All Announcements Reviews Articles Trailers Blog Movies

Olivia Wilde will direct the Christmas comedy Naughty

10 Dec

The movie will be produced by Margot Robbie.

A still from the movie "Don't Worry, Darling."

Actress and director Olivia Wilde ("Don't Worry Darling") will direct the Christmas comedy Naughty, which has been described as "Bridesmaids" at the North Pole".

Jimmy Warden, who worked on "Cocaine Bear", will be responsible for the script. In the center of the plot will be Mallory, who wants to get sole custody of her son. But to do so, she needs to find Santa Claus and convince him to testify at her divorce hearing.

The movie will be released by LuckyChap, the production company of Margot Robbie, Tom Ackerley, and Josie McNamara, who are listed as producers on the picture. No studio has yet acquired the rights to the film, but Deadline speculates that, thanks to LuckyChap's recent success with "Barbie" and Wilde in the director's chair, it won't be difficult.

A filming start date, as well as the project's cast, has not yet been announced.

Add the movie "Naughty" to your list

Discuss this news

Singoross

PRO

10 Dec 2023, 12:17 #

The thirteenth will make a film about Santa House

AweSerg

10 Dec 2023, 13:56 #

A producer? Seriously???
It sounds like a "blowout."

himmelsky

10 Dec 2023, 20:27 #

Феминизмы в тексте? Продюсерка?
Не отстаём от западных стран, однако.

-8

webchillout

11 Dec 2023, 18:03 #

Should we lag behind civilization?

-1

ItzamYeh

12 Dec 2023, 16:01 #

@webchillout: from a civilization where a man with a pussy declares himself a woman in order to participate in women's competitions. Where the highest achievement is considered to be trans or to be black, and if you are a black trans, then all doors are open for you. Where the idea of creating a party of pedophiles is considered normal "Charity, Freedom and Diversity ". It is better to keep up with such a civilization.

webchillout

12 Dec 2023, 16:06 #

Well, if you only see this, then you can keep falling behind.

-3

ItzamYeh

12 Dec 2023, 17:34 #

@webchillout: I see not only that, but answered in the context of the previous comment. Is it considered a civilization to twist the language in favor of the agenda?

Шоич

12 Dec 2023, 18:57 #

@ItzamYeh: The language is not a dead block, the fact that it changes is normal. But it's very funny that many people use this argument in disputes over feminitives, as if you are really worried about poor language.

webchillout

12 Dec 2023, 20:09 #

You have to cross the rules, everything changes, including the agenda, one today, another tomorrow. The world is static only in the cemetery and in the villages.

ItzamYeh

13 Dec 2023, 10:13 #

@Shoich: the conversation was not about the language, but about the civilization for which we supposedly have to repeat everything. As for the language, if it changes naturally, this is normal, but if in order to repeat alien stupid new rules that are not related to culture or language, this leads to degradation. It's like if a person was born fat because he has genetic abnormalities and if he has stuffed his belly with garbage food, therefore he pulls into his mouth everything that is given. The complexity of language determines the complexity of the nervous system, the number of neural connections and the development of the brain directly, and this determines a person's ability to solve problems.
For fun, find videos of Soviet broadcasts on YouTube where they talk to schoolchildren, listen to people's speech and thoughts, and then listen to any interview by Dani Milokhin and feel the difference.

ItzamYeh

13 Dec 2023, 10:17 #

@webchillout: well, today one agenda is tomorrow another, today you put food in your mouth, tomorrow in your ass. The world is not static there either, it's just that the surrounding space is determined by just such agendas. The question is not about the static nature of the world, but whether you will degrade or develop.

Limiriya

15 Dec 2023, 09:37 #

And tell me, please, an example of a natural way to change the language? What is now the norm for us - at a time when people were modifying it - could also be perceived with hostility, and from our bell tower this may seem "natural"

ItzamYeh

15 Dec 2023, 11:44 #

@Limiriya: about the natural change, it meant different pronunciation of the same words depending on the region. Front door — entrance, for example. I repeat once again, the context of my comment did not relate to language, I realize that we have already lost it, but spoke about the distortion of language precisely for the sake of the agenda and alien values that are imposed on us. In general, the answer was to a man who considers it a civilization to drag all kinds of garbage to himself.

Otherwise, tomorrow you will wake up in a world where there are 100,500 genders and you will think how to live the day so as not to offend anyone by accident.

Dark_Spawn

06 Mar 23:13 #

@ItzamYeh: "Для прикола найди не ютюбе видео советских передач, где со школьниками беседуют, послушай речь и мысли людей,"

Пффф... А теперь эти повзрослевшие школьники верят в чипирование, еврейский заговор и рак от вышек 5G.

KatRamanovich

PRO

10 Dec 2023, 23:00 #

I try to avoid getting into conversations on the topic of feminitives - I consider it rare stupidity, sounding, in places, more like an insult. But here it's straight epic: because of the "producer", the entire text of the article went wrong... In general, I was not interested and was not deposited in my mind 😂😂

+10

VeryBadKarma

PRO

11 Dec 2023, 10:31 #

- It's so bad here! Is there a doctor among you?
- I'm a doctor.
- I'm a doctoral student
- I'm a doctor
- I'm a doctor.
🤦🏻‍♂️

-3

mixer1701

PRO

11 Dec 2023, 11:20 #

And what did the author decide/ decided that it was not the producer who was right, but the producer?

Шоич

11 Dec 2023, 14:55 #

Census of clowns in comments.

br1ella

PRO

11 Dec 2023, 21:06 #

Продюсерша звучит приятнее на мой вкус если прям обязательно нужен феминитив, но лучше без коверкания языка обойтись.

alesenok

11 Dec 2023, 22:01 #

While I was reading, I thought that I was not clinging and would write about producers and directors after all. And it turns out that everything is here with such comments😁 But the truth is jarring and this form sounds more pejorative than respectful. In Russian, na -ka, -ki are usually not very respectful forms of nouns and names end, such as actress, singer, Olka, Lenka, etc., therefore it does not sound at all.
What kind of fashion is this?🤦

alesenok

11 Dec 2023, 22:02 #

@alesenok: *I won't hold on

KatRamanovich

PRO

13 Dec 2023, 17:20 #

@alesenok: I support you 100%! Where the normal version of the "distribution by birth" (I'll give you a hackneyed example from the poet-poetess) is excellent. And this pervert is c-c-brrrr. But there is a strong feeling that you will not get good results from a trainer, professor, instructor or doctor (xs, really, do they use such options)?..

albinka_

15 Dec 2023, 23:14 #

@alesenok: an athlete, an artist, a student, a tennis player, a citizen, a Russian woman and others may now be offended for "rather humiliatingly than respectfully")

And along with them, all the other thousands of feminine words ending in -ka, and having no humiliating subtext: spoon, fork, branch, crumb (bread), boat, roast, rack, T-shirt, watering can, crust, hot water bottle... here you can continue to list for another 3 hours. Are these all bad words? well (but what about their more polite forms?

I also don't like the suffix -ka, which is attached to everything without linguistic analysis of the word (the Russian language has a huge history of feminitives and word formation, variations and other suffixes can be used). I understand that many people also don't like how it sounds, but your argument is complete bullshit, which is easily refuted by counterexamples, and in fact it's just a taste.

alesenok

16 Dec 2023, 08:09 #

@albinka_: OK, I agree. But when you hear something that cuts the ear, associations immediately arise with words that have such a form with an unpleasant semantic coloring, and not with those that have such an ending in the usual form.
In general, your arguments are absolutely justified, I agree with them, but the directors and producers did not sound better for me.

override999

14 Jan 21:23 #

A producer??? The editor did not look at the copywriter... What are you guys doing?

Add a comment: