Amazon and the BBC plan to renew "Good Omens" for a third season
Deadline's sources report that Amazon Prime Video and the BBC are set to order a third season of the series "Good Omens" starring Michael Sheen and David Tennant. It will reportedly be the final one.
However, on the new series, if the project is still extended, will not work one of the showrunners of the first two seasons — Douglas MacKinnon left the series. MacKinnon himself told about it on social networks, and after the information was confirmed by Neil Gaiman — the second showrunner of "Omen", but both did not disclose the reasons for leaving.
The first season of the project was based on the book of the same name by Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman. It told about the angel Aziraphale and the demon Crowley. They have been living among ordinary people for centuries, doing the work assigned to them. But when the final battle between Heaven and Hell comes, which could destroy humanity, Crowley and Aziraphale unite to prevent the apocalypse.
In the second season, the series went beyond the original book, with all the events revealed in the first installment. In the story, Aziraphale and Crowley, having prevented the apocalypse, return to ordinary life in London's Soho among mere mortals. But one day on their doorstep appears Gabriel, who does not remember who he is.
Discuss this news
I'm glad they won't stretch the series
I'm definitely waiting!
I would tolerate the plot move of a couple of Crowley and Aziraphale, with severe pains in my abdominal cavity, even in the form that was in season 2. I spoke mainly about the obvious consistent pushing of the agenda, which I saw, among other things, due to the excessive abundance in comparison with the first season of LGBT persanages.
How little you know about the people involved in writing fan fiction. These are not always girls and very rarely 13-year-olds. The contingent there is quite adult and adequate. And where among the screenwriters did you see those same girls? Or do you think that only 13 girls find homosexual topics interesting and want to write and shoot something on it?
The agenda is in the eyes of the beholder, not in the product itself. If you took same-sex couples for granted and did not experience negativity in their attitude, believe me, you would either not care or thoughts towards the agenda would not even turn.
P.S. "humanity will not die out, because the absolute majority of normal people" Then it turns out that your fears are groundless? Why then was it necessary to disperse all this tirade about "oh, how bad is it "?)
And if, as you write, "normal" people are the majority, and humanity will not die out, then why are you so offended by the slightest manifestation of something different, in your opinion, from "normality "? Do they interfere with you at work or in your personal life, maybe they harass you? Or do they just exist and it makes you cringe?
Can't have children, but should they? And if same-sex people don't want to? And if the opposite-sexes don't want to? Are you going to force me?
Statistical error?) Well, then there is no trouble. Since we have an absolute majority of people of different sexes, then the number of same-sex people can be neglected! So everything is fine and there is no problem, hooray!
If 2*2=4, it will not be equal to 5, no matter how much you tell us all)
In your opinion, the quality of the series has suffered, in mine it has not. Whose opinion is correct?
There is no primary source for season 2. In the first "there were no reperesentations ", everything is according to the canon. So what we started with is what we came to - the truth is in the eyes of the beholder.
So I think further discussion is pointless, because the movement in a circle and the many repetitions of the same thing do not entertain me.
Once again: we cannot abstract from personal views, because we are discussing your personal view. Discussing a personal opinion, it cannot be abandoned. If you want to abstract, don't continue the dialogue.
Try to prove your point again and again.
You tell me the main thing yourself, I'll read it.
There are polls, and I said it in the same paragraph. But between the lines you don't know how to read whose visibility. I don't dispute the results, why did you decide that.
That's right, both judgments are opinions. Accordingly, you cannot say that abnormality is something indisputable and cannot be questioned. And accordingly, all your assurances that this is not the norm do not make sense
I think we won't discuss it if you haven't even written how you understand it right now.
Who agrees, with whom do you agree?
There was no talk about loyalty of opinions. No, I haven't stopped.
but how, you ask? yes, everything is simple, since they also invented different number systems and within the framework of some of them - and 2 + 2 = 5 maybe, but you need to specify this in advance.
Also in nature, to which you so persistently appeal, there are same-sex couples among animals.
And how are offspring born among same-sex animals there?
Why is everyone who is negatively disposed towards same-sex couples so fixated on natural procreation? Why would a person invent many things that improved and made his life easier if you keep saying that everything with additional help is an anomaly. A person with a pacemaker is an anomaly, let him somehow, there is nothing like that in nature, well, he will die and die, but like in nature. Lost an arm or a leg, crawl, as in nature, there is nothing to count on prostheses. Dental implantation - forget it, nature is not supposed to. Who should consider such people who have taken advantage of the achievements of human progress, also an anomaly?
I am very worried about this series, because the second season had not the same vibe as the first one🥹
I would like a maximum of 1.5-2 years😁🙈
On the other hand, I really don't want the third one to disappoint and slide down. In any case, I am waiting for the return of my favorite duo
I'm definitely waiting!
I eat apples, but I don't really need Apple ads.
With the same success, you can say 'useless fucking comments from you ', but maybe someone likes you, and if there is at least one such person, my statement will already be refuted - this is how evidence works)
Hungry people need food, people need air, I don't need advertising apples.
if a same-sex couple is an advertisement for faggotry, then a pair of m + w is that an advertisement for heterosexuality? And if the children, God forbid, are shown - is this an advertisement for motherhood?) Can I then not show small children in the cinema? - I don't want motherhood to be advertised to me, because nobody fucking needs it, otherwise I'm afraid I'll see enough of children on the screen, and I'll want to start myself :D
I hope to adequately complete the series)
Neither the first season nor the actors came in (although I love the actors themselves, but not for these roles)
I didn't even watch the second season
As they say, I started for health, finished for peace