
- We need new thinking; - *Vitvitsky puts forward versions of why the killer from Bataysk is not a maniac from the forest belt*; - Comrade Captain, you're talking bullshit.
That is, this is a type of humiliation, first to ask about something new, about a different view of the situation, and then to humiliate for this very different vision. I liked that a little later they agreed with Witwicki's version, albeit at the behest of the top. But even without that, the version is sound and well-told. I can't be sure, but it seems like in the end the dude, who is kind of a maniac, forgot to take off the earrings given to the girl he killed. If so, in theory they can figure him out, because the earrings on the girl are earrings from another victim.
@Masya: they will definitely come out to him, because it is known that a large sum was spent and a lot of effort was spent on catching Chikatilo, but while they were looking for him, many other cases were uncovered. I think this is one of those cases.
What a stupid version to suspect that there is an investigator from the authorities.. Of course, one can assume, but why did they not immediately think that the killer could be among the "vigilantes" in order to divert suspicion from himself and merge with the crowd, then the circle of suspects would have significantly decreased
@a1185778: No one seriously thinks so. He clearly said that he destroys his enemies. And under this pretext and such a vague formulation, you can just destroy the psychologist
A very interesting series, I watched it in one go. Season 2 is definitely better, because attention is paid only to the investigation and maniacs, and not to love affairs and drunken bosses.
Somehow, the psychologist expresses too many very correct versions. There are already more doubts starting to appear that it was just like that. Absolutely every time he expresses his version in detail, sometimes in too much detail, it does not happen, it seems to me.
I agree with everyone, it's finally a really cool series, and I hope it continues in the same spirit. It's good that they watered down the series with the Bataille killer.
Discussion: Season 2, Episode 3 Join the Discussion
23- *Vitvitsky puts forward versions of why the killer from Bataysk is not a maniac from the forest belt*;
- Comrade Captain, you're talking bullshit.
That is, this is a type of humiliation, first to ask about something new, about a different view of the situation, and then to humiliate for this very different vision.
I liked that a little later they agreed with Witwicki's version, albeit at the behest of the top. But even without that, the version is sound and well-told.
I can't be sure, but it seems like in the end the dude, who is kind of a maniac, forgot to take off the earrings given to the girl he killed. If so, in theory they can figure him out, because the earrings on the girl are earrings from another victim.
Of course, one can assume, but why did they not immediately think that the killer could be among the "vigilantes" in order to divert suspicion from himself and merge with the crowd, then the circle of suspects would have significantly decreased
Even they quickly went out to Cheryomushkin...