s01e04 — Chapter 4: The State of Texas vs. Robert Durst

Name: Chapter 4: The State of Texas vs. Robert Durst
Released: 2015-03-01
Rating: 4.221

The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst — s01e04 — Chapter 4: The State of Texas vs. Robert Durst

My rating

4.221

MyShows

(122)

Duration:	51 min.
Released:	01.03.2015^{02.03.2015 01:00}
Watched by:	1 278^47.65%

Subscription

Purchase

$2.99

$1.99

Discussion of the 4 episode of the 1 season
Discuss this episode
7

_October_

02 May 2021, 12:45 #

ШТА? Невиновен?

irina_pobeda

PRO

12 May 2021, 18:51 #

А почему его не судили за то что он расчленил и выбросил тело? А что, так можно было?))

NyanQt3_14

04 Jan 2023, 04:30 #

@irina_pobeda: ему предъявили убийство, а в нём его оправдали.
А судить (в США) по одному и тому же делу одного человека дважды -нельзя.
Так что тут вопросы к прокураторе, которые пошли на это, не имея прямых улик.
За надругательство над телом его бы сто процентов посадили

Dori_Grey

PRO

27 Mar 17:42 #

What kind of freaks were on the jury?
The guy says he dismembered a man and they're like, no, not guilty. Yes, even thinking about it, I want to puke.
Knowing about the 5th Amendment, than they thought, justifying it.

When you see a man who dismembered another man coming out of court with such a happy smile, you immediately understand that he is definitely not guilty.

NyanQt3_14

28 Mar 00:27 #

@Dori_Grey: it's not the jury's fault that he was accused of murder, for which there is no evidence, and not for abusing the body
Well, don't forget. that Robert, for all his disgust, had charisma.

Dori_Grey

PRO

28 Mar 00:47 #

@NyanQt3_14: What kind of magical charisma is this that everyone talks about, but you can't see it at close range? We were shown an interview, clips from the trial, and the only thing I immediately saw in him was a bad liar, but I didn't notice charisma.
I understand what you're talking about, but for me it's kind of wild to know that he chopped a man up, scattered him in bags, then hid his head, but it wasn't his fault. In general, I cannot imagine that an innocent and adequate person can chop someone to pieces.
I am far from jurisprudence, if you understand this, then maybe you know why it was impossible to start from the fact that self-defense, too, cannot be proved?

NyanQt3_14

28 Mar 04:25 #

@Dori_Grey: well, there is already a presumption of innocence, as it seems to me, you do not need to prove that you did not commit a crime, this is the burden of the prosecutor. If you claim that he didn't do it out of self-defense, prove it

Add a comment:

s01e04 — Chapter 4: The State of Texas vs. Robert Durst

My rating

Discussion of the 4 episode of the 1 seasonDiscuss this episode7

Discussion of the 4 episode of the 1 season
Discuss this episode
7