Description
From her volatile childhood as Norma Jeane, through her rise to stardom and romantic entanglements, this reimagined fictional portrait of Hollywood legend Marilyn Monroe blurs the lines of fact and fiction to explore the widening split between her public and private selves.
A huge plus of the film is Ana de Armas. The most similar Marilyn so far, well, a beauty..And she played wonderfully, of course, to the point of goosebumps.
And yes, Ana and still nyashka! :)
Ana de Armas is very similar to Marilyn😍
The authors and the same actors represented by De Armas said that the film was created in order to show Marilyn and Norma - these are different people. That Marilyn was objectified, used her & # 34; body", that her role is " stupid blonde". That in fact, the norm is a well - read, educated person. This is the same woman that in the 50s (!) tried to create my own production company in Hollywood, Karl! In this masculine Hollywood of the 50s!
The basis for the plot is excellent. Especially true stories.
But what do we see in the movie? Ana de Armas-who should show how to minimize the difference between Marilyn and Norma, plays them completely the same. Marilyn Monroe in the frame spoke with a sigh, a languid look, and so on. But this is not the norm. This is an image for the object.
The only scene where we are told that Norma is not a stupid girl is a comparison with my sisters. But even in this scene, where she is clearly accused of not being able to read such a work. How is she behaving? Builds eyes, lips with a bow and continues to look like a stupid blonde.
They try to tell us that people looked at her as a piece of meat, while showing us a naked Ana de Armas in the film almost through every scene. And the frame on the shooting platform, where the skirt develops - a few minutes from all angles translates the lower underwear.
And yet - the movie runs for almost three hours, and half the characters around Norma that turn around know who it is! Five minutes to show her underwear from under the dress, and find 30 seconds to explain - this is her makeup artist, they were close in a friendly way, and so on did not find time. Roughly speaking, I have to guess who it is. Keep Wikipedia open all the time?
Huge potential and mediocre work. Starting with the script, ending with the acting game.
Being Norma Jean, I probably would have turned over in my grave.
I didn't expect the film to be an ordinary biopic, no one promised that, and if you know Dominic's work, it will become obvious why everything was shot the way it was shot.
And everything was shot very beautifully, magically, with a change of cameras and sharpness. Black-and-white frames are replaced by bright colored ones, indicating, as I understood it, the mood of the Norm.
Her father's letters were very infuriating, – who are you anyway to condemn her? And when it turned out who wrote them, it became strange: Chaplin Jr. wanted to avenge her abortion in this way? You killed my child– did I symbolically kill your father?
But in general, I see here the humanization of a pop icon, a reminder that she was first of all a person, very lonely, in whom everyone around saw anything but a human being. And, of course, after this movie, it will be very difficult to laugh at Some Like it Hot.
I really love biopics and have never seen a movie jump on a grave like this one.
I am not an ardent fan of Monroe, but I am familiar with her biography, so for the first few minutes with little Norma Jean, I caught facepalms. They just took the fact that her mother was ill and turned it upside down: they threw apocalyptic shots with fires, a thriller with drowning and the dramatic moment when the girl was sent to an orphanage by random neighbors.
Actually, this motif of desperation runs through the whole film. Since childhood, the authors jump into an acting career, where Marilyn is immediately and certainly raped. Of course, why show how she loved movies, how she worked in a factory and became a model? Monroe is a priori a victim, all those around her are lustful, vile and smelly bastards who use her. The creators did not consider anything except family beatings and debauchery in the life of the actress. The subsequent scenes are just competing in their abomination.
Of course, there was fear, disappointment, and pain in Marilyn. But she didn't stop there. This woman challenged the industry, became one of the first women in history to create her own production studio, had a large library and was very well-read, opened a career for black jazz singer Ella Fitzgerald (this was in the 50s!). But no, it's better to show Ana de Armas's bare breasts at every opportunity, call her "meat" or a dumbass, I'm generally silent about the shot from her vagina.
Я не смотрела другие работы этого режиссера, но, по мне, он использовала просто ВСЕ приемы современного кино, от разной ширины и цвета кадра (Вы уже придумали, что именно это значит? Держите в курсе!), до трясущегося и следующего перед героем крупного плана. Режиссер снял набор клипов, склеил их в нечто единое, а заумные и всеведущие кинокритики уже сами придумают, как это правильно интерпретировать.
«Блондинка» - очень грязный, пошлый, липкий фильм. Он не о Мэрилин, он об абстрактной актрисе того времени. Если вы не знаете о Монро ничего или знаете только общие факты, вы вряд ли поймете хоть что-нибудь из изложенного. Это не сюжет, не кино, рассказывающее историю, это набор сюрреалистических образов, среди которых не понятно, где сон, где явь, а где очередной приход или припадок.
Получилось слишком много букв, но просто очень хотелось вылить своё Буэ из души...
Понимаю, что это не 100% правда, но думаю многие моменты были в действительности. Хотя бы отдаленно.
Единственный минус (лично для меня), что вся история идет отрывками и нет единой линии сюжета. Из-за этого в какие-то моменты терялась суть повествования.
Дичь какая то позорная.
Фильм критикует, то что с Монро обращались как с куском мясом, при этом постоянно раздевают Аню.
У смены чб и цвета я не обнаружил смысла. Сначала я подумал - так они отделяют правду от вымысла, но нет.
Или что в цвете - когда Норма счастлива, но тоже нет!
А эта постельная сцена где оператор мотает камерой влево вправо и переход к следующей сцене через водопад...
Операторская работ в целом в фильме местами выглядит странно. Столько разных приёмов используется просто так, ну захотелось оператору так, ну они и сделали так. (как видимо и цветокору, захотелось в цвете - было в цвете)
Ана действительно главное достоинство фильма.
Ну хоть правду показали, о том, что тупая сосалка и наркоманка просто знала у кого сосать и когда вовремя умереть. Умеют же американцы сотворять себе правильных кумиров вот из этого, и поклоняться им через несколько десятков лет после их смерти ))