It's a little early for the filler series to be launched. Hal appeared at the very end and it was the best moment of the episode, and John's backstory could have been told much faster without wasting such time.. I hope that they will continue to develop the plot and do without gluing with flashbacks, because for an 8-episode season this is an unacceptable luxury.
I liked this episode the most of all so far, the story of John's childhood was told coolly, and it was interesting to see how Hall contributed to the dismissal and almost destruction of John's family. I just thought at first that his father was so strict and I was chasing him, but then my mother wasn't all at home, the main thing was to wake my father up so that he could shoot an apple, and then I got up shaking like I don't know who. There are few special effects and action, but the series went off with a bang, everything is better than the previous one.
Some kind of strange series, to put it mildly, not the series itself, but the order in which it was inserted in the series - in season 1
They usually do this and have done it a million times. There was a first film where they show the present - current events - 1 film and the second film shows the past - 2 films
And then it's kind of very strange the first two episodes - 2 episodes there is something like the present, then bam the third episode - 3 series is the past a strange decision If this episode had been put on the second, then it would have been fine, but when it was put on the third, it's very strange to me.
Because of this, it feels as if the serial numbers have been mixed up.
I'm being bombarded with minuses again, but I don't care - this episode is just the apotheosis of the agenda in person. And on such serious cheeks that it looks like a parody. "Do you even know what it's like to ask a black person in America if he's scared? Even up there, you don't care about us." Afiget! Well, yes, aliens from outer space, who had seen millions of worlds and hundreds of thousands of species, had to fly to the edge of the galaxy, see blacks and such: "Wow, you're special!" - Did they say why they didn't choose me? - They said some bullshit about the imperfection of the system. Indeed, this is why blacks are not hired, and not because a man did not meet the "do not be afraid" selection criteria. And everything is so serious and so in person that nothing but laughter causes. And the top of the absurdity is that the series is written by white men.
@Jmann: I also liked how John's mom was like, "sometimes a black guy needs to raise his hand, not because he's not good enough, but they just don't notice us." Lady, the aliens were literally testing your black husband, and they didn't care about his skin color, you told them yourself, "Didn't you notice our skin color?" - they tested his personality, and he failed the test. But the culprit is, of course, skin color and an "imperfect system." That is, according to your logic, "did you not pass the interview? because black" and "they don't notice black people" live in the same universe at the same time. It's my brain that can write something like this in the same episode. He also announced that "Hal got the ring simply because he is privileged in life not to know fear" (well, you understand, white privileges), while the scriptwriters themselves literally prescribed to him in episode 1 "the main fear of anyone is to lose their parents, I lost my father, I had nothing more to fear." But according to mom, you can only be afraid of blacks in America, and there are no other fears in life and there cannot be. Hospade
@Jmann: That's Lindelof, he used to stuff this nonsense into his lines back in the Guardians. Apparently, he definitely needs to add a social or racial subtext to what is happening in the superhero pancake series. Otherwise, what kind of Author is he without this, he creates Art
@Jmann: Yes xs about the straight "agenda". This was not presented as the opinion of the creators of the series and as some kind of "truth", it was presented as the views of John's very radical (and generally not very adequate, judging by the methods of education) mother. And when they want to show some kind of morality and open the audience's eyes to something, such speeches usually come from adequate positive characters.
@devoker: so in their opinion, THIS IS A POSITIVE CHARACTER, lol. A loving mother who wants the best for her son. That's the thing, if they had turned her out to the maximum as a negative character who "what markers, go ahead and shoot at dad" - I would still understand. As many have well emphasized, John's entire "origin" is more like the arch of becoming an xDD villain.
@plscallme: blia. Yes, life was not easy for blacks, but bitches still whine as if they were in slavery. Like, "they don't notice us blacks," or maybe white was just better? Does such an answer not fit into the worldview? I don't know if 90% of Blacks are in basketball, has anyone even said a word? No, they're better, and you can't argue with that.
@Jmann: how your carcass wants to squeal about the agenda on every shot with black people. The funny thing is, your existence is a vivid example that everything they say about white people is absolutely justified))
@Alex___Krok: You've got the carcass. Without brains, apparently. It is necessary to understand where it is appropriate to convey this topic, and HOW to convey it. Instead of throwing "he got a ring because he's white" in the face. Not to understand that this is stupidly tasteless and hypocritical on the part of the authors who promote their personal political views through a series about super bitch heroes (watch the interview) - you need to be a brainless breadcrumb who, instead of intellectual conversation and reasoning, has one argument in response - "you're just a racist." Well, yes, exactly the same as the aliens, who, having seen millions of worlds and races, had to see the blacks and decide that they needed special treatment. It's such a shameful cheap thing that the PPTs. For some reason, films like Blade, Men in Black, or Bad Guys got by quietly, demonstrating the strength and skills of the characters without constant lectures about how everyone around them owed them something because they were black, and did not require special treatment.
@Jmann: So you are a racist, why are you so disgusted by the truth?)) It's ridiculous how you whine that "whites were offended" in a TV series, but at the same time, blacks in the same TV series for some reason have to keep quiet about the fact that thirty years earlier they weren't even considered full-fledged people. Shut up, bitch, don't spoil the mood of the white gentleman))
@Alex___Krok: 30 years earlier, it was 96, the black Will Smith did not get off the screens and was in the main roles. Yeah, "they didn't count for people."
@Kenny1608: how nice that in your world, the existence of 5-10 successful black actors in Hollywood of the noughties reflects the attitude of millions of whites to millions of people of the black race. I wish it would still fit in with something in the reality that we live in.
And because you follow the narrative (which refers to which year) You're obviously not strong, so here's a joke for you—when John's mom talks to the Guard, it's the eighties, and when she talks to him about the "privilege of living without fear," it's the nineties. In the United States, racial segregation was officially abolished only in July 1964.
Please calculate how much time has passed between the mentioned events, if you still took advantage of the privilege to finish the second grade.
@Jmann: Absolutely right. Moreover, Dad didn't say a word, and mother spent the whole episode talking about how difficult it is to be black. I couldn't even watch it anymore. And this phrase: "Hal became a lantern because he has the privilege of not living in fear." Oh, God, go to hell, you're too much for me. Apart from you, no one experiences fear or overcomes difficulties.
God, forgive me if I don't know the Lord and the Green Lantern very well, but the series is just boring. The blacks were offended that they did not become a Green Lantern, because they are the best and they should be the only ones🤦♂️I have nothing against blacks, but it's like he's privileged and you're not. You're cooler than them because you're black, what the hell?
@Conorrouch: So you missed the fact that the kid was deprived of his childhood and subjected to intense training, just so that he would have a CHANCE? And he didn't let himself down in the future either, he lived in the taiga on foot food for nine months for the CHANCE. And what about the fact that the guy is chosen because he has good genes, says the "white woman"?
@Togusa: He didn't even know that he was being followed or if his parents were telling the truth at all. It was as if the kid lived in a sect where they believed in some kind of aliens and his highest goal.
@Conorrouch: Such "nonsense" about one's identity can play a cruel joke on the black race in America in the future. Nature does not tolerate distortions and in some places abruptly and cruelly corrects towards balance!
The guess about John's father turned out to be true, but who knew that Mom would become the center of insanity. Although, as parents, they weren't bad at all in the end, I expected the worst after the start. It is clear that many viewers will be triggered by the topic of the struggle for a place among blacks, but as the guardian has shown, these are purely local problems of our planet, you can not get rid of this, if the events in America, then blacks were thinking about this recognition.
The guardians themselves are kind of murky, spending so much time courting the next candidates (and besides John, there was at least one other option in the room) breaks the very meaning of being naturally chosen by character. And it would have been fine if Hal had broken the system, disappointed them over time or after the conflict with Sinestro, but she came to apologize with a diamond right away. Apologize for what? The ring felt fear, and flew away to the next one. Maybe they don't like the emotional range of the human race, so they need a well-mannered soldier on a leash next. Meanwhile, Guy Gardner 😈
It feels very strange from the series. On the one hand, John has a very cool origin. They showed him how he was raised. They showed how his father almost got drunk because he failed the test. It was all very interesting.
On the other hand, we have a mom who talks about black rights in America. Yes, they had problems. Yes, it was during this time period that they began to somehow get out of this shit. But it's being served right on the forehead, as if that's the only reason why he didn't become a lantern.
Another thing that made me uneasy was this interview at the very end. Hal is also to blame for the fact that John's family is shit (unfortunately, his father failed the test himself). And it's Hal's fault that John didn't shoot the guy (he had three chances that he didn't take). And anyway, it's all Hal's fault, "yeah".
I liked the series as a whole. And it's cool, and the narration is very interesting, and the actors are good. But of course there are a couple of comments.
@SarkoxedAF: >he had three chances that he didn't take Three windows in five seconds in which it was necessary to make sure that the target was not blocked, calculate pre-emption, adjust for wind and moon phase, exhale and pull the trigger. He only got a real chance in the morning, when the Gray Wolf started coming out onto the porch.
I won't say that the episode flew by unnoticed. But overall, I liked the way the story was wrapped up. However, at the beginning of the first episode, they teased how his childhood passed, and this slightly removes the shock moment from this series. The main thing is that now the backstory is over and you can focus on the story itself.
The ending with the revelation of Hal, of course, just broke)
Where is it without one of the modern agendas? It didn't feel tangible, people wrote before, but after this episode everything fell into place! PS: Hell is a stranger even more than I thought! I reviewed Lanterns 2011 and there he is a beginner!
@ArtchibalD: And what is Hell "asshole"? A student was forcibly imposed on him, and even who had to take the ring away from him. Is he supposed to be happy about this? Hull behaves appropriately to his situation. And unlike the family, Stewart doesn't tell the guards and everyone that they want to replace him because he's white.
It's funny that first the mother talks about how her black people are oppressed in America in 2016, and then, as a test, she takes the child to a classic black neighborhood.
@Ebony_Maw: it's generally OK, yes - the most terrible test of fearlessness is to send a child to a black hood. and 15 minutes before that, I was healing how blacks, even under the yoke of trials, ascend to the top best of all. and both of these two live in the same universe in her world (well, and the scriptwriters, respectively)
The series is very good, the actors play well, the production, the restrained music in the background to the beat of the series, and in general they told everything, and most importantly— the woman from the Ozarks, the actress, of course, is a legend!
But there are a lot of claims too:
First, there are racial issues. I have no doubt that blacks in the United States and beyond did not have a very good life back then, to put it mildly, as there is no doubt that many of them still live with constant background anxiety.
But! Firstly, a lot of these worries are exaggerated by those who shout loudly about such troubles, and this, unfortunately, is the case.
And secondly, specifically at the moments when the main characters start talking about racial issues, it sounds extremely lifeless. Mb, someone says that, but hardly most people, even within the family, communicate in everyday life exactly the way they do here. They seem to be reading out slogans or quotes from textbooks, but they don't speak their everyday phrases.
Secondly, the next psychotherapeutic and childish traumatism.
I will not even speak specifically here and specifically now in my own words, I will turn to the same evidence-based science.
And in recent years, she has moved away, and quite seriously, from the theme that a bad family and a bad childhood rigidly determine the rest of her life.
The human psyche, says today's science, has plasticity, and if it didn't exist, then absolutely all of humanity would have lived in endless fear due to mental injuries dating back to ancient times, when both children and adults lived a life of horror.
Not to mention that today literally anything falls under the concept of psychotrauma — mom looked the wrong way, it means injury, fell off a bike and scratched her knee, psychotrauma, etc.
It is predispositions that rule the ball, and it is the innate potential of a person that deterministically determines in which way a person's life will take place.
Childhood and family certainly play a role, and it is huge, no doubt, but it is not given a decisive role, it is just one of the stages of life, and what is called childhood traumas in many cases simply becomes a part of life, and a person lives on.
I don't condone bad parents and a difficult childhood, but the fact remains that they don't define a person, and the same bad family will eventually produce completely different people with different reactions and so on, because they are initially different people.
Unfortunately, it is in Gunn's cinematic universe that the ideas of total psychotherapy, child trauma and elaboration in the therapist's office play too much of a role — in "Peacemaker", in "Superman", and now here.
On the one hand, there is a sense of nobility here, because if childhood and parents are to blame for everything, then no one is bad, and everyone can be reformed.
But this completely ignores the fundamental foundation of man in the form of millions of years of evolution, genetics, heredity, personal predispositions of a person, what connections his consciousness makes, etc.
A criminal can grow out of a happy family. A humanitarian can grow out of a dysfunctional one. A family of Myshows fans can grow up to be a person who has watched all these movies and TV shows in general.)
A person can and should, for the sake of his own well-being, take responsibility for his own existence on himself, learn about himself and understand as much as possible based on his own predispositions, without other people's thoughts, imposed concepts and trends of science, which still changes over the years, often also to meet the needs of the ruling community.
So with all due respect to "Lanterns", it is precisely these aspects in this series that are, of course, fierce crap, which, although in some ways it has a place to be, is not universal, not one hundred percent and, most importantly, is not a verdict.
Therefore, when the Guardian calls parenting programming, she is mistaken. Consciousness is not a program at all, just like the brain and the person himself as a whole is not a computer, and it is impossible to program a person with education, the inside will still look out.
The same Americans and Soviet scientists tried it in the last century, but it didn't work out)
@Alex___Krok: That's not what I'm talking about. Scientists have conducted experiments in order to completely break down everything that was before and create a new consciousness from scratch. It didn't work out.
In general, even without all this, John's relatives are still dried fruits...
And Hal is also a beauty, he must protect the entire planet, but he actually stands on the side of a single state.
And, by the way, if he knows the bureaucrats from the American Ministry of Defense, he won't enlist the support of the government in that small town. Or he won't turn to Superman for help...
@tyashkin: It clearly states that the one John was sent to Kamchatka for is a terrorist (there was no other information about him in the series). If for you, the imprisonment of a terrorist is to stand on the side of a single state, then other countries, apparently, have nothing against terrorists, right?
@tyashkin: Terrorists are often considered by some (usually fanatics) to be "not terrorists," but this is a very specific term. And someone either falls under it or not, and how they are treated does not matter.
@IBelkin: this way, no one falls under it in a vacuum, someone always declares someone a terrorist. For some, he's a businessman, for others he's a terrorist. There is no single criterion, all countries have different understandings, and the fact that today everyone is accusing each other of supporting international terrorism, but denying the accusations against them, only confirms this.
So that's the point, I don't dispute that someone in particular is trying to make this very specific term rubbery in their own interests. But it has a specific definition and attributes, and someone either falls under it or not, it's all pretty binary. And if someone uses this term to someone who does not fall under it, then this is a completely different problem. I mean, in this series, a specific character was called a terrorist and they didn't give a single reason to doubt it (after all, they didn't show the audience any information that contradicted this definition, unlike, for example, the "unfair" attitude of the ring towards John's father, where he declares that he was supposed to become a lantern and immediately it is shown to the viewer that he did not fit the selection criteria for this position.) Yes, they didn't show anything that would confirm this definition, but this is explained by the fact that this is not even a minor character, but just a character, a passing function in the plot and nothing more.
@kobiii: Did he grow up normal? No, with such an upbringing, he demonstrates the wonders of mental stability and shows truly Nordic calmness. But I can't even call it a normal language.
@tyashkin: So, in your opinion, there is an oak bark for 9 months, when everyone, including his superiors, tells him that he just had to press the evacuation button, is this normal behavior of a sane person? I don't even mention his behavior as a child, he was a child there who needed child protection services and couldn't fully understand what was happening due to his age.
@IBelkin: firmness of character is not necessarily education, lol, it's a genetic predisposition. Childhood certainly has an impact, as I wrote earlier, but it does not have a decisive impact. The foundation was laid from birth anyway.
@tyashkin: I agree that the genetic lottery can play a bigger role than parenting, but in the series they themselves draw a parallel that John has been drummed into his whole life almost from birth that his whole life should be subordinated to an attempt to become a lantern. That it's all part of the journey, as John himself tells Hell's superiors at that interview. Even if he's been, let's say, "single-minded" since birth, the fact that he signed up for a mission in the process of which he ate oak bark is a direct result of his upbringing and the attitudes that his parents laid down for him. Without which he could have lived a normal life, and where even if he had possessed the same tenacity, it would never have appeared in such an extreme.
John's good origin, after which it becomes a pity for his broken childhood and the reason why he became a vegan is understandable, it was a reward for knocking down apples with bullets from his head where he showed no fear, he was already sick of cheeseburgers and most likely it was a psychological trauma for life. I was also surprised that everyone thought from the beginning that John's crazy father started training him because of a missed opportunity, but John's mother played the biggest role in this. Yes, now many people will start writing about the WHISTLE, the blacks say that they were humiliated and do not notice. Well, first of all, John's father was chosen and he would have become a lantern, but for absolutely understandable reasons, are you afraid to answer the question? he replied yes. Secondly, according to John, his father does not hold anger or hatred against Hal Jordon himself. Well, the third most important thing is that Stewart's black parents themselves are shown as absolutely not ideal parents (especially the mother) who love their son, but in fact they deprived him of a normal childhood, normal relations with his brothers, and all because they were obsessed with the goal of making him a green lantern at all costs. For this reason, these conversations about the agenda that I've been sick of for 10 years about and without, in this particular case, look to me like pulling an owl on a well-known subject.
@LuckyPens: Would you like to take a closer look at the situation with your father? He couldn'T become a Lantern. Precisely because he was afraid, the reasons are secondary. And the aliens don't give a damn about skin color, as was correctly noted above. It is important to have the fear with which the road to the Building is ordered. Oh, Hal is white and therefore knows no fear, but we are black and it is in our blood! But we also want the right to be Lanterns!Well, wow. That's how you have it, but you need to match it. That is, the textbook "Is it because I'm black?!", explicitly and openly. Using the example of the father. And there was no need to make a biorobot out of the son, it was just necessary to eliminate this very slavish mentality. The agenda is in all its glory: I'm worse than him, but I wasn't chosen for my skin color.
@Hidji: So who's going to rush from the agenda to the basic edits because it was said that they weren't chosen because blacks and their lives are harder for them, or the soy liberals who will shout that black parents were shown as some kind of crazy? It also shows that the fucked-up parents blame all their failures on racism, completely ignoring the fact that it was Stuart Sr. who was approached earlier than white Jordan. And this is despite the story of Hal himself, his father, and that he stopped being afraid after his death (I think he talked about it in the first episode). For them, he is just an abstract privileged, and he is not afraid not because of the loss of his father at a young age, but because of the color of his skin.It's a direct anti-protest, even, a vivid demonstration of what an obsession with oppression leads to. The only way Rodakov can justify this is by the time frame. The series starts in 1996 and John is already being trained, and they started when he was 5 and in the beginning he was already grown up and taller than in the 3rd series, he looked about 10, that is, he was born in 1986 or so, the parents themselves are well ... from 30 to 40 years old mb, then they were born somewhere in this range from about 1946-1956, and then the gpt chat or Wikipedia to help them find and experience that they had this idea of oppression stuck. This does not justify them in any way in their “upbringing” of John, but at least it can explain why they think that way. But it was my mother who killed me the most, so she's actually the initiator of the training, not my father (although it's his fault), who teased him about the task where he ate berries and what else he would find, with the answer-"you don't eat meat anyway," I wonder why, and more Chet started talking about a happy life. To which John replied, “When were you interested in my happiness?”. In general, the kid's life was a mess.
@Hidji: well, apparently the rules changed for the blue people in 2026, so in 2006 (the last year when Hal's hologram was updated) there were no lanterns or trainees, but in 2016 there already are, or for some other reason they also chose Guy, let's see if they will give further hints or reveal everything.
@Hidji: moreover, his brothers also bully him with "you don't know the words, you're not black, you listen to your classical music" - that is, in order to raise a Lantern, parents raise a black child... LIKE WHITE. You can 't do it on purpose .
@Jmann: It also caught my eye when I looked at it. If you haven't seen it, I advise you to watch the movie "American Fiction" with Jeffrey Wright, it just ridicules such stereotypes, into which they try to drive an entire social group. The film is good and shows that at least some blacks in the United States also have questions about this representation.
The horror is terrible. The worst series of three with a huge margin. Firstly, all these flashbacks could be reduced by 2 times in terms of timing. And secondly, do not allocate a whole series for them, but simply schedule them within the season for 5 minutes per episode. It would be much more organic. And then the topic of racism came up so ridiculously and clumsily head-on that I was hit by a facepalm.
Well, John's parents. Both are good, one failed the test and let's get hysterical, and the other got so crazy on the streetlight ring that little John was thrown out of the car in the most deprived area of the city, and even at night., and also called it "training." klaas. And how John still grew up normal. As it is, the series is not bad.
@avafozzui: I agree with everything, except that John grew up normal, let me disagree. Yes, John shows wonders of calmness, but this is also abnormal. He behaves like a robot, and this is a direct result of the fact that there is no child protection service at the conceptual level in this series.
@tyashkin: I agree that different people can grow up in the same environment on equal terms, but such an environment cannot but have a significant impact on the development of a child, and the correlation will necessarily not be in favor of a normal balanced individual. You yourself provide a fork of options for exactly how this childhood "crippled" John, and not that everything is fine with him.
@IBelkin: I have given the options just to show that supporters of child injury can interpret any outcome in their favor, often without any evidence at all.
@tyashkin: I agree with you that you can interpret anything in this way. But the series clearly does not show the case when it is inflated out of small things. Here is a vivid example when his entire childhood is one continuous childhood trauma.
@tyrell: and I didn't say that childhood doesn't have any impact. But education does not condemn a person, predispositions will still be stronger, even if you educate them. Especially for initially anxious people.
John was finally properly revealed, and the story turned out to be interesting. However, it was possible to make it shorter. And Hal 's appearance at the end is straight 💥💣
We've already said enough about black racism and white privilege. It is sad to see, of course, another inappropriate interweaving of the agenda. I just don't understand the reason for my parents' shaking. why did they dream of making a candidate for lanterns out of a larvae, if people found out about their existence recently and didn't promise any obvious bonuses here, besides, they don't even know what the cons, advantages, and pitfalls of this position are. In addition to the banal fact that the obviously emotionally unstable yazhmama decided that her son was the best boy in the world.
@iken: I had the same thoughts, and I can only justify it by saying that we have a DCU here and there are other superheroes besides Hal. And the mother wanted to see her son among them).
The idea that John's father did not become a Lantern because he is black and his experience in certain conditions taught him to be afraid, and Hal became because he is a white jerk who does not know fear in a carefree life, has a place to be. But then the ring superficially selects candidates, following the principle: "dementia and courage." And Guy fits into this principle, by the way. Besides, this idea is illogical: wouldn't a person who is accustomed to privileges, when faced with their absence, be even more afraid? Going further, the idea of privileges is a losing one in the long run: let's say a man with the attitude that the whole world owes him and who easily gets what he wants, because of privileges, receives enormous power and treats it as due. However, his strength is overwhelming for the time being, sooner or later he will face a threat that will be stronger than him, and then he will need a will that he does not have, he only has empty self-confidence. Shouldn't the ring anticipate this?Can the will develop in a person who has not gone through difficulties, who does not know what fear is? The guardians want to replace Hal, but the ring chose him, and I believe it's for a reason. So far, we have only been shown the view of John's parents on the situation (formed under the influence of a specific context). We are waiting for Hal's side to be shown, we don't know much about him at all, and it's too early to accept the opinion of John's parents as the main idea of the show's creators, while it's all very interesting, but vague.
What if Hal's fearlessness really, as suggested by the commenter above, grows out of the emptiness inside him (and not the superficial idea of privilege)? He's lonely, he lost his father early, he's not attached to anyone or anything, which means he has nothing to lose, he's pretty reckless, but what if it's not because of overconfidence, as others assume, but lack of value in his own life? The guardian also asked John about being close to his family. Was the ring vibrating between the father of a family, who has the responsibility to raise children in a dangerous world ("I'm afraid"), and a young guy who has already overcome his loss and lost his most precious thing ("I'm not afraid")? Of course, this is just a guess so far, but it would be interesting if they turned this way: Only a person without tribe and clan, without connections and intimacy, can become a Green Lantern.
No problem, but I'll speak out. It's just a series of rygalovo subpoenas. It's as if the dark-skinned people have beaten out a place in the lanterns with their agenda, and it looks like a circus. The aliens fell for it, they show us that even up there they are tolerant of them))) one laugh at a time. It's like the author is burning up over it all. If so, then ok. If it's serious, then it's a PPC
The very idea that you can become a lantern, as they say, and supposedly those who have no fear become it, breaks everything. Hal's original story is cool and logical. And this is some kind of bullshit. According to this logic, was Spider-Man also a White privileged? Or is Batman a white millionaire, and Iron Man? Poor dark-skinned people. They even staked out a place among the lanterns for you.
I had a lot of questions while watching the episode, but the main one is, where is the child protection service looking? A lot has already been said about the summons and the "extraordinary" parenting methods from John's family. I really hope that John's family's point of view will not be the ultimate truth and that we will be shown a different view of these events (but I doubt it very much). As amazing as it is, it's literally Hell's fault that he's better suited for the job. It's just amazing, even if we accept the fact that, apparently, all blacks are afraid when living in the USA, unlike whites, then even then Hull is still better suited for this job (lack of fear is a prerequisite for this job, and why should guards care why some candidates have it Do you have, but others don't? It's not their problem at all), and that's why he got it. And in the eyes of John's family, his father should have been chosen simply because he was black and didn't care that he wasn't suitable, because life was harder for him. It's like setting up a running competition and awarding the victory not to the one who runs the distance faster, but to the one-legged one, and that he is much slower, but it's harder for him. John's father is a jerk and a loser. Yes, they didn't choose him, yes, it hurts him, but instead of getting over it and moving on, he gets hung up on it and starts to ruin his life, his family's life, and as a result, because his wife (whose place is in a mental hospital) offers to raise their son to be a robot, he ruins him too. life, starting from childhood, depriving him of choice, childhood, happiness and everything else. And the father doesn't even try to object to this psychopath. And at the moment when John was eating grass in Kamchatka for 9 months, and then Hell just flew in and solved the problem in 15 seconds, I laughed. It was brilliant, Hell is again to blame for just doing the job faster than our "chosen" John (yes, because he has a ring, but what difference does it make if the result is achieved).
On this scene, I thought the episode would go the other way altogether! In the first episode, it felt like John's dad was completely crazy, but here's a twist, Mom is even crazier, and shooting apples from her head was her idea. An interesting insight is that racial inequality is a real psychological trauma that is passed down through the generations. In this case, the injury has a face — Hal Jordan. From the point of view of John's parents, this is a white privileged asshole who stole a job from a black man simply because he was lucky not to know fear. From John's point of view, this is a man who stole his childhood and career from him (but also because of him he went into art, which led to his ability to create projections). From Hal's point of view, John is a punishment for his indiscipline and recklessness. Someone wrote that this is a filler series, but this is a huge context in their relationship, which is built on hatred, while they both have a lot to learn from each other. I assume that Hal will have to learn discipline at some point, and John will have to listen not to orders, but to himself. Maybe that's why he didn't get the ring after 10 years? The rap scene in the car is the most touching, John could be both happy and proud for his parents, but neither his parents nor the Guards wished him happiness. It's funny how the Guardian came to apologize for the father's injury, and in the end indirectly led to the injury of the child.
People are not programmed, they are educated. I don't see the difference. But she is.
John the Talking Bird - It looks like he liked me 😅 The experience in the life of a small child is counted, the parents, of course, had to make difficult decisions, and the child's life was seriously shaken, it's even a pity for this not too happy boy.
Well, despite the fact that the canon was partially changed, the essence remained roughly, and the series was interesting - it looked cheerful, but, my God, when the stories about poor blacks from the mouth of a crazy mother began, I felt, even with my vaccination to the agenda in the series, I wanted to rewind these moments - so clumsy and far-fetched for It looked good..
I see comments about the summons, maybe I'm a jerk, but I liked the parenting scenes, it was sincerely submitted! And it's funny when John was happily walking home, and there was Hal the jerk who caused such a moment. Bitch, I don't give a fuck what you were hoping for and I don't need a fucking sidekick, he's a treasure!!!
Not only is the series literally a filler, its entire origin could be revealed by conversations between the characters. But it's difficult, it's necessary to write a script. So John, another good representative of the Earth, was turned into some kind of crazy sectarian. I really don't want to look any further, Lindelof, fuck you already.
@Sergant744: хорошая сценарная работа, это когда тебе показывают, и все становится понятно. А вот когда зрителю для понимания надо что-то говорить в лоб, это уже халтура и костыль. Отдельно ору с "филлера". Кто тебе вообще сказал, что сериал про события из первых двух серий? Изначально было понятно, что он про двух центральных персонажей и их характеры. Комичность их отношений и химию между ними. Про то, что делает человека героем. Но уж точно не про каких-то там инопланетян в маленьком городке. Тем более тем уже раскрыли загадку из начала. Пришельцы там были из-за мэнхантера. Сюжетная арка закончена, а новую еще не начали, получается, что это идеальное место для "филлера".
in the first 2 episodes, the agenda was more or less tolerable. but this is clearly overkill. It's a pity, I really liked the beginning. I don't even know if I should drop it now, because I like Hela's line.
And I liked the series. At least it became clear why Stuart was immune to Hal's selfishness and narcissism. But I feel sorry for him as a child. They were afraid that the father would go as a cuckoo, and the mother left. At the age of five, giving away weapons instead of pencils is a tin thing, of course.
I always write about the agenda and all that, if you want to fool around, I have 100 comments about the agenda, but I didn't notice it in this series. Although other commentators called me a fascist. It's purely historical I liked it, it's a shame for John. It's more about the fact that the parents didn't work out and they send their children to all sorts of sections, where they didn't succeed. A good series
I hope this series will have a series a la "God enters the bar", like the Guardians of the same Lindelof. Anyone who watched the above-mentioned series knows how this series blew the brain with a shot of all guns at once.
I'm tired of discussing the topic of the agenda in the comments.. It seems to me that some people don't even fully understand the meaning of this word and call everything related to black people, women, etc. a subpoena. In this series, the story is mostly from the perspective of a black family. Of course, it will be dedicated to their problems, difficulties, thoughts, and so on. And I don't understand what's wrong with that?) The mother expresses her feeling about the world's attitude towards them (and it's partly true). And since this series is about the formation of a black hero, it seems appropriate here. Well, it's not just dark-skinned people in our world who complain about fate and consider themselves deprived. There are also many TV series and films about this (and even here this topic was partly touched upon in previous episodes, but then for some reason no one wrote about the agenda). It's a shame, in general, that behind these searches, people don't notice a well-written origin. And the Guardians chose John not because of his skin color, but because of his character, skills, and discipline. Well, that's right, if someone thinks that the aliens fell for the agenda :)
@Hidji: well, at least they showed that he was accepted for this role. They didn't tell me how Guy got the ring. And Guy himself wasn't in this series (yet).
@apollo_2001: I'm wondering, what kind of problems are we talking about? They live in a decent house, they have three children who are not poor. Obviously, both the father and the mother work somewhere. They have enough money for a family, a way of life and to assemble a stupid plate for space negotiations) Isn't the feeling of a mother the opinion of a spoiled girl? Legally and defacto, there is no other attitude towards blacks at the time of the events. A lot of blacks occupy key positions, a lot of blacks work in the best offices, and soon a black president will be elected. Think about it, they didn't have a female president, but there was a black man, and they keep whining) Well, answer honestly, putting your hand on your heart. With such an indifferent attitude towards a child, who is more likely to grow up to be a hero or a serial killer? I would personally bet on the latter.
@Lighthouse012: some people live in luxury cottages on the islands and still find reasons to resent life. It depends on the character of the person. That's what I wrote about, that the authors revealed the mother as a person who considers herself to be racially disadvantaged, which has an impact on the child and, in this case, on the character's origin. And this is not an agenda, but the texture of this story.
The best series of three, the characters are perfectly shown, the story is well and intelligently told. There are no subpoenas, despite the whining in the comments) Bro, a loser black woman is scolding you for a subpoena, of course she's unhappy with the system and wants to blame all the failures on anything but her own failure. It's just human nature. All the thoughts expressed are suitable for the characters who expressed them. This is called good screenwriting, friends...
When Germans said they were the best because they were Germans, it was racist. When blacks say that they are the best because they are blacks, it magically turns out to be a struggle against racism. Well, it's such a mess to look into the furnace.
To be honest, I don't understand the meaning of this series. We were told everything we needed to know in a short episode where John was placed against a wall with an apple. By God, I didn't learn anything new from the series. But besides the fact that parents would rather raise a maniac in this way than a lantern) And I don't understand this at all. We're black, they don't notice us. You literally have all the rights in your country. At the time of these words, blacks occupy a bunch of the highest positions in the government. In 2009, Obama became president altogether. And of course, it's hard to imagine a worse representation of a black person) We have Jordan here, the pilot, but there are no random people there. He's become a lantern, and he's doing his duty properly. He's also a cheerful and lively guy who can get drunk and play politics under the influence. And on the other hand, a family of lunatics. A father who is a spineless weakling. I peed in my pants and swelled up from the guard's visit. And a mother who makes a child get shot because it's getting harder for blacks and they don't notice. They're just finished!!!) if I had my way, I would never have taken John as a lantern)
And people on serious topics here write about "black people's problems again" and so on? Is it okay that John's mother was living at the crossroads of a time when blacks had a million problems and when it started to subside? And now she wants to see her dreams in the face of her son? And then they also show the conflict between John and Hall due to the fact that they want to replace Hall, fearing that he will turn into a second Sinestro. They show you one thing, you see another for some reason
I thought his dad was crazy, but his mom broke all the records. To be honest, I didn't quite understand the tone of the series, the feeling that they were being vindicated. Like they lived in fear, you know why, so they bullied their son to make him strong. Two sick psychos.
Where a man is looking for help, a woman saw only benefits. Oh, I'm sorry that our system is not perfect, and your husband went crazy, here's a diamond for you, and a social contract that you will raise a fearless warrior for us by breaking his psyche and making him crazy. And not because your people's rights are being violated and you will become the first black superhero. Fuck, it's just fucked up. Here's a story about childhood, which is really the worst motivation I've ever seen, why did he decide to become a superhero. My parents imposed some kind of purpose, drummed it into me to be without Fucking, and now the ring is inherited as a devoted one. I thought the whole story would be done differently. The father only wanted a confession so that they would believe him, and the mother immediately redrawn everything into a favorable situation for herself, fucked up
I don't understand why everyone is so underestimating the rating of this episode, but if you look at it from the outside, it's a great episode. We were told the story of John, his training, his family, his father's injury and striving for the best for his son... albeit by imposing his expectations and problems on him. It's a very cool episode, especially at the moment with the blue bosses, how they think and evaluate candidates) Overall, I like how both Hell and John play, both interesting and unique characters.
myshows.me is an informational TV & movie catalog and watch-tracking service. We do not host, store, stream, or distribute any video content, and we do not provide download links. All information is reference material only.
Discussion: Season 1, Episode 3 Join the Discussion
130I just thought at first that his father was so strict and I was chasing him, but then my mother wasn't all at home, the main thing was to wake my father up so that he could shoot an apple, and then I got up shaking like I don't know who.
There are few special effects and action, but the series went off with a bang, everything is better than the previous one.
Some kind of strange series, to put it mildly, not the series itself, but the order in which it was inserted in the series - in season 1
They usually do this and have done it a million times. There was a first film where they show the present - current events - 1 film and the second film shows the past - 2 films
And then it's kind of very strange the first two episodes - 2 episodes there is something like the present, then bam the third episode - 3 series is the past a strange decision
If this episode had been put on the second, then it would have been fine, but when it was put on the third, it's very strange to me.
Because of this, it feels as if the serial numbers have been mixed up.
"Do you even know what it's like to ask a black person in America if he's scared? Even up there, you don't care about us."
Afiget! Well, yes, aliens from outer space, who had seen millions of worlds and hundreds of thousands of species, had to fly to the edge of the galaxy, see blacks and such: "Wow, you're special!"
- Did they say why they didn't choose me?
- They said some bullshit about the imperfection of the system.
Indeed, this is why blacks are not hired, and not because a man did not meet the "do not be afraid" selection criteria.
And everything is so serious and so in person that nothing but laughter causes. And the top of the absurdity is that the series is written by white men.
Lady, the aliens were literally testing your black husband, and they didn't care about his skin color, you told them yourself, "Didn't you notice our skin color?" - they tested his personality, and he failed the test. But the culprit is, of course, skin color and an "imperfect system." That is, according to your logic, "did you not pass the interview? because black" and "they don't notice black people" live in the same universe at the same time. It's my brain that can write something like this in the same episode.
He also announced that "Hal got the ring simply because he is privileged in life not to know fear" (well, you understand, white privileges), while the scriptwriters themselves literally prescribed to him in episode 1 "the main fear of anyone is to lose their parents, I lost my father, I had nothing more to fear." But according to mom, you can only be afraid of blacks in America, and there are no other fears in life and there cannot be. Hospade
And when they want to show some kind of morality and open the audience's eyes to something, such speeches usually come from adequate positive characters.
As many have well emphasized, John's entire "origin" is more like the arch of becoming an xDD villain.
And because you follow the narrative (which refers to which year) You're obviously not strong, so here's a joke for you—when John's mom talks to the Guard, it's the eighties, and when she talks to him about the "privilege of living without fear," it's the nineties. In the United States, racial segregation was officially abolished only in July 1964.
Please calculate how much time has passed between the mentioned events, if you still took advantage of the privilege to finish the second grade.
The guardians themselves are kind of murky, spending so much time courting the next candidates (and besides John, there was at least one other option in the room) breaks the very meaning of being naturally chosen by character. And it would have been fine if Hal had broken the system, disappointed them over time or after the conflict with Sinestro, but she came to apologize with a diamond right away. Apologize for what? The ring felt fear, and flew away to the next one. Maybe they don't like the emotional range of the human race, so they need a well-mannered soldier on a leash next. Meanwhile, Guy Gardner 😈
On the other hand, we have a mom who talks about black rights in America. Yes, they had problems. Yes, it was during this time period that they began to somehow get out of this shit. But it's being served right on the forehead, as if that's the only reason why he didn't become a lantern.
Another thing that made me uneasy was this interview at the very end. Hal is also to blame for the fact that John's family is shit (unfortunately, his father failed the test himself). And it's Hal's fault that John didn't shoot the guy (he had three chances that he didn't take). And anyway, it's all Hal's fault, "yeah".
I liked the series as a whole. And it's cool, and the narration is very interesting, and the actors are good. But of course there are a couple of comments.
Three windows in five seconds in which it was necessary to make sure that the target was not blocked, calculate pre-emption, adjust for wind and moon phase, exhale and pull the trigger. He only got a real chance in the morning, when the Gray Wolf started coming out onto the porch.
However, at the beginning of the first episode, they teased how his childhood passed, and this slightly removes the shock moment from this series.
The main thing is that now the backstory is over and you can focus on the story itself.
The ending with the revelation of Hal, of course, just broke)
PS: Hell is a stranger even more than I thought! I reviewed Lanterns 2011 and there he is a beginner!
But there are a lot of claims too:
First, there are racial issues. I have no doubt that blacks in the United States and beyond did not have a very good life back then, to put it mildly, as there is no doubt that many of them still live with constant background anxiety.
But! Firstly, a lot of these worries are exaggerated by those who shout loudly about such troubles, and this, unfortunately, is the case.
And secondly, specifically at the moments when the main characters start talking about racial issues, it sounds extremely lifeless. Mb, someone says that, but hardly most people, even within the family, communicate in everyday life exactly the way they do here. They seem to be reading out slogans or quotes from textbooks, but they don't speak their everyday phrases.
I will not even speak specifically here and specifically now in my own words, I will turn to the same evidence-based science.
And in recent years, she has moved away, and quite seriously, from the theme that a bad family and a bad childhood rigidly determine the rest of her life.
The human psyche, says today's science, has plasticity, and if it didn't exist, then absolutely all of humanity would have lived in endless fear due to mental injuries dating back to ancient times, when both children and adults lived a life of horror.
Not to mention that today literally anything falls under the concept of psychotrauma — mom looked the wrong way, it means injury, fell off a bike and scratched her knee, psychotrauma, etc.
It is predispositions that rule the ball, and it is the innate potential of a person that deterministically determines in which way a person's life will take place.
Childhood and family certainly play a role, and it is huge, no doubt, but it is not given a decisive role, it is just one of the stages of life, and what is called childhood traumas in many cases simply becomes a part of life, and a person lives on.
I don't condone bad parents and a difficult childhood, but the fact remains that they don't define a person, and the same bad family will eventually produce completely different people with different reactions and so on, because they are initially different people.
On the one hand, there is a sense of nobility here, because if childhood and parents are to blame for everything, then no one is bad, and everyone can be reformed.
But this completely ignores the fundamental foundation of man in the form of millions of years of evolution, genetics, heredity, personal predispositions of a person, what connections his consciousness makes, etc.
A criminal can grow out of a happy family. A humanitarian can grow out of a dysfunctional one. A family of Myshows fans can grow up to be a person who has watched all these movies and TV shows in general.)
A person can and should, for the sake of his own well-being, take responsibility for his own existence on himself, learn about himself and understand as much as possible based on his own predispositions, without other people's thoughts, imposed concepts and trends of science, which still changes over the years, often also to meet the needs of the ruling community.
So with all due respect to "Lanterns", it is precisely these aspects in this series that are, of course, fierce crap, which, although in some ways it has a place to be, is not universal, not one hundred percent and, most importantly, is not a verdict.
Therefore, when the Guardian calls parenting programming, she is mistaken. Consciousness is not a program at all, just like the brain and the person himself as a whole is not a computer, and it is impossible to program a person with education, the inside will still look out.
The same Americans and Soviet scientists tried it in the last century, but it didn't work out)
And Hal is also a beauty, he must protect the entire planet, but he actually stands on the side of a single state.
And, by the way, if he knows the bureaucrats from the American Ministry of Defense, he won't enlist the support of the government in that small town. Or he won't turn to Superman for help...
Terrorism is crap anyway.
The joke is that for some, a terrorist can be a hero for others, even if initially he is not a terrorist at all.
Give a five-year-old a gun ✔
It's strange that John still grew up normal
By the way, John's father was hardly born before 1956, because he's about the same age as Hal, give or take. And Tom was in his sixth decade in 2016.
John grew up with little emotion, which means that he is a robot due to a bad traumatic childhood.
John grew up highly emotional, which means he is trying to compensate for the result of a terrible childhood.
Completely different people can grow up from one bad family.
Childhood is not a sentence, like parents, the human psyche is not so amoebic.
And Hal 's appearance at the end is straight 💥💣
So far, we have only been shown the view of John's parents on the situation (formed under the influence of a specific context). We are waiting for Hal's side to be shown, we don't know much about him at all, and it's too early to accept the opinion of John's parents as the main idea of the show's creators, while it's all very interesting, but vague.
Black, like the bitterest chocolate
At the end, Outkast plays, heh.
From the point of view of John's parents, this is a white privileged asshole who stole a job from a black man simply because he was lucky not to know fear.
From John's point of view, this is a man who stole his childhood and career from him (but also because of him he went into art, which led to his ability to create projections).
From Hal's point of view, John is a punishment for his indiscipline and recklessness. Someone wrote that this is a filler series, but this is a huge context in their relationship, which is built on hatred, while they both have a lot to learn from each other. I assume that Hal will have to learn discipline at some point, and John will have to listen not to orders, but to himself. Maybe that's why he didn't get the ring after 10 years?
The rap scene in the car is the most touching, John could be both happy and proud for his parents, but neither his parents nor the Guards wished him happiness. It's funny how the Guardian came to apologize for the father's injury, and in the end indirectly led to the injury of the child.
I don't see the difference.
But she is.
John the Talking Bird - It looks like he liked me 😅
The experience in the life of a small child is counted, the parents, of course, had to make difficult decisions, and the child's life was seriously shaken, it's even a pity for this not too happy boy.
Although other commentators called me a fascist.
It's purely historical
I liked it, it's a shame for John.
It's more about the fact that the parents didn't work out and they send their children to all sorts of sections, where they didn't succeed.
A good series
@kiprian_zhurov: да что-то как-то подзае***и с этой повесткой в каждом комментарии.
Никак люди не свыкнутся с вещами, которые уже с нами навсегда
Прав был Платон: "Нет более жестокого господина, чем бывший раб"
Как будто поговорить больше не о чем...
It's a shame, in general, that behind these searches, people don't notice a well-written origin.
And the Guardians chose John not because of his skin color, but because of his character, skills, and discipline. Well, that's right, if someone thinks that the aliens fell for the agenda :)
Isn't the feeling of a mother the opinion of a spoiled girl? Legally and defacto, there is no other attitude towards blacks at the time of the events. A lot of blacks occupy key positions, a lot of blacks work in the best offices, and soon a black president will be elected. Think about it, they didn't have a female president, but there was a black man, and they keep whining)
Well, answer honestly, putting your hand on your heart. With such an indifferent attitude towards a child, who is more likely to grow up to be a hero or a serial killer? I would personally bet on the latter.
When blacks say that they are the best because they are blacks, it magically turns out to be a struggle against racism.
Well, it's such a mess to look into the furnace.
Is it okay that John's mother was living at the crossroads of a time when blacks had a million problems and when it started to subside? And now she wants to see her dreams in the face of her son?
And then they also show the conflict between John and Hall due to the fact that they want to replace Hall, fearing that he will turn into a second Sinestro.
They show you one thing, you see another for some reason
"Son, aren't you going to be an American Marine?"
I've
been living here for 60 years, and I've never seen a black man in Kamchatka...
P.S. I am not the author, but the joke is too painful...