Ads

s03e01 — Lovely But Lethal

My rating

Rate
Rate the shows you've watched and get up-to-date recommendations
4.352
MyShows
(159)
Duration: 90 min.
Released: 23.09.197323.09.1973 19:00
Watched by: 5 73362.1%
3 season
s03e01
s02e05 - Requiem for a Falling Star
s02e06 - A Stitch in Crime
s02e07 - The Most Dangerous Match
s02e08 - Double Shock
s03e01 - Lovely But Lethal
s03e02 - Any Old Port in a Storm
s03e03 - Candidate for Crime
s03e04 - Double Exposure
s03e05 - Publish or Perish

Discussion of the 1 episode of the 3 season
Discuss this episode
3

unclesam
unclesam
28 Apr 2018, 16:26 #
Wow, young Martin Sheen! The son, the one with the same surname, turns out to be very similar.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+8
opa_kroshka
opa_kroshka
23 Sep 2019, 18:44 #
I have slightly controversial feelings about this series. On the one hand, the beautiful Vera Miles, referring us to Hitchcock's "Psycho" with the phrase "I couldn't kill a fly" in a conversation with Colombo.
On the other hand, ehh, an incredibly annoying mess with endless changes in the length and color of the main character's nails. Well, I understand that DNA analysis was not used in criminology in the 70s, but she left her blood at the crime scene when she grabbed the broken glass with her bare fingers and thoughtfully then rubbed the fragments in her hand. The lab could at least confirm that it was a woman's blood, and the blood type matched that of the killer. Then, Columbo, who came to the crime scene and groped everything there. I understand that it is in his nature to be absent-minded and touch foreign objects, but still he is a professional person and would not grab everything right in the "epicenter" of the murder, if only the script did not desperately need it. And what kind of criminologists are these who are not able to distinguish a broken glass from fragments of a slide?
About the second murder in general, in the end, they are silent, even no assumptions made by Columbo, completely crumpled.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+10
Fish40
Fish40
09 Apr 2021, 19:55 #
As I understood it, the victim's blood was on the glass. And the criminologists said it was a glass, because the victim had a glass and it broke. And the microscope glass is small, so it was assumed that there was only a glass.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+6
Add a comment:
Ads