He laughed at the businessman Kostya, who is overly calm, intelligent and the most dangerous in the entire prison at the moment. The series is still interesting and doesn't let you lose interest.
@marlenad_13: I also wanted to write that the series is dynamic, a lot of things are happening and the plot is not delayed yet. I hope they keep up the pace.
It's been very good so far in two episodes. I like everything, from the pitch to the atmosphere. okko seems to have rolled out a quality product again. Yeah, it's hard, it's hard. but damn, it's completely addictive.
@MOPE_AHAHACOB: most likely, love will happen between them, he treats her well, unlike her husband, and she will lead him... But it is unclear what this will result in. Something's going to happen at home.
@Flotus: yes, there is no line here — darkness and a difficult topic. a wedding (and apparently a pregnancy) after a rape. Three people have HIV. It's good for Yankovsky alone, business is ruined. But I think his family is afraid of him for a reason, something has to happen.
@Flotus: I thought it was Konstantin the abuser, and my wife was afraid of his reaction to the lost scarf, so she sent her daughter to look for him, but Kostya reacted appropriately. MB. and the truth is, the problem is with her.
@RinaAb: It's interesting to see. And Steklov fell for her - perhaps if Ivan Filippovich is really an abuser, then there will be a triangle and Steklov will turn out to be normal there.
So Yankovsky began to acquire a characteristic type among his characters, it's a pity, but I hope it's not his fault, but the directors who claim such roles.
It's a good start, but somehow I got tired of this blackness of the 80s-90s, as if this is the main asset for Russian cinema, it's time to learn how to shoot well about something else.
I would also like to say that the Human Rights Center Wednesday knows how to address and disclose social problems in its projects, for which I respect them.
@Liyuuuuunder: Yes, there are a lot of different Russian TV series. and the topic of the heavy 90s will be chewed on for a long time - firstly, it catches on, secondly, many more remember, and thirdly, everything that happened then should somehow be reflected by the people.
As far as I know, a situation where a person has a negative status, but at the same time he is infected, is possible only if he has recently become infected and the virus may not be noticeable on the test yet. But in this case, how is Peter not infected by the test, and his wife has received a positive status, if, in theory, he infected her and she has the virus for a shorter period of time?
Or am I poorly informed and this is still possible (to have a negative status, but to be a carrier)?
@Liyuuuuunder: The non-progressors are infected and an antibody test would show a positive result. It's just that their viral load has not been detected for quite a long time. And the primary test they did was always for antibodies. So the series skewed this topic.
@rainbow_ol: He probably doesn't have HIV, but his dentist wife picked it up somewhere and distributed it to the patients. His mistress has also been contagious for a long time. In order for HIV to be detectable, it must take three months from the moment of infection. And for the symptoms to appear like her teeth, it would take years!
@Yorinko: I also thought that her husband might have brought a sailor, or that her lover was not her first 🤷♀️ Anyway, this "Dr. Fuck@co." what was he thinking🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️ He wasn't protected🤷♀️ he's a doctor, with the harbor sluts and then to his wife and other women😬
@Yorinko: I also think that my wife got infected at work (and maybe not even from the woman we were shown with - there was an HIV boom at that time), but he wasn't sick at all - he just burned up with infidelities because he over-interpreted what came from his side.
@rainbow_ol: I also think it's a joint. Unless they explain later in some other way that women in another place have become infected. If he doesn't have the virus in his blood, he couldn't infect them. Well, or a false analysis. But since it's stated here that he's such a special person, it's just a mistake, we didn't check the information properly.
wow! Considering that my first home is Kamchatka, it was very exciting to see the familiar landscapes! Shots and atmosphere at a height But the plot is addictive, even Yankovsky is somewhat different from his other roles, and this is interesting. The intertwining of the characters' "dirty" personal lives with highly moral choices and dialogues is also interesting. So far, it doesn't irritate, but adds charm. But it's going to be hard for someone as impressionable as me. Even after two episodes, I got into the Professor and, of course, I already feel sorry for him, even remembering what he did. And here's the question: why is Kostya's (Yankovsky's) family so scared and afraid of a reaction, so long as he appears to be a positive hero of retribution?
@komarinaaaaa: how did you watch the series if your character Yankovsky is a positive character? He's a total psychopath. Are you so taken in because he's saying out loud the generally accepted ethical and moral norms in modern society?
@WreckerTH: The "positive hero of retribution" just means that he sees in himself a great idea to decide other people's destinies, which most often will be justified by society, and he also went into business with it) And for that time, he was really atypical, as you already correctly noted)
@komarinaaaaa: As I've already written, Kostya is the scariest and most dangerous person, and he should also be on the other side of the bars. But he's smart enough, and it gives you the creeps. Maybe his wife knows his true face, and from this her fear of her husband, and consequently her fear for her daughter and the possible consequences of their mistakes? But on the other hand, maybe in the future they will show us the other side, and we will worry about Kostya?
@marlenad_13: Oh, yes... and he doesn't seem to support tyranny, and his wife is scared and uncommunicative.. She was so glad that at least someone was interested in her personal in the form of her husband's colleague. But you can't empathize with Kostya in any way - he kills people, sells and doesn't lead an eye.… Well, that could have broken a man like that back then…
I fell for Kostya and his speeches in the first episode, and he... oh, plus this blissful smile and a glassy look. I agree with the comments that he's an abuser: his wife is kind of scared. The lines with the rapist and HIV are full, even xs, what else can I add. In general, it's interesting to watch, but it's mentally difficult.
A powerful impression, a catchy and non-standard concept, "the densest " dialogues, as if there were not even unnecessary or unnecessary lines.
But I was especially impressed by the attention to detail and the old-fashioned cigarette packs that my father smoked all the noughties and left one as a keepsake after he quit smoking.
Of course, most of the women here have a particularly difficult fate. HIV, that's crazy. It's already scary what might happen to Kostya's wife, she's the only one who doesn't have an obvious line yet.
Konstantin himself is obviously in trouble with his head (but how good is Yankovsky). At the moment of the shooting, Kotova was sitting with her face straight. Although, again, everything may not be so clear-cut, they must show us how he came to such a life.
It's so unpleasant to look at all this, but it's impossible to tear yourself away. I like the laconic dialogues separately.
@Zelinski: Have you watched the previous series Gligorova Highway?In general, women have an enchanting fate there, as if Balabanov's cargo 200 had been reshot.
@vk860469: I haven't looked at the track yet, but I'm planning to. yes, I also heard from friends that I have a lot in common with Balabanov) well, what can I do, unfortunately, this doesn't happen in life yet
I would like to write a detailed review. But I don't want to waste time on it. The fact that the director shot such magnificent works as Crystal and the Track does not mean that now everything that comes out of his pen will be a masterpiece.
I will only write theses: - The series was announced on a specific topic. 30% of the time is devoted to this topic, the rest is the personal life of the characters, which does not affect the main theme at all, or indirectly some lines, but again, this can be shown using less screen time. - Characters of the characters: We were shown an honest prosecutor and his alleged development. Are you serious? Well, I don't believe it. From his choice of a girl, from the fact that he would break his principles like that. The moralist Yankovsky. Who asked to treat criminals with respect. What was his character breakdown? Which trigger changed his moral beliefs. That he agrees not only to sell, but also to torture, even though he killed the previous one in the first episode so that he wouldn't suffer. Devoted fans of the series, please tell us. And also explain the motivation of the moralist to kill his father, who introduced this idea to them. If it could have been played out differently and two parents invited to the execution. How did a spineless moustache become a guard of the FSIN in a strict regime zone with puffs? But his character supposedly plays a key role in the plot. The doctor is OK, there is a development and his morale has not been shaken Steklov - OK, I could agree
If I wanted to watch a series about life in the 90s, I would have turned on Dashing. At least he's what he claims to be. The director is trying to sit on a few chairs. And show a series about the 90s and social problems. And the very topic of outsourcing And reveal the psychology of criminals. But no, it doesn't work. He is far from Mind Hunters. Further, the motivation to put it on stream has not been particularly worked out. Since we were shown at the beginning that pyzhikov doesn't sit much. This means that the sample of rich witnesses will be extremely narrow. But let them explain further here.
@Lebedos: That's not how it works in drama. If the logic set by the author is violated in a book or movie, the consumer becomes disappointed and drops, rather than eating with the thought, "What if the author explains everything to us at the end?";
@Paramelion: what's the claim that the series is specifically about the 90s? If I'm not mistaken, the moratorium was introduced in 1996-1997, and I think the series will end with the closure of the shop. I agree about the search for rich victims, and in general they have 5 lifers there, if they had filmed it about a polar owl or a black dolphin it would have been more logical.
@kalsarikannit: Where did you see me saying that the claim is that the series is about the 90s? The claim is that the key theme that was stated in the series is shown in a smaller proportion than everything else. Perhaps this will change further. But I watched two episodes about other social problems of that time that were not related to outsourcing. They're not badly shot. But if I wanted to watch a series about it, I would watch a series that would declare it and give Dashing as an example.;
@Paramelion: The fact is that it was possible to pull off such an attraction, if at all, then only in the 90s, and in such a wilderness. All the actors, even despite the general devastation, must have a motive to create a criminal group. And it is shown. What is the claim that the prosecutor is with the princes? By the fact that he himself blurted it out a couple of times? It's obvious that he's a rag, his wife is a whore, and the prison governor is sending him. As the princes were, they collapsed.) Yankovsky is obviously probing everyone, and you mistook his shot at the first convict for an act of mercy. He set himself up like that right away, saying that's how I can do it. He is immediately presented as a serious person.) Well, he killed the Cat for this, he is obviously a sociopath and a criminal. I don't mean that I'm an Urka, but in psychology. Removed the intruder. Tell me, too, two parents at once, but why not take an excursion to the firing squad right away?) A spineless moustache? Well, the 90s, in such a prison, find more willing to work. Somewhere in the capitals, an employee could carry vodka to convicts, five times more expensive. And here..
The only thing is that the concentration of fateful events on one group in a short time period is, let's say, off the charts. Well, the movie still works, the speakers work again.)
@AbuAziz: Thanks for the detailed opinion) But I don't agree about the prosecutor anyway. We were shown that everyone shuns him because of his principles and stubbornness. And then bam, and he's already at the same table with them, and they're laying out a criminal scheme for him. We were not shown how he shared his problems and did not show the others the urgent need for money. How could they know that he wouldn't rat on them just for one idea?
@Paramelion: I may have missed the point at first, about the emphasis on his stubbornness. But he doesn't have any litigation going on. This is indicated by his dialogue with his wife, where he says that he cannot live with her mother. It turns out that they have already lived with her mother, and now with his parents. Well, again, he's a mama's boy, and his girl is a fire, he doesn't want to miss her. There's a contrast with the wall again, because it's true that people have been queuing behind these walls for years, it's not like that, but there's everything here, just pay. And according to the second remark, after all, there is an episode where usatii, on Yankovsky's instructions, comes to the prosecutor for a list of the professor's victims. And he announces the dachshund to him. Here's the entrance ticket.
@AbuAziz: I'm sorry, but when they show us the principled prosecutor from the first scenes of the series (he demanded compliance with the law from the head of the prison). It is impossible to completely change your views in a day. First there is a small bribe, just the case in the office where he wrote a tax for issuing a case. Note that there is nothing particularly criminal here, he just takes money for spending his time a little and handing over the case to another government employee. And then they show us that he is sitting at a crime table and agrees to commit crime. Character breakdown should be gradual.
Stop whining that the series didn't meet your expectations in the first two episodes, literate! Don't look-the solution is simple. You're writing outright heresy to make it seem like you're on the subject and fumbling about something.
@Paramelion: An opinion worthy of respect. I didn't like the episode where the prosecutor's wife stands wet from head to toe, his mother is twisted after being kicked in the stomach
Finally! All the characters are in place, the conflict is marked, the schematics are clear. The second episode is a bold colon in the story. On the one hand, we have inhumans who are deprived of freedom and revel in impunity until they are caught (Professor), and on the other, there are free individuals who also assert themselves through unpunished acts that also cripple people's lives (Doctor). And who is more of a moral freak - and that still needs to be seen! "That's another question.
If in doubt, look boldly, the first two episodes are exactly right. There will be a complete impression. The project is, yes, with chernukha, but Bykovskaya (Factory, Major): flirting with morality without overloading with moralizing. Accompanied by beautiful views of Kamchatka. It's a pity that she's not shown on the big screen that often. ^]
And those who will then take the corpse of the murdered maniac and bury him will have no questions, why is half of his face cut out or are they also in a share? And those who find the corpse of a man with a sawed-off shotgun, by the nature of the injury, it is not clear that there is no suicide at point-blank range?
@kalsarikannit: the death is pronounced by a doctor, the body is not given to relatives, they are buried on the territory of the prison. The prosecutor provides the paperwork. Everything is in the share and everything is hidden.
I've been waiting a long time for this series with Vanya Yankovsky. The start is super, the hero lines too. The Wednesday company is shooting under the leadership of Alexander Tsekalo, which already means that it will be a strong work, many of the series turned out to be cool. We'll keep watching, it's a pity that one episode is released once a week.
Very interesting character lines, they don't fully reveal secrets, but everyone has their own dark side. Intrigue, what kind of Kostya is really: a quiet abuser, or was it shown that way on purpose? Oh, this waiting for a new episode once a week, I remember on the Track, especially when the episode ends at the most interesting place. It's too early to draw full conclusions. Looking at
Yes, indeed, there is corruption and blackness, which is often a reality for small towns with colonies... So I thought it would be just a pure drama drama, and then there's a detective thriller, even quite a bit of an action movie! It was interesting, even exciting! There is, of course, a certain primitiveness of the scenario, when all the participants in the executions are brought to make decisions through emerging life problems, and at the same time! Except for the reader of the book "The Stallion"))), he was apparently impressed by the book! ))) And, with a high degree of probability, a future corpse, because of staring at Kostya's wife, especially considering how he (Kostya) solves problems.…
@marlenad_13: I'm betting on him, too, or rather his wife, who is greedy or money-hungry. She won't be able to hold back.. He 'll lose his temper and burn the money
I really like it so far. Thank you for not showing the really hard scenes (the rape and the massacre of the victim's mother against the killer). At the same time, it's still dark and heavy on the soul after watching, but that's right.
Vanya— my respect, turned out to be a very intriguing character. Interesting, despite the fact that he has a persistent feeling of being completely inanimate inside a person. Such a person is a black hole. It's still unclear with his wife and daughter: the scene with Kostya's return home is deliberately arranged so that there are more questions than answers. He may be an abuser of his wife (and that's not a fact), but not of his daughter. Which doesn't make it better, but it's definitely more multidimensional. I hope this character will be revealed gradually until the eighth episode, because a lot is already clear about the rest.
The picture is cool, and the decision in favor of the 4:3 format was correct. I'll watch as the episodes come out, because it would be emotionally difficult to swallow in a couple of nights.
@reflexenia: I agree with you, it's very hard to swallow this right away. Given the 3 episodes that have already been released, I also couldn't start 3 immediately after the second episode. It's a pity that OKKO doesn't make subtitles. I noticed that in TV shows they always make the music sound higher than the dialogues. Of course, this makes the immersion in the series higher, but I don't have enough dialogues.
@rodriguezzz: He probably shouldn't. I read the memoirs of a policeman, in the 70s he was a member of such a team that executed. He also describes himself, a prosecutor, a doctor and three policemen. They weren't even prison staff. Such a side job. After the shooting, a day off, allowances. The point is that no one would know the specific performers. But at least only the right people knew. Even the sentence was not carried out in the prison itself, but there was a special place. He describes a lot of details there, and the gun is small, so that there is less dirt, and there are a lot of purely technical points. And in the series, the prison governor clearly outlined his priorities :)
About HIV. She was sitting in an armchair and said that she had had a gum problem for six months. Why did they think he had infected her? Or did I miss something?
@Yulkafomkina: You haven't been to Twitch yet, they walk around in herds and repeat one word that's the coolest thing at the moment (with your mind, I want pizza, I understand)
So that's where Yankovsky is not a trembling creature, but has the right. 🤔 There are no unambiguous characters, they are not trustworthy, and they are unpleasant. But I like it!
But could a philologist pronounce catharsis in 96? Give a little encouragement to a philologist who graduated in 2008, who was taught by teachers to experience catharsis after reading tons.
@LuM_E: by the way, no one taught us how to experience catharsis in philology)) I actually first learned this word when I listened to the Russian metal band of the same name) But that was before I joined FeelFuck))
@LuM_E: Well, it's still on the first syllable. You can listen to it in Google Translator. They pronounce it as Catharsis. The etymology of the word is ancient Greek, even there the stress was on the first syllable.
@-TraumfraU-: There are no questions about etymology, which is why I am in favor of emphasizing the first syllable, although now they allow a variant on the second. As for pronunciation in English, I trust the transcription from dictionaries.
@LuM_E: Catharsis has two accents, you can have both catharsis and catharsis. The stress on the first syllable is from Greek, and on the second one, I think, from the influence on the stress of Russian.
@jackie_lapin: Thanks! My question is not about the modern norm, but about the 90s. At that time, only the stress on the origin was considered acceptable - on the first syllable. I mean, it's the philological environment that the character came from. This orthoepical stuffiness is from the musical category - the series features songs that had not yet been recorded at the time of the events)
@WinnyQ: 1 US dollar in 1996 is equal to two dollars by modern standards. This does not apply to Russia, but specifically to the United States. That is, those hundred dollars, if you do all the calculations, will now be equal to about 18k rubles.
Some kind of hopeless, overwhelming burden. It's as if Netflix wanted to take down Russian blackmail without understanding the essence. It would be better if the story about outsourcing occupied the main timekeeping, and not all these lives of uninteresting characters.
How addictive the series is. This gloomy atmosphere and beautiful landscapes are especially catchy. It is very interesting what awaits the heroes in the finale, whether they will be able to get away with it.
I rarely pay attention to Russian TV series, but this one really fascinated me. I will definitely continue to watch it further. The plot is fascinating, the atmosphere of gloom is conveyed very accurately, the musical accompaniment and landscapes are magnificent, and, finally, the wonderful cast, which is interesting to watch.
there are so many smokers in the frame, and in my opinion, both of the women in this episode smoked thin cigarettes, but were they there at all at that time? There are thin browns there, clearly Chapman
@nuwandarenton: this is with a 99% probability More. PS: and what is Chapman?? This is the first time I've heard of such a brand of cigarettes.. SORRY: I Googled it.. Surprisingly, it wasn't until 2025 that I found out about these cigarettes.. Although I remember those years that I also remember the Bulgarian BT, and Cosmos, and the Stewardess.. But I've never seen anyone like this before.. And the truth is, live forever, study forever, but you'll die a fool anyway..)
The topic of requesting materials from the prosecutor is super strange, because FSIN officers have access to the information that they kind of bought from him, such a joint is certainly specific, but since they recreated the form of those years, then they could steam up and come up with another move to involve the prosecutor.
I don't like it when all the black stuff and stuff is called saker hood. Balabanov had an idea and a metaphor, and he did something that got into the hearts. It's like all the dark cliches have been collected here, everything bad can happen is bound to happen. I wonder how the topic of this retaliation, involving the relatives of the victims, will develop. Konstantin resembles a tempting devil) sneaks in and touches on all the darkest things, and then the little people caught up with their problems. And when he gave out about rape in modern theses, well xs. This is stupid manipulation. I don't believe he could have sincerely said that. It's already so clear that he's a psychopath, there can be no compassion there.
Hthon hthon, of course, supporting what was said earlier, but the actors are acting out ... the eyes are happy. Otherwise, they are hurt by overwhelming sadness, despair and hopelessness.
@id755353277: Because that's often the case in life. You look at your friends - the perfect wife/husband, the perfect family - the husband/ wife are cheating.
Discussion of the 2 episode of the 1 season Discuss this episode
132Yeah, it's hard, it's hard. but damn, it's completely addictive.
Most likely, there will be something criminal.
The HIV line is very difficult, but very relevant here
Is Mom a philologist or a domestic abuser?
It's a good start, but somehow I got tired of this blackness of the 80s-90s, as if this is the main asset for Russian cinema, it's time to learn how to shoot well about something else.
I would also like to say that the Human Rights Center Wednesday knows how to address and disclose social problems in its projects, for which I respect them.
As far as I know, a situation where a person has a negative status, but at the same time he is infected, is possible only if he has recently become infected and the virus may not be noticeable on the test yet. But in this case, how is Peter not infected by the test, and his wife has received a positive status, if, in theory, he infected her and she has the virus for a shorter period of time?
Or am I poorly informed and this is still possible (to have a negative status, but to be a carrier)?
In order for HIV to be detectable, it must take three months from the moment of infection. And for the symptoms to appear like her teeth, it would take years!
But the plot is addictive, even Yankovsky is somewhat different from his other roles, and this is interesting. The intertwining of the characters' "dirty" personal lives with highly moral choices and dialogues is also interesting. So far, it doesn't irritate, but adds charm.
But it's going to be hard for someone as impressionable as me. Even after two episodes, I got into the Professor and, of course, I already feel sorry for him, even remembering what he did.
And here's the question: why is Kostya's (Yankovsky's) family so scared and afraid of a reaction, so long as he appears to be a positive hero of retribution?
I agree with the comments that he's an abuser: his wife is kind of scared.
The lines with the rapist and HIV are full, even xs, what else can I add.
In general, it's interesting to watch, but it's mentally difficult.
But I was especially impressed by the attention to detail and the old-fashioned cigarette packs that my father smoked all the noughties and left one as a keepsake after he quit smoking.
Konstantin himself is obviously in trouble with his head (but how good is Yankovsky). At the moment of the shooting, Kotova was sitting with her face straight. Although, again, everything may not be so clear-cut, they must show us how he came to such a life.
It's so unpleasant to look at all this, but it's impossible to tear yourself away. I like the laconic dialogues separately.
The fact that the director shot such magnificent works as Crystal and the Track does not mean that now everything that comes out of his pen will be a masterpiece.
I will only write theses:
- The series was announced on a specific topic. 30% of the time is devoted to this topic, the rest is the personal life of the characters, which does not affect the main theme at all, or indirectly some lines, but again, this can be shown using less screen time.
- Characters of the characters:
We were shown an honest prosecutor and his alleged development. Are you serious? Well, I don't believe it. From his choice of a girl, from the fact that he would break his principles like that.
The moralist Yankovsky. Who asked to treat criminals with respect. What was his character breakdown? Which trigger changed his moral beliefs. That he agrees not only to sell, but also to torture, even though he killed the previous one in the first episode so that he wouldn't suffer. Devoted fans of the series, please tell us.
And also explain the motivation of the moralist to kill his father, who introduced this idea to them. If it could have been played out differently and two parents invited to the execution.
How did a spineless moustache become a guard of the FSIN in a strict regime zone with puffs? But his character supposedly plays a key role in the plot.
The doctor is OK, there is a development and his morale has not been shaken
Steklov - OK, I could agree
If I wanted to watch a series about life in the 90s, I would have turned on Dashing. At least he's what he claims to be.
The director is trying to sit on a few chairs.
And show a series about the 90s and social problems.
And the very topic of outsourcing
And reveal the psychology of criminals.
But no, it doesn't work. He is far from Mind Hunters.
Further, the motivation to put it on stream has not been particularly worked out. Since we were shown at the beginning that pyzhikov doesn't sit much. This means that the sample of rich witnesses will be extremely narrow. But let them explain further here.
What is the claim that the prosecutor is with the princes? By the fact that he himself blurted it out a couple of times? It's obvious that he's a rag, his wife is a whore, and the prison governor is sending him. As the princes were, they collapsed.)
Yankovsky is obviously probing everyone, and you mistook his shot at the first convict for an act of mercy. He set himself up like that right away, saying that's how I can do it. He is immediately presented as a serious person.)
Well, he killed the Cat for this, he is obviously a sociopath and a criminal. I don't mean that I'm an Urka, but in psychology. Removed the intruder. Tell me, too, two parents at once, but why not take an excursion to the firing squad right away?)
A spineless moustache? Well, the 90s, in such a prison, find more willing to work. Somewhere in the capitals, an employee could carry vodka to convicts, five times more expensive. And here..
The only thing is that the concentration of fateful events on one group in a short time period is, let's say, off the charts. Well, the movie still works, the speakers work again.)
But I don't agree about the prosecutor anyway. We were shown that everyone shuns him because of his principles and stubbornness. And then bam, and he's already at the same table with them, and they're laying out a criminal scheme for him. We were not shown how he shared his problems and did not show the others the urgent need for money. How could they know that he wouldn't rat on them just for one idea?
And according to the second remark, after all, there is an episode where usatii, on Yankovsky's instructions, comes to the prosecutor for a list of the professor's victims. And he announces the dachshund to him. Here's the entrance ticket.
Character breakdown should be gradual.
I didn't like the episode where the prosecutor's wife stands wet from head to toe, his mother is twisted after being kicked in the stomach
I wonder what will happen next.
If in doubt, look boldly, the first two episodes are exactly right. There will be a complete impression. The project is, yes, with chernukha, but Bykovskaya (Factory, Major): flirting with morality without overloading with moralizing. Accompanied by beautiful views of Kamchatka. It's a pity that she's not shown on the big screen that often. ^]
And the feeling that everything will be bad in the finale has been formed since the first episode.
Oh, this waiting for a new episode once a week, I remember on the Track, especially when the episode ends at the most interesting place. It's too early to draw full conclusions. Looking at
( Roma is still a dark horse , but Sasha is suspicious )
For Kostya, this is a fixed idea, apparently while Kostya is busy, his wife and daughter are at peace.
Vanya— my respect, turned out to be a very intriguing character. Interesting, despite the fact that he has a persistent feeling of being completely inanimate inside a person. Such a person is a black hole. It's still unclear with his wife and daughter: the scene with Kostya's return home is deliberately arranged so that there are more questions than answers. He may be an abuser of his wife (and that's not a fact), but not of his daughter. Which doesn't make it better, but it's definitely more multidimensional. I hope this character will be revealed gradually until the eighth episode, because a lot is already clear about the rest.
The picture is cool, and the decision in favor of the 4:3 format was correct. I'll watch as the episodes come out, because it would be emotionally difficult to swallow in a couple of nights.
Even the sentence was not carried out in the prison itself, but there was a special place. He describes a lot of details there, and the gun is small, so that there is less dirt, and there are a lot of purely technical points.
And in the series, the prison governor clearly outlined his priorities :)
been to Twitch yet, they walk around in herds and repeat one word that's the coolest thing at the moment (with your mind, I want pizza, I understand)
There are no unambiguous characters, they are not trustworthy, and they are unpleasant. But I like it!
Vaz 2106 cost 28,000,000
PS: and what is Chapman?? This is the first time I've heard of such a brand of cigarettes..
SORRY: I Googled it.. Surprisingly, it wasn't until 2025 that I found out about these cigarettes.. Although I remember those years that I also remember the Bulgarian BT, and Cosmos, and the Stewardess.. But I've never seen anyone like this before.. And the truth is, live forever, study forever, but you'll die a fool anyway..)
You look at your friends - the perfect wife/husband, the perfect family - the husband/ wife are cheating.
For the Gaza Strip, like it without looking!