I liked the ending! Many people correctly assumed that their happiness would not last long, and this pleases, because the boss staged cruelty without rules! Nina's actions are very strange - she flew away happily, and her daughter?! Alexander's wife turns out to be a scary girl! It's a pity Bones's story wasn't shown, but he outlived everyone, which made me laugh in the end! It's a good series.
@marlenad_13: I had some assumptions before this episode, and they were confirmed - I think it's not her daughter. Kostya probably already had a daughter before he and Nina met, so they don't have a strong emotional connection.
@lexastaw: I'm begging you, she was a prostitute, Kostya accepted her (fell in love/ regretted / decided to play the hero - I don't know). He gave her stability, money, but also gave her rules, as he said himself. Apparently he wanted a child, she gave it to him, but she didn't like a daughter from a man who was just a lifesaver to her. Apparently the child knew this or just felt it. Therefore, that the daughter was exactly like the mother, that the mother was like the daughter.
@lexastaw: By the way, maybe she accidentally got knocked up by him, he wanted to keep the child, start a family, and do something noble, but all she had to do was escape from prostitution and money for books.
@an_khv: I do not dispute that this may be the case. But still, there is usually a strong bond between a mother and a child (regardless of whether she is a prostitute or not). Moreover, the girl is not quite an adult yet. Those who have children will understand, those who don't can hardly explain it. And judging by what we see, their relationship is more like that of girlfriends. The child doesn't care where the mother goes or leaves, the mother doesn't care what happens to the child. Well, it's very strange. I've seen mothers who don't care about their children, yes. But I've never seen children so indifferent before. That's why it seems to me that she's probably not the child's mother. But we don't know what happened before.
@an_khv: Where are the hints that she's a prostitute? She's a philologist, so she graduated from university. The fact that they could have met in the same psychiatric hospital, it seems to be true.
@Flotus: It's a clear hint to me when he says, "Do you remember how we met? I gave you security, money, and rules. You accepted security and money, but you didn't accept the rules. And the fact that she is a philologist is the second hint. The hungry and harsh 90s, there was no work anyway, who the hell needed philologists there, so she probably went to earn what she could I've seen suggestions in the comments before that when she had sex with Roma, she looked ordinary, as if she didn't give a fuck about feelings and intimacy, sex was like work.
@an_khv: or maybe she was just pregnant with someone's child. And judging by Kostya's conversations with Rybkin, blood kinship is not so important. Therefore, he accepted this girl as his daughter.
@an_khv: I think the series deliberately doesn't specify all these details, making it clear that it's not that important. They revealed just enough to outline the character of Bones, but she doesn't play a role here. But I agree with all the assumptions - she was definitely a prostitute, the child was either from another (she got knocked up at work, he took her pregnant), or from him, but she gave birth to a daughter at his request, for him, she didn't care. All this explains her strange behavior, as if she is not a wife, but a paid servant, and her attitude towards the child is like a nanny, not a mother.
@an_khv: sucked out of the finger. A private view? So she's a strange girl in her own right. A philologist is more of a hint that she is not of this world. And as for the rules of the psychopath Kostya, an unscrupulous manipulator, a nervous breakdown.
@an_khv: I'm begging you, the girl is about 9 years old, the action takes place in 1996, so they could have met at the beginning of perestroika, the year 85-86, in the mid-80s it was still not so bad that philologists who love books and spend money on Schiller instead of boots became prostitutes or drug addicts or whatever else could happen to this Nina..
@an_khv: Girl, can you count? In the 1996 film, the girl is at least 10 years old, which means she was born during the Soviet era in the mid-80s. This means that either his daughter is not his, or his wife was not a prostitute, and the circumstances under which we met had nothing to do with it. The daughter is indifferent to the mother, as well as the mother to the daughter, because this abusive person has long suppressed their feelings in them, there is only fear and indifference.
@lexastaw: In one of the episodes, the girl addressed Nina by her first name, and not by the word "mom." I already had the idea that the baby wasn't hers.
@marlenad_13: And what about my daughter? The mother is absolutely spineless. She's much more comfortable and safer with her dad than with such an infantile mother.
It seems to me that it would be much cooler if the great and brilliant Kostya really died like a stray dog at a bus stop.
I really liked all the female roles! Mila Yershova is finally in an atypical role, and I just fell in love with Dasha Kotroleva's game, I hope this role will open a lot of doors for her :)
@rainbow_ol: on the one hand, you're right about Kostya, but on the other, his daughter would have been left an orphan, because until her mother heard about Kostya's death, it's not a fact that she would have returned, it would have been painfully easy to fly away🙁
@vk860469: What kind of hero is he? He will take the place of the head of the colony and will also sell murders. Yes, a moratorium has been introduced, but the Japanese will sell beating prisoners to death.
@marlenad_13: Here, people watched the series backwards, after reading the first comment and seeing so many likes, I was just stunned. Either they really overlooked something, or it's a massive mental blackout.😁
@marlenad_13: The person with the nickname vk860469 described everything normally, I don't see any point in repeating myself. I don't understand why the character of Bones caused such a negative reaction.Most likely, the difference in generations is affecting and it is unfortunate that the current generation does not know how to set priorities correctly. Yes, all the characters here are very ambiguous.Kostya is a character with his own philosophy, but compared to all the other characters, he looks the most in a winning position. Therefore, I did not understand the HYPE of the source comment of this thread. p.s. Romanticize such an antihero, of course, in no case impossible.
@_ValmonT_: I totally agree. When I thought for a minute that this worthless girl had just killed the only interesting character, I was very upset. They had all lived in this swamp before him, the main topic of conversation was a piglet at a wedding, the main event was to hang out at a rural disco. Of course, he's not a classic protagonist, he's such an antihero, as controversial and ambiguous as possible, with his own code, like Dexter. He made them think, he made them move, he stirred up this snake tangle. Yes, he's more of an antagonist, but he's interesting, you want to listen to him, try to understand his motives. And the rest are just vegetables - they lived like vegetables in poverty - and continued to live with money in the same way. No one even had a thought about what was good and what was bad, they couldn't even figure out what was wrong with him, but it was okay) And their women are the same (except for the doctor's wife, the only story where the motivation of the characters is clear) - narrow-minded, greedy, lazy. I'm very happy about the finale, it's a happy ending for me)
@_ValmonT_: I read that Kostya is the prototype of the devil in this series, as he manipulates people and reflects all the vices, or finds them. And each character has its own specific negative reflection. The same Kostya, outsources everything, starting with the execution and ending with the prisoner, who killed everyone. Roughly speaking, he does the same with the rest of the characters. It seems to be an explanation from the creator of the series (I'm not 100% sure) . I got the same impression when watching it. Therefore, where the reference "Ala Brother" is here is not clear to me, more precisely, there are parallels between Kostya and Danila, of course, but still. Bagrov looks a lot softer and more human to me than Kostya. Kostya is a jerk, the others are no better. The series is basically neither about the bad nor the good, for me the only adequate character is the wife of a doctor with HIV.
@_ValmonT_: Kostya failed Kotov only because he wanted 50k instead of 500 bucks. Then I just wanted to take down the third one in 40k. And he spun some nonsense to his accomplices about the right to who should execute the sentence, just at that moment he pushed everyone's heads together and turned everyone in. Then he did the same thing with the wives. Kostya doesn't have any philosophy or morals at all, the worst in terms of human qualities of all.
@Marrrrrrrrrrusia: He doesn't have any code, what nonsense... He gave himself the right to kill innocents, while depriving those who were not directly involved in death row of the right to execute the sentence. Where is the consistency, morality, and principles here?
@AndreyDubrovsky: The fact that you don't like his principles doesn't mean that he doesn't have them, it's just that they're not good and kind principles, but he clearly has them, that's literally the essence of the whole series, it's unclear why you watched it. In the finale, the screenwriter sets out the main message in the words of Bones - when you live like hell and you don't want to take responsibility, it's very convenient to put decision-making on another person, and then blame him for everything. I agree with the comment above - Kostya is such a prototype of Woland, he doesn't do much on his own, but pushes the characters to act (actually, outsource), and then watches the result. No one is saying that he is a good person, as you say, but one cannot argue with the fact that he is an interesting character, very consistent in exposing other people's dirt.
@Marrrrrrrrrrusia: What's the principle? There is no consistency in his words and actions, only contradictions. In the very first episode, he initially shakes for the charter, wants to follow the rules, and 10 minutes later he executes without confirming his identity, citing humanity. In the second episode, he kills a Cat only because they were able to outbid his 500,000 price, and then tells his colleagues how unethical it is to outsource execution just for the money. He was in favor of democracy and voting, but as soon as the majority turned out to be against it, he merged them all.
What does responsibility have to do with it? Sasha was the most liquid, and this monologue was addressed to him. No one else put anything on anyone like that. Kostya did the most, and the two murders in the first episodes tell the tale. What kind of observation are we talking about? He just floated through the plot, navigating as the problems came. So it's not even close to a saw
@AndreyDubrovsky: Kostya killed Kotov not because someone outbid his price, but because he started threatening them. As for everything else, you're confusing the principles and the right principles again. I'm not saying that Kostya is a good person with high morals. But he's the most interesting character in the series with his beliefs. They can be cruel, cynical, even terrible - but they are there, unlike all the other characters, who just go with the flow, cursing life and feeling sorry for themselves.
@Marrrrrrrrrrusia: He started blackmailing Kotov right away. After taking the money, Kostya confirmed the deal, but he obviously knew that he would merge Kotova. He came to the last shooting with Kotov with a shotgun, obviously to kill him. On the part of Kotov, his latest actions are not blackmail, but a claim in response to a brazen attack.
Integrity is the conformity of behavioral norms and beliefs both in words and in deeds. You can't be principled about one thing, you're either principled or you're not. This is the observance of a kind of code of honor, an internal charter. You can't break the law by robbing stalls and not consider yourself a criminal just because you don't violate other laws of the Criminal Code.
Kostya, on the other hand, violates literally all his principles, all the theses that he preaches to others, under the guise of morality and ethics. For example, the main plot rift, when he turned against Oleg as a performer. Where even initially he wanted to kill him, guided by another threat from the cops. Already on the spot, he changed his rhetoric to "has no right to kill a serial killer, because he is in no way related to the victims." but. In the very first episode, in the very first minutes, Vladik lynches himself, and his wife wasn't raped, it wasn't even self-defense. It's not even self-defense for Sasha, because he attacked an unarmed man with a gun.
And how can you call a person both cynical and principled? These are essentially antonyms. Kostya, if he is principled in something, it is only in the absence of these very principles.
He is greedy, greedy for money, although, again, he claims the opposite. But really what? The first murder, execution in the series: out of humane motives and contrary to the rules, shoots a prisoner without waiting for confirmation of identity. That is, in his understanding, he suffered when the verdict was read out to him. At the same time, for money, it was normal for a rich woman to cut off her ears, nose, and tail. Where humanity is.
He's a cynic, an interesting character, but not a principled one. I'm tired of winning this argument.
@AndreyDubrovsky: No, you haven't won this argument.
For Kostya, the main problem in Kotov is not only and not so much blackmail as his stubborn conviction of his own right to kill and an active desire to kill. It is for this reason that Oleg is also unpleasant to him — because of his active desire to kill a person, in his case, also a person who personally did nothing to him.
In the first episode, at the point where Vadik was killed, it was precisely self-defense, because the charming, unarmed Vadik had already disarmed Rybkin and pointed a gun at him. It was a classic situation where it was either you or you. Kostya, as a man with combat experience and PTSD (which was indicated by the scriptwriter), naturally fired without hesitation. For him, this is an algorithm that has been perfected to the point of automatism.
No, Kostya is not greedy at all. The greedy ones here are the prosecutor and Katya, Rybkin and Natasha, the prison governor, even the investigator who emptied Kotov's pockets. But not Kostya, who, being the leader, took an equal share with the rest and did not spend the money at all, but, most likely, saved for his daughter's future. Let's just note in the margins that neither the prosecutor nor the Rybkins had children, and the latter could not even have.
It was not normal for Kostya to bully a man, being just an executor of the sentence. At the same time, he could understand a mother who wanted to avenge her daughter. It is important to take into account that she informed him about her intentions literally a minute before the execution, and he could no longer refuse her. Not only out of selfish motives (he won't give her money, he'll tell the cops), but also because he offered her this service himself and was responsible for it.
Watch the podcast with director Dusan Gligorov and cinematographer Batyr Morgachev. Dusan expresses his opinion about Kostya very clearly there, and the director's opinion is always crucial, because it is through his optics that we observe the characters, it is his meanings that the actors convey through their work.
Yes, Kostya is principled, he has his own belief system. And that's why he conditionally won by staying alive. This does not make him a good person, although whether there are any good people at all is also an extensive question. This makes him a person who has a foothold in life that helps him to dig out and not rely on others, not to be guided by their opinions.
@reflexenia: Integrity is consistency, consistency is multi-repetition. Because you can't be principled and kill one avenger for wanting to, and not kill the other for acting. 2. Only Vladik could defend himself. By taking away the weapon and not even firing, he did not violate any laws or moral norms in this episode. Kostya did not know about the wear and tear, did not know Vladik personally, and there was no recognition in the dialogue. But Kostya doesn't shoot Sasha, but Vladik shoots Vladik in a similar situation. 3. If he hadn't been greedy, he wouldn't have searched the list for the richest and most accomplished relative among all the victims. What kind of leader? It's just a director's farce and nonsense that a sergeant can turn around and solve something in special purpose colonies. 4. The affirmative answer to the question of identity verification is a basic, basic moment from the time of Roman millennial law. No trial will begin until the defendant confirms that he is him. From the very first minute, Kostya put himself above the law, made himself the arbiter of fate, because it was he who confirmed the identity of the maniac. And this is about the same as if, on behalf of some harmful user, I write a purely heartfelt statement that Kostya was unscrupulous in the end. He felt sorry for the crying maniac, and beat the innocent Oleja and chained him to the radiator. He could understand a blonde for 50k bucks, but a Cat for 500 couldn't. I won't watch anything. It doesn't matter what the director wanted to convey, what he intended, it's important that he got it in the end. And only I, the viewer, am his judge and I will evaluate his work and tell him whether he succeeded or not.
White cannot be black. But just the same, a truly principled person is ready to lay down his life for his principles. I understand you, girls, Yankovsky is a breed, still young, but already experienced in cinema, interesting, determined, strong-willed character, it's a sin not to fall in love with such a hero. It's really hard for me to argue logic with your hormones. But 2-0
@AndreyDubrovsky: integrity, if you really want to delve into this definition, is a personality quality that consists in the voluntary fulfillment of principles recognized by a particular person. Kostya follows his principles. 2. He's not Vladik, but Vadik, first of all. Secondly, you include a clerical rat who analyzes an episode as simple as a stick from the point of view of legal norms. When the gun was in Vadik's hands and he went with it to Rybkin, the self-defense ended and the retaliatory attack began. We are well aware that he would have shot Rybkin, knowing everything about this character that we already knew by this point: that he is a violent rapist and is clearly connected with criminals. Or are you seriously saying now that he would have let him live? The man who intended to kill him and whose fiancee he raped? Kostya got his bearings in the situation the way a man with combat experience should have, who knew Rybkin superficially and noticed that something was wrong with him all day. 3. I do not consider it necessary to argue about the director's "nonsense" and "farce". This is an artistic statement on the verge of authorial and spectator cinema, and not "The Investigation was conducted" with Kanevsky. It's good that the brain structure of directors and screenwriters is strikingly different from yours, otherwise we would have nothing to watch and nothing to discuss. As part of this story and the outsourcing venture, Kostya is the leader, and it's also stupid to argue with this, it's just a fact. He's the driving force behind the whole script. 4. Kostya put himself above the law, but Kostya thereby stopped the disgusting bullying and watching the man's deathbed tantrum. Obviously, everyone present was doing this not because they respected the letter of the law so much (they just had to put it on it), but because they considered it permissible. Not to mention that the law is not always morally correct, that not every legal norm is relevant at the moment. No need to change them, yes. But from a moral point of view, he was right at the moment, not the turntables following a stupid procedure.
Don't look, it's your business. Why think about it, why find out the opinion of the authors of the work, if everything has already turned out so wonderfully in your head.
There is neither white nor black, Uncle. The world is not black and white, good morning. And you're not discussing with a girl, I'm thirty-two and I'm not in love with either Ivan or Kostya. You're about as perceptive about people as you are about characters, which is not surprising, of course. It is also not surprising that it is, of course, impossible for a man not to comment on Yankovsky's "hormones" and breed when discussing his role with a woman.
And yes, "wear and tear" is about a car or an organism. What Vadik did is called rape, and there is no need to shorten this word, thereby negating this crime.
@AndreyDubrovsky: You don't win the argument, the opponent (me) is just too lazy to answer you. @reflexenia responded beautifully and reasonably to each of your take, I can only summarize - you watched the series superficially and literally, without thinking about the characters and motivation. That's why Kostya is just a bad person for you without a double bottom, because you were shown how he killed two people, and this is bad, so the question is closed. That's why his wife is just a gray mouse, because you were shown that she looks pale and dresses poorly, why continue to think about Kostya's words, how he took her and what he gave her, he didn't say in plain text looking into the camera. My wife was a prostitute.) For people like you, the creators specially recorded a whole podcast, already directly stating the message in words through your mouth, but why watch it, since you already understood everything perfectly, and even explained it to us)
@Marrrrrrrrrrusia: Kostya is the leader, and it's also stupid to argue with this.
I wonder how many retired whores in cinema and prose at the age of 25 dissect in rags and read stories about student nymphets, so that this image appears as typical, and that after 7 hours of timekeeping it still raises questions
@AndreyDubrovsky: He didn't take the money. Kotov only flashed them and promised to give them back after the Professor 's execution . And then he immediately started blackmailing them. That's why no one threw it. They promised him to think about it, and then they told him to go home to Khabarovsk. And the money was taken from his pocket by the cop when the body was found.
@AndreyDubrovsky: so you're not winning, so you're tired) your opponent's arguments are more weighty, and you've sunk to some nonsense - I'm leveling 2 thousand characters; Very self-confident, but no, you are far from winning. And not even in the top three.
@rjusha: My claim is only to be principled, and everything else is not even interesting to discuss without this base. Ksenia considers it possible to appeal with definitions through an introductory word: "brave is someone who acts boldly in various situations," which already sounds extremely unconvincing. But I don't blame women for completely misunderstanding the term, after all, being principled is more of a male character trait, I would even say a key one. Integrity is an oath, an oath to oneself to do one thing and not another. And the hero of Yankovsky, I don't remember his name anymore, in the first episode of the very first series reveals his unscrupulousness: first he requires some formalities when applying for a job, and after 5 minutes he executes a person without observing protocol. THAT's IT. There is nothing more to discuss here, only if in a drunken state you do not try to pass off green as red, calling nonsense arguments. And, by the way, the film was wrapped specifically by a principled doctor who injected his schmuck only to the seriously ill and needy, and not to anyone for fun, for money or life.
@Marrrrrrrrrrusia: It seems to me that the finale shows that they can't even get rid of anyone normally without a supervisor. And it turns out that he's the one who screwed everyone over.…
@crubik: for you and the two commenters above, who have decided that the hero of Bones is now a national hero and has the right. Kostya is not a fucking hero, since he is so noble, he could have arranged for his relatives to be executed for free. I remind you that he not only monetized it, but also killed the victim's father, because the mother of another victim offered him more money. I also remind you that for buying books, he forced his wife to wear summer shoes, and then, according to the plot, he forcibly shaved her, he's no fucking better than any of the characters in this series.
@crubik: He killed at least two people in the beginning. If he killed the bandit "in fairness ", then he killed the man from the wedding to cover his ass
@sf-ram: Oh, how one-sided, though. And let's take a closer look? Who did he kill? - a thug who raped a colleague's fiancee. A colleague who took a gun but peed on it to show that he wasn't a pussy and could rip everyone's throat out for his family, even to the point of murder. Kostya did what he was supposed to do, defend the honor of his family. This asshole didn't tell his wife that he PERSONALLY killed the bandit, and his wife thought he personally killed him and didn't piss, so she considered him a hero. The guy from the wedding wanted to eat a fish, and ...Sit down. Kostya covered not only his own ass, but the ass of everyone in this chain. Because someone would have let it slip, especially "pissing " and everyone would have sat down. Sledak was no fool there.
@rainbow_ol: Hmm. you're probably listening in the wrong place when he said that he doesn't want to kill them and you can make sure that the murder happens anyway, but you can also make some money. The fact that it's considered very bad for you to earn extra money at that time and you need to do everything for free, so you can starve to death. If the victim is not found about the killer's actions, they are executed without him. The arithmetic is simple He killed the victim's father because of his words that he was knocking what he saw. If he had fucked up and gone off into the sunset, he would still be alive, especially playing extortion with people who can kill a person without any problems is a stupid idea. About the book. Kostya said to buy shoes, but his wife bought books. It's logical to think that she doesn't need shoes. Later in the story, he shaved her because of what she did - she slept with a colleague while she was married, who eventually dumped her at an important moment. And she dumped him, stealing all his money.
After being executed by foreigners, it was such a disgusting feeling that the sudden turn of events, where everyone was shot, caused a lot of excitement!
We took a look at the evening in one gulp. I've already been disappointed in the final episode, and here's the punchline, cool! The question about Zhuchkov's partner, why did he give up on the loss of a colleague?
@nikita_radio: Zhuchkov was very correct. He annoyed his colleagues in a dangerous business. And my partner initially didn't want to investigate anything.
- Emergency, guys 🚬 Thank you for a good project! I'm glad I watched one episode a week)
The head of the prison had thoughts that the visitors in the city, who were relaxing loudly, could be anyone. From tourists to undercover people?
In a conversation in a restaurant, Kostya is right in some places. - did I take your wife to have an abortion too? (Sasha, out of habit, looked for the guilty around him.
Kostya's scene with Nina was impressive: the yellow curtains, the creamy color of the skirt and the carpet behind. flecked with yellow and similar to the color of a Bone sweater. Those patterns showed the two characters closely intertwined. And it wasn't like Nina was being "released/kicked out."
Will raffaele sales rise or not?😃 At the end of the episode, as in the previous episode, there is a coffin, already with words.
Everyone showed their true faces in all their glory. They were obvious enough, but judging by the comments, it was hard for many to get there. Nina behaved as Kostya had predicted. Despite the fact that her character didn't cause me anything but nausea from beginning to end, this is probably the only logical thing she did, because Roma the Stallion deserved it. Natasha turned out to be exactly the same empty fool that her mother wanted to get rid of, but also capable of killing a person easily and with a smile (now they will come with sermons about living through trauma, of course, and about the fact that Natasha is not in her right mind). Katya, perhaps, has not received any development, except that she has become more submissive. Julia turned on her brain, which is commendable. All the performers, with the exception of Petya, who still had some sprouts of humanity visible in his eyes, also revealed their disgust to the maximum. The final scene gives you a sense of grim satisfaction. It's great that Kostya didn't die at the bus stop and that the mercy shown to the Doctor returned to him. The doctor must have thought of something and understood who the prescription was for. Of the disadvantages, there is a lot of excess, a lot that, on the contrary, would need to be fully disclosed. It's a pity that there wasn't a scene of Bones with his motherless daughter. It's a pity that we still haven't figured out if Julia's son is infected (although she won't figure it out until six months later). It's a pity that we still don't know a lot about Kostya. At the same time, I could easily have done without a scene in a bar with Natasha and Vadim's widow, as well as without gatherings in the prison governor's restaurant with Natasha's mother. I liked the scene with Kostya and Rybkin. And the complex interaction was well played, and the way Kostya put his hand on his shoulder and showed participation in time was pleasing (albeit predictable). So far, the first confused thoughts are like this.
Oh, well, yes, not my idea, a friend noticed: it's interesting that in the final Rybkin gave an order for the first time in his life, and it was obeyed.
@reflexenia: Unfortunately, they left out how Kostya got access to the armory to take the machine gun. But it's for added drama at the end, so it'll do just fine. It was so unexpected with the killer convict that it was just oh) Well, Katya and Natasha were also pleased, who finally understood everything about themselves. And they opened up in all their natural fullness. As a result, as in the beginning, I only feel sorry for the doctor's wife with HIV. Well, at least he'll pay for half of the treatment, and then he'll come up with something. Nina, as expected, was not so simple. It's a pity her past was never revealed to us.
@reflexenia: I hope. She's the only positive character there who suffered for nothing. But for some reason I don't envy Natasha) I don't even know why.
@GermanSW: If we assume that this happened within one or two days, maybe even hours, and there were only 5 people in the entire area who were aware of him, then it is quite logical that he passed through the checkpoint unhindered.
@reflexenia: Good post, just 99% of my thoughts) As for the doctor, maybe he wasn't sure who the cocktail was for, but we realized earlier that he was actually a man with his own code - to kill those who suffer, to whom life is harder than death. But now he realized that the cocktail he was being asked for was clearly not for mercy killing, that these vile people were planning another abomination, so he decided not to help them by distorting the recipe.
As for the understatement, there is a lot that has not been revealed, but it seems to be enough to understand the essence of the story. Was Kostya's wife a prostitute before? Was it his daughter? What's with Julia now?
It was like it was such a long book, a whole novel, and the creators chose to tell this piece of the story from the middle, which is probably enough for me, the rest can be thought out a little, it's even more interesting this way)
@Marrrrrrrrrrusia: who even invented this nonsense about prostitution? She's just the most default gray mouse, nerdy. The prosecutor's wife is much more like a whore.
It would be better to read this Stallion, obviously, this is the biggest marker of the character of the heroine.
@AndreyDubrovsky: You're watching the series like a child-what you've been told is the truth. And many people read between the lines, but we were specifically given a bunch of hints. But the prosecutor's wife is brightly made up, and Kostya's wife looks somehow pale, how could she have worked as a prostitute in the past, she doesn't even have red lipstick, get out of the profession!)
@Marrrrrrrrrrusia: it turns out that she didn't rob her grandmother, but took payment for services for her son with a percentage. No red lipstick - a nymphomaniac, a slut. Is she wearing red lipstick, hanging out in clubs, twirling her ass in front of left-wing men - an honest, decent, enviable wife, almost a virgin - are these hints? Or is it still a good example of female logic in action?
@Marrrrrrrrrrusia: In general, it's obvious with the doctor: he realized that the cocktail was for Bones and gave the wrong recipe, because he was the only one who treated him humanly in the beginning. Yes, there are inconsistencies, as with weapons, but otherwise the final scene would not have been so spectacular.
@reflexenia: Natasha repaid her husband for taking revenge on Gopnik. The doctor didn't know anything and couldn't know if he didn't figure it out himself, but he was just the most correct and principled, killing only those in need and asking with his knowledge, but not random types. And, by the way, by making this deal with the hospital, he killed two birds with one stone: he did not share the elixir of death for selfish purposes, and cut himself to life. I don't remember such a win-win situation in this series.
@AndreyDubrovsky: I just don't understand how he was admitted to the hospital, and also what kind of pardon - if according to the documents he has already been shot.
@reflexenia: You said that now they will come with sermons about living through trauma - yes, that's right))) Here's my sermon: Natasha was really traumatized, but her mother and husband also turned away from her, at the very moment when she needed support and help, of course she was hurt and sick. Also in the narrative of the series, we see Natasha's growth, albeit negative, as a character: at first she could not accept that the man who raped her was also a husband, a savior for someone and a generally good person (from a conversation with his wife) and she did not know how to treat him. Then further traumatic events occurred, and at the next meeting with the widow, she talks about how glad she is that he was killed. Her worldview has changed, and killing an abuser is no longer such a mortal sin, but justice. Julia turned on her brain, which is commendable. I'll also say a few words here, she didn't turn them on herself, but they turned on themselves, thanks to her son. A friend found out that she was HIV-positive, and immediately started attacking Yulia, saying she wanted to infect me as well as you could. Julia, despite her dislike for her husband, nevertheless decided to return to him - she needed money, and not only for herself, but also for her son, so that her blood would not be affected in the future by the same sufferings that she had begun (as soon as her friend found out, she immediately began to talk differently). And how else to do it? To allow the person who is to blame for this and who has ways to solve the problem (money) to do something. Just as it seems to me, the doctor did not understand who the prescription was being asked for. He just didn't want the murder that was going to be committed not to be on his conscience. He is a doctor after all, and as I understand it, initially his goal was good - to get rid of suffering. And then it's unclear why and for whom he was suddenly asked for a recipe, and he just made a mixture of something that would knock down, but not kill. It's a pretty ambiguous series and characters, you can spend forever discussing opinions and thinking, but in my opinion, that's the beauty of the series))
The ending, of course, is spectacular, but the scriptwriters didn't bother at all during the writing of the series with at least some plausibility. It is simply impossible to believe that none of Kostya's killers thought about making sure that he was dead, and not to believe in the effectiveness of the cocktail from the Doctor. Was Natasha's words enough for everyone? Did everyone calmly go to report to the boss that the job was done without even making sure that Kostya was dead? Did anyone even have any doubts that the heart attack might not be fatal and Kostya would be pumped out by an ambulance, which would be called to him when they found him? Who is such a primitive in the plot designed for? Or should the series be watched as a metaphorical fairy tale?
@id269224568: at the same time, they checked the pulse of the man beaten to death by the Japs, although they could just finish him off with a shot. And they happily drove past Kostya and that's it))
@an_khv: Well, it was in prison, where there are no unnecessary witnesses. And the one at the bus stop. They were just afraid to go out to check. They showed us that they are not particularly brave people. Suddenly someone will see. Plus the euphoria, the dizziness of success.
@id269224568: It's like you haven't watched the show before. All murderers are devoid of intelligence, cowardly, short-sighted. Only Kostya realized that the Professor was not really guilty, he said this in one of the episodes, because he got to the bottom of it. For the rest of the characters, he's just as much a maniac as the rest, who would give anything for his life. And because of their lack of intelligence, as well as the fact that they were motivated only by money, they did not even realize that the Professor did not kill and would not kill anyone (having said the recipe, he did not just ask why they needed it).
@katyaxlove: It's just that the world has collapsed for the local narrow-minded comrades. They've been telling the whole series that Kostya is a maniac, an absolute evil. And then it turns out that even the white sheep Natasha and Nina do this, and they kill (but thanks to the Professor it didn't work out), and they steal and throw money. And poor Nina didn't want to leave the tyrant. Although throughout the series it was shown that in the series all the main characters are more or less ambiguous, contradictory and far from positive. But the locals had a sore spot when I wrote about it. And here in the last episode, without any hints at all, they showed what all the characters are like. That's why some people are burning up because everything turned out not to be the way they wanted it to be) If the series had ended at the moment before the scene in the boss's office, there would have been joyful cries that everything had ended so well.))
@lexastaw: The fact that the other characters are negative doesn't make Kostya positive. Kostya is a sociopath and a manipulator. The rest of the characters are driven by small-minded villains. But Kostya is not a positive character and definitely not a good person. There is not a single good person in the series at all, all with their own vices and dark sides.
@lexastaw: I was one of those who said that Yankovsky wasn't playing an abuser, that it didn't look like it to me at all. It's good that I was wrong, and in general, he's not exactly what they tried to mold him into.
@nikatoten: Pahaha, yes, yes, the main villain)) It was he who brought the Japs to finish off the prisoner and take away the organs. Your fifth point is burning up significantly from the fact that Kostya turned out not to be as ugly as you wanted him to be)))
The ending is A SHOCK Tarantino would have appreciated it! I'm not talking about the whole episode, because not all the questions are answered, but the last scene is awesome!!!
But I would also like to mention something else.:
"I gave you security, I gave you money, I gave you rules. You took the security and the money, but there are no rules. And not a word about love. So Nina was really a prostitute after all? Yeah? And I felt sorry for her all season, but she turned out to be some kind of scum.
And Natasha and her mother? Honestly? I didn't feel sorry for her, but I understood why she behaved like that towards her daughter. She loves her, she wants to love her, but Natasha is not such a flower: a drinking, walking, adult daughter sitting on her neck. No education, no prospects, no desire to strive for something more. And not knowing what else to do, she makes the only right (as it seems to her) decision - to marry her off, take her off her shoulders and finally live her life.
And the doctor's wife... I hope she's going to be okay.
I don't justify Kostya's actions in any way, but in a conversation in a cafe with Sanya, he was telling the truth. He doesn't want to take responsibility, understand decisions, and is comfortable being a performer. And as soon as something serious happens, it immediately merges. And the fact that Sasha couldn't fulfill his plan (TWICE) was only confirmed by Kostya's words.
In general, the last episode put everything under a different angle, everything is so ambiguous. Is Kostya really the MOST negative character in this whole story?
@an_khv: wow, it's cool to read such sensible thoughts) There are still people here who are able to objectively evaluate the plot and characters. I was almost eaten here for such thoughts in the comments to other series))) Especially for the fact that I did not consider Nina and Natasha to be positive characters, and Kostya to be absolutely evil. He said that all heroes are ambiguous and contradictory. But there was such a howl. Many people have only white and black paint in their arsenal. Either bad or good. Although there's so much mixed up in all the characters that it's silly to think in such categories.
@an_khv: well, the main thing is what conclusions will be drawn as a result) Well, admitting mistakes is also a strong position, it seems to me) Well, many TV shows are watched to relax and miss the details. For example, I was immediately alerted by the moment when she (a married girl, kind of intelligent), discusses an erotic novel with an unfamiliar man (Roma). Probably, in the modern world, this is not something immoral. But for me personally, this is unacceptable. Therefore, the idea immediately arose that Nina is far from what she is shown to be or what she wants to appear.
@an_khv: Natasha's mom is also not white and fluffy, their relationship is built on a complete misunderstanding of each other. When her daughter needed moral support after being raped, her mother was outraged and tried to read morals. Her mother raised her to be such a good-for-nothing and selfish, and she also tried to get rid of unnecessary garbage. But in general, she and her husband are an ideal couple, two restless people who do not know what to do with their lives, only she is also more determined than he is.
It's funny enough that the moratorium on the death penalty was adopted in April 1997, and in March of the same year, the album of Civil Defense "Solntsevorot" was released with the song "The road Runs Far...", which was used in the final scene. Well, actually, the soundtrack of the series is my homage. It was a pleasure to listen throughout the entire viewing.
I don't know where I got more excited, probably from the moment when Nina gave pussy to a crazy granny 😁 She and Roma fully deserved it ))) The series is just fire, please advise something similar to Outsourcing and Track))
@katyaxlove: Crystal . I looked after the Track, these are conditionally male and female versions of a similar situation (a lot of different nuances, of course, but also a lot of similar things)! And the team worked the same way.
Do I understand correctly that the doctor falsely gave the non-lethal composition of the cocktail? And who was Nina that he suddenly let her go so easily?
@Flotus: Well, her mom is no better either. Even though her mother wanted her daughter to study, etc., that's why this girl became like this and saw such an upbringing from her mother.
In short, I mostly blame my mother, since my daughter is like this only because of her advice.
And she got married on the advice of her mother, and she had an abortion on the advice of her mother. And she came to her house, too, because in the hospital she said that "let's live together." Well, the daughter came to her later, but with black money.
Conclusion: mom is mentally ill, and this was especially evident in the last episode. Therefore, it's not just the redhead who should be annoying. Here, each character is distinguished by his own coolness, so to speak.
@wwile_: The daughter is like that because she is like that. You can't become something thanks to someone else's advice. A person acts based on his own desires and motives. And if not, then, as Kostya correctly said, he will always be assigned the role of a performer. Natasha's problem is that the most fundamental decisions (getting married, having an abortion) she accepted after listening to her mother. Because she didn't want to think herself, and she didn't have anything to think about, she didn't have any brains at all. There are a lot of examples when in the most dysfunctional families, the most disgusting parents grew up with decent, intelligent children, like roses among manure. Yes, the environment shapes us in many ways, instills certain values in us. But then there's us.
@wwile_: Natasha's chain of failures closed down and ended after the information about Sanechka's courageous, vindictive act. Her motivation to stab Kostya is more than understandable and logical. She literally became the wife of the Decembrist, ready to risk herself for the sake of her lover, carrying out his orders.
@elfiina: but it seems to me that a continuation is not necessary. The outsourcers are dead, Kostya is not involved, because all the witnesses are dead, Nina has dumped, Kostya has dirt on Natasha, the prosecutor's wife will not take revenge. Kostya is also likely to leave for another city with the money and his daughter. The moratorium was imposed. What is the sequel about?
@_AR_: judging by the status of the series, it is closed) and there is logically nothing to continue, their activities cannot be continued anyway and everyone is (almost) dead
In the comments above, I saw that Kostya later came to the conclusion that the doctor was, in fact, innocent. Was it real? I may have missed something, but the only thing that bothered him about the doctor's death was that he might be killed by an innocent person.
@spl7nc4: yeah. He also said that about the doctor, that he fulfilled the wishes of relatives and patients, saving them from suffering. And yes, that the doctor, in fact, is not to blame for anything. And since none of the relatives of the doctor's victims wanted him dead, allowing an outsider to kill him was just murder for money. How does he differ from a maniac? His dialogue was the same
@spl7nc4: In episode 3, Kostya interviews the Doctor, goes to the relatives of the victims, and everyone says that they don't feel anything bad about him at all, on the contrary, they speak very well of him and thank him. It seems at this moment Kostya gets the idea that the Doctor is not a maniac. The doctor was just performing illegal euthanasia, but he's not a psychopath, sick, etc. And in episode 5, in a conversation with an accomplice doctor from the colony, he tells him: - Do you understand that the Doctor is the only person who is not to blame for anything? And the most interesting thing is that the Doctor hears it all (he was shown right at that moment, how he was eavesdropping).
That is, from the point of view of the law, he is guilty of murder (but there is generally another article, another story, so to speak). Kostya and the Doctor are very similar, in fact. Therefore, for Kostya, he is not guilty, because the Doctor did not kill, he stopped tagging people.
Now, by the way, I was thinking that the Doctor might have guessed that this dose of the deadly drug could be for Bones. 1) He overheard the conversation and realized what they were doing + that Kostya was against the Doctor's execution 2) There was no Bone on the Doctor's coffer And since the local doctor is illiterate, he tricked him)
@lexastaw: When the Doctor asked who the cocktail was for?"It seemed to me that he realized that they wanted to remove one of their own. Otherwise, why? The wrong side of what happened through the eyes of Bones and the Doctor is absolutely not shown. I think it's a great idea for the second season, to tell this story from the other side.
@lexastaw: It seems to me that the moment is for whom the cocktail is for and whether the doctor understood it is not important.Because the doctor is not a murderer.Well, from the point of view of the law, he's a murderer.From the point of view of ethical morality, it is twofold.But from the point of view of relatives, he is not a murderer. That's why he gave me a fake recipe so that I wouldn't become a murderer in my eyes.
@lexastaw: even if it occurred to him that the doctor was innocent after all the conversations with the victims' parents, he still sat in the hotel until the evening, waiting for the father of the murdered woman. I mean, Kostya's actions often differ greatly from his words.
@alexblaze: I disagree. It seems to me that the suicide of the victim's father is the fattest argument. Why did the father do this? Because it's his fault. He agreed to euthanasia, he wanted it. It will sound ironic, but the Doctor is just a performer. I think it was after that that Kostya got the full picture.
Perhaps that's why Oleg made him so angry. He is a leftist man, but he came and blamed the Doctor for the death of his friend and his child. Although, in fact, the Doctor is only partly to blame for one thing (without the father's desire, nothing would have happened), he is not at all to blame for the other.
So everything is reasonable here and nothing goes wrong.
in general, it seemed that the creators had not fully decided what the character of Kostya should be....and if you believe the cut scenes, he was still a negative character. and in the end, though ambiguous, it is rather positive and you feel sympathy for it.
@spl7nc4: the fact is that all the characters here are ambiguous. For example, those who were fascinated by Nina and Natasha received a cold shower in the last episode. One robbed and ran away from everyone, the other killed (even if it didn't work out). Although it was initially clear that they were ambiguous characters, but everyone was so focused on Kostya that they didn't notice much. As for me, it turned out cool. There are no positive characters in the series. Everyone has a sin. Some have none. There may be sympathy for Kostya due to the fact that he has principles. Personality. Others don't. The rest of the characters are more concerned about money. Well, almost everyone is spineless.
@lexastaw: I will not stop defending the doctor's wife, I consider her the only positive character, even though she did not betray her husband and agreed to use dirty money for treatment
@an_khv: your right. Although it is clear that she is not a bad person. But still, to leave an innocent man in trouble that would lead to his death. Taking dirty money from a man who is unfaithful to you and has given you an incurable, terrible disease. I don't see anything positive here.
It's also worth remembering that outsourcing has evolved from an execution into a method of entertaining sick bastards. And by the way, they weren't having fun with some maniac beast, but with a man convicted of an economic crime. So it's not just dirty money here - it's real blood money.
Is it worth condemning her, given the situation she finds herself in? I don't think so. But personally, I don't see a positive character here. After all, a positive character is positive because he did something good, fought evil, sacrificed himself, etc. Julia has none of this.
There is no doubt that everyone is a nit (except Julia), but this does not whitewash Kostya, it does not make him less finished, even if the scale of everyone else's rot exceeds his personal one at times. Kostya still offered outsourcing, he still became the catalyst for the whole cunt, didn't he? Such an unfinished Joker — he tore off the masks from all these bastards, showed their essence and blablabla. Why, and most importantly fuck? A virtue, damn it. Xs, evil does not cease to be evil, even if it is lesser. But he spoke well about responsibility.
The shooting is powerful. And the ending itself? Well, I don't know, it seems like everyone got what they deserved, but it seemed too fantastic. I think the ending was slightly sweetened.
@olive_uxus: oh, but recently I sang something completely different)) But apparently it never got to the end. There are no positive characters in the series. Julia? Yes, there is no doubt that compared to the others, she is almost the whitest and fluffiest. BUT. She saw Oleg, he begged her for help. What did she do? That's right, I turned a blind eye. Isn't she to blame for Oleg's death? There is a share of guilt. She also didn't care where her husband got so much money from, it didn't bother her to continue living peacefully with him. So it's worth clearing up the veil of hatred for Kostya a little and looking at everything more objectively.))
"he became the catalyst for the whole cunt" Seriously? Did he rape Natasha? Did he force her to have an abortion? Did someone force Sanya to go kill the rapist? Did he infect Yulia with HIV? Or maybe it was because of him that Petya was running around with women? Or maybe because of him, Katya and Andrey's life wasn't going well? Etc. And outsourcing is to blame for all of the above, I wonder? Was someone forced to outsource at gunpoint?
Maybe it's enough to put all the responsibility on Kostya, making the rest of the victims? Yes, Kostya is a leader, he played an important role in some moments. Maybe we should finally admit that, as you put it, it's not just Kostya who's finished in the series, but everyone else as well? And as you say correctly (but to paraphrase a bit): The fact that Kostya is finished doesn't whitewash the others?
@lexastaw: I kind of wrote in plain text that all the nits. And she has never refused her previous comments. According to Yulia, yes, maybe I forgot about Oleg, I'm sorry about that.
There is no veil of hatred, but I have already realized that those who don't like Kostya are blind-deaf-uneducated-with a narrow mindset in order to see the full depth that you see.
Kostya is the catalyst for shit, not the reason, do you see the difference? The man pulled the strings, which led to various problems in the relations of the prosecutor, Rybkin and Roma. Not the reason, once again.
And we kind of finished the conversation three episodes ago, when you, dear, wrote that there was nothing to have a dialogue with me about — why are you stuck again?
@olive_uxus: The problem is not whether Kostya likes it or not. I'll tell you a secret, but I don't like anyone in this series at all, if you're hinting at something)) The problem is that you and others like you saw the absolute evil in the Bone, stuck a stigma and started running around with it, not noticing what others were doing, whitewashing them at times. And at the same time, he stopped seeing that Kostya was as ambiguous as everyone else.
Then why wasn't Sanya the catalyst? After all, he went to kill the rapist, took a shit, he was at gunpoint, and Kostya had to commit murder and step onto a dirty path.
Or why wasn't Kotov the catalyst? He was the one who brought this idea.
Or maybe, after all, not everything is as black and white as you draw it again?
@biatchtoksinjev: Man, have you ever heard of a 14-year-old kid suggesting reading books instead of watching low-grade content? You have a strange knowledge of the world. There are problems with logic, perception, and consistency. One is a man, the other is a 14-year-old...
Well, if a person is watching content for the mentally retarded, that's saying something. And when you see that a person is also unable to understand the meaning of what is written, the picture develops. And to appeal (on the one hand, by the way) to what a person consumes: it has always been and will always be relevant. Because it shows what he fills himself with. It also shows what he is striving for. An adequate person strives for art, knowledge, etc., a piglet strives for a puddle of mud, but more. ))) So, man, be healthy.))
@lexastaw: Ahaha, who would have thought that a highly moral intellectual is also a Gram Nazi - there has never been such a thing, and here it is again.
as for "understanding the meaning of what is written": in my humble opinion (and not only in my opinion, judging by the disadvantages), it is you who do not understand the meaning of what is written: you have to manage to see comment after comment what other commentators have not even written in letters. And then, after they explained exactly what they meant, they also twisted half of it in favor of their non-working arguments.…
I'll tell you a secret: people watch a variety of content that exists not only for the notorious self-development that you trump, but purely to have fun, relax the brain after a long day at work, etc. etc.
It seems like you've been running around here that your Kostya is being labeled, and you've decided that I'm a dumbass just because of some kind of psychics. Is anything tight, Mr. Flexible Thinking?
@biatchtoksinjev: You're a funny little fool)) I don't want to dirty the letters about you anymore, as I wrote nonsense, and I keep writing the same thing))
I thought until the last moment that they would merge the finale, but they pulled it off like that) I'm happy. The gloomy and oppressive atmosphere throughout the series, everyone got what they deserved. Nina, of course, it was just a surprise, I didn't think that she would leave her daughter until the last..
How did Bones get access to the weapon? In '96, prison officers had SS (special equipment): a rubber stick, handcuffs, and gas. It's up to the viewers to figure it out. Regarding the medication in the syringe, I think the doctor who was on the pancreas guessed that it was for killing someone, and gave another prescription that does not kill. At the end, they showed a scene of him laughing. The ending seems to be the only correct one, so to speak, in the sense that all the prisoners were shot, who was imprisoned for the murder of an Interior Ministry employee. Kostya outplayed everyone, it was readable from series 3-4. Overall, it's not a bad series. 8 out of 10.
@vk860469: the shooting was done with a pistol. We could have shown a short scene about how Kostya got a machine gun. Otherwise, it's just a mini-scene of him taking a man off camera.
@Crosser: and you remember, there was a scene at the very beginning, where Kostya and Rybkin handed over their weapons before going home. (When Rybkin stole a gun to get revenge). So they had access.
I remember in the comments to the previous episodes, Kostya was a maniac, an abuser, and many others. And here, it turns out, after the last episode, Nina has already become bad for most. How changeable people's opinions are.
The series is wonderful, another successful project about the 90s lately.
@raul777g: In the last episode, the scriptwriters expertly swap the characters, exposing their true essence with specific actions.And those who seemed like a positive character yesterday eventually voluntarily become traitors and murderers out of a thirst for banal profit , thus exposing their dirty souls and thoughts . In general, all the characters except Bones do not have any clear moral principles and firm life attitudes. And by the way, their moral decline is reflected in the new poster of the series with a hint of the fall of Pompeii." Great allegory!
@GermanSW: Well, we're either in favor of morality or going to the police. I'm not talking about Vadik because he fits in, but Kotov doesn't. Kotov threatened to hand them over IF they refused him. If he had killed the Professor, he wouldn't have gone to the police either. But for some reason, the principled Kostya did not sell outsourcing to him for $ 500, but to Alla for an amount 100 times more. But what about "human life cannot be turned into an auction" or if you really want to, then you can?
@g1481395: Because for 500 dollars, he would hardly have been able to persuade the rest of the team. This is not the kind of money for which you can put your head under an article. Especially if you divide them into five. So the mother of the murdered girl is better suited to implement the idea of outsourcing, anyway. And the Cat had to think before threatening two prison guards who had already killed a man in front of his eyes.
@g1481395: One more time. In order to bring the idea and philosophy of outsourcing to life. The consent of the other colleagues was needed. They would have refused for 500 dollars for all of them. And then it wouldn't have worked.
@g1481395: What you don't understand speaks more about you. Than about me. Kostya wanted to realize his idea.To let the victims' relatives pay off the killers. Kotov, with his 500 bucks, was not suitable for this. Because in order to realize the idea, the WHOLE team had to be interested. And he offered too little money. And it became an obstacle to the realization of the idea. But money is important here, not because Kostya is selfish. But because there should be enough of them to involve others in the execution of the idea. Kostya wouldn't have done it alone. It's much easier to explain, I do not know.
@raul777g: Ninochka is a cheater and a cuckoo in fact. A robber, a beater, and a robber of elderly, pious grannies. She was a lover bugger and an egotist. As a woman, there is no more sinful heroine in the series. I would even say that she alone outweighs the totality of all the mistakes and omissions of the other heroines, absolutely all the female characters in the series. As a woman, she did not fulfill her main female function - she did not save and even broke up her family, the only one of all, if anything.
How can I fuck up the ending at the last minute Well done, it would have been better if it had just been a riot in prison. The main scum/serpent tempter of the series, who ruined the lives of so many people who usually lived, received absolutely no retribution...
@Liyuuuuunder: Oh, not everyone got Kostya's monologue about responsibility. His retribution is that he is forced to live in this world, look at the squalor of people and somehow coexist with them. That's more than enough for a man with his brains.
@reflexenia: Poor wretch, if only he'd just watched instead of coaching people. He brought everyone to the edge, pushed them in the back and watched with a grin on his face as they crashed, getting some kind of inhuman pleasure from it, if it weren't for him, everyone would have lived peacefully, doing their daily chores, building families the way they could. This blackness of their souls might never have surfaced.
@Liyuuuuunder: He didn't train anyone, he didn't lead anyone to any edge. And he clearly did not feel any pleasure, especially inhuman. How can you see this in Vanya's character? If burnout had an ambassador, it would be Kostya Volkov. He understands this world completely, just like in a meme. And he sees it without rose-colored glasses. Everyone voluntarily gave him the right to make decisions. He didn't force them in any way. We are the only ones responsible for every choice in our lives, not some conditional Other who is stronger or smarter. This is the main idea of the series, and I won't even add "in my opinion," because it's obvious, to put it mildly. And it's all the sadder that even such an obvious message did not reach many viewers, and they remained in the position of a deceived victim, like Sasha Rybkin sniffling in the cafe scene.
@reflexenia: You've probably watched the series badly. Didn't you see how Kostya forced Petya to cheat on his wife all the time? How did he get Petya to infect Yulia with HIV? And then he forced Andrey and Katya to live in their parents' house, pitted them there. He convinced Katya that she wanted a good life and to run away from her husband. Then he arranged for Natasha to be raped, and for her mother to insist on an abortion, just like Sanya. Etc. Everyone lived in peace, peace and joy, and then, as soon as Kostya came and let's take out the blackness of their souls... Phaahha, didn't you watch such a series?))) I don't understand if people have a memory like fish, or if it's so difficult to properly perceive what is shown on the screen...
@reflexenia: The whole housewarming scene is bliss in Kostya's eyes, dead souls were sitting at the table, and he was admiring it. A wife crawling on her knees with a bald cut head, shaved by him for the amusement of her ego and the pleasure in his eyes after wiping away false tears. The only thing I can accept as some kind of attempt to justify his behavior is that he just doesn't feel anything in his normal state, and such abominations happening around him are pulling out the last remnants of sensitivity.
He never took responsibility for his actions. After all, he killed the rapist, who asked him to??? He killed the witness. He came up with this whole outsourcing thing. He blew everyone's ears, saw Sasha doubting everything, especially himself, the guy, who, I'm sorry, but is clearly young, and already works in a strict zone and executes death sentences, drove his ambiguous philosophical assholes so that the guy's roof whistled even more. He, in turn, ruined the life of his new wife, who had not yet moved away from her mother's influence, and here was her husband, whom she seemed to need to obey, but he himself did not understand how best, because his friend had rinsed his brains. The rest were also crushed bit by bit to the point that if there were any facets of reason, then they were gone.
I don't feel sorry for any of the murdered outsourcing participants, but Kostya's miraculous appearance at the end doesn't respond to me. To me, he's like the mastermind of a murder, he also has to answer fairly, and he can also become a boss somewhere, apparently. (I hope they have enough brains not to continue this)
@lexastaw: they lived the way they lived, that's how everyone lived at that time, unfortunately. But they didn't break the law, they didn't kill people because it was profitable for them. You're the one who doesn't understand what you've seen. It wasn't the domestic violence that drove them to the handle, but the illegal murders around them, the pressure of first one manipulator, and then a worse manipulator, but more authoritative and constant fear. Why did you cling to their family squabbles and erase from your memory what happened outside of that?
@Liyuuuuunder: There was no bliss there. Yes, he was amused by what was happening, but nothing more. And this perception of what is happening is a logical tactic in the context of mental health, because he did not come to visit, but to the kunstkamera in fact. And he lives in it too. Therefore, in order to somehow get rid of it, you can focus on the comedic component in this tragicomedy. And putting aside the armor of moral superiority, it was really a ridiculous situation. And the whole housewarming party is funny, despite the ugliness of what is happening. Life is always like this, it's not black and white, it has a lot of colors, it never has any one clear state, one clear emotion. I didn't see any false tears in the scene with my wife in this episode. In my opinion, he felt sorry for her, but it was sticky and humiliating for both sides, as if she were not a human being, but a dog with broken paws. And that's why he didn't want to live with her anymore. If Kostya hadn't killed the rapist, the rapist would have killed Rybkin. It was a defense, although this does not negate the fact that Kostya committed murder. However, it was Sasha who created this situation. He killed a witness, and no one absolves him of responsibility for this act either. This is a criminal offense. But I also do not absolve the witness of responsibility for the fact that he came to ramble to two turntables whom he saw killing a man. Just as an investigator cannot be absolved of responsibility for going on a date with an organized criminal group on the territory of a high-security facility without warning anyone (here's a minus for the scriptwriter, who tied the characters with one blood in such a primitive way). Eldar Kalimulin, who plays Sasha Rybkin, is thirty-one. He looks thirty-one, despite the offended face of lyali. When will he get fat? At fifty? Vanya Yankovsky is thirty-four. There are three years between Sasha and Kostya. The problem with a thirty-one-year-old forehead is that he was going to get married for some reason, and for some reason he gave the leadership of his family life to a colleague. By the way, Kostya told Natasha absolutely sensible things. But her brain doesn't click there so much that she didn't hear it at all and even went to murder just to stay with the poor Sasha, who is ready to polish his dick for raffaella. And now I have to feel sympathy for these insects, and strongly condemn the bad, terrible Volkov, yeah. Kostya has never refused responsibility for his actions. He says in plain text and more than once that he does many things for others. He doesn't shy away from it. And, given his combat experience in Chechnya, it's possible to explain why he kills people so easily. He has a real trauma and PTSD, which all manifest themselves individually. That doesn't excuse him, but it explains how I keep saying it. What explanation can be given for the bestial cruelty of these freaks? How can you explain the fact that they stood and looked (though turning away) at what the Japanese were doing? Only their total inner squalor. It doesn't respond to you, but it does to many. I came across a good definition for this character: "black conscience". Yes, it's black. But conscience, because with concepts. In this sense, he absolutely inherits Danila Bagrova. He even sheltered a bald prostitute under his wing (this parallel is clearly no coincidence).
@Liyuuuuunder: Not everyone lived like this, you don't have to invent it. Tell me, why did the prosecutor outsource? Wasn't it because his wife wanted a beautiful life and money? And she didn't care where they came from, they just were. And Dr. Peter, can you tell me why he agreed? Wasn't it because he cheated on his wife and infected her with HIV? And he felt guilty. Sanya and Roman also had a desire to get money for a reason. These people are mired in mud even to the Bone. Kostya gave them the opportunity to go deeper, they did it perfectly. Even without him, we got deeper and deeper.
If there were no Bones, there would be other ways to drown yourself. A normal and conscientious person with character will not do what they did.
@Liyuuuuunder: If Kostya hadn't shown up in their town, Natasha would have been raped anyway. Vadik would have killed Sanka. And that body with the baby would have brought her to an abortion in the same way. Kostya, on the contrary, urged his wife to feel sorry for this moron. The doctor's wife would have died of HIV, because they wouldn't even have that money. But at least there's a chance. Well, the prosecutor's wife would have left him if it hadn't been for the money from outsourcing. And there are also different versions of events possible. Kostya just let them prove themselves. And what happened came out.
@reflexenia: half of your arguments are your guesses, the age of the actor is not equal to the age of the character, the wife is a prostitute, who said that? She could have been an orphan whom he met by chance and realized that he could make himself a pocket dog, which he eventually pawed and killed, and many other stories of their meeting can be imagined.
"He takes responsibility" to say is not to take. He didn't pay for these murders in any way, in case you forgot, he was going to outsource all this to the prison governor and these morons. If sledak had been smarter, this would have happened.
@lexastaw: Most of them lived in such a place. Someone cheated, someone was raped, someone was beaten, someone was a spineless mother's weirdo. There are four people walking past this mountain, there are other people working there, here they are the percentage of normal/ordinary families and these abnormal ones. If Kostya hadn't offered, yes, there would have been no money, yes, something went wrong for someone, but it would have been an ordinary life and they would have lived it the way they could cope with their difficulties. Your "he just showed what they are" yes, take any person, you will find some kind of wormhole, this does not mean that you have to push and poke there so that EVERYONE SEES. People are not saints, but they do not deserve provocations from leftist people who are bored on this planet.
@Liyuuuuunder: Eldar Kalimulin is obviously not young. Rybkin obviously has a lot of experience working in prison, which is clear from the very first scenes. He must be at least twenty-five, that's for sure. That is, the brain is physiologically already fully formed. And nothing prevents him from being thirty-one years old, very many remain infantile all their lives, not to mention this age. A prostitute wife is literally asking for it. Yes, this is the same guess as yours, with the only difference that Kostya called her a prostitute, and obviously not without reason. Perhaps he was referring simply to sexual impurity, rather than occupation, but we saw, and also clearly for good reason, how easily she fell under Roman. And no, not because she split up at that moment or detached herself from herself, as some wrote, but because she doesn't care about the star, who's on it, who controls it, as long as this someone gives her some benefits and an understanding of what to do. That's why she didn't want to leave Kostya so much. From Kostya, and not from his daughter. Because the girl is a burden, and Kostya is a nutritious sponsor. And he didn't interrupt her with any paws. She is initially poor. Well, responsibility isn't just criminal, is it? Kostya's attitude to the state and its right to assign responsibility to someone is understandable. He sees that there is no de facto state, that it is immoral, that the perpetrators escape punishment. He does not want to be responsible to such a state. And he does everything to prevent this from happening.
@an_khv: No, Vadik would have killed Sanka. Kostya showed up at the last moment. Just before Vadik was about to shoot. And by the way, after that, Vadik could find Natasha and finish her off. On my nerves, after a failed assassination attempt.
@Liyuuuuunder: I don't understand why everyone forgot that Kostya was the first killer in the series. He also wanted to kill Oleg... The character is no better than the others, and at some points worse.
@Liyuuuuunder: They wrote that the screenwriters spoke about Kostya as a participant in the war in Chechnya. He really looks like a man who is not himself, in a state of PTSD, who perceives the surrounding reality in a distorted way. And all this "ordinary" life doesn't bother him. He is also a kind of "maniac".
A great ending! Yes, it was a little unexpected, but when they started showing their Happy endings, it was already clear that it was going to be a fuck-up. Such an oppressive atmosphere of the whole series and such a cheerful ending!
Okko just amazes me! They've been releasing a bunch of interesting projects lately, and this one is no exception. The title of "The Most anticipated TV series of the Year" is definitely about him.
The ending and the whole story are just fire! Yankovsky is a cool actor, his performance in the series was very convincing. The female characters also turned out great. And all this blackness and depressive atmosphere around — well, just to the point, the name of the series fully justifies itself.
A powerful ending and a cool series in general, finished well, didn't get high for long The fact that Kostya will survive (the betrayal of the doctor) is expected. Kostya was the only one who treated him well In general , the doctor is the luckiest , it turns out that he escaped death twice Murder by foreigners is very cruel, it gives you goosebumps. The female roles are cool, Natasha's mom is certainly far from being the perfect mom.
the special effects of the tik-tok filter level were upset in the final scene, it was very eye-catching, the blood just looks disgusting, and the bullet holes too
or maybe the doctor guessed who the mixture was for and gave the wrong proportions?.. as a result, Kostya, who was not very loved as a character, was the only one left alive, which means he is clean, because there is no way to find out what happened)) but somehow I misunderstood something to Kostya: he calmly kills a rapist on the street, then a witness, and when it came to executing the sentence, he was against someone on the left, who was not injured... the ending is kind of forced. Well, there's no groundwork for the next season, and by the years, the pardon law has already been released in the series . In general, it's not a bad series.
@skazo4huk: Well, Vadik was a rapist, and Kotov was blackmailing Kostya and Rybkin. And then Kostya told him to go to Khabarovsk. If I had listened, I would still be alive. That is, from his point of view, they deserved it. And the Doctor took upon himself the sin and the death sentence in order to help the suffering people pass away without pain. And that's why Kostya didn't want to be killed by some leftist.
@GermanSW: I know all this, yes, but he was generally in favor of the moral that someone on the left does not have the right to kill a condemned person, but only the victims. Not just doctors
I guessed that the moratorium would be featured in the final, as it was not by chance that the year 96 was chosen. However, I assumed that they would execute, and then it would be revealed that the criminal must be alive because of the moratorium and they would all be covered because of this. Well, like relatives start to find out, etc.
And here the ending is bright and spectacular. But as far as I'm concerned, it's merged. What is the director trying to convey to us? Who is more cunning and right? Is history written by the winners? Kostya is the same negative character as the others, what kind of punishment did he suffer?
Well, not to mention the fact that he went to a secure facility after being suspended, and calmly brought the prisoner to the chief's office without raising questions from anyone. I also got a signed weapon. The fact that they trusted the cocktail and did not check the fact of death has already been mentioned above. Was it interesting to watch? It was. Did the actors act well? Great. But can I say that this is the perfect job? No, as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't evoke a response.
They competently threw it out to the audience: was there a triumph of justice or not? Are there enough punishments for crimes, or are there more candidates?
Everything is clear on the bone, I chewed everything through the mouth of several characters about responsibility for decision-making and about the principles of life. It's a great move to outsource the execution of a sentence to someone who has a greater thirst for revenge.
But according to the Doctor's joke, it is very expected. Presumptuous stupidity to trust him. And that sincere laugh at the end is great. Still, there was at least one character who was happy in the end!
Am I a very bad person, that I laughed in my voice from the ending?))))) In my opinion, shikaaaaarnoooo!!! This is exactly the kind of epic ending that should have been done in such a series. Bravo to the scriptwriters, it's really an application for the TV series of the year. I never liked Nina, you could figure her out right away. This is a very convenient position for the victim, although in fact it is an ordinary device. I'm sorry for Natasha. She's not a model of morality either, but she's a person no one has ever really loved, not even her own mother. That's why she was so excited when she found out that her husband had killed a rapist, in her world it was like a heroic act, that someone protected her. And I'm just really interested in how she will live in the same city with Kostya?))) I don't envy Natasha. About the rest, so everything is clear))) We were surprised with the Japanese, of course. The outsourcers had such fucking faces. Like they're the most beaten down, but they're not - they knocked on the bottom. There won't be a second season, I think.
They turned the psychopath Bones into the perfect just ruler of fate. Everyone's freaks, but he's just smarter, so he got away with it. And the question of how the convict got the machine gun remains open.
@VikDz: Well, where did Kostya get it? Did they just give it away at the armory and not ask why? After all, this prison is special.the object and all the actions there are probably a bunch of instructions. To me, it's a weak point in the script.
The ending is great. There are so many unexpected things in one episode. And Natasha showed herself and the doctor. I didn't expect Bones to come back. And the execution scene is just creepy. The behavior of everyone present. After that, I don't feel sorry for any of them.
I don't understand why everyone writes that Kostya is not a bad character.... He behaved abominably with his wife, he killed people in cold blood. You can't be "less bad" or "more bad." There are no positive characters in this series, it's just that everyone has their own responsibility. Someone pulled the trigger himself, someone gave the order to pull the trigger, someone knew that they were pulling the trigger, but calmly continued to live with it because of monetary gain.
@vk572064: my wife and I completely chewed it out for the viewer, she herself initially agreed to live under his rule. And she could leave him at any moment. And in the end, she was shown what she is. She abandoned her daughter, whom she clearly didn't care about, abandoned her lover for money, and it's a miracle that his mother didn't kill him. Is it really worth sympathizing with her?
In principle, the women here are all likely to grab the money that's left, and who goes where won't disappear.
Except for the cop who was killed, everyone here is worth each other
@Sociophobe: Yeah, she could leave him at any moment.…In a city where there is no work and being completely dependent on it physically, economically and morally. And by the way, he works in prison, he probably has connections and he knows very well how to manipulate people's weaknesses and inspire them with what he wants.
By the way, the story gives the impression that the girl is not her daughter. This was not disclosed in detail, but it looks like there is zero emotional connection between them.
And plus, I want to point out that as soon as she had the financial opportunity, the first thing she did was board a plane.
@vk572064: why not? Kotov, Sledak, Dentist, Doctor Black, Millionaire punisher. The prosecutor's office has a wife, in general, OK, just young and beautiful in such a Zazhopinsk, even her trip to the club turned out to be one of the most harmless
The thirst for easy money clouded their minds so much that they just took it and believed that a man sentenced to death for killing people would help them? It's not for nothing that the last episode focused on the relationship between Bones and the Doctor, because the latter understood who the others wanted to kill. But during the final scene, bravo, several scenarios flew through my head, but everything turned out differently.
I'll dilute everyone's enthusiasm. I didn't like the show. The same Crystal is an order of magnitude higher, there is a sense of drama there, it catches to the quick. This one is not. Either because there are no characters worth sympathizing with, or because they relied on entertainment, adding absolutely all human vices. It seemed to me that everything was in a heap, events were moving too fast. You don't have time to think about exactly how the shown gun will fire, as it is already firing. I didn't understand why we were watching this series at all - what were they trying to convey to us? "This one is bad, but these ones, aren't they even worse?" Bravo to the actors, the picture and the views are beautiful. I didn't get the idea of the series.
@oasumii: Yes, the ending is so-so if they were all imprisoned, there would be some kind of morality and meaning. But the authors decided that the too predictable ending made this nonsense. It wasn't clear with the bald man at all, why did he kill himself if he saw the commemoration? It would be logical to kill Kostya and give up. I would have just sat there.
@prosvirkina: The last execution seems to have been in the fall of 1996. This is one time.
Two, you probably don't know how the investigation is going. It's a bunch of bureaucracy + then courts + appeals. Even just an investigation usually takes place within a month + trial + appeals. You can definitely delay a year for six months.
So, without even realizing that a moratorium had been imposed, he had bought his life time with a new crime, while everything described above would have happened. There wasn't much point in killing yourself.
@Sociophobe: A pardon does not mean that he is free. His death penalty was commuted to life imprisonment. And he probably didn't want to sit for the rest of his days.
@Sociophobe: I think he killed them because Kostya told him something. And after the execution, he saw the pardon order on the table, realized that he would be in prison for a long time and decided that it would be easier to die himself than to endure prison for life.
@an_khv: he killed them because he just hates cops + he heard how they beat the previous executed man. This shooting was a joy to him, but he shot himself because he imagined what life would be like for him until the end of his days under the supervision of colleagues of the murdered
@dubolom: Well, these films successfully escape often. If he were alone, many of them would have been shot. I could have tried to raise a riot, of course, the ending is also predictable: special forces assault and most likely death.
If by some miracle he escaped, a large-scale search would eventually find him. Most of them find them.
A super wonderful option, escaped into the wilderness and became a successful survivalist. Well, this is on the verge of fiction.
@oasumii: I'm with you. Beautifully and qualitatively shot. But this is a completely empty work, where the authors are not interested in the characters, events happen because the scriptwriter needs it, and not out of the inner logic and motivation of the characters. It's just that the blackheads piled up with beautiful music and views.
@oasumii: as for me, it's a purely Bykovsky series, like the Major for 8 episodes, that's its theme. Indeed, personally, I have not seen such well-developed and well-played characters for a long time. Well, there is no passing role, not a single one
I'm shocked by the finale. How cleverly Kostya outplayed everyone... and his wife (or who was she to him?) She didn't lose her head, took the money and flew away, hopefully to a place where she would be happy...
I'm probably in the absolute minority, but in the end, I didn't like the series. It was shot and played beautifully, but there are questions about the story. Or rather, not even to the story itself, but to the way it is told. Firstly, the authors completely ignored everyday logic. There's a cop that everyone forgets about, as if he never existed, and Kotov, who materializes from nowhere at the end. How did he get through security, who gave him a gun, if he's on vacation for everyone? Yes, the scriptwriter was clearly not writing a realistic thriller, but rather a philosophical parable - but the action still does not take place in a parallel reality. After all, it is clearly stated that the year is 1996. It is precisely because of this attempt to combine the parable with stories about HIV, domestic violence, rape, and other everyday nightmares that the series does not work for me. The characters are essentially certain types that either don't develop at all, or on the contrary change dramatically because the author of the script wanted to. Natasha suddenly, at the snap of a finger, agrees to kill a man who has done nothing wrong to her personally. Just because she returned to her husband, who had recently left her. By the final episode, I wouldn't be surprised at anything at all, maybe that's why the unexpected ending with the resurrection of the Cat didn't make an impression. Plus, for a series that tries to raise difficult topics, they too often say the main thoughts head-on. Which is only worth Kotov's monologue in a cafe. As a result, for me, Outsourcing is an example of a series in which everything else was sacrificed for the sake of effect and message.
@id156759855: I agree, but you can understand about Natasha, many people go like a cuckoo after being raped, and then she also lost her child's ability to procreate. My version is that she just went like a cuckoo. Plus they hit her over the head with a mug. By the way, this moment was very predictable, when that girl got up and finished her beer, I immediately thought that she was going to hit Natasha over the head with a mug. Perhaps Natasha's reaction was retarded due to alcohol intoxication. I was watching it sober))
@id156759855: I agree with the rest, but for Natasha, we were shown that she had nowhere to go. And in the cafe, when she felt joy that the rapist had been killed and none other than her husband, she decided by all means to return to him and thank him for it. We were also shown intimate intimacy where she pleasured him. Then, since he was a coward himself, he decided to shift responsibility to Natasha for solving the problem with Bones. And she gladly agreed, because she felt that she had to repay him for dealing with the rapist and not sending her away again.
@NoizPitcher: I agree, but it was interesting anyway. The main thing is to include critical thinking and not take it seriously)) Example: A squid game. There's a lot of black stuff there)) And many hundreds of murders. It's just a TV show.)
And I'm glad Nina was able to get out of the clutches of abuse. That she overcame her softness , bought expensive boots and flew away. Many people write about not being attached to their daughter, but let's look at it from the other side, the daughter was leaking everything to her dad and sending her life, "you're shaming me."…The daughter is shown as a copy of the father…Well, yes, Nina is not of this world. These are usually creative people. She tolerated them. and Kostya, and my daughter, and may she be happy, reads books and lives peacefully without abuse. I hope I didn't hurt anyone's feelings with my comment. Honestly, it's a creepy scene, as Kostya cut Nina's hair right in front of my eyes.
@Prinsecka: "was she able to get out"? She was literally pushed out of this abuse, despite her desire to stay. To overcome your softness is, for example, to leave on your own. And not to be on the street, not to come to a strange grandmother and rob her. Comparing an adult capable (albeit pretending to be incapacitated) lady and a girl elementary school student is powerful, of course. "You're shaming me" is more than a child's natural reaction to the appearance of an inadequate mother in shoes from the cold. Moreover, the girl was very quickly ashamed of this phrase and ran after her mother. Otherwise, how did her daughter poison her life? Well, you conveniently forgot that it was your daughter who tried to help her when she was a child. "She put up with them." I wouldn't have tolerated it that way. If she was patient, why didn't she want to leave? And in what place is she a creative person? What does this mean? That she reads books, like about every first person? And in what kind of fabulous reality would a creature so unfit for life be happy? The money will run out. Unfortunately, philologists are not exactly in demand in the labor market. Especially in a foreign country. None of the heroines will be happy, except, perhaps, Julia, if she manages to recover. It is quite possible that HIV will mobilize her and teach her to enjoy every day.
@reflexenia: maybe not creative, but sophisticated. moreover, under the wild 8-10 years of pressure from a manipulative psychopathic abuser. To want (to leave) and to be able are different verbs. Besides, Kamchatka is a cold hell for such a vulnerable soul. Obviously, in order to fully familiarize yourself with this character, you need to read the Stallion and take a closer look at the female character there.
The finale is like icy water in the face. Without catharsis, without hope, just a dot. The kind that leaves only silence and the feeling that you've been squeezed out. It's amazing how the series managed to maintain a somber tone until the very end, without slipping into a farce. But it's also scary — there's no light, no way out, just a gray routine where everything is predictably bad.
The characters have not changed by the end, except that the masks have finally fallen off. Yankovsky brought his hero to a complete moral nullification. At some point, you catch yourself thinking that you can't even hate him anymore — he's become so much a symbol of something bigger, some kind of system without a soul and without a purpose.
I would like to say that the series was impressive. But it would be more correct to empty it. It feels like it's gotten a little darker inside. If the authors wanted to use this ending to remind us how it shouldn't be, they did it.
I join the majority of what has been written, I liked the series, the ending with a spark in the truest sense of the word, but there were unanswered questions.
1. About Nina's past, the fact that Kostya called Roma's mom her prostitute, I thought that this was a branded and reliable cliche for money on the bench, and not a reference to the past. Her motivation and relationship with Kostya were unclear, from the secret purchase of books instead of boots and the punishment of shaving to the abandonment of her daughter. Communication is at zero. And where did Kostya keep the money, that Nina didn't find it and didn't take it, the rest of the women found everything? 2. What happened to the doctor's sex addiction? And why was she in the series, in order to get sick and one sick lover would be enough to interact with the doctor? But it also turned out to be questionable. 3. The rapist's wife says that his body has been found. Drunk Natasha, without hearing the cause of death: am I glad that he was killed, and besides a mug on the head there is no continuation? 4. The investigator is missing — no one cares. Well, gone and gone 5. The most confusing character for me was Natasha's mother, everything related to her was close to some kind of twists, but it never played out: attempts to look for a cop, overheard by the prison governor exposing the daughter's monologue. She gets involved in everything that doesn't really concern her, and then, at the snap of her fingers, she abruptly doesn't care. 6. Well, I can barely imagine a dialogue between a drunken, bloody Natasha and her husband, where he asks her to kill Kostya instead of him, so that what? Should I keep eating Raffaelki? Cover his ass out of pity? To resume a relationship?
@maryalice_me: 1. invested in the spiritual, not the material. shaving your head is a thousand-year-old punishment for female infidelity. The daughter is mentally more mature than the mother, so it's still unclear who left whom. 2. balanced the dosage 3. Does my wife have Stockholm syndrome, should I have shot her with a shotgun too? 4. the base 5. Her last monologue was sincere. with them, she finally cut the umbilical cord with her daughter and began to build her personal life. It was quite successful until the last moment 6. Why drunk? It could have been a few days there, and her husband was a hero in her eyes, where did the pity come from, on the contrary, complete submission and devotion. blowjob is just an indicator of the finally accomplished transition to unconditional male dominance in their family.
I thought they leaked the series, but the ending is good. The actors are all just great. I really like Mila Yershova - from difficult teenagers to Outsourcing. It's a very good project.
The final is fire! In this episode, I had a terrible aversion to all the characters except Julia. At the moment when the Japanese were beating the Robber to death, I even cried a little from a sense of injustice, because they made the decision in hindsight, and most likely he would have been able to serve until the death penalty was abolished. In the finale, I felt a little sorry for Peter, but there was still a bit of humanity in him until the last. And oh, how upset I was when I saw Kostya in the finale, I assumed that he was alive, because the doctor understood who they needed this cocktail for.… But all the same, I hoped that this cunning asshole would be merged exactly as ridiculously as he deserves. To be honest, I expected more from this series, I bet 8/10.
@masha_nice: because he read the order that exempted him from the death penalty. He decided to be shot after listening through the wall to his neighbor being dragged to execution by force. Well, more precisely, Yankovsky's hero probably put him up to it.
@masha_nice: I think he was already mentally ready for the end, but instant death and torture to death are different things, so he agreed to take revenge and took his own life.
@masha_nice: He killed two guards and the prison governor. He would no longer face a death sentence, anyway, the moratorium was introduced in 1997. But sooner or later, the guards probably beat him to death in his cell for this, so he probably decided right away - so as not to suffer.
When Kostya was killed, figuratively speaking, I honestly burned out with these schmucks, which they were happy about. Kostya gave them everything, an idea and money, without him they're a bunch of empty-headed idiots and they pulled it off so easily. Everyone is so happy, the prosecutor got a promotion, the doctor's wife seemed to be getting better, Natasha and Sanya started bed wars, but that wasn't it 😄
Of course, this execution with the Japs, the prison governor overplayed his hand against the background of such money. Kostya and the team were at least looking for people whose loved ones had been killed.
The conversation between Bones and Sledge in the restick is 100% right, the first one is to blame, but we must not forget that the manipulator is still the same.
The ending, of course, amused 😂 just a bunch of idiots, such peppers)) If they got rid of the Bone, they should have found the body, and how would he be listed as deceased? The question arises as to how he got back to prison in his uniform. Okay, let's overlook this fact 😁 but Tarantino and Balabanov really appreciated it, the commentators above are right 👍 overall, I'm happy with the series, I've been waiting for it for a long time only because of Yankovsky
@Mankun1anec: This is the nineties, there is no electronic pass system that could instantly restrict his entry. The administration is in chaos, they didn't officially dismiss him to get his pass and uniform, they thought he was dead. The checkpoint guards are not aware of their affairs, an employee came and came. It's just logical.
It's some kind of crazy series. It's just that bullshit happens for the sake of bullshit. This is the scene where the decanter flies into the raped woman's head, the quintessence of the series. Its essence. In any other crime series, they would try to get rid of the boss because he holds them by the balls. But no, let's get rid of the author of the idea, who is already suspended.
On the very topic of the series, it's good if there is one episode. Everything else is filler. There are only three executions, the last two with a lot of problems. All the characters are crazy. Maybe there was no outsourcing, but this is all a mass fantasy of psychiatric patients. Or everyone is dead, and the action takes place in purgatory. I do not know how else to explain the total irrational behavior of all the characters.
@driveshaft: Don't you think it's easier to get rid of the sergeant than the warden? the boss has been serving with a backbone for a long time, the boss has been murdering sledak himself and signed up for their deluge , so if the idea can be outsourced, what is the value of the author, besides radishes, which will turn everyone in at the first shoo
@driveshaft: as a result, it was not possible to jump off even bypassing the sergeant, let alone the superiors. Actually, this movie has the most ridiculous statutory relationship that I've seen. The prosecutor with the lieutenant colonel's shoulder straps talks on equal terms with the soldier sergeants, this is such ridiculous nonsense
"Until you take responsibility for your actions, you won't budge. And you will always be a performer. And your life will always be led by someone. And you will always outsource it."
10 minutes before the end, I was already imagining the return of Bones in the second season.😂 But the ending honestly fell out of the blue. With a snap of his fingers, Kostya returned and everyone was killed, and it would seem such a series and such an abrupt ending. The series is ordinary, but at the same time a masterpiece. It shows the instinctive essence of a person, which I liked the most. It's a pity Kostya didn't reveal himself as a character, it's a great game and the Persian himself is interesting, but without a backstory it's a big omission (( And it's a pity that the series ended there and it's unlikely that something worthy and similar will be removed in the near future.
The ending is fire. I didn't expect it, I thought they'd all go to jail) And the final soundtrack is also chic, right into the theme. A great series has come out!!!
The ending was stunning. Basically, of all the heroes, the only one I feel sorry for is the doctor's family. A wife can't handle such expensive treatment alone. The rest of the women will not suffer much for the dead. Nina turned out to be absolutely worthless. In the first episodes, she looked like a well-read, educated, intelligent and exemplary wife. And in fact, she's a lost soul, she doesn't even need a daughter. Kostya even arranged everything beautifully at the end of the episode. The moment with the Japanese was amazing. Of course, these guys are businessmen. They are ready to go to any kind of blackmail for the sake of money. The series is definitely top-notch. It looks great in one go
Yes, the series chernukha and all the characters eventually reveal themselves from the wrong side. And what is the latest episode with the portrait of Yeltsin...Well, whoever understood understood, the era of even greater uncertainty and blackness. Yankovsky played great, honestly, I could feel the whole abyss of this hero's soul. but! How can so many commentators sympathize with him??? Compared to the others, he may seem like the lesser of the evils, but certainly not the one you root for. I agree that Kostya's wife is still a runaway woman, but as you can't see, he has been abusing and belittling her for years, not allowing her to make any decisions herself, treating her not as a person, but as a thing, property. She couldn't have been any different already, it was against the background of his cruelty to his wife that his character revealed itself most darkly to me. It is clear that no one whitewashes her betrayal, but in such a system of relationships there can be no love in principle, only fear and secret hatred. He's a terrible manipulator, with his own value system. And the fact that there are sound principles in his system does not make him a good person. He first cut off his wife's escape routes, and then kicked her out like a stray dog, knowing that she had nowhere to go, there is also a special cruelty in this, isn't there? Again, no one says that the wife is an angel, but does this give a man the right to remain generally good, but so... m? No. You're either normal under any external circumstances, or you're not, that's it.
Until you take responsibility for your actions, you won't budge. And you will always be a performer. And your life will always be led by someone. And you will always outsource it.
A one-and-a-half-page story with a one-paragraph idea turned into an eight-episode black-and-white TV series. It's scary that the audience, which has recently been imbued with empathy for the Jackal, is now praising this series. Is it really necessary to paint characters with a paintbrush in different shades of black in order to convey the idea? Blunt yelling and tantrums are interspersed with banalities of the vk status level. The fake 90s, like the fake life of Kamchatka in the 90s, hurt the eyes of those who visited Kamchatka in the 90s. It turned out to stuff all the mythologized trash of the 90s into a dozen characters, only the characters became caricatured, as in the most low-grade crafts of some TV channels. Misunderstanding the status of the justice adviser from the first scene simply turns the whole story into a farce, and the last scene into a scene from the Auditor (not the Auditor, damn it). Although what can I say, the toilet of the Kamchatka restaurant with ten booths clearly indicates that the action takes place somewhere in a parallel universe, in the non-existent city of Yelizov, which did not exist then in the Kamchatka Territory. Where are people trying to leave for YAK40, but they come back because YAK40 cannot fly from Kamchatka to Khabarovsk. Where everything is black and white, like in Pleasantville, and to become "colored" you need to love your neighbor. But none of the main characters acquired any color. The irony is that the most humanistic philanthropist seems to be the condemned Doctor. It's just that they can't see these paints through the layers of shit applied on top.
How did this lishen (the father of the murdered woman) figure them out? How did he find out about Bandos' murder?
It's even funnier about bandos. I saw that you were worried and went to keep an eye on you with a sawed-off shotgun! And then I fell right on the street, Vasya, unknown to me! Just like that! And then the murdered dad! And then I'm like, let's get into ethical questions, who can kill and who can't? And then I'll lay them all down and sit down myself! What???
He's so complicated! His aunt, the author, wrote that this is how she imagines romantic characters.
@alilka: by the way, this could be the beauty of the script, if it weren't for the witness and Oleg (?), then all the murders in the series would have been outsourced, by someone else's hands. The convicts were deligated, Kostya wanted to kill the rapist, they wanted to deal with the cop, the boss fit in, they wanted to kill Kostya, Natasha, and even the robber did the final execution instead of Kostya.
@maryalice_me: The Japanese finished off the robber. The final shot was fired by the killer of the investigator and two more cops. It was written on the door of his cell.
Surprisingly, I got associations with the hero of the great Oleg Yankovsky, Ivan's grandfather in the film My Affectionate and Gentle Beast. In this film, the main character also commits a crime for which innocent people are being punished. And the GG itself remains white and fluffy. One-on-one with the series))
Kostya is no better than other heroes. He could have taken $500 from Kotov ($100 each) and not killed him. It would somehow justify his good looks. And he took the money from Kotov and started looking for a more profitable outsourcing option. I think he already knew at that moment that he was going to kill the Cat. The beauty of the Dice doesn't fit with this plot twist.
It just so happened that I watched this series. Since the first episode, it's been a complete facepalm, as if my aunt wrote the script. I looked, and it's true - auntie.
Unbelievable nonsense, in everything. Starting with the idea itself.
@ArcherMZ: To make some arguments. I worked in law enforcement agencies from 1991 to 2004. Therefore, I can responsibly say that this is not just a game. It's a FIERCE game.
If you don't think with your head at all and don't know anything about how the system works, well, it's such a strange entertainment.
@an_khv: According to this logic, you can give an Oscar to absolutely every picture and say, "Well, that's what the author intended.") This answer is not related to the opinion of the author of the post)
@Paramelion: I'm talking about basic common sense. Do you really think that there will be people who will buy themselves a life sentence for money? To kill Vasya, who is already being executed? The idea itself is idiotic. Plus, there's a lot of absolutely wild stuff. Like a penniless prosecutor who can't make money except with an infinitely dangerous and stupid idea? In 1992, I still remember, the regional prosecutor arranged a wedding for children in his mansion - the governor did not have such a thing)
People who are looking for inconsistencies"this cannot be, such nonsense" how do you live such a boring life....To look for only the truth in the series, well, it's generally..)
I feel sorry for the children . I was especially worried about the boy, that he would somehow get AIDS after he cut himself with his mother with a Christmas tree toy. ❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹
God, what utter nonsense. It's a pity for the time spent, an absurdly written, insincere craft, with a clumsily acting cast (except, perhaps, the doctor's wife and the prison governor). Shock content for the sake of shock content, causing nothing but a cringe and nervous laughter.
The final. A curtain. It was a great experience. A gorgeous beginning: intriguing, sometimes black, not without a twist. To the accompaniment of the magnificent scenery of the expanses of Kamchatka: its views, its harsh beaches, all these gigantic volcanoes, with the sauce of harsh sobering poverty. The middle is sagging in places. You're about to quit. You're holding on. You look further. And here he is. That's the ending. Uncompromising. Cynical. Unpredictable.
I am sure that you, like the vast majority of the audience, literally on the next scene after the outlined schematics (and this is the very beginning), planned to quit the series and move on. Why waste time on chewing gum? I beg. No, I beg you, my dear viewer, watch it to the end. And you will be rewarded.
And not only because of Yankovsky's character. For all the public dislike of the actor, he has perfectly written dialogues. Do you remember how you waded through the thorns in "The Master and Margarita", how you admired the simplicity of thoughts and the genius of Yeshea Ganotsri? Yankovsky's hero is the new Yeshea. And his truthfulness, his honesty, his sobering words cannot sing the praises of a screenwriter. Well, what a good fellow!
Outsourcing doesn't have a happy ending. Just as Sangadzhiev's project of the same name did not have one. Just a bold dot. And a bag of answers to all the questions. And you will not review it, like absolutely any film by Yuri Bykov. But it will definitely remain an anchor in your memory, as one of the brightest media products of this year. Cold, sobering, and thought-provoking.
Well, I don't know. Kostya is definitely an instigator for me. Remember the senseless and moral murder of my father (at the very beginning), just because others offered more, but he was refused and he was a witness.
And as for the incitement, if Kostya hadn't come, none of this would have happened, they would have lived a boring life by the rules. And here he is, definitely an insidious villain.
I don't even want to write about other characters, the series left a negative impression. If Kostya had eventually died and the others had been imprisoned, it would have been the right thing to do. But not this(((
Of course, I knew that there would be no happy ending, but that's how it is.I don't know. and somehow it 's left unsaid and everything seems to be already clear .
Between episodes 7 and 8, I watched the Volunteer's Playlist. Therefore, it seemed that the fact that she stuck a syringe in him was very logical coming out of their relationship in that series)
The ending is hideously fused, far-fetched and taken from the ceiling. It feels like the scriptwriters didn't even try to write something more logical, but settled on " and it will do!". It's clear that all the freaks had to be punished, but in such a stupid way? Plus, the main scum was still alive... Ugh, %la!..
@andrwell: Well, the creators had a few ideas about the end of Outsourcing. Thank God, our nerves turned white, and in fact they gave us a more or less logical one)
According to actress Mila Ershova in an interview with Snob, the screenwriters initially considered the option where Ivan Yankovsky's character arranges a terrible massacre. In the draft script, he dealt with all the female characters of the series in turn, including the girlfriends of the main characters and even the mother of Dani Steklov, played by Olga Lapshina.
Instead of being shocked and trying to stop their friend, the other characters suddenly agreed with his arguments. They not only accepted his theory, but also disposed of the bodies together by simply dumping the car with the dead in the gorge.
The creators of the series realized that such an ending would be illogical, and they completely revised it, making the final version more meaningful and balanced.
So if Kostya's colleagues hadn't decided to use a cocktail from the doctor, the ending wouldn't have happened?) I wonder where he got the machine gun to give to the prisoner Well, an interesting point with the prisoner himself, what guarantees would he not have failed Kostya? Or did Kostya predict the decision to commit suicide too?) In general, there are a lot of conventions and "luck" in the finale, which makes it feel very crumpled and unsaid. I liked the series as a whole, a solid 7/10, but they didn't finish the ending :)
PS: It feels like there should have been at least one more episode between the events of the middle and the finale of the series
I don't understand why Kostya was left alive as a character (like he's positive). When there was a situation with the second prisoner, he rubbed in that they were not holding an auction, although he had arranged it with 1, transferring the right to a richer woman with a business. He plays with words rather than observing justice with deep digging of the truth.
The creators didn't put the squeeze on it. I would like everyone to die in the end, either on merit, or so that the poor guys don't suffer further. The women in the series are presented as corrupt, the men as weak-willed and insecure. Towering over all of this is Jankowski, who is something between a monster from slasher and detective mindhammer ala Hannibal Lecter. I'm waiting for the second season, where Yankovsky kills everyone in Moscow, and in the third he will be launched into space to fight aliens.
Yakov did a great job playing Mephistopheles/Woland in human form. I am happy for Nina: she gained strength and changed her life. Still, there would be a purely marketing inscription at the beginning of the series — "Based on real events," like, for example, the Cohen brothers, so that everyone would get fucked up)
I felt really sad for Peter in the final. Firstly, I didn't feel any negative emotions about the character himself, but I genuinely liked him (although, it would seem, everyone in a row..) Perhaps this follows from the second reason, namely, that the actor has really sunk into my soul, as if he just lives. His gait, facial expressions, and manner of communication turned out to be so lively and real. I want to watch him play more and more, but alas and ah(
The ending is certainly stunning :) Well , to be honest , the series is creepy , all the characters are sick bastards 😐 The series dragged on right away , I haven 't seen anything like it yet , turn by turn it 's straight
Oh yes, of all the heroes, it's a pity only for the girl who got sick with the PLAGUE, now they won't cure her, even the child will remain an orphan :(
Well... that. I disagree with most of the comments here. Kostya is not an ambiguous character, he is a standard psychopath, this is very clearly shown. What exactly is ambiguous about it? Every second serial killer talks about his own damn code of honor, according to which he did it. Kostya knows how to manipulate people, apparently, it worked for some of the audience.
All the other characters are also quite unambiguous in the sense that they all have a high tolerance for violence (throughout the first series, they consistently ignore not only the pain of a prisoner in prison, but also the outright trash going on in their homes) and actively manifest it (and everyone, not just men — Katya fights, Nina sends daughter at night for a scarf). However, they are not Kostya. They grew up in violence, so they are tolerant of violence, and therefore they can only show most of their emotions through violence — this is also quite clearly shown by the characters of Natasha's mother, Roma's mother, and Andrei's parents. We don't see loving parents in this series at all. Even remotely positive characters like Julia or Nina quietly run away from children.
None of them, unlike Kostya (and much later Natasha), knows how to kill. It's kind of their job, but we don't really see any of them being able to kill anyone with their own hand. They watch all the time with complete indifference — and yes, this is what is happening to the country, including now. But they can't kill themselves, and that's what preserves their humanity, what leaves the way for some positive change.
I do not know what the creators wanted to show with the finale. Apparently, the only people left alive in the end are those who can kill and do it on their own terms—with the connivance of everyone else. Well, that's about how the nineties really ended.
But I wouldn't say that the series has revealed this idea in some cathartic way. It's a long way from Balabanov or Zvyagintsev, but they've had it for a long time. Rather, it's another disservice.—
@AshtrayHeart8: At first, his brother was seen not as a satire, but as a role model, and now Kostya will probably become such a model for many. That is, we have not learned from Balabanov's mistakes. Very sad
Well, I didn't have enough of Yankovsky, of course)) I'd love to watch a few more episodes.
But I liked the ending. In general, it was obvious that a friendly company of people who wanted to earn extra money would not last long, there was only a question of how everything would end for them. Kostya surprised me, it turned out quite unexpectedly and epically. They left on a beautiful note, you might say)
Nina was also very surprised. I didn't think she was capable of beating up a grandmother and stealing money. Indeed, all the characters here are as ambiguous and colorful as possible.
And the execution scene! The Japanese, the heart in the package, the imperturbable translator..Some kind of extremely black game))
As strange as it may sound, I will miss this whole atmosphere. I will definitely review it after some time.
@g1481395: And how much time has passed? My broken head more or less healed only after a month. And there were bruises under both eyes for at least a couple of weeks. But there's nothing here at all
Yes, I'm surprised to read comments that praise Kostya. We were shown a calculating maniac who subtly played on the psychology of the environment. His hairstyle, his unshakeable calmness and the rubbing of some kind of heresy that killing for money is blasphemy. This was said by a character who killed a man, a witness, in cold blood in a parking lot and was ready to kill anyone without batting an eyebrow.
I liked how they wrapped up the happy ending, which ended a bit absurdly. To be honest, the prisoner who shoots everyone and Kostya, who is still alive, do not look like the end of the series, but like a grotesque metaphor.
I still think that Kostya died in the parking lot, and what we were shown at the end were character glitches. I hardly believe that he is so cunning and beat everyone. Well, or it's sad if the scriptwriters decided to put it that way.
@perekat__: I believe that all is not lost when I see comments like yours that see that Kostya is not a hero, well, in any form and there is no ambiguity at all.
I guess it's time for me to return to Russian TV series, especially mini-format and crime genre - I missed a lot. In general, it was very exciting and interesting to watch the events. Smooth, almost without sagging, keeps you in suspense. Well, Yankovsky is very likeable as an actor, but then, in general, according to the script, the character is so charismatic.
Cool ending) I don't know what many people didn't like. Volkov is the only one who is as psychotic as all the inmates of a special-security prison. He fed them and communicated with them. He was kind in the first episodes. It's clear that this is all his cunning plan. And the Doctor apparently considered him one of his own since he helped him. It's all logical. No mysticism.
Yankovsky also played sledak in Fischer, and the Afghan in Aswalt - I don't believe him. Well, he can't play strong, strong-willed characters, either his role or his face. He grew up with a golden spoon in his ass, well, what does he know about the life of marginals, for whom slapping a person for a check is a routine matter. But, for example, I immediately recognized the same blonde from You Give the Youth in the movie Dr. Lisa, there was not even a comedic train. Petrov2,0, but Kozlovsky seems to be more talented and diverse. Yankovsky is still young and needs to appear in some sports films.
In the first episodes , I thought that in the end everything would be blamed on Kostya , he would be convicted and sentenced to death , and his comrades would outsource him) There is no completely positive character, the same doctor's wife, Yulia, does not really think about her son when he called and waited for her, she took pills. I thought when I heard that her son was calling her , she would change her mind , but there 's a moot point , of course . 🤷🏻♀️ The second moment is when the prosecutor's wife and Natasha come to her , she got drunk and forgot to pick up her son in search of her husband 's money . Against the background of other characters, Julia is the most adequate of course)
It's a great series. As black as possible. I once wrote a comment about the TV series Highway that it was the most depressing tape, but no, now my favorite is Outsourcing, where not only melancholy and decay, but also the characters are the most finished scum, without a single positive character. Hell, they even put scum in the episodes, like that saleswoman with the earrings)))
It's how much the scriptwriter doesn't like Russia, which gives out such heroes. Even the most working and beloved image of her Brother, a hero with PTSD and a sense of justice, has managed to disfigure the image of Kostya Volkov, which ceases to sympathize.
Yeah, everything is rotten and everything is gone...
But the series is good. It's interesting, intriguing, and raises a lot of uncomfortable topics.
The acting is great. Excellent camerawork. Cool decorations, apartments, interiors, everything is worked out at the proper level. For once, I was pleased with the work of the sound engineer, the dialogues are really well heard, no one is whispering under their noses, so you can feel our work with mistakes.
Okko well done , we are waiting for more suitable projects
PS. The series reminded me of the old movie I am a Doll, 2002, directed by Yuri Kara, starring Domogarov.
The topic of life prisoners is raised there, who are used as "training equipment" for sparring special agents, such as live dummies on which punches and techniques are practiced. Like gladiators of the 21st century.
The film is good, bloody and hopeless. Well, almost the big brother of Outsourcing)
Before this series, I thought that "In a cage" was very dark, but this one turned out to be darker. The series is good, it shows all the pain of the hinterland...
I thought the Doctor wouldn't betray his idea of mercy killing. Therefore, he did not give the real composition of the cocktail. I hoped that Konstantin would survive and come up with something. Of course, the violence in the office was unexpected. Basically, everyone got what they deserved. These people wouldn't have ended up well anyway. They went overboard in everything. Their wives, it's a separate kind of art. The vices of people are very well shown, what principles they can compromise. It was a very creepy murder scene, when the Chinese just punched me in the face. It caused some twofold feelings. In general, the series is decent. I didn't expect it, although it's gloomy and rotting. But this is a piece of people's lives, such people and such stories are alive. It's creepy.
Discussion of the 8 episode of the 1 season Discuss this episode
359It's a good series.
But still, there is usually a strong bond between a mother and a child (regardless of whether she is a prostitute or not). Moreover, the girl is not quite an adult yet.
Those who have children will understand, those who don't can hardly explain it.
And judging by what we see, their relationship is more like that of girlfriends. The child doesn't care where the mother goes or leaves, the mother doesn't care what happens to the child.
Well, it's very strange. I've seen mothers who don't care about their children, yes.
But I've never seen children so indifferent before.
That's why it seems to me that she's probably not the child's mother. But we don't know what happened before.
And the fact that she is a philologist is the second hint. The hungry and harsh 90s, there was no work anyway, who the hell needed philologists there, so she probably went to earn what she could
I've seen suggestions in the comments before that when she had sex with Roma, she looked ordinary, as if she didn't give a fuck about feelings and intimacy, sex was like work.
Therefore, he accepted this girl as his daughter.
I really liked all the female roles! Mila Yershova is finally in an atypical role, and I just fell in love with Dasha Kotroleva's game, I hope this role will open a lot of doors for her :)
p.s. Romanticize such an antihero, of course, in no case impossible.
Kostya doesn't have any philosophy or morals at all, the worst in terms of human qualities of all.
He gave himself the right to kill innocents, while depriving those who were not directly involved in death row of the right to execute the sentence. Where is the consistency, morality, and principles here?
What does responsibility have to do with it? Sasha was the most liquid, and this monologue was addressed to him. No one else put anything on anyone like that.
Kostya did the most, and the two murders in the first episodes tell the tale.
What kind of observation are we talking about? He just floated through the plot, navigating as the problems came. So it's not even close to a saw
Integrity is the conformity of behavioral norms and beliefs both in words and in deeds. You can't be principled about one thing, you're either principled or you're not. This is the observance of a kind of code of honor, an internal charter. You can't break the law by robbing stalls and not consider yourself a criminal just because you don't violate other laws of the Criminal Code.
Kostya, on the other hand, violates literally all his principles, all the theses that he preaches to others, under the guise of morality and ethics. For example, the main plot rift, when he turned against Oleg as a performer. Where even initially he wanted to kill him, guided by another threat from the cops. Already on the spot, he changed his rhetoric to "has no right to kill a serial killer, because he is in no way related to the victims." but. In the very first episode, in the very first minutes, Vladik lynches himself, and his wife wasn't raped, it wasn't even self-defense. It's not even self-defense for Sasha, because he attacked an unarmed man with a gun.
And how can you call a person both cynical and principled? These are essentially antonyms. Kostya, if he is principled in something, it is only in the absence of these very principles.
He is greedy, greedy for money, although, again, he claims the opposite. But really what? The first murder, execution in the series: out of humane motives and contrary to the rules, shoots a prisoner without waiting for confirmation of identity. That is, in his understanding, he suffered when the verdict was read out to him. At the same time, for money, it was normal for a rich woman to cut off her ears, nose, and tail. Where humanity is.
He's a cynic, an interesting character, but not a principled one. I'm tired of winning this argument.
@AndreyDubrovsky: No, you haven't won this argument.
Integrity is consistency, consistency is multi-repetition. Because you can't be principled and kill one avenger for wanting to, and not kill the other for acting.
2. Only Vladik could defend himself. By taking away the weapon and not even firing, he did not violate any laws or moral norms in this episode. Kostya did not know about the wear and tear, did not know Vladik personally, and there was no recognition in the dialogue. But Kostya doesn't shoot Sasha, but Vladik shoots Vladik in a similar situation.
3. If he hadn't been greedy, he wouldn't have searched the list for the richest and most accomplished relative among all the victims. What kind of leader? It's just a director's farce and nonsense that a sergeant can turn around and solve something in special purpose colonies.
4. The affirmative answer to the question of identity verification is a basic, basic moment from the time of Roman millennial law. No trial will begin until the defendant confirms that he is him. From the very first minute, Kostya put himself above the law, made himself the arbiter of fate, because it was he who confirmed the identity of the maniac. And this is about the same as if, on behalf of some harmful user, I write a purely heartfelt statement that Kostya was unscrupulous in the end.
He felt sorry for the crying maniac, and beat the innocent Oleja and chained him to the radiator. He could understand a blonde for 50k bucks, but a Cat for 500 couldn't.
I won't watch anything. It doesn't matter what the director wanted to convey, what he intended, it's important that he got it in the end. And only I, the viewer, am his judge and I will evaluate his work and tell him whether he succeeded or not.
White cannot be black. But just the same, a truly principled person is ready to lay down his life for his principles.
I understand you, girls, Yankovsky is a breed, still young, but already experienced in cinema, interesting, determined, strong-willed character, it's a sin not to fall in love with such a hero. It's really hard for me to argue logic with your hormones. But 2-0
@AndreyDubrovsky: integrity, if you really want to delve into this definition, is a personality quality that consists in the voluntary fulfillment of principles recognized by a particular person. Kostya follows his principles.
2. He's not Vladik, but Vadik, first of all. Secondly, you include a clerical rat who analyzes an episode as simple as a stick from the point of view of legal norms. When the gun was in Vadik's hands and he went with it to Rybkin, the self-defense ended and the retaliatory attack began. We are well aware that he would have shot Rybkin, knowing everything about this character that we already knew by this point: that he is a violent rapist and is clearly connected with criminals. Or are you seriously saying now that he would have let him live? The man who intended to kill him and whose fiancee he raped? Kostya got his bearings in the situation the way a man with combat experience should have, who knew Rybkin superficially and noticed that something was wrong with him all day.
3. I do not consider it necessary to argue about the director's "nonsense" and "farce". This is an artistic statement on the verge of authorial and spectator cinema, and not "The Investigation was conducted" with Kanevsky. It's good that the brain structure of directors and screenwriters is strikingly different from yours, otherwise we would have nothing to watch and nothing to discuss. As part of this story and the outsourcing venture, Kostya is the leader, and it's also stupid to argue with this, it's just a fact. He's the driving force behind the whole script.
4. Kostya put himself above the law, but Kostya thereby stopped the disgusting bullying and watching the man's deathbed tantrum. Obviously, everyone present was doing this not because they respected the letter of the law so much (they just had to put it on it), but because they considered it permissible. Not to mention that the law is not always morally correct, that not every legal norm is relevant at the moment. No need to change them, yes. But from a moral point of view, he was right at the moment, not the turntables following a stupid procedure.
Don't look, it's your business. Why think about it, why find out the opinion of the authors of the work, if everything has already turned out so wonderfully in your head.
There is neither white nor black, Uncle. The world is not black and white, good morning. And you're not discussing with a girl, I'm thirty-two and I'm not in love with either Ivan or Kostya. You're about as perceptive about people as you are about characters, which is not surprising, of course. It is also not surprising that it is, of course, impossible for a man not to comment on Yankovsky's "hormones" and breed when discussing his role with a woman.
And yes, "wear and tear" is about a car or an organism. What Vadik did is called rape, and there is no need to shorten this word, thereby negating this crime.
I wonder how many retired whores in cinema and prose at the age of 25 dissect in rags and read stories about student nymphets, so that this image appears as typical, and that after 7 hours of timekeeping it still raises questions
Kotov only flashed them and promised to give them back after the Professor 's execution .
And then he immediately started blackmailing them.
That's why no one threw it.
They promised him to think about it, and then they told him to go home to Khabarovsk.
And the money was taken from his pocket by the cop when the body was found.
Very self-confident, but no, you are far from winning. And not even in the top three.
But I don't blame women for completely misunderstanding the term, after all, being principled is more of a male character trait, I would even say a key one. Integrity is an oath, an oath to oneself to do one thing and not another. And the hero of Yankovsky, I don't remember his name anymore, in the first episode of the very first series reveals his unscrupulousness: first he requires some formalities when applying for a job, and after 5 minutes he executes a person without observing protocol. THAT's IT. There is nothing more to discuss here, only if in a drunken state you do not try to pass off green as red, calling nonsense arguments.
And, by the way, the film was wrapped specifically by a principled doctor who injected his schmuck only to the seriously ill and needy, and not to anyone for fun, for money or life.
The guy from the wedding wanted to eat a fish, and ...Sit down. Kostya covered not only his own ass, but the ass of everyone in this chain. Because someone would have let it slip, especially "pissing " and everyone would have sat down. Sledak was no fool there.
He killed the victim's father because of his words that he was knocking what he saw. If he had fucked up and gone off into the sunset, he would still be alive, especially playing extortion with people who can kill a person without any problems is a stupid idea.
About the book. Kostya said to buy shoes, but his wife bought books. It's logical to think that she doesn't need shoes. Later in the story, he shaved her because of what she did - she slept with a colleague while she was married, who eventually dumped her at an important moment. And she dumped him, stealing all his money.
The question about Zhuchkov's partner, why did he give up on the loss of a colleague?
He annoyed his colleagues in a dangerous business.
And my partner initially didn't want to investigate anything.
Thank you for a good project! I'm glad I watched one episode a week)
The head of the prison had thoughts that the visitors in the city, who were relaxing loudly, could be anyone. From tourists to undercover people?
In a conversation in a restaurant, Kostya is right in some places. - did I take your wife to have an abortion too? (Sasha, out of habit, looked for the guilty around him.
Kostya's scene with Nina was impressive: the yellow curtains, the creamy color of the skirt and the carpet behind. flecked with yellow and similar to the color of a Bone sweater. Those patterns showed the two characters closely intertwined. And it wasn't like Nina was being "released/kicked out."
Will raffaele sales rise or not?😃
At the end of the episode, as in the previous episode, there is a coffin, already with words.
Nina behaved as Kostya had predicted. Despite the fact that her character didn't cause me anything but nausea from beginning to end, this is probably the only logical thing she did, because Roma the Stallion deserved it.
Natasha turned out to be exactly the same empty fool that her mother wanted to get rid of, but also capable of killing a person easily and with a smile (now they will come with sermons about living through trauma, of course, and about the fact that Natasha is not in her right mind).
Katya, perhaps, has not received any development, except that she has become more submissive. Julia turned on her brain, which is commendable.
All the performers, with the exception of Petya, who still had some sprouts of humanity visible in his eyes, also revealed their disgust to the maximum.
The final scene gives you a sense of grim satisfaction. It's great that Kostya didn't die at the bus stop and that the mercy shown to the Doctor returned to him. The doctor must have thought of something and understood who the prescription was for.
Of the disadvantages, there is a lot of excess, a lot that, on the contrary, would need to be fully disclosed. It's a pity that there wasn't a scene of Bones with his motherless daughter. It's a pity that we still haven't figured out if Julia's son is infected (although she won't figure it out until six months later). It's a pity that we still don't know a lot about Kostya. At the same time, I could easily have done without a scene in a bar with Natasha and Vadim's widow, as well as without gatherings in the prison governor's restaurant with Natasha's mother.
I liked the scene with Kostya and Rybkin. And the complex interaction was well played, and the way Kostya put his hand on his shoulder and showed participation in time was pleasing (albeit predictable).
So far, the first confused thoughts are like this.
Oh, well, yes, not my idea, a friend noticed: it's interesting that in the final Rybkin gave an order for the first time in his life, and it was obeyed.
But it's for added drama at the end, so it'll do just fine.
It was so unexpected with the killer convict that it was just oh)
Well, Katya and Natasha were also pleased, who finally understood everything about themselves.
And they opened up in all their natural fullness.
As a result, as in the beginning, I only feel sorry for the doctor's wife with HIV.
Well, at least he'll pay for half of the treatment, and then he'll come up with something.
Nina, as expected, was not so simple.
It's a pity her past was never revealed to us.
But for some reason I don't envy Natasha)
I don't even know why.
As for the understatement, there is a lot that has not been revealed, but it seems to be enough to understand the essence of the story. Was Kostya's wife a prostitute before? Was it his daughter? What's with Julia now?
It was like it was such a long book, a whole novel, and the creators chose to tell this piece of the story from the middle, which is probably enough for me, the rest can be thought out a little, it's even more interesting this way)
It would be better to read this Stallion, obviously, this is the biggest marker of the character of the heroine.
No red lipstick - a nymphomaniac, a slut. Is she wearing red lipstick, hanging out in clubs, twirling her ass in front of left-wing men - an honest, decent, enviable wife, almost a virgin - are these hints? Or is it still a good example of female logic in action?
The doctor didn't know anything and couldn't know if he didn't figure it out himself, but he was just the most correct and principled, killing only those in need and asking with his knowledge, but not random types. And, by the way, by making this deal with the hospital, he killed two birds with one stone: he did not share the elixir of death for selfish purposes, and cut himself to life. I don't remember such a win-win situation in this series.
Julia turned on her brain, which is commendable. I'll also say a few words here, she didn't turn them on herself, but they turned on themselves, thanks to her son. A friend found out that she was HIV-positive, and immediately started attacking Yulia, saying she wanted to infect me as well as you could. Julia, despite her dislike for her husband, nevertheless decided to return to him - she needed money, and not only for herself, but also for her son, so that her blood would not be affected in the future by the same sufferings that she had begun (as soon as her friend found out, she immediately began to talk differently). And how else to do it? To allow the person who is to blame for this and who has ways to solve the problem (money) to do something.
Just as it seems to me, the doctor did not understand who the prescription was being asked for. He just didn't want the murder that was going to be committed not to be on his conscience. He is a doctor after all, and as I understand it, initially his goal was good - to get rid of suffering. And then it's unclear why and for whom he was suddenly asked for a recipe, and he just made a mixture of something that would knock down, but not kill.
It's a pretty ambiguous series and characters, you can spend forever discussing opinions and thinking, but in my opinion, that's the beauty of the series))
And the one at the bus stop.
They were just afraid to go out to check.
They showed us that they are not particularly brave people.
Suddenly someone will see.
Plus the euphoria, the dizziness of success.
Only Kostya realized that the Professor was not really guilty, he said this in one of the episodes, because he got to the bottom of it.
For the rest of the characters, he's just as much a maniac as the rest, who would give anything for his life.
And because of their lack of intelligence, as well as the fact that they were motivated only by money, they did not even realize that the Professor did not kill and would not kill anyone (having said the recipe, he did not just ask why they needed it).
And then it turns out that even the white sheep Natasha and Nina do this, and they kill (but thanks to the Professor it didn't work out), and they steal and throw money. And poor Nina didn't want to leave the tyrant.
Although throughout the series it was shown that in the series all the main characters are more or less ambiguous, contradictory and far from positive. But the locals had a sore spot when I wrote about it.
And here in the last episode, without any hints at all, they showed what all the characters are like. That's why some people are burning up because everything turned out not to be the way they wanted it to be)
If the series had ended at the moment before the scene in the boss's office, there would have been joyful cries that everything had ended so well.))
It was he who brought the Japs to finish off the prisoner and take away the organs.
Your fifth point is burning up significantly from the fact that Kostya turned out not to be as ugly as you wanted him to be)))
But I would also like to mention something else.:
"I gave you security, I gave you money, I gave you rules. You took the security and the money, but there are no rules. And not a word about love. So Nina was really a prostitute after all? Yeah?
And I felt sorry for her all season, but she turned out to be some kind of scum.
And Natasha and her mother? Honestly? I didn't feel sorry for her, but I understood why she behaved like that towards her daughter. She loves her, she wants to love her, but Natasha is not such a flower: a drinking, walking, adult daughter sitting on her neck. No education, no prospects, no desire to strive for something more. And not knowing what else to do, she makes the only right (as it seems to her) decision - to marry her off, take her off her shoulders and finally live her life.
And the doctor's wife... I hope she's going to be okay.
I don't justify Kostya's actions in any way, but in a conversation in a cafe with Sanya, he was telling the truth. He doesn't want to take responsibility, understand decisions, and is comfortable being a performer. And as soon as something serious happens, it immediately merges. And the fact that Sasha couldn't fulfill his plan (TWICE) was only confirmed by Kostya's words.
In general, the last episode put everything under a different angle, everything is so ambiguous. Is Kostya really the MOST negative character in this whole story?
I was almost eaten here for such thoughts in the comments to other series)))
Especially for the fact that I did not consider Nina and Natasha to be positive characters, and Kostya to be absolutely evil.
He said that all heroes are ambiguous and contradictory.
But there was such a howl. Many people have only white and black paint in their arsenal. Either bad or good. Although there's so much mixed up in all the characters that it's silly to think in such categories.
Well, many TV shows are watched to relax and miss the details.
For example, I was immediately alerted by the moment when she (a married girl, kind of intelligent), discusses an erotic novel with an unfamiliar man (Roma).
Probably, in the modern world, this is not something immoral. But for me personally, this is unacceptable. Therefore, the idea immediately arose that Nina is far from what she is shown to be or what she wants to appear.
Well, actually, the soundtrack of the series is my homage. It was a pleasure to listen throughout the entire viewing.
And who was Nina that he suddenly let her go so easily?
Even though her mother wanted her daughter to study, etc., that's why this girl became like this and saw such an upbringing from her mother.
In short, I mostly blame my mother, since my daughter is like this only because of her advice.
And she got married on the advice of her mother, and she had an abortion on the advice of her mother.
And she came to her house, too, because in the hospital she said that "let's live together." Well, the daughter came to her later, but with black money.
Conclusion: mom is mentally ill, and this was especially evident in the last episode.
Therefore, it's not just the redhead who should be annoying.
Here, each character is distinguished by his own coolness, so to speak.
There are a lot of examples when in the most dysfunctional families, the most disgusting parents grew up with decent, intelligent children, like roses among manure. Yes, the environment shapes us in many ways, instills certain values in us. But then there's us.
Advice is advice, but everyone has their own head on their shoulders
It's funny that the ending is open, and everyone can see the ending in their own way.
(...and went to another city, the next prison :))) )
It seems at this moment Kostya gets the idea that the Doctor is not a maniac. The doctor was just performing illegal euthanasia, but he's not a psychopath, sick, etc.
And in episode 5, in a conversation with an accomplice doctor from the colony, he tells him:
- Do you understand that the Doctor is the only person who is not to blame for anything?
And the most interesting thing is that the Doctor hears it all (he was shown right at that moment, how he was eavesdropping).
That is, from the point of view of the law, he is guilty of murder (but there is generally another article, another story, so to speak). Kostya and the Doctor are very similar, in fact. Therefore, for Kostya, he is not guilty, because the Doctor did not kill, he stopped tagging people.
Now, by the way, I was thinking that the Doctor might have guessed that this dose of the deadly drug could be for Bones.
1) He overheard the conversation and realized what they were doing + that Kostya was against the Doctor's execution
2) There was no Bone on the Doctor's coffer
And since the local doctor is illiterate, he tricked him)
Why did the father do this? Because it's his fault. He agreed to euthanasia, he wanted it. It will sound ironic, but the Doctor is just a performer.
I think it was after that that Kostya got the full picture.
Perhaps that's why Oleg made him so angry. He is a leftist man, but he came and blamed the Doctor for the death of his friend and his child. Although, in fact, the Doctor is only partly to blame for one thing (without the father's desire, nothing would have happened), he is not at all to blame for the other.
So everything is reasonable here and nothing goes wrong.
As for me, it turned out cool. There are no positive characters in the series. Everyone has a sin. Some have none.
There may be sympathy for Kostya due to the fact that he has principles. Personality.
Others don't. The rest of the characters are more concerned about money. Well, almost everyone is spineless.
Although it is clear that she is not a bad person.
But still, to leave an innocent man in trouble that would lead to his death. Taking dirty money from a man who is unfaithful to you and has given you an incurable, terrible disease.
I don't see anything positive here.
It's also worth remembering that outsourcing has evolved from an execution into a method of entertaining sick bastards. And by the way, they weren't having fun with some maniac beast, but with a man convicted of an economic crime.
So it's not just dirty money here - it's real blood money.
Is it worth condemning her, given the situation she finds herself in? I don't think so. But personally, I don't see a positive character here.
After all, a positive character is positive because he did something good, fought evil, sacrificed himself, etc. Julia has none of this.
The shooting is powerful. And the ending itself? Well, I don't know, it seems like everyone got what they deserved, but it seemed too fantastic. I think the ending was slightly sweetened.
But apparently it never got to the end. There are no positive characters in the series.
Julia? Yes, there is no doubt that compared to the others, she is almost the whitest and fluffiest.
BUT.
She saw Oleg, he begged her for help. What did she do? That's right, I turned a blind eye. Isn't she to blame for Oleg's death? There is a share of guilt.
She also didn't care where her husband got so much money from, it didn't bother her to continue living peacefully with him.
So it's worth clearing up the veil of hatred for Kostya a little and looking at everything more objectively.))
"he became the catalyst for the whole cunt"
Seriously? Did he rape Natasha? Did he force her to have an abortion? Did someone force Sanya to go kill the rapist? Did he infect Yulia with HIV? Or maybe it was because of him that Petya was running around with women? Or maybe because of him, Katya and Andrey's life wasn't going well? Etc.
And outsourcing is to blame for all of the above, I wonder?
Was someone forced to outsource at gunpoint?
Maybe it's enough to put all the responsibility on Kostya, making the rest of the victims? Yes, Kostya is a leader, he played an important role in some moments.
Maybe we should finally admit that, as you put it, it's not just Kostya who's finished in the series, but everyone else as well? And as you say correctly (but to paraphrase a bit): The fact that Kostya is finished doesn't whitewash the others?
There is no veil of hatred, but I have already realized that those who don't like Kostya are blind-deaf-uneducated-with a narrow mindset in order to see the full depth that you see.
Kostya is the catalyst for shit, not the reason, do you see the difference? The man pulled the strings, which led to various problems in the relations of the prosecutor, Rybkin and Roma. Not the reason, once again.
And we kind of finished the conversation three episodes ago, when you, dear, wrote that there was nothing to have a dialogue with me about — why are you stuck again?
I'll tell you a secret, but I don't like anyone in this series at all, if you're hinting at something))
The problem is that you and others like you saw the absolute evil in the Bone, stuck a stigma and started running around with it, not noticing what others were doing, whitewashing them at times. And at the same time, he stopped seeing that Kostya was as ambiguous as everyone else.
Then why wasn't Sanya the catalyst? After all, he went to kill the rapist, took a shit, he was at gunpoint, and Kostya had to commit murder and step onto a dirty path.
Or why wasn't Kotov the catalyst? He was the one who brought this idea.
Or maybe, after all, not everything is as black and white as you draw it again?
Man, in 2025, would you like to appeal to someone who is watching what and advise you to read books, are you 14?)
There are problems with logic, perception, and consistency. One is a man, the other is a 14-year-old...
Well, if a person is watching content for the mentally retarded, that's saying something. And when you see that a person is also unable to understand the meaning of what is written, the picture develops.
And to appeal (on the one hand, by the way) to what a person consumes: it has always been and will always be relevant. Because it shows what he fills himself with. It also shows what he is striving for.
An adequate person strives for art, knowledge, etc., a piglet strives for a puddle of mud, but more. ))) So, man, be healthy.))
as for "understanding the meaning of what is written": in my humble opinion (and not only in my opinion, judging by the disadvantages), it is you who do not understand the meaning of what is written: you have to manage to see comment after comment what other commentators have not even written in letters. And then, after they explained exactly what they meant, they also twisted half of it in favor of their non-working arguments.…
I'll tell you a secret: people watch a variety of content that exists not only for the notorious self-development that you trump, but purely to have fun, relax the brain after a long day at work, etc. etc.
It seems like you've been running around here that your Kostya is being labeled, and you've decided that I'm a dumbass just because of some kind of psychics. Is anything tight, Mr. Flexible Thinking?
I'm happy.
The gloomy and oppressive atmosphere throughout the series, everyone got what they deserved.
Nina, of course, it was just a surprise, I didn't think that she would leave her daughter until the last..
Regarding the medication in the syringe, I think the doctor who was on the pancreas guessed that it was for killing someone, and gave another prescription that does not kill. At the end, they showed a scene of him laughing. The ending seems to be the only correct one, so to speak, in the sense that all the prisoners were shot, who was imprisoned for the murder of an Interior Ministry employee.
Kostya outplayed everyone, it was readable from series 3-4.
Overall, it's not a bad series. 8 out of 10.
The series was shot perfectly, the cast is great, but Yankovsky, as always, is on top.🔥
And here, it turns out, after the last episode, Nina has already become bad for most. How changeable people's opinions are.
The series is wonderful, another successful project about the 90s lately.
In general, all the characters except Bones do not have any clear moral principles and firm life attitudes.
And by the way, their moral decline is reflected in the new poster of the series with a hint of the fall of Pompeii."
Great allegory!
From Kostya's point of view, Vadik's murder was absolutely justified.
And Kotov threatened to turn them in.
This is not the kind of money for which you can put your head under an article.
Especially if you divide them into five.
So the mother of the murdered girl is better suited to implement the idea of outsourcing, anyway.
And the Cat had to think before threatening two prison guards who had already killed a man in front of his eyes.
The consent of the other colleagues was needed.
They would have refused for 500 dollars for all of them.
And then it wouldn't have worked.
Than about me.
Kostya wanted to realize his idea.To let the victims' relatives pay off the killers.
Kotov, with his 500 bucks, was not suitable for this.
Because in order to realize the idea, the WHOLE team had to be interested. And he offered too little money.
And it became an obstacle to the realization of the idea.
But money is important here, not because Kostya is selfish.
But because there should be enough of them to involve others in the execution of the idea.
Kostya wouldn't have done it alone.
It's much easier to explain, I do not know.
As a woman, she did not fulfill her main female function - she did not save and even broke up her family, the only one of all, if anything.
No, well, Okko is really good at bombing the industry with its projects in a row. A very early bid for one of the best Russian TV series of the year.
Well done, it would have been better if it had just been a riot in prison. The main scum/serpent tempter of the series, who ruined the lives of so many people who usually lived, received absolutely no retribution...
Everyone voluntarily gave him the right to make decisions. He didn't force them in any way. We are the only ones responsible for every choice in our lives, not some conditional Other who is stronger or smarter. This is the main idea of the series, and I won't even add "in my opinion," because it's obvious, to put it mildly. And it's all the sadder that even such an obvious message did not reach many viewers, and they remained in the position of a deceived victim, like Sasha Rybkin sniffling in the cafe scene.
And then he forced Andrey and Katya to live in their parents' house, pitted them there. He convinced Katya that she wanted a good life and to run away from her husband.
Then he arranged for Natasha to be raped, and for her mother to insist on an abortion, just like Sanya.
Etc.
Everyone lived in peace, peace and joy, and then, as soon as Kostya came and let's take out the blackness of their souls...
Phaahha, didn't you watch such a series?)))
I don't understand if people have a memory like fish, or if it's so difficult to properly perceive what is shown on the screen...
The only thing I can accept as some kind of attempt to justify his behavior is that he just doesn't feel anything in his normal state, and such abominations happening around him are pulling out the last remnants of sensitivity.
He never took responsibility for his actions. After all, he killed the rapist, who asked him to??? He killed the witness. He came up with this whole outsourcing thing. He blew everyone's ears, saw Sasha doubting everything, especially himself, the guy, who, I'm sorry, but is clearly young, and already works in a strict zone and executes death sentences, drove his ambiguous philosophical assholes so that the guy's roof whistled even more. He, in turn, ruined the life of his new wife, who had not yet moved away from her mother's influence, and here was her husband, whom she seemed to need to obey, but he himself did not understand how best, because his friend had rinsed his brains. The rest were also crushed bit by bit to the point that if there were any facets of reason, then they were gone.
I don't feel sorry for any of the murdered outsourcing participants, but Kostya's miraculous appearance at the end doesn't respond to me. To me, he's like the mastermind of a murder, he also has to answer fairly, and he can also become a boss somewhere, apparently. (I hope they have enough brains not to continue this)
I didn't see any false tears in the scene with my wife in this episode. In my opinion, he felt sorry for her, but it was sticky and humiliating for both sides, as if she were not a human being, but a dog with broken paws. And that's why he didn't want to live with her anymore.
If Kostya hadn't killed the rapist, the rapist would have killed Rybkin. It was a defense, although this does not negate the fact that Kostya committed murder. However, it was Sasha who created this situation.
He killed a witness, and no one absolves him of responsibility for this act either. This is a criminal offense. But I also do not absolve the witness of responsibility for the fact that he came to ramble to two turntables whom he saw killing a man. Just as an investigator cannot be absolved of responsibility for going on a date with an organized criminal group on the territory of a high-security facility without warning anyone (here's a minus for the scriptwriter, who tied the characters with one blood in such a primitive way).
Eldar Kalimulin, who plays Sasha Rybkin, is thirty-one. He looks thirty-one, despite the offended face of lyali. When will he get fat? At fifty? Vanya Yankovsky is thirty-four. There are three years between Sasha and Kostya. The problem with a thirty-one-year-old forehead is that he was going to get married for some reason, and for some reason he gave the leadership of his family life to a colleague. By the way, Kostya told Natasha absolutely sensible things. But her brain doesn't click there so much that she didn't hear it at all and even went to murder just to stay with the poor Sasha, who is ready to polish his dick for raffaella. And now I have to feel sympathy for these insects, and strongly condemn the bad, terrible Volkov, yeah. Kostya has never refused responsibility for his actions. He says in plain text and more than once that he does many things for others. He doesn't shy away from it. And, given his combat experience in Chechnya, it's possible to explain why he kills people so easily. He has a real trauma and PTSD, which all manifest themselves individually. That doesn't excuse him, but it explains how I keep saying it. What explanation can be given for the bestial cruelty of these freaks? How can you explain the fact that they stood and looked (though turning away) at what the Japanese were doing? Only their total inner squalor.
It doesn't respond to you, but it does to many. I came across a good definition for this character: "black conscience". Yes, it's black. But conscience, because with concepts. In this sense, he absolutely inherits Danila Bagrova. He even sheltered a bald prostitute under his wing (this parallel is clearly no coincidence).
Tell me, why did the prosecutor outsource? Wasn't it because his wife wanted a beautiful life and money? And she didn't care where they came from, they just were.
And Dr. Peter, can you tell me why he agreed? Wasn't it because he cheated on his wife and infected her with HIV? And he felt guilty.
Sanya and Roman also had a desire to get money for a reason.
These people are mired in mud even to the Bone. Kostya gave them the opportunity to go deeper, they did it perfectly. Even without him, we got deeper and deeper.
If there were no Bones, there would be other ways to drown yourself.
A normal and conscientious person with character will not do what they did.
Vadik would have killed Sanka.
And that body with the baby would have brought her to an abortion in the same way.
Kostya, on the contrary, urged his wife to feel sorry for this moron.
The doctor's wife would have died of HIV, because they wouldn't even have that money. But at least there's a chance.
Well, the prosecutor's wife would have left him if it hadn't been for the money from outsourcing.
And there are also different versions of events possible.
Kostya just let them prove themselves.
And what happened came out.
"He takes responsibility" to say is not to take. He didn't pay for these murders in any way, in case you forgot, he was going to outsource all this to the prison governor and these morons. If sledak had been smarter, this would have happened.
There are four people walking past this mountain, there are other people working there, here they are the percentage of normal/ordinary families and these abnormal ones.
If Kostya hadn't offered, yes, there would have been no money, yes, something went wrong for someone, but it would have been an ordinary life and they would have lived it the way they could cope with their difficulties.
Your "he just showed what they are" yes, take any person, you will find some kind of wormhole, this does not mean that you have to push and poke there so that EVERYONE SEES. People are not saints, but they do not deserve provocations from leftist people who are bored on this planet.
Well, responsibility isn't just criminal, is it? Kostya's attitude to the state and its right to assign responsibility to someone is understandable. He sees that there is no de facto state, that it is immoral, that the perpetrators escape punishment. He does not want to be responsible to such a state. And he does everything to prevent this from happening.
Kostya showed up at the last moment.
Just before Vadik was about to shoot.
And by the way, after that, Vadik could find Natasha and finish her off.
On my nerves, after a failed assassination attempt.
Such an oppressive atmosphere of the whole series and such a cheerful ending!
The ending and the whole story are just fire! Yankovsky is a cool actor, his performance in the series was very convincing. The female characters also turned out great. And all this blackness and depressive atmosphere around — well, just to the point, the name of the series fully justifies itself.
The fact that Kostya will survive (the betrayal of the doctor) is expected. Kostya was the only one who treated him well
In general , the doctor is the luckiest , it turns out that he escaped death twice
Murder by foreigners is very cruel, it gives you goosebumps.
The female roles are cool, Natasha's mom is certainly far from being the perfect mom.
as a result, Kostya, who was not very loved as a character, was the only one left alive, which means he is clean, because there is no way to find out what happened)) but somehow I misunderstood something to Kostya: he calmly kills a rapist on the street, then a witness, and when it came to executing the sentence, he was against someone on the left, who was not injured... the ending is kind of forced. Well, there's no groundwork for the next season, and by the years, the pardon law has already been released in the series
. In general, it's not a bad series.
And then Kostya told him to go to Khabarovsk.
If I had listened, I would still be alive.
That is, from his point of view, they deserved it.
And the Doctor took upon himself the sin and the death sentence in order to help the suffering people pass away without pain.
And that's why Kostya didn't want to be killed by some leftist.
And here the ending is bright and spectacular. But as far as I'm concerned, it's merged. What is the director trying to convey to us? Who is more cunning and right? Is history written by the winners? Kostya is the same negative character as the others, what kind of punishment did he suffer?
Well, not to mention the fact that he went to a secure facility after being suspended, and calmly brought the prisoner to the chief's office without raising questions from anyone. I also got a signed weapon.
The fact that they trusted the cocktail and did not check the fact of death has already been mentioned above.
Was it interesting to watch? It was. Did the actors act well? Great. But can I say that this is the perfect job? No, as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't evoke a response.
Everything is clear on the bone, I chewed everything through the mouth of several characters about responsibility for decision-making and about the principles of life. It's a great move to outsource the execution of a sentence to someone who has a greater thirst for revenge.
But according to the Doctor's joke, it is very expected. Presumptuous stupidity to trust him. And that sincere laugh at the end is great. Still, there was at least one character who was happy in the end!
In my opinion, shikaaaaarnoooo!!! This is exactly the kind of epic ending that should have been done in such a series. Bravo to the scriptwriters, it's really an application for the TV series of the year.
I never liked Nina, you could figure her out right away. This is a very convenient position for the victim, although in fact it is an ordinary device.
I'm sorry for Natasha. She's not a model of morality either, but she's a person no one has ever really loved, not even her own mother. That's why she was so excited when she found out that her husband had killed a rapist, in her world it was like a heroic act, that someone protected her. And I'm just really interested in how she will live in the same city with Kostya?))) I don't envy Natasha.
About the rest, so everything is clear)))
We were surprised with the Japanese, of course. The outsourcers had such fucking faces. Like they're the most beaten down, but they're not - they knocked on the bottom.
There won't be a second season, I think.
And the question of how the convict got the machine gun remains open.
- bring the package
It's a
purely mundane situation that no one was surprised about.
In principle, the women here are all likely to grab the money that's left, and who goes where won't disappear.
Except for the cop who was killed, everyone here is worth each other
By the way, the story gives the impression that the girl is not her daughter. This was not disclosed in detail, but it looks like there is zero emotional connection between them.
And plus, I want to point out that as soon as she had the financial opportunity, the first thing she did was board a plane.
Kotov, Sledak, Dentist, Doctor Black, Millionaire punisher. The prosecutor's office has a wife, in general, OK, just young and beautiful in such a Zazhopinsk, even her trip to the club turned out to be one of the most harmless
Two, you probably don't know how the investigation is going.
It's a bunch of bureaucracy + then courts + appeals. Even just an investigation usually takes place within a month + trial + appeals. You can definitely delay a year for six months.
So, without even realizing that a moratorium had been imposed, he had bought his life time with a new crime, while everything described above would have happened. There wasn't much point in killing yourself.
If by some miracle he escaped, a large-scale search would eventually find him. Most of them find them.
A super wonderful option, escaped into the wilderness and became a successful survivalist. Well, this is on the verge of fiction.
How cleverly Kostya outplayed everyone... and his wife (or who was she to him?) She didn't lose her head, took the money and flew away, hopefully to a place where she would be happy...
I hope I didn't hurt anyone's feelings with my comment. Honestly, it's a creepy scene, as Kostya cut Nina's hair right in front of my eyes.
Comparing an adult capable (albeit pretending to be incapacitated) lady and a girl elementary school student is powerful, of course. "You're shaming me" is more than a child's natural reaction to the appearance of an inadequate mother in shoes from the cold. Moreover, the girl was very quickly ashamed of this phrase and ran after her mother. Otherwise, how did her daughter poison her life? Well, you conveniently forgot that it was your daughter who tried to help her when she was a child.
"She put up with them." I wouldn't have tolerated it that way. If she was patient, why didn't she want to leave? And in what place is she a creative person? What does this mean? That she reads books, like about every first person? And in what kind of fabulous reality would a creature so unfit for life be happy? The money will run out. Unfortunately, philologists are not exactly in demand in the labor market. Especially in a foreign country. None of the heroines will be happy, except, perhaps, Julia, if she manages to recover. It is quite possible that HIV will mobilize her and teach her to enjoy every day.
To want (to leave) and to be able are different verbs.
Besides, Kamchatka is a cold hell for such a vulnerable soul.
Obviously, in order to fully familiarize yourself with this character, you need to read the Stallion and take a closer look at the female character there.
The characters have not changed by the end, except that the masks have finally fallen off. Yankovsky brought his hero to a complete moral nullification. At some point, you catch yourself thinking that you can't even hate him anymore — he's become so much a symbol of something bigger, some kind of system without a soul and without a purpose.
I would like to say that the series was impressive. But it would be more correct to empty it. It feels like it's gotten a little darker inside. If the authors wanted to use this ending to remind us how it shouldn't be, they did it.
1. About Nina's past, the fact that Kostya called Roma's mom her prostitute, I thought that this was a branded and reliable cliche for money on the bench, and not a reference to the past. Her motivation and relationship with Kostya were unclear, from the secret purchase of books instead of boots and the punishment of shaving to the abandonment of her daughter. Communication is at zero. And where did Kostya keep the money, that Nina didn't find it and didn't take it, the rest of the women found everything?
2. What happened to the doctor's sex addiction? And why was she in the series, in order to get sick and one sick lover would be enough to interact with the doctor? But it also turned out to be questionable.
3. The rapist's wife says that his body has been found. Drunk Natasha, without hearing the cause of death: am I glad that he was killed, and besides a mug on the head there is no continuation?
4. The investigator is missing — no one cares. Well, gone and gone
5. The most confusing character for me was Natasha's mother, everything related to her was close to some kind of twists, but it never played out: attempts to look for a cop, overheard by the prison governor exposing the daughter's monologue. She gets involved in everything that doesn't really concern her, and then, at the snap of her fingers, she abruptly doesn't care.
6. Well, I can barely imagine a dialogue between a drunken, bloody Natasha and her husband, where he asks her to kill Kostya instead of him, so that what? Should I keep eating Raffaelki? Cover his ass out of pity? To resume a relationship?
1. invested in the spiritual, not the material. shaving your head is a thousand-year-old punishment for female infidelity. The daughter is mentally more mature than the mother, so it's still unclear who left whom.
2. balanced the dosage
3. Does my wife have Stockholm syndrome, should I have shot her with a shotgun too?
4. the base
5. Her last monologue was sincere. with them, she finally cut the umbilical cord with her daughter and began to build her personal life. It was quite successful until the last moment
6. Why drunk? It could have been a few days there, and her husband was a hero in her eyes, where did the pity come from, on the contrary, complete submission and devotion. blowjob is just an indicator of the finally accomplished transition to unconditional male dominance in their family.
At the moment when the Japanese were beating the Robber to death, I even cried a little from a sense of injustice, because they made the decision in hindsight, and most likely he would have been able to serve until the death penalty was abolished. In the finale, I felt a little sorry for Peter, but there was still a bit of humanity in him until the last. And oh, how upset I was when I saw Kostya in the finale, I assumed that he was alive, because the doctor understood who they needed this cocktail for.… But all the same, I hoped that this cunning asshole would be merged exactly as ridiculously as he deserves. To be honest, I expected more from this series, I bet 8/10.
Of course, this execution with the Japs, the prison governor overplayed his hand against the background of such money. Kostya and the team were at least looking for people whose loved ones had been killed.
The conversation between Bones and Sledge in the restick is 100% right, the first one is to blame, but we must not forget that the manipulator is still the same.
The ending, of course, amused 😂 just a bunch of idiots, such peppers)) If they got rid of the Bone, they should have found the body, and how would he be listed as deceased? The question arises as to how he got back to prison in his uniform. Okay, let's overlook this fact 😁 but Tarantino and Balabanov really appreciated it, the commentators above are right 👍 overall, I'm happy with the series, I've been waiting for it for a long time only because of Yankovsky
On the very topic of the series, it's good if there is one episode. Everything else is filler. There are only three executions, the last two with a lot of problems. All the characters are crazy. Maybe there was no outsourcing, but this is all a mass fantasy of psychiatric patients. Or everyone is dead, and the action takes place in purgatory. I do not know how else to explain the total irrational behavior of all the characters.
the boss has been serving with a backbone
for a long time, the boss has been murdering sledak himself and signed up for their deluge
, so if the idea can be outsourced, what is the value of the author, besides radishes, which will turn everyone in at the first shoo
Actually, this movie has the most ridiculous statutory relationship that I've seen. The prosecutor with the lieutenant colonel's shoulder straps talks on equal terms with the soldier sergeants, this is such ridiculous nonsense
Wow, thanks for this product in Russian cinema.
Nina turned out to be absolutely worthless. In the first episodes, she looked like a well-read, educated, intelligent and exemplary wife. And in fact, she's a lost soul, she doesn't even need a daughter.
Kostya even arranged everything beautifully at the end of the episode.
The moment with the Japanese was amazing. Of course, these guys are businessmen. They are ready to go to any kind of blackmail for the sake of money.
The series is definitely top-notch. It looks great in one go
Yankovsky played great, honestly, I could feel the whole abyss of this hero's soul. but! How can so many commentators sympathize with him??? Compared to the others, he may seem like the lesser of the evils, but certainly not the one you root for.
I agree that Kostya's wife is still a runaway woman, but as you can't see, he has been abusing and belittling her for years, not allowing her to make any decisions herself, treating her not as a person, but as a thing, property. She couldn't have been any different already, it was against the background of his cruelty to his wife that his character revealed itself most darkly to me. It is clear that no one whitewashes her betrayal, but in such a system of relationships there can be no love in principle, only fear and secret hatred. He's a terrible manipulator, with his own value system. And the fact that there are sound principles in his system does not make him a good person. He first cut off his wife's escape routes, and then kicked her out like a stray dog, knowing that she had nowhere to go, there is also a special cruelty in this, isn't there? Again, no one says that the wife is an angel, but does this give a man the right to remain generally good, but so... m? No. You're either normal under any external circumstances, or you're not, that's it.
And you will always be a performer.
And your life will always be led by someone.
And you will always outsource it.
Exactly! There are so many holes, it's crazy...
How did this lishen (the father of the murdered woman) figure them out? How did he find out about Bandos' murder?
It's even funnier about bandos. I saw that you were worried and went to keep an eye on you with a sawed-off shotgun! And then I fell right on the street, Vasya, unknown to me! Just like that! And then the murdered dad! And then I'm like, let's get into ethical questions, who can kill and who can't? And then I'll lay them all down and sit down myself! What???
He's so complicated! His aunt, the author, wrote that this is how she imagines romantic characters.
The final shot was fired by the killer of the investigator and two more cops.
It was written on the door of his cell.
Kostya is no better than other heroes. He could have taken $500 from Kotov ($100 each) and not killed him. It would somehow justify his good looks. And he took the money from Kotov and started looking for a more profitable outsourcing option. I think he already knew at that moment that he was going to kill the Cat. The beauty of the Dice doesn't fit with this plot twist.
Unbelievable nonsense, in everything. Starting with the idea itself.
If you don't think with your head at all and don't know anything about how the system works, well, it's such a strange entertainment.
This answer is not related to the opinion of the author of the post)
I don't even want to find fault with anything!
I was especially worried about the boy, that he would somehow get AIDS after he cut himself with his mother with a Christmas tree toy.
❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹❤️🩹
Shock content for the sake of shock content, causing nothing but a cringe and nervous laughter.
I am sure that you, like the vast majority of the audience, literally on the next scene after the outlined schematics (and this is the very beginning), planned to quit the series and move on. Why waste time on chewing gum? I beg. No, I beg you, my dear viewer, watch it to the end. And you will be rewarded.
And not only because of Yankovsky's character. For all the public dislike of the actor, he has perfectly written dialogues. Do you remember how you waded through the thorns in "The Master and Margarita", how you admired the simplicity of thoughts and the genius of Yeshea Ganotsri? Yankovsky's hero is the new Yeshea. And his truthfulness, his honesty, his sobering words cannot sing the praises of a screenwriter. Well, what a good fellow!
Outsourcing doesn't have a happy ending. Just as Sangadzhiev's project of the same name did not have one. Just a bold dot. And a bag of answers to all the questions. And you will not review it, like absolutely any film by Yuri Bykov. But it will definitely remain an anchor in your memory, as one of the brightest media products of this year. Cold, sobering, and thought-provoking.
Remember the senseless and moral murder of my father (at the very beginning), just because others offered more, but he was refused and he was a witness.
And as for the incitement, if Kostya hadn't come, none of this would have happened, they would have lived a boring life by the rules. And here he is, definitely an insidious villain.
I don't even want to write about other characters, the series left a negative impression. If Kostya had eventually died and the others had been imprisoned, it would have been the right thing to do. But not this(((
In general, it feels strange.
According to actress Mila Ershova in an interview with Snob, the screenwriters initially considered the option where Ivan Yankovsky's character arranges a terrible massacre. In the draft script, he dealt with all the female characters of the series in turn, including the girlfriends of the main characters and even the mother of Dani Steklov, played by Olga Lapshina.
Instead of being shocked and trying to stop their friend, the other characters suddenly agreed with his arguments. They not only accepted his theory, but also disposed of the bodies together by simply dumping the car with the dead in the gorge.
The creators of the series realized that such an ending would be illogical, and they completely revised it, making the final version more meaningful and balanced.
I wonder where he got the machine gun to give to the prisoner
Well, an interesting point with the prisoner himself, what guarantees would he not have failed Kostya? Or did Kostya predict the decision to commit suicide too?)
In general, there are a lot of conventions and "luck" in the finale, which makes it feel very crumpled and unsaid.
I liked the series as a whole, a solid 7/10, but they didn't finish the ending :)
PS: It feels like there should have been at least one more episode between the events of the middle and the finale of the series
When there was a situation with the second prisoner, he rubbed in that they were not holding an auction, although he had arranged it with 1, transferring the right to a richer woman with a business. He plays with words rather than observing justice with deep digging of the truth.
Then something went wrong altogether.
I didn't get the series, unfortunately (
I expected more
Firstly, I didn't feel any negative emotions about the character himself, but I genuinely liked him (although, it would seem, everyone in a row..) Perhaps this follows from the second reason, namely, that the actor has really sunk into my soul, as if he just lives. His gait, facial expressions, and manner of communication turned out to be so lively and real. I want to watch him play more and more, but alas and ah(
I disagree with most of the comments here. Kostya is not an ambiguous character, he is a standard psychopath, this is very clearly shown. What exactly is ambiguous about it? Every second serial killer talks about his own damn code of honor, according to which he did it. Kostya knows how to manipulate people, apparently, it worked for some of the audience.
All the other characters are also quite unambiguous in the sense that they all have a high tolerance for violence (throughout the first series, they consistently ignore not only the pain of a prisoner in prison, but also the outright trash going on in their homes) and actively manifest it (and everyone, not just men — Katya fights, Nina sends daughter at night for a scarf). However, they are not Kostya. They grew up in violence, so they are tolerant of violence, and therefore they can only show most of their emotions through violence — this is also quite clearly shown by the characters of Natasha's mother, Roma's mother, and Andrei's parents. We don't see loving parents in this series at all. Even remotely positive characters like Julia or Nina quietly run away from children.
None of them, unlike Kostya (and much later Natasha), knows how to kill. It's kind of their job, but we don't really see any of them being able to kill anyone with their own hand. They watch all the time with complete indifference — and yes, this is what is happening to the country, including now. But they can't kill themselves, and that's what preserves their humanity, what leaves the way for some positive change.
I do not know what the creators wanted to show with the finale. Apparently, the only people left alive in the end are those who can kill and do it on their own terms—with the connivance of everyone else. Well, that's about how the nineties really ended.
But I wouldn't say that the series has revealed this idea in some cathartic way. It's a long way from Balabanov or Zvyagintsev, but they've had it for a long time. Rather, it's another disservice.—
But I liked the ending. In general, it was obvious that a friendly company of people who wanted to earn extra money would not last long, there was only a question of how everything would end for them. Kostya surprised me, it turned out quite unexpectedly and epically. They left on a beautiful note, you might say)
Nina was also very surprised. I didn't think she was capable of beating up a grandmother and stealing money. Indeed, all the characters here are as ambiguous and colorful as possible.
And the execution scene! The Japanese, the heart in the package, the imperturbable translator..Some kind of extremely black game))
As strange as it may sound, I will miss this whole atmosphere. I will definitely review it after some time.
A series about real animals.
I liked how they wrapped up the happy ending, which ended a bit absurdly. To be honest, the prisoner who shoots everyone and Kostya, who is still alive, do not look like the end of the series, but like a grotesque metaphor.
I still think that Kostya died in the parking lot, and what we were shown at the end were character glitches. I hardly believe that he is so cunning and beat everyone. Well, or it's sad if the scriptwriters decided to put it that way.
I don't know what many people didn't like.
Volkov is the only one who is as psychotic as all the inmates of a special-security prison. He fed them and communicated with them. He was kind in the first episodes.
It's clear that this is all his cunning plan. And the Doctor apparently considered him one of his own since he helped him.
It's all logical. No mysticism.
And I didn't want it to end like this. Nina's a good girl, she's gone
But, for example, I immediately recognized the same blonde from You Give the Youth in the movie Dr. Lisa, there was not even a comedic train.
Petrov2,0, but Kozlovsky seems to be more talented and diverse. Yankovsky is still young and needs to appear in some sports films.
Yes, how young he is, after five years and forty
, his grandfather was already a Soviet-scale star at his age.
There is no completely positive character, the same doctor's wife, Yulia, does not really think about her son when he called and waited for her, she took pills. I thought when I heard that her son was calling her , she would change her mind , but there 's a moot point , of course . 🤷🏻♀️ The second moment is when the prosecutor's wife and Natasha come to her , she got drunk and forgot to pick up her son in search of her husband 's money .
Against the background of other characters, Julia is the most adequate of course)
You have to try to take a shit like that.
It's how much the scriptwriter doesn't like Russia, which gives out such heroes. Even the most working and beloved image of her Brother, a hero with PTSD and a sense of justice, has managed to disfigure the image of Kostya Volkov, which ceases to sympathize.
Yeah, everything is rotten and everything is gone...
But the series is good. It's interesting, intriguing, and raises a lot of uncomfortable topics.
The acting is great. Excellent camerawork. Cool decorations, apartments, interiors, everything is worked out at the proper level. For once, I was pleased with the work of the sound engineer, the dialogues are really well heard, no one is whispering under their noses, so you can feel our work with mistakes.
Okko well done , we are waiting for more suitable projects
The topic of life prisoners is raised there, who are used as "training equipment" for sparring special agents, such as live dummies on which punches and techniques are practiced. Like gladiators of the 21st century.
The film is good, bloody and hopeless. Well, almost the big brother of Outsourcing)