"The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" will be made into a TV series
Amazon MGM Studios is working on the series "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo", which will be set in the universe of Stieg Larsson's trilogy "Millennium". The project already has a showrunner: it became Veena Sud, who worked on the series "The Killing".
"The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" first became known about the series back in May 2020, but the project was at the earliest stage of development, and since then there has been no news about it. At the time, it was also reported that the upcoming series would be a standalone story about one of the novel's main characters, Lisbeth Salander, but now plot details remain a big secret.
Before that, "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" was screened in Sweden — the first film of the trilogy by Niels Arden Oplev was released in 2009, and in 2011 David Fincher released the American adaptation of the first novel.
Add the TV series "The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo" to your list
Discuss this news
Well, we are waiting for what the Americans will do from a whole story, perhaps even with a 4 book. which Stieg Larsson himself did not have time to finish - The girl who got stuck in the web https://myshows.me/movie/9429/
The very color! I hope that the representatives of the female aerobatic team are immensely happy with this😁
I want to go to the hospital to see a doctor, not a doctor; I study with teachers, not with teachers; I read books by worthy and talented authors, not autorok ...
Why mock the Russian language so much?
By the way, Anglicisms in speech are not as bad as a bunch of parentheses in 2023.
everyone: what to minus, it would be better to try to argue with letters, even if your thought would be stupid, but it would be reasoning, and so degradation is below the level of bonobos (camrt, this is not about you), and they minus on the fan and regardless of whether the comment is positive - there will definitely be a dozen dizs; and I'm not about dislikes under your comments (don't give a shit at all), but about the general trend of site comments
Well, no one is perfect))
Or did you respect the teachers and call the female teachers teachers?
I also don't like the sound of feminitives, but I don't like it even more when people say that in the feminine gender (with suffixes and so on) only people who are not professionals call their profession, since they have time to come up with a separate name for themselves :D
But I, as a girl who worked in the "male " profession (as a programmer), have seen this, especially at uni, while I was studying, especially from older men) when the teachers told us at serious meetings that we entered this profession only because there are a lot of boys here: " Half of you girls will definitely not finish studying, it's clear to everyone why you came here - to find yourself good IT husbands. Therefore, give the boys normal topics for the laboratory, they need to study, and take yourself on the residual principle, you will not work by profession anyway" :D
Well, or when I worked as a sysadmin in one office with other IT guys and managers, and someone who didn't know me came into our office and said something like: there's a problem with the server, can you take a look?, I said OK, I'll take a look", and in response to me: " yeah, but if anything, let the sysadmin take a look" :D)
It's getting much better now, which I'm glad about. Just because there are a lot of girls in IT (programmers, testers), but when I studied (more than 15 years ago) then there were only 4 girls in a group of 30 people. But still girls in IT are not taken seriously enough, and it is still considered that this profession is more for boys.
Well, of course, you had such an Institute... I graduated in 2008, so half of the girls were in our group, we studied for a sysadmin..
We didn't have an institute, but a university) You would have seen it if you had read it more carefully)
I don't understand why this function is needed at all..
and you write "Women are usually less professional"
Everyone has their own observations. I've often seen the guys who are the guys) But in general, yes, it all depends on the person, not on gender, well, also on the position and company. Apparently it was in your environment and in your environment that it happened. The fact that the girls around you were not pros - I sympathize, perhaps they were hired just on the basis of external data and soft skills, and not a prof.qualities, which is also kind of not OK, but who knows.
It's clear that the attitude will depend on how you put yourself and present yourself, but I wrote about stereotypes and people's ideas when I didn't have time to put myself in any way, for example. I understand that it is difficult to perceive this, being a guy, but it rather works in such a way that if a person is a pretty girl, she most often needs to prove to everyone that she is a pro, and if a person is a kind of serious-looking guy, he needs to try harder so that everyone finally notices how much he is fuck off :D
I interviewed, hired and fired both guys and girls, and I will honestly say that girls took it more steadfastly, like "ok, thanks for the valuable comments and for the cooperation ", and in the guys' reaction there were tantrums, and even aggression and demands to talk to the director or higher management, because I'm just the head of the department and I don't fumble for the whole life of the company, and the director should know what valuable personnel the company will lose if I fire him / don't hire him :D
In general, this discussion has gone too far from the original article here.
But by the way, Lisbeth in the book/movie is also a female programmer, so it's funny :D
conversation was about women. And they took them because of the presence of a diploma, not external data. And we had, and still have, a technologist who would put any man behind his belt. Both young and beautiful. And he knows how to answer in case of anything.
By the way, about harrasment, I will tell you that women are no less engaged in it than men. And some even blackmail sex quite frankly.
And what does it have to do with it "it is more comfortable to communicate "? in general, it is more comfortable for me to communicate with men and my best friend is also male, I have always been in men's companies since childhood: I drove a bike, jumped from garages into snowdrifts, played computer games and collected legos. I have never attacked men in my messages and I talk calmly with the guys in this thread, but for some reason we can't get along with you.
I can honestly say that because of certain stereotypes in society, I myself used to suffer from misogyny and even experiencing superiority over stupid girls, because I could hang out with boys on equal terms, fumbled in math and computers and was not interested in girly bullshit.34;. But as I got older, I realized that these are all stereotypes, and women often abuse other women themselves, like you are now, for example. Therefore, I stopped behaving disdainfully towards women and made myself wonderful friends who are just the smartest people and professionals in their professions.
I just don't understand why it hurts you so much if a woman calls herself not a programmer, but a programmer.
If I find myself in a situation where there are two people in the office, and I do not know which of them is the director (no matter what gender), I will just clarify to whom I can address my question. Because I always prefer to ask a clarifying question first, if I don't know something, and then draw conclusions.
Well, your own reactions and conclusions are also proof. For some reason, you have decided everything for me here: you can't bring discrimination here, so you are not interested in thinking for others what they are interested in and what is not - this is not much different from making conclusions about who is in what position without clarification, or who is a pro and who is not.
And I did not say at all that one should be offended if a person is confused with another. For some reason, you turned my words in the other direction altogether.
I was just saying that if a woman likes her profession to have a feminine equivalent word, and if she wants to be called that, what's so terrible about it. At the same time, I even mentioned that I don't really like the sound of it myself, and I don't require you to call me that.
For example, I'm still doing photography, but I don't call myself a photographer, because it doesn't sound very good to my ear, but if someone writes this in their profile, I won't yell that it's terrible, and that's why this girl is a bad photographer. But there is another example - I'm still drawing, and there is an established term (I don't know, maybe it also seems meaningless and discordant to you) - an artist - that's how I can call myself, it's a familiar term, generally accepted, it doesn't trigger the ear of anyone, because it's been used for decades. And as for me, artists are no worse than artists. In short, these are your personal paddocks, since you associate the word with professionalism, and put some restrictions on others in terminology. I still understand if absolutely all professions were called in the masculine gender, and then suddenly, for no reason, they decided to redo the language, but a bunch of words have a variation for both sexes. As far as I understand, you are just annoyed by those that are more "modern".
And when "yat" was cleaned, a lot of people also yelled that without "yat " only plebeians and illiterate write, and "real smart people " will remain true to the canons. The fact that you give an example of a harmonious change of spelling reform - in fact, a law issued by the state (which was opposed by a lot of people, and which was not adopted immediately because of this), and not an independent transformation of the language - also says a lot about your thinking and how that you didn't even bother to check how these "changes" were initially met by the people.
I think further argument is pointless, good luck to you)
Here are some quotes from letters, articles and books of people of that time, so that you do not make unsubstantiated statements without conducting fact-checking:
/// In a letter from Grand Duchess Olga Nikolaevna dated October 17, 1917, there are these words: "How do you like the new spelling? In my opinion, it is surprisingly ugly and stupid"
Article "On the question of old and new orthography" by Archbishop Averky (Taushev): "The letter was given to us by our St. The Orthodox Church, and therefore it is unacceptable, in addition to the Church, to solve spelling issues, arbitrarily recognizing certain letters of our alphabet as "obsolete and "unnecessary"
, Ivan Ilyin called the new spelling "crooked": "This is a clear example of when "simpler" and "easier" means worse, rougher, more primitive, undeveloped, meaningless, or, simply, – blind barbarism. It is much easier to moo a cow than to write Pushkin's poems or to pronounce Cicero's speeches; should we not announce the Russian stacks with a cow's moo?"
And with feminitives, there is just a complication.
"...Thanks to a useful letter, a solid sign!
But it is only now that he has become so quiet, modest and virtuous.
The time has not gone far when not only schoolchildren who were learning to read and write, but all our people literally suffered under the yoke of this letter–robber, the letter-idler and slacker, the letter-parasite.
Then the best linguists wrote about the firm sign with anger and indignation. At that time, passionate defensive speeches were dedicated to him by all those who wished the people darkness, ignorance and oppression. <...>
Already in 1918, the parasite letter experienced what its parasite owners, idlers and robbers of all stripes also experienced: a decisive war was declared against it. Do not think that this war was simple and easy. The people of the old world seized on the meaningless squiggle "b" as their banner. <...>
...Wherever the white army still held out, where generals, manufacturers, bankers and landowners clung to power, the old "ep" acted as their loyal ally. He advanced with Kolchak, retreated with Yudenich, fled with Denikin, and finally, together with Baron Wrangel, disappeared forever into the irrevocable past. So for several long years, this letter played the role of a separator not only inside the word, but also in the gigantic spaces of our country, it divided life and death, light and darkness, the past and the future...".
I didn't call myself an engineer in any message - where did you get this from at all? Did you come up with something yourself again? Or did you already write about me, but about the girl above, but for some reason addressed the message to me, and finally wove the arguments about the authors, engineers and witchers into one confusing illogical tangle?
Well, according to your logic, I could show you the same thing: "is it possible to assume that "ladies ", who has time to show everyone for suffixes and write more than 4000 comments on myshous - there is a normal job?" Based on your words, we can conclude that you are a doctor? "I've seen doctors of any gender and age, they don't have time for such disputes."
In general, you are not saying very logical things and I can subject all these statements of yours to critical analysis, for one simple reason - you present everything you write as infallible truth and speak for everyone around you, and also write not only your own opinion", and allegedly facts that are very easily counter-documented..
But in any case, I have already finished the argument with you, thank you for the fascinating conversation and good luck in business.
Кстати, тоже самое и с жи щи и чу щу. Происходит постепенное упрощение.
I don't encourage everyone to use feminitives. I just wonder why they are so triggering some and they are bursting to ban them? It's just that no opponent of feminitives has yet been able to adequately explain to me what is so terrible about them? Why is no one confused by cleaners, teachers, athletes, poetesses, guides, waitresses, dancers, acrobats, etc., but in other professions that simply do not have a similar female name yet, it's immediately " fucked up what a horror", "why-why" and " it also means that she's a fool, not a professional, since that's what she's called." Or is the reason only in the dissonant suffix?
Просто в языке так сложилось и стало правилом. Я же писал выше, что пока не сложилось в языке, будет выглядеть неправильно и нелепо.
Вот кстати в тему насчёт слова "пидарас". Некоторые геи прямо требуют себя так называть. Якобы происходит реклейминг слова и разрушение негативной семантики. А по факту это не работает, выглядит смешно и уничижительно.
And no, no matter what @ramzy writes above, the author is not always equal to the writer, because the author is a broad term, and it is not always only about books.
In short, my opinion is: who does not like how it sounds, can not use it, I do not like it - I do not use it. But when they start yelling about the fact that this is all a sign of idiocy, stupidity and unprofessionalism - then it becomes interesting to me to discuss whether a person has reason to think so.
Вот интересная статья на эту тему https://vk.com/wall-711_22400
Well, the girl with whom I argued held the same opinion - if a person calls his profession feminine, then this is definitely not a professional. Perhaps it's not specifically about feminitives, but in relation to "femininity, which for some reason is perceived as something pejorative. Well, as I wrote above, I myself was brought up in such an environment: I despised femininity, always wanted to be my boy, asked my friends to call me friend too, because I'm with you on Equals, I'm not some kind of girlfriend, I'm your bro. And now that I'm already very decently grown up, it all seems very interesting to me, this phenomenon is interesting.
and quotes from it:
"When do you think the word leader appeared in the Russian language? With the advent of a new era? Or maybe it was in 1970? Well, or in 1870... Not at all. This feminitive is present in the text of 1670. However, it does not refer to a real woman: "The Most Holy Theotokos is the leader and assistant."
"The dictionary of the Russian language of the XVIII century offers as an interpretation of the ambasadritsa/Issa not only "the ambassador's wife", but also a woman ambassador"!
"Finally, at the beginning of the twentieth century, a wrestler arose, but already as the name of a profession, also, in general, a new one - although the word wrestler itself, of course, is old. The Russian audience was madly carried away at this time by circus wrestling, and not only athletes and strongmen, but also athletes and strongmen began to enter the arena. "Many wrestlers have already received prizes for wrestling in Moscow, Odessa, Sevastopol, Finland and abroad" ("Petersburg leaflet”. 23.05.1907)
Well, as I understand it, a lot of feminitives ceased to be used in Soviet times, when all women also became comrades.)
And yes, sometimes, no matter what they say about professionalism, it is impossible not to indicate the gender of a person, and it does not always work well here just to substitute a first name, surname or verb - because it is also not always euphonious.
Imagine my story: "Oh, yes, surgeon Gevorgyan - she's really super-cool, she's a very competent doctor - performed a top-level operation on me. And while I was waiting in the reception area, a young receptionist brought tea - we need to work harder to correlate all adjectives and verbs by gender.
Or such a phrase as it sounds: " Your terrible incompetent manager, who for some reason cannot do her job properly" - well, damn, the inconsistency of childbirth also hits hard on the ear, that's even better sounds: "Your terrible incompetent manager, who does not work well, because he holds a feminitive position" :D