Ads

Amazon and the BBC plan to renew "Good Omens" for a third season

24 Oct
Toshyak
It will be the last one.
A still from "Good Omens."

Deadline's sources report that Amazon Prime Video and the BBC are set to order a third season of the series "Good Omens" starring Michael Sheen and David Tennant. It will reportedly be the final one.

However, on the new series, if the project is still extended, will not work one of the showrunners of the first two seasons — Douglas MacKinnon left the series. MacKinnon himself told about it on social networks, and after the information was confirmed by Neil Gaiman — the second showrunner of "Omen", but both did not disclose the reasons for leaving.

The first season of the project was based on the book of the same name by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman. It told about the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley. They have been living among ordinary people for centuries, doing the work assigned to them. But when the final battle between Heaven and Hell comes, which could destroy humanity, Crowley and Aziraphale unite to prevent the apocalypse.

In the second season, the series went beyond the original book, with all the events revealed in the first installment. In the story, Aziraphale and Crowley, having prevented the apocalypse, return to ordinary life in London's Soho among mere mortals. But one day on their doorstep appears Gabriel, who does not remember who he is.

Add the TV series "Good Omens" to your list

Discuss this news

ZRaoulDuke
ZRaoulDuke
PRO
24 Oct 2023, 16:15 #
I hope at least at the end of the last season they will live a happy family, and maybe even have children) With wings and horns)))
Reply
Show
who liked?
+54
anastval
anastval
PRO
30 Oct 2023, 14:37 #
Yeah, it would be great at all
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Varyast
Varyast
PRO
24 Oct 2023, 16:15 #
I'm really looking forward to a great series
I'm glad they won't stretch the series
Reply
Show
who liked?
+13
meatJuice
meatJuice
24 Oct 2023, 23:33 #
@Varyast: It's already been stretched for a whole extra season. Originally there was supposed to be one
Reply
Show
who liked?
+39
Lenushka_nik
Lenushka_nik
PRO
24 Oct 2023, 16:21 #
Our beloved couple will be together again! 🥰 Och hope for a happy ending ❤️💔
Reply
Show
who liked?
+15
child_bluda
child_bluda
PRO
24 Oct 2023, 16:30 #
In my opinion, it's great when the creators know when to stop. I hope our couple of birds will live happily.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+20
suzanna9491
suzanna9491
24 Oct 2023, 17:22 #
I should have stopped after the first season
Reply
Show
who liked?
+62
UliaChayka
UliaChayka
24 Oct 2023, 18:04 #
@suzanna9491: I support you
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
marvina
marvina
03 Nov 2023, 01:01 #
@child_bluda: if they knew when to stop, there wouldn't be a second season
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
24 Oct 2023, 16:40 #
That would be another Neverwhere they would decide to film again.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+9
Katze69
Katze69
24 Oct 2023, 21:40 #
@MarkRaffer: Oh yeah, that would be great!
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
anastasiaazza
anastasiaazza
PRO
24 Oct 2023, 18:12 #
Very glad! I hope at least the ending will be happy!
I'm definitely waiting!
Reply
Show
who liked?
+6
luvrok
luvrok
PRO
24 Oct 2023, 18:19 #
from a series of satires on Christianity to a gay drama without much meaning. The second season does not reveal anything important at all, all the characters are bland, the plot is a failure. It was just necessary to stop and not spoil the impressions of the first season by blurring everything with a bold agenda. For me, the story ended in the first season
Reply
Show
who liked?
+50
luvrok
luvrok
PRO
24 Oct 2023, 18:24 #
@luvrok: I still understand when non-traditional orientation appears in a TV series or movie not as a common phenomenon, it's cool and I don't mind, or it's really a drama that poses some problems and in which the appearance of a large number of LGBT people is due to the plot and consistently, which is no less important. But a ton of gays were dragged into this season, suddenly, last season was not about that at all and such a reversal is not at all logical and not consistent, it's hard to say who is not an LGBT member there at all. Such an obvious push is obvious and the meaning of the series is lost behind all this attempt to push someone's radical ideas.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+23
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
24 Oct 2023, 18:53 #
@luvrok: so you understood that the first season is a satire on Christianity, and that the second season is a satire on LGBT people - you could not realize?
Reply
Show
who liked?
-15
zakhar_larin
zakhar_larin
24 Oct 2023, 20:20 #
@MarkRaffer: Watch The Sandman by Neil Gaiman and realize that the second season is not a satire.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+11
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
24 Oct 2023, 20:37 #
@luvrok: The first season perfectly shows the basis for the development of such a relationship between Crowley and Aziraphale. It's the same in the book, the only thing missing was physical intimacy. Which is logical and brought out in the second season. And somehow their relationship is also not about gay, but a real drama that poses the problem of choosing between Aziraphale's desire to bring heaven to his understanding of goodness and order, to choose service and Crowley's desire to put big and fat on the upper and lower chancellery and live by their own rules, choose each other. The angelic essence of Aziraphale and the love of paradise have not gone away, just darkened due to the time of hanging out with Crowley. And in the latter, human freedom of will has sprouted too much and a good egoism has been preserved. The drama lies in the choice of the path and the difference of worldviews, and not in the agenda, as many people imagine.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+15
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
25 Oct 2023, 00:00 #
@zakhar_larin: so you think I'm familiar with the Sandman? So in the American Gods, moments also slipped by, but in this particular case, this is hypertrophied - that's what references to sarcasm, satire, and so on.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-8
luvrok
luvrok
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 16:13 #
@AshenKai:due to the fact that they are creatures of God, I still had a weak idea of their couple, although the thoughts were in season 1 (tell the Christian god that he created gay angels), besides, the fantasies of 13-year-old girls writing fan fiction and considering gays something interesting, I am not particularly interested, and I absolutely do not share and do not see what they consider obvious.
I would tolerate the plot move of a couple of Crowley and Aziraphale, with severe pains in my abdominal cavity, even in the form that was in season 2. I spoke mainly about the obvious consistent pushing of the agenda, which I saw, among other things, due to the excessive abundance in comparison with the first season of LGBT persanages.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-6
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 19:05 #
@luvrok: If you don't see and share something, it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist or shouldn't be.
How little you know about the people involved in writing fan fiction. These are not always girls and very rarely 13-year-olds. The contingent there is quite adult and adequate. And where among the screenwriters did you see those same girls? Or do you think that only 13 girls find homosexual topics interesting and want to write and shoot something on it?
The agenda is in the eyes of the beholder, not in the product itself. If you took same-sex couples for granted and did not experience negativity in their attitude, believe me, you would either not care or thoughts towards the agenda would not even turn.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+10
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
26 Oct 2023, 14:05 #
And why should anyone take same-sex couples for granted?
Reply
Show
who liked?
-8
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
26 Oct 2023, 15:32 #
Comment has been deleted
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
26 Oct 2023, 18:57 #
@MarkRaffer: I wasn't talking to you
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
26 Oct 2023, 19:34 #
@DmitriKravchenko: but I'm with you, so I'll repeat it again - you shouldn't give a fuck? why is there so much interest in what others do in bed?
Reply
Show
who liked?
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
26 Oct 2023, 19:48 #
@MarkRaffer: first of all, no need to poke, no one drank with you on the bruderschaft. Secondly, we will continue the conversation when you have picked up manners and vocabulary.
Reply
Show
who liked?
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
26 Oct 2023, 20:26 #
Comment has been deleted
meatJuice
meatJuice
27 Oct 2023, 12:34 #
@MarkRaffer: I have a counter question, and "you don't give a fuck should" that he doesn't give a fuck?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
27 Oct 2023, 12:47 #
Comment has been deleted
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
27 Oct 2023, 20:40 #
@DmitriKravchenko: and why shouldn't I be scared?
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 14:56 #
Because it's NOT normal, no matter how someone tries to convince people otherwise.
Reply
Show
who liked?
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 18:05 #
@DmitriKravchenko: why did you decide (also for everyone) that this is not normal? No matter how you try to convince me, there is no norm)
Reply
Show
who liked?
-4
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 18:34 #
It's not me. This is nature
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 18:54 #
@DmitriKravchenko: why did you decide that nature decided this? And how do you know what nature has decided?
Reply
Show
who liked?
-6
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 18:57 #
And what about childbearing for same-sex couples, remind me?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 19:38 #
@DmitriKravchenko: Do you have sex just for the sake of procreation? Either you have a meager sex life, or a lot of children. Anyway, I'm sorry.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 19:47 #
It's all lyrics. You asked why this is not the norm. I have answered you. Humanity, consisting of same-sex couples, will die out. Therefore, this is not the norm. And sex is the tenth thing.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 20:24 #
@DmitriKravchenko: the norm is when there are same-sex couples on a par with opposite-sex ones, and not just one or the other. Same-sex couples can also have children - surrogacy, sperm donors, IVF, etc. Or are same-sex couples just men for you?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+4
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 21:33 #
@AshenKai: no, that's not the norm. And they will never become equal, no matter how they try to impose this point of view on themselves and others. They can have anyone, but it won't be their children. They will not extend themselves into the future, life will not continue. Accept it. Biology is here against you.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 21:48 #
@DmitriKravchenko: Apparently you don't know biology well. If an egg or sperm participating in the creation of an unborn child is taken from one of the people in a same-sex relationship, then this child will be theirs and he will be their continuation. The same IVF and surrogate motherhood is about this. So it's more likely that you will have to accept the norm, well, or it's pointless to lament for the rest of your life that humanity will die out because of gays.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 22:10 #
No matter how many times you call it the norm, it will not become the norm (at least repeat the "pie" ten times, it will not be sweeter in your mouth). You yourself write: "taken from one (!) of the people." Not from both. There will be no unification. You still need the opposite pair. And as long as it is, the opposite will not be considered the norm. I am already silent that it is necessary to dodge in such a way in order to achieve what is done elementary in nature. Funny. And humanity will not die out precisely because the absolute majority of normal people.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-4
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 22:21 #
@DmitriKravchenko: and what side is it here? And what prevents same-sex couples from using IVF? Or surrogate motherhood. Everything becomes the norm if you reason with your ego)
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 22:22 #
@DmitriKravchenko: humanity will not consist of same-sex couples. That's not how it works.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 22:23 #
@DmitriKravchenko: so please don't impose your own with your "No, this is not the norm". The adequacy here is against you.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-3
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 22:35 #
@DmitriKravchenko: no matter how many times you call it not the norm, it is not the norm. Refuting one does not prove the other. However, it is worth noting that the change of generations is not subject to any norms. Everything new at the beginning is always perceived with hostility. But in the end, people either accept (agree or accept) innovations, or do not accept them. Therefore, you can be of any opinion, but in the current reality there are same-sex couples. And you will not take out a dispute with this fact, you can even try. And to impose your worldview is quite a circus on your part. Therefore, yes, someone sees LGBT, and someone sees the relationship of the characters. There is one thing, but " as you call the ship, so it will sail".

P.S. "humanity will not die out, because the absolute majority of normal people" Then it turns out that your fears are groundless? Why then was it necessary to disperse all this tirade about "oh, how bad is it "?)
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 22:36 #
@DmitriKravchenko: at least ten times call homosexuality not the norm, it will not become so. Even for opposite-sex couples, childbearing is often not given elementary and they have to resort to methods invented by man. Because man is driven not by nature and biology, but by reason.
And if, as you write, "normal" people are the majority, and humanity will not die out, then why are you so offended by the slightest manifestation of something different, in your opinion, from "normality "? Do they interfere with you at work or in your personal life, maybe they harass you? Or do they just exist and it makes you cringe?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 22:36 #
1) the fact that the need for special tricks is evidence of a deviation from the norm. By themselves, same-sex couples cannot have children 2) here, you are already on the right track. Will not be. Small deviations from the norm are a statistical error 3) why impose it? If "zhi-shi" is written with and, then at least impose, at least do not impose, it will still be so. 4) so no one denies that they exist. Where did you read this from me? I have no concerns. We have a dispute about the fact that this is a deviation.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 22:41 #
@DmitriKravchenko: tricks are also needed for different genders. Inconsistency.
Can't have children, but should they? And if same-sex people don't want to? And if the opposite-sexes don't want to? Are you going to force me?
Statistical error?) Well, then there is no trouble. Since we have an absolute majority of people of different sexes, then the number of same-sex people can be neglected! So everything is fine and there is no problem, hooray!
If 2*2=4, it will not be equal to 5, no matter how much you tell us all)
Reply
Show
who liked?
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 22:45 #
For opposite-sex couples, problems with childbearing are an exception to the rule, for same-sex couples it is an axiom. Do you feel the difference? It doesn't bother me in any way, as long as it happens in everyone's private apartment. And if you take it out into society, be kind enough to be ready to be criticized. Yes, and in the Constitution we have prescribed something in this regard. In relation specifically to the series, I don't like that the quality of the product suffers because of this. Screenwriters are not thinking about the development of a good story, but about representativeness. And this is very noticeable if we compare the same film adaptations of Gaiman with the original sources.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-3
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 22:49 #
It's not about "want /don't want", but how it is arranged by nature. Evolution, so to speak. Or God, as you like. So there is no problem, the norm should not be called. We're not saying that osteochondrosis is the norm, are we? That's how it is here.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
28 Oct 2023, 23:04 #
@DmitriKravchenko: I don't feel the difference, because there is none. To criticize and to censure are still different things. The series is not Russian and our Constitution is no sideways to it. You are free to treat homosexuality as you please, but as soon as you take it out into society, be kind enough to be prepared that you may be criticized.
In your opinion, the quality of the series has suffered, in mine it has not. Whose opinion is correct?
There is no primary source for season 2. In the first "there were no reperesentations ", everything is according to the canon. So what we started with is what we came to - the truth is in the eyes of the beholder.
So I think further discussion is pointless, because the movement in a circle and the many repetitions of the same thing do not entertain me.
Reply
Show
who liked?
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 23:50 #
@DmitriKravchenko: I don't feel the difference, there is none. Yes, but you were criticized in the end. The quality of the product does not suffer, there are 13 reasons why sexual education also sends greetings.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-4
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 23:51 #
@AshenKai: similarly
Reply
Show
who liked?
-5
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 09:53 #
@AshenKai: 1) If you don't feel the difference, it's not my problem, would you agree? 2) Well, let it be censured. 3) The Constitution was mentioned in relation to the dispute about the norm, not the series 4) That's the point. When discussing the phenomenon, you turn to criticism of the opponent's personality, and this is the main evidence of the lack of arguments. If you don't believe it, you can look into any textbook of rhetoric. I'm criticizing a phenomenon that goes out into society, not specific people. 5) What you like season 2 - For God's sake. With regard to Gaiman's series, I meant, first of all, "American Gods" and "Sandman".
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 09:57 #
@Sachet_chaya: 1) I wrote about the criticism above 2) About the quality of the series. You look at the ratings of the seasons "13 reasons". What they were at the beginning of the first, and what they became at the end of the last. Doesn't mean anything? It's the same with "Sexual Perception"
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 11:00 #
@DmitriKravchenko: criticism of the opponent's personality occurs because we are discussing personal points of view, not the point of view of the creators of the series. This is logical.
Reply
Show
who liked?
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 11:03 #
No. This is completely not logical. Contradicts all the postulates of rhetoric. Learn to abstract from personal views.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 11:03 #
@DmitriKravchenko: 1) what exactly did you write there above? If you refer to your previous statements, quote them so that I can understand you correctly. Answer again. 2) can you confirm that the ratings were falling only because of same-sexism? Until it's proven, it doesn't mean anything.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-3
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 11:06 #
@DmitriKravchenko: please quote the postulates. And explain how they are sideways here.
Once again: we cannot abstract from personal views, because we are discussing your personal view. Discussing a personal opinion, it cannot be abandoned. If you want to abstract, don't continue the dialogue.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 11:28 #
@Sachet_chaya: 1) Not. I think you are wonderfully able to re-read everything yourself. To engage in self-citation is already a bad thing. 2) And I don't need it. You claimed that the quality of these series did not fall. But the audience didn't agree with you. If you want, justify their fall with something else. 3) You not only can, but should. The rhetoric is based on this. You really don't know that? Well, Google it then. See how you need to prove a point. I'm not discussing a personal view. And the phenomenon in its objective totality.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 11:47 #
@DmitriKravchenko: 1) self-citation is the postulates of rhetoric. This way you will be better understood. 2) so I justified it, it contradicts the fact that ratings have some meaning here. 3) should I use personal opinion to talk about opinions? Okay, I'll have to. Not if you're overwriting the postulates, you're Googling. I don't have to prove your opinion, but you have to prove yours. So do it. I'll take a look, but you haven't proved yours. I still disagree with you and want to argue. Your rhetoric is bad. If I see this phenomenon differently, there can be no objectivity. Because not everyone calls not the norm what you call not the norm. If there are different visions of the situation, there can be no objectivity. Plus there is no classification of the norm. And if there was, there would be no disputes.

Try to prove your point again and again.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-4
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 12:07 #
@Sachet_chaya: 1) No. Well, don't talk about what you don't understand. You're an adult. Just rewriting what your opponent tells you is not serious. 2) No, they did not justify it. You said that the quality was not falling, but it was falling. 3) You know, you are the first person in the world who seriously claims that it is necessary to switch to personalities in the discussion. It's strong. With your permission, I will tell my colleagues at the university about this. It will be a rich material for them. 4) You can see this phenomenon as you like, but this does not negate the fact that this is not the norm. And in this case, with me, the overwhelming majority agrees. 5) Objectivity is always there. You can assume anything, though, that the earth is flat. Nothing will change from this. It will still be round. Or is there no objectivity here either?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+4
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 12:17 #
@DmitriKravchenko: 1) well, don't say that, you understand, not me. I want and write, what's stopping me? 2) justified. Do not agree that justified - your problem. I didn't say that. Please read me carefully and don't write nonsense. I did not deny the drop in quality. 3) everything happens for the first time. 4) it is not for you, it is for me. Objectivity is no longer possible if opinions differ. Will there be a list of this majority? By name, with a full dossier. Otherwise, the argument in your rhetoric will not be weighty. 5) there is objectivity in the facts. We are discussing opinions. Opinions are subjective. You may think that something is not the norm. It may not be the norm. There is no objectivity in anything where there are different opinions.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-4
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 13:12 #
@Sachet_chaya: 1) you can write anything if it is written for the sake of writing itself, and not for the sake of finding the truth 2) No, they did not justify it. How was it not denied the drop in quality when it was written "the quality of the product does not suffer&#34?;. 3) If you want to turn ignorance into virtue, it's your business. For the sake of interest, read what the terms "Ad personam", "Circumstantiae" and "Tu quoque" mean in relation to the discussion. Maybe you'll understand something. 4) Have you seen VTSIOM polls regarding same-sex marriage? Have you heard about the amendments to the Constitution adopted by the majority of votes? Do you seriously think that the majority is for same-sex couples? That's straight sincere? 5) What are the facts? What are you talking about? Haven't you heard about the Flatlanders? They have an opinion that the earth is flat, the photo is a fake, the flight into space is a conspiracy. So you also refuse to be objective in this question, right?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 13:50 #
@DmitriKravchenko: 1) this is what you are doing here))) 2) justified. It's written, but you took it out of context. 3) well, what do they mean? Tell us exactly how you understand them. 4) have you seen the research of scientists regarding same-sex marriage? Have you heard about science? Do you seriously think that statistics are accurate? Do you really think so? 5) such facts. I don't know what you're talking about. You only write an opinion in different words, but I didn't see the facts. At least one concrete proof of abnormality was given. I refuse to be objective in everything, because people somehow perceive everything through the prism of their consciousness. Therefore, everything ambiguous is biased.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-4
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 13:59 #
1) specifically and to the point. 2) no, they did not justify it. Nothing is taken out of context there 3) exactly what I wrote to you about above. Make an effort, read. 4) saw and heard. So what about the VTsIOM polls and about the constitutional amendments is there anything to say on the merits? Do you dispute their results? 5) so find out before entering into a discussion. How does the opinion that the earth is flat differ from the opinion that same-sex couples are the norm? Both opinions.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 14:38 #
@DmitriKravchenko: it's torn out, I know for sure, I wrote it and I know.
You tell me the main thing yourself, I'll read it.
There are polls, and I said it in the same paragraph. But between the lines you don't know how to read whose visibility. I don't dispute the results, why did you decide that.
That's right, both judgments are opinions. Accordingly, you cannot say that abnormality is something indisputable and cannot be questioned. And accordingly, all your assurances that this is not the norm do not make sense
Reply
Show
who liked?
-6
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 15:41 #
1) no, it's not torn out 2) that's how you read it, and we'll discuss it 3) that is, do you agree that most same-sex couples do not approve? 4) and both opinions are correct? So the earth is flat? For you, the statement that the earth is round has ceased to be an objective fact?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 17:33 #
@DmitriKravchenko: ok. But I see that my words have been taken out of context.
I think we won't discuss it if you haven't even written how you understand it right now.
Who agrees, with whom do you agree?
There was no talk about loyalty of opinions. No, I haven't stopped.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-4
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
29 Oct 2023, 17:56 #
1) you can see anything, but they are not torn out 2) so you didn't bother to read. 3) you are with polls 4) you wrote above that these are opinions, and now write that it is a fact. How so?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
AweSerg
AweSerg
29 Oct 2023, 20:31 #
Your spam broke away from the discussion of the topic...
Reply
Show
who liked?
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 22:07 #
@DmitriKravchenko: I propose to summarize - we both expressed opinions and no more. No one has said anything true or true.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-5
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
30 Oct 2023, 11:03 #
@Sachet_chaya: 10+10=100
but how, you ask? yes, everything is simple, since they also invented different number systems and within the framework of some of them - and 2 + 2 = 5 maybe, but you need to specify this in advance.
Reply
Show
who liked?
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
30 Oct 2023, 13:14 #
@MarkRaffer: Yes. But in reality, everything is a little simpler - it has the simplest mathematics.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-3
albinka_
albinka_
06 Nov 2023, 01:26 #
@DmitriKravchenko: since the times of ancient Rome and ancient Greece, they have been engaged in sodomy, but humanity has not died out, what do you say to that?

Also in nature, to which you so persistently appeal, there are same-sex couples among animals.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
ramzy
ramzy
06 Nov 2023, 02:05 #
@AshenKai: по вашей логике существование человека в коме на ИВЛ тоже можно нормальной жизнью назвать. А что, технологии ведь поддерживают функции организма
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
06 Nov 2023, 09:56 #
@albinka_: I will say that the example of extinction was given to illustrate the case when same-sex relationships, turning into the norm, will pass a certain critical value in percentage terms. They haven't moved yet. And yes, neither in Ancient Rome nor in Ancient Greece did it occur to anyone to arrange marches on this occasion.

And how are offspring born among same-sex animals there?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
06 Nov 2023, 10:20 #
@ramzy: coma is a disease, it is a deviation of the body from healthy functioning. To prefer your gender in sex is not a disease, it is not contagious, it does not have a negative effect on the human body, it does not interfere with the normal daily life of a person. So unlike a coma, same-sex sex is normal.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
06 Nov 2023, 11:54 #
@albinka_: that's right... but he's really a homophobe, so why even have a discussion with such people when everything about him became known?
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
ramzy
ramzy
06 Nov 2023, 13:03 #
@AshenKai: так и кома не заразна, если ее причина не инфекция. Однополый секс вообще то оказывает негативное влияние на жизнь и здоровье, правда, у мужчин. Среди каких групп населения была первая вспышка ВИЧ-инфекции? Кто может заразиться гепатитом "С" половым путем? Мужчины, практикующие однополый секс, это группа риска. И вы приводили в пример как норму именно шансы такой пары на размножение, а оно у подобных людей невозможно без дополнительных технологий. А кого законы природы обычно вычеркивают из схемы продолжения рода? Как раз аномалии. Так что однополый секс и близко не норма. Что касается древнего мира, я не знаю, насколько там действительно были распространены однополые отношения, не вижу никаких доказательств того, что этим кто-то так уж сильно увлекался вне развращенных дворов Калигулы и ему подобных. А если читать того же Плутарха. нормальным подобное никогда не считали
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
ramzy
ramzy
06 Nov 2023, 13:07 #
@MarkRaffer: термин фобия абсолютно не подходит, не считать нормой то, что ею и не является, это не патологический страх. Да и геи вроде бы не пауки. И уж простите, мне все равно, кто с кем спит, пока меня не заставляют свечку держать и восхищаться
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
AshenKai
AshenKai
PRO
06 Nov 2023, 13:21 #
@ramzy: Do you seriously think that only same-sex couples can get hepatitis? I am generally silent about HIV, because you are now directly expressing the opinion of the middle of the last century and trying to pass it off as the truth. Men and women who practice any kind of sex are a risk group - this disease does not care about gender and who sleeps with whom.
Why is everyone who is negatively disposed towards same-sex couples so fixated on natural procreation? Why would a person invent many things that improved and made his life easier if you keep saying that everything with additional help is an anomaly. A person with a pacemaker is an anomaly, let him somehow, there is nothing like that in nature, well, he will die and die, but like in nature. Lost an arm or a leg, crawl, as in nature, there is nothing to count on prostheses. Dental implantation - forget it, nature is not supposed to. Who should consider such people who have taken advantage of the achievements of human progress, also an anomaly?
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
ramzy
ramzy
06 Nov 2023, 14:43 #
@AshenKai: я говорю конкретно о гепатите "С", который обычно не передается половым путем. Не про гепатит "В", который передается независимо от предпочтений. Что касается ВИЧ, повторяю, я написала о самых первых очагах инфекции, именно из-за массовой вспышки неизвестной пневмонии среди гомосексуалистов вирус и открыли. Я не утверждаю, что сейчас им заражаются только геи. Что касается групп риска, мужчины, практикующие однополый секс, женщины и мужчины, склонные к беспорядочным половым связям и наркоманы, это группы риска. А не просто мужчины и женщины, практикующие секс. И опять же,хватит передергивать, человек, живущий с кардиостимулятором, болен, и без кардиостимулятора умрет. Если бы у него не было проблем с сердечной деятельностью, никто бы ему его не ставил. Точно также, если у человека здоровые зубы, ему не нужна имплантация. Вы сами приводите примеры заболеваний, требующих медицинской помощи, при этом почему то одно конкретное отклонение заставляете на тех же основаниях признать нормой. Что касается естественного продолжении рода, это залог выживания вида, так что вполне нормально стремиться к процветанию своего.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
06 Nov 2023, 15:37 #
@ramzy: it's not a phobia thing, but it's already an established term... so what claims do you have that you can't even eat, but you sculpt minuses? Go ahead and ignore it!
Reply
Show
who liked?
ramzy
ramzy
06 Nov 2023, 15:54 #
@MarkRaffer: ой, какие мы обидчивые. И я что-то не поняла, мне почему то минусы лепить можно, а вам я почему то тем же ответить не могу. Очень надеюсь, что вы и правда будете меня игнорировать
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
06 Nov 2023, 23:04 #
@ramzy: the answer is not to a specific person, but just a comment in the thread. Not a single sane argument has been thrown here so far. Yes, I didn't do it either, but am I really the only one so stupid? The point is simply to move from discussing opinion to something more established - to facts.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
meatJuice
meatJuice
24 Oct 2023, 23:35 #
@luvrok: For season 2, a low bow to Gaiman. The first season is completely in Pratchett's style, which was related only to this season, both the humor of this season and the world are written completely in his spirit.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
luvrok
luvrok
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 16:22 #
@meatJuice: сколько учи режиссеров не продолжать экранизации выдумками сценаристов которые думают что СМОГУТ ПОВТОРИТЬ, а они не как не научатся. Нил Гейман не был у меня хоть как-то в списке уважаемых мною сценаристов, но гарантированно теперь он там не появится никогда)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
25 Oct 2023, 19:28 #
@luvrok: keep up to date
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
7kozlov
7kozlov
24 Oct 2023, 22:34 #
Вот даже не знаю теперь, радоваться ли этой новости после такого финала прошлого сезон...
Reply
Show
who liked?
+8
chevimiks
chevimiks
24 Oct 2023, 23:49 #
On the one hand, I am glad, but on the other, I worry about how they would not spoil everything.
I am very worried about this series, because the second season had not the same vibe as the first one🥹
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
MemesKirdi
MemesKirdi
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 00:14 #
I really want to see the third season and hope that it won't have to wait 5 years)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+8
fiery_matsu
fiery_matsu
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 00:29 #
I agree😅
I would like a maximum of 1.5-2 years😁🙈
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
zzz_203
zzz_203
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 09:31 #
I love this couple 🥰 I will look forward to the continuation of their story 🤗
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
Pixsi
Pixsi
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 11:10 #
On the one hand, a wonderful and beloved series, the second season of which was released at the level.
On the other hand, I really don't want the third one to disappoint and slide down. In any case, I am waiting for the return of my favorite duo
Reply
Show
who liked?
Elves
Elves
25 Oct 2023, 12:18 #
After the second season & # 34; thank you, don't& # 34;.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+9
anastasiaazza
anastasiaazza
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 12:49 #
Very glad! I hope at least the ending will be happy!
I'm definitely waiting!
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
AweSerg
AweSerg
25 Oct 2023, 16:00 #
the 2nd season was waiting, but it was spoiled by unnecessary and unnecessary faggots. 3rd I hope will do without subpoenas.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
luvrok
luvrok
PRO
25 Oct 2023, 16:26 #
@AweSerg: short and clear
Reply
Show
who liked?
-5
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
25 Oct 2023, 19:29 #
@AweSerg: Everyone sees what they want
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
DmitriKravchenko
DmitriKravchenko
PRO
26 Oct 2023, 14:06 #
How can you not see the facts?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
27 Oct 2023, 20:40 #
@DmitriKravchenko: игнорировать их
Reply
Show
who liked?
-7
AweSerg
AweSerg
27 Oct 2023, 23:47 #
@Paketik_chaya: and how can you ignore what you see? Oops.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 18:04 #
@AweSerg: it's already who sees what, and says the same to the public)
Reply
Show
who liked?
-5
AweSerg
AweSerg
28 Oct 2023, 19:35 #
@Paketik_chaya: let the faggots keep quiet. In short, you go to all the other scum, in an emergency.
Reply
Show
who liked?
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
28 Oct 2023, 22:19 #
@AweSerg: well, then everyone keeps quiet and no one puts their own opinions above other people's. Dogs (Morons) bark (howl), the caravan (justice) goes (reigns).
Reply
Show
who liked?
-5
albinka_
albinka_
06 Nov 2023, 01:31 #
@AweSerg: How is this not needed by anyone? Your statement is completely illogical, because this, as you put it, is needed at least by these same "faggots" :D
Reply
Show
who liked?
-3
AweSerg
AweSerg
06 Nov 2023, 14:07 #
@albinka_: your logic is incorrect.
I eat apples, but I don't really need Apple ads.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
albinka_
albinka_
06 Nov 2023, 23:04 #
@AweSerg: Your logic is wrong because you are making a generalization based on personal experience. If I don't fucking need reviews on vacuum cleaners, it doesn't mean that nobody needs them.
With the same success, you can say 'useless fucking comments from you ', but maybe someone likes you, and if there is at least one such person, my statement will already be refuted - this is how evidence works)
Reply
Show
who liked?
AweSerg
AweSerg
07 Nov 2023, 02:18 #
@albinka_: you clearly have a problem with logic... or are not familiar with the meaning of the word need. faggots will not die out without advertising faggotry, (unfortunately) they do not need it.
Hungry people need food, people need air, I don't need advertising apples.
Reply
Show
who liked?
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
07 Nov 2023, 13:37 #
@AweSerg: demons apparently don't need adequacy either
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
albinka_
albinka_
09 Nov 2023, 00:54 #
@AweSerg: Ahaha) Yes, I'm sorry) your logic is perfect, I shouldn't have questioned it)
if a same-sex couple is an advertisement for faggotry, then a pair of m + w is that an advertisement for heterosexuality? And if the children, God forbid, are shown - is this an advertisement for motherhood?) Can I then not show small children in the cinema? - I don't want motherhood to be advertised to me, because nobody fucking needs it, otherwise I'm afraid I'll see enough of children on the screen, and I'll want to start myself :D
Reply
Show
who liked?
AweSerg
AweSerg
09 Nov 2023, 01:11 #
Comment has been deleted
MarkRaffer
MarkRaffer
09 Nov 2023, 01:21 #
Comment has been deleted
albinka_
albinka_
09 Nov 2023, 04:19 #
@MarkRaffer: well, okay, the person doesn't understand jokes) what to do)
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
WildBart
WildBart
25 Oct 2023, 19:52 #
I didn't find where I read, but somewhere I saw information from the creators that the general developments of Pratchett and Gaiman on the sequel will be implemented in the third season, and the second is as a lead-up to those events. If this is the case, then some fileriness of the 2nd season becomes clear.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+10
миафарра
миафарра
25 Oct 2023, 22:38 #
I hope the nightingales will sing on Berkeley Street
Reply
Show
who liked?
+5
Jlia17
Jlia17
26 Oct 2023, 00:39 #
We'll see, we'll see...
I hope to adequately complete the series)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Djigman
Djigman
26 Oct 2023, 09:22 #
The second season was already disgusting, it's scary to imagine the third
Reply
Show
who liked?
+5
paranoid_nerd
paranoid_nerd
26 Oct 2023, 21:16 #
Despite the well-felt fillery of the second season, the third one is now definitely needed, because a crookedly finished story (even if it is) is better than an unfinished or completed in the form of a book/ script or something else. Well, we will wait and see, although the enthusiasm has significantly decreased.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+7
camilla_foxie
camilla_foxie
27 Oct 2023, 18:55 #
The second one didn't really come to me. Although I liked the first one
Reply
Show
who liked?
+7
aysv01
aysv01
27 Oct 2023, 20:26 #
Considering the finale of the last season, we definitely need a new one!!! 💅🏻
Reply
Show
who liked?
Ourania
Ourania
27 Oct 2023, 23:15 #
The question is how long we have to wait...
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
29 Oct 2023, 11:47 #
Comment has been deleted
Glownesstock
Glownesstock
03 Nov 2023, 11:52 #
Unpopular opinion: The terrible embodiment of the beautiful Pratchett (and Gaiman)
Neither the first season nor the actors came in (although I love the actors themselves, but not for these roles)
I didn't even watch the second season
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
ramzy
ramzy
06 Nov 2023, 01:56 #
I don't understand why they filmed the second season when the first one was completely finished and didn't require any continuation. And they are also going to rivet the third one. It's good that, taught by bitter experience, I didn't even try to watch the second one
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
alanWWWWWW
alanWWWWWW
07 Nov 2023, 15:25 #
The first one was good, I started watching the second one out of interest, but I reached the end already because of the general entourage. I didn't like the plot a bit.
As they say, I started for health, finished for peace
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
Add a comment:
Ads