- Do you know what it feels like to have a two-meter hose shoved into your colon? - No, but now I respect that basketball player you dated in college. Oh, lolish! House is such a House!)))
You know what makes me happy: the series 2004-2006, where LGBT+ couples were presented as the norm. There were no screams or excuses, although now, in 2016, this issue is very acute in the States. They just served it up. "Her partner," "her girlfriend," and none of House's team, none of the clinic said it wasn't OK. This is the kind of content I want to see in films and TV series featuring LGBT+ people - absolutely no reaction. It's a couple. It's a family. It happens here the same way as in all other couples, as well as in heteros. This is n o r m a l l n o. Ah, that's great.
@youarebymyside: Yes, normal people have always treated them normally. The only thing that became annoying were these sudden screams at every step "we are being belittled!!!!"
@MrsChimodanova: For pity's sake, I'm not harnessing for anyone at all))) I just don't like watching complaints myself instead of interesting plots, I always calmly watched TV series with different characters, whether gay or straight, no matter, as long as they were well written. And then suddenly a period began when arguments about how such people are always and everywhere put in the second grade began to be shoved into many projects on the floor of the series. Well, it's just boring.
P. S. I don't want to offend anyone, I'm just speaking for myself. But if this topic is personal for you, please share your experience, is such a position really effective? For adequate people, this will not change anything, and as for the rejected, will they really become kinder from the everywhere thundering agenda? And will they make life easier for the LGBT community? Suddenly everyone realizes?
@Annie10792: Oh, well, if we're talking about plots, then I agree, it's just that LGBT characters are much more interesting than another story of kaminaut or self-acceptance. I generally don't mind movies on this topic, but I'm tired of watching the same thing. I would like... Well, that's how it is in this series. The characters are just living their complicated lives. In general, I really like it, exactly how it is shown here. 100% of the heterosexual couples in the series have their dark secrets, and the lesbian couple is also not idealized - their cockroaches, like everyone else's.
I have no personal experience in this matter, I do not have the habit of talking to assholes, it is unsafe. But there are enough examples and statistics that yes, it works. People are always scared of the unfamiliar in the first place. Suddenly realizing is unlikely, but gradually... Water sharpens the stone. I think that what infuriates many people now is the "agenda" - this is the effect of the pendulum. For a long time, the LGBT topic was taboo, like the topic of sex in general - and then the hippies, the sexual revolution, Stonewall - LGBT swung the pendulum, violated the status quo. This process is slow, and has now gained enough weight to reach the broad masses, so to speak. And, of course, it provoked opposition. I think that the pendulum will swing for some time, in one direction and in another, and when it stops, the old world will no longer be.
It pisses me off that they say "partner" in the original about a lesbian couple, but they still translate "girlfriends" 🙄🙄🙄 well, really, what kind of "girlfriends" if they obviously sleep in the same bed at the beginning of the film?
Guys, I understand everything except one thing. Why was fgds done without a gag? She could just close her mouth and that's it, it wouldn't open because of nerves.
I am impressed that Cameron considers people to be good by default, but still you need to have no illusions. To believe that a person can do well and to believe that he is obliged to do well are two different things.
Wilson seemed to say that the articles were about different things: Foreman wrote about diagnostics, and Cameron wrote about ethics. Then there is no theft.
Ideally, of course, it is better to write a joint article. But what's the problem with publishing a second article if the material is different? And I would quote Forman
@sokobath: well, since this is kind of a teaching hospital and so many interesting cases go through House's team, it's strange that they haven't published anything before
Oh, Foreman is from the "sleek and sleek" category, as I call it. Everything and everything around him is not as important as the fact that he is building a career, climbing up and shining with his own importance. By the way, not so long ago, in a conversation with someone, he said "Cameron is my friend," and now like this..... He was proud.
And Cameron has also shown herself to be unprofessional in this episode, to put it mildly. For some reason, I decided that I had the right to condemn a person and because of my hysterical righteousness, I did the procedure so rudely! Kapets, damn it, if one of the patients on Cameron's shift does not reach the face of the saints, that's it, the righteous Cameron quarters him. What kind of nonsense is this? By the way, this is not an indicator of holiness, but of a bunch of personal unprocessed psychologisms. A really good person adequately perceives the fact that everyone has their own shortcomings, he lives according to his conscience, but does not condemn others. And Cameron is very hysterical about condemning others. I would assume that this is because of internal prohibitions, they say, others can do it calmly, but I can't, I can't. And it infuriates her so much that she punishes patients, made the procedure more painful for the girl. And I don't care that the poor guy didn't sleep for 10 days, she's not a saint - that means everything, torture and execution. Ugh, I can't stand hysterical righteous people. If I were Foreman, I wouldn't be friends with her either.
Apparently, they only have an adequate Chase there, and does not confuse personal triggers with work.
I think Chase is inadequate there too. Remember how he reported all of House's cases to that sponsor. Anyway, it seems to me that he is ready for a lot for the sake of work, if he had stolen this article, he would have published it too
Cameron has gone through bachelor's degree, medical school and God knows how much more practice and behaves like a saint. Has her life not yet taught her that people are reptiles? At the same time, she tells that she married a cancer patient, fell in love with his friend and almost slept with him. She forgot to look at herself
It's a familiar situation when a person doesn't want to apologize. You're willing to compromise for the sake of your relationship, but he's not. He doesn't care about your feelings.
- No, but now I respect that basketball player you dated in college.
Oh, lolish! House is such a House!)))
Sweet, naive Cameron.
You know what makes me happy: the series 2004-2006, where LGBT+ couples were presented as the norm. There were no screams or excuses, although now, in 2016, this issue is very acute in the States. They just served it up. "Her partner," "her girlfriend," and none of House's team, none of the clinic said it wasn't OK. This is the kind of content I want to see in films and TV series featuring LGBT+ people - absolutely no reaction. It's a couple. It's a family. It happens here the same way as in all other couples, as well as in heteros. This is n o r m a l l n o.
Ah, that's great.
P. S. I don't want to offend anyone, I'm just speaking for myself. But if this topic is personal for you, please share your experience, is such a position really effective? For adequate people, this will not change anything, and as for the rejected, will they really become kinder from the everywhere thundering agenda? And will they make life easier for the LGBT community? Suddenly everyone realizes?
In general, I really like it, exactly how it is shown here. 100% of the heterosexual couples in the series have their dark secrets, and the lesbian couple is also not idealized - their cockroaches, like everyone else's.
I have no personal experience in this matter, I do not have the habit of talking to assholes, it is unsafe. But there are enough examples and statistics that yes, it works. People are always scared of the unfamiliar in the first place. Suddenly realizing is unlikely, but gradually... Water sharpens the stone.
I think that what infuriates many people now is the "agenda" - this is the effect of the pendulum. For a long time, the LGBT topic was taboo, like the topic of sex in general - and then the hippies, the sexual revolution, Stonewall - LGBT swung the pendulum, violated the status quo. This process is slow, and has now gained enough weight to reach the broad masses, so to speak. And, of course, it provoked opposition. I think that the pendulum will swing for some time, in one direction and in another, and when it stops, the old world will no longer be.
- What, all three of them?)
Both girls got fucked up in the end. Great relationship, yeah.
I'm afraid of dogs for nothing. 😣
Ideally, of course, it is better to write a joint article.
But what's the problem with publishing a second article if the material is different? And I would quote Forman
And Cameron has also shown herself to be unprofessional in this episode, to put it mildly. For some reason, I decided that I had the right to condemn a person and because of my hysterical righteousness, I did the procedure so rudely! Kapets, damn it, if one of the patients on Cameron's shift does not reach the face of the saints, that's it, the righteous Cameron quarters him. What kind of nonsense is this? By the way, this is not an indicator of holiness, but of a bunch of personal unprocessed psychologisms. A really good person adequately perceives the fact that everyone has their own shortcomings, he lives according to his conscience, but does not condemn others. And Cameron is very hysterical about condemning others. I would assume that this is because of internal prohibitions, they say, others can do it calmly, but I can't, I can't. And it infuriates her so much that she punishes patients, made the procedure more painful for the girl. And I don't care that the poor guy didn't sleep for 10 days, she's not a saint - that means everything, torture and execution. Ugh, I can't stand hysterical righteous people. If I were Foreman, I wouldn't be friends with her either.
Apparently, they only have an adequate Chase there, and does not confuse personal triggers with work.