s01e08 — Episode 8

@blacki3: There are 11 books based on the story.

@tsarinadzicc: But... The same Rupert? You have to try hard to think that he is definitely good against everything bad (and I wouldn't say that he suddenly began to be shown like that in the second half). He may not be as disgusting as Tony, but Kamon, there is no question of the struggle of good against universal evil.

@RiaNeimless: I haven't made it to the finale yet, but since the New Year's party, the series has begun to remind me harshly of the Cinderella fairy tale. Therefore, the ending from episode 3 is difficult to spoiler. However, it seems that the series did not pretend to be a serious genre from the very beginning.

Did you think a lot logically and with your brain at the age of 20? Or did you listen to someone's advice, especially ex-wives?) Especially when such a famous handsome man fell in love with you) Yes, the last forty-year-old brains will lose here))

@typographera: продлили!

@trefi: maybe he took the girl away, and he was offended, it will be interesting to find out))

@_berkeya: Maude is a typical narcissistic mother. Always in the first place. Throughout the series, my husband and I marveled at how a mother like her could have such completely sweet, kind, empathetic children. Until they were shown to be somehow mentally distorted, as is usually the case with such a mother. Apparently, Declan was making some kind of balance there. Although, considering that he is a zealous workaholic, as he says more than once, it is unclear who raised them at all. This kind of Fashion was clearly carried away by parties, boyfriends and other productions right a month after giving birth (she was, like, an actress). Such stars of the whole earth can't just physically sit at home. It's their undoing.
There must have been babysitters there since the children were born, and they raised all three of them.
Well, Maude, aside from sentiment, I can really understand. It seems to me that any normal woman with a family and at least some healthy ambitions will understand that she wants to fulfill herself, work, and not be an appendage to her husband. There's definitely nothing terrible about it, she said it right.: I'm so used to doing everything for others that I've already forgotten what it feels like for myself in general. The children are already healthy, there is clearly no warm relationship with their mother there, so she would have gone to London a long time ago, where she feels good and her vibe, unlike in the village. Why did she suffer for so long?!
She just shouldn't have had children initially, in my opinion)) It's only good with yourself, and for men to admire.

@_berkeya: But I don't understand. I don't approve, but I understand. You just have to look through the eyes of the 70s, when she gave birth, and that attitude towards women. Despite all her ambitions, she gave birth to the weather and a third child, and settled down at home to fulfill the "women's program" of that time, having completely different ambitions. She quit the theater at the peak of her demand, because she had to choose either her husband's career + children, or her career. A husband would definitely not sacrifice his own, which means a divorce and more children with her and a career minus.
But now the children have grown up, and her husband spends very little time with her, and her lax moral principles allowed her to seek admiration on the side. Yes, we can condemn what she is like, but the husband knows what she is like and does not divorce. He's comfortable. He's not going to do anything about the fact that she desperately misses him.
And the fact that she did not say goodbye to the children was foolishly shown to us, because the children were standing in the crowd and also did not react to her departure in any way, it did not correspond to their relationship before.