Ads

"Black Mirror" has been renewed for a seventh season

22 Nov
Toshyak
Production starts at the end of the year.
A still from "Black Mirror."

Variety reported that Netflix has renewed the anthology "Black Mirror" for a seventh season. The previous, sixth, season of the project was released in June, it entered the top 10 Netflix in 92 countries, as well as spent four weeks in the global English-language top of the streaming service.

The cast of the seventh season has not yet been confirmed, but according to Variety, production on the series will begin at the end of the year. Details of the plot and the number of episodes are kept secret, but it is known that the executive producers of the project will again be Charlie Brooker, Annabel Jones, and Jessica Rhodes.

In "Black Mirror", each episode of which tells a different story, the authors ask the question: how does technology, which has changed almost every aspect of our lives in recent years, affect the relationships between people and can be used against them? After all, every plasma screen, monitor, smartphone — a black mirror of human existence in the XXI century.

Add the TV series "Black Mirror" to your list

Discuss this news

weltkindl
weltkindl
PRO
22 Nov 2023, 17:53 #
One of the projects that has been holding the bar since the first season. We are waiting for the continuation! 🔥
Reply
Show
who liked?
+16
FoxMulderalien
FoxMulderalien
PRO
22 Nov 2023, 19:32 #
@weltkindl: every episode has a new plot, and some of them had a very sagging plan
Reply
Show
who liked?
+73
weltkindl
weltkindl
PRO
22 Nov 2023, 19:36 #
@FoxMulderalien: Дело вкуса 🤷‍♀️
Reply
Show
who liked?
+9
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
28 Nov 2023, 01:09 #
@weltkindl: well, objectively, according to estimates, it is even clear that the series does not hold the bar and is sliding... especially season 6.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+15
weltkindl
weltkindl
PRO
28 Nov 2023, 06:34 #
@mavlytovfagiz: How long ago did the assessments stop being subjective? And what specific ratings are you referring to?
Reply
Show
who liked?
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
29 Nov 2023, 22:35 #
@weltkindl: collective rating on a variety of sites cannot be subjective.
Take at least IMDB ratings, at least Myshows.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
weltkindl
weltkindl
PRO
30 Nov 2023, 06:43 #
@mavlytovfagiz: Yeah. Only here my comment was not about the ratings of Myshows and IMDB, but about my personal opinion based on my own ratings. I thought it was clear from my responses to other comments.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
30 Nov 2023, 19:29 #
@mavlytovfagiz: from the sum of something only subjective, something objective cannot appear
Reply
Show
who liked?
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
01 Dec 2023, 18:40 #
@Paketik_chaya: and what kind of knowledge do you consider objective?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
02 Dec 2023, 19:34 #
@mavlytovfagiz: Not amenable to value judgment. And the fact that 150 people negatively evaluated the film, and 4,850 people positively - means that "most liked the film" and not the film turned out to be good." That is, the value judgment of even 5 thousand people remains a value judgment and is not entitled to be called the truth.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
03 Dec 2023, 16:05 #
@Paketik_chaya: give an example of objective non-evaluative judgment in art.
It is very interesting to find out)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
04 Dec 2023, 13:32 #
@mavlytovfagiz: That's what I said, that there is no objectivity.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
05 Dec 2023, 02:31 #
@Paketik_chaya: the estimates themselves may be subjective, but their statistics are objective.
If 4850 people consider a film worthy of a score of 2, and 150 give a score of 5, then the film is statistically objectively considered bad.
If there was no serious outflow of audience on the platform and some series was rated 50,000 people in season 1, and 10,000 in season 6, then the series objectively slipped;
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
05 Dec 2023, 07:00 #
@mavlytovfagiz: what is originally composed of the subjective cannot be objective)
You can have any opinion you want, but I have my own. And what you call statistics is always the usual average. And it shows grades, not quality, which is measured in a completely different way.
Reply
Show
who liked?
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
05 Dec 2023, 18:59 #
@Sachet_chaya: The statistics of a subjective opinion can be objective.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
06 Dec 2023, 08:08 #
@mavlytovfagiz: No, the quality will not come out of the audience's ratings. At least. The quality is evaluated without emotions and impressions. This has weight in the audience's ratings.
Reply
Show
who liked?
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
06 Dec 2023, 19:53 #
@Paketik_chaya: interest can be assessed, and already from interest it is possible to draw conclusions about whether the series has slipped or not.

Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
07 Dec 2023, 12:55 #
@mavlytovfagiz: nevertheless, personal opinion cannot reflect quality. Everyone has their own bar for the label "the rolled-up series".
Reply
Show
who liked?
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
07 Dec 2023, 17:13 #
@Sachet_chaya: I'm not talking about quality, but interest. Everyone has their own bar, but statistically objectively it is possible to assess whether the series has slipped or not according to estimates and the number of ratings.
Reply
Show
who liked?
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
07 Dec 2023, 19:39 #
@mavlytovfagiz: and again, there can be no objective out of the subjective.
Reply
Show
who liked?
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
07 Dec 2023, 19:57 #
@Sachet_chaya: The statistics of a subjective opinion can be objective.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
08 Dec 2023, 07:56 #
@mavlytovfagiz: No. The subjective average is not a lens.
Reply
Show
who liked?
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
10 Dec 2023, 21:27 #
@Paketik_chaya: the statistics themselves are objective.
If 1,000,000 people watch the series and 100,000 of them are rated at 5, and a year later 200,000 viewers are rated at 3, then statistics objectively indicate that the interest of viewers is falling.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
11 Dec 2023, 00:44 #
@mavlytovfagiz: I repeat once again: the sum of subjective assessments will not be objectivity. There are subjective assessments and they always remain subjective, whatever you do with them. This is the like/dislike ratio. And there are objective criteria. This ratio is high-quality /low-quality. And people also evaluate it by these criteria, and this is already subjectivity.

In general, there is no impersonal thing from collecting personal opinions
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
11 Dec 2023, 20:07 #
@Sachet_chaya: The collection of statistics itself can be objective, even a subjective opinion, and objective conclusions can be drawn from these data.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
12 Dec 2023, 17:35 #
@mavlytovfagiz: не может.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
12 Dec 2023, 18:06 #
@Paketik_chaya: the ratings and the number of ratings and views have a statistical feature and the collection of such data may well be objective.
Reply
Show
who liked?
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
12 Dec 2023, 18:21 #
@mavlytovfagiz: Nope. The collection process may be objective, but it does not solve anything. The result remains subjective because it consists of the subjective. And that's kind of what you want to prevent.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
13 Dec 2023, 00:18 #
@Sachet_chaya: here. Having collected objective statistical data of subjective assessments, it is possible to draw objective conclusions about the interest of viewers.

If 1,000,000 people watch the series and 100,000 of them are rated at 5, and a year later 200,000 viewers are rated at 3, then statistics objectively indicate that the interest of viewers is falling.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
13 Dec 2023, 00:41 #
@mavlytovfagiz: but the data is subjective. This means that statistics are subjective = subject to personal opinions. And if it is, then no matter how objective the conclusions are, the data is subjective. Already here, it doesn't fit.

And it all started with quality, not the interest of the audience, you went somewhere to your steppe.
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
13 Dec 2023, 01:11 #
@Sachet_chaya: Statistical data are objective, as they are obtained by collecting statistical signs of subjective assessments and their number.

You were the only one who wrote about the quality, I didn't write about the quality of the series.
And what do you call a high-quality TV series?

We can conclude that the series has slipped or not and the bad or good series is based only on statistical data of audience interest.

If 1,000,000 people watch the series and 100,000 of them are rated at 5, and a year later 200,000 viewers are rated at 3, then statistics objectively indicate that the interest of viewers is falling and the series has slipped, has become worse.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
olekolegovich
olekolegovich
13 Dec 2023, 02:14 #
@mavlytovfagiz: yes, when you have already calmed down both...
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Little_Girle
Little_Girle
PRO
13 Dec 2023, 06:13 #
@olekolegovich: I support it, it seems that we have already gone in the second round) Everything is from the beginning))
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
13 Dec 2023, 08:18 #
@mavlytovfagiz: indeed, as they write above, we are going in the second round. I will not repeat why these data are subjective.

Why are you writing about something else if we're talking about quality? I do not know what I call a high-quality series, there are no general criteria accepted as a standard.

Good - this word refers to those very criteria. This does not follow from the statistics.

So these estimates do not coincide with the criteria)
Unbiased criteria are not estimates on the IMDB, different conclusions follow from them. Sometimes ratings are given without even looking at the product, because of certain facts. Evaluation statistics provide a cross-section of personal opinions. And this inevitably contradicts the conclusions that are drawn based on certain criteria.

In general, there are criteria - the quality is evaluated according to them. The rest is just statistics that do not show quality.
Reply
Show
who liked?
mavlytovfagiz
mavlytovfagiz
PRO
13 Dec 2023, 16:32 #
@Paketik_chaya: you were the only one who wrote about the quality of the series, I didn't write about the quality.
You are using the "straw scarecrow" technique of black rhetoric
Let's leave it at that. I wrote everything I wanted to write.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
13 Dec 2023, 17:07 #
@mavlytovfagiz: I also wrote everything I wanted a long time ago, but you kept saying your own thing. I would like you to analyze the quality of the lowest rated series. Not based on estimates, but based on what is shown. According to the criteria, of course.
Reply
Show
who liked?
myauser
myauser
22 Nov 2023, 19:53 #
@weltkindl: if the fourth was still watchable and contained interesting concepts, then the fifth noticeably sank in quality, and the sixth managed to forget at all
Reply
Show
who liked?
+33
weltkindl
weltkindl
PRO
22 Nov 2023, 20:31 #
@myauser: I won't convince you, everyone has their own. Personally, the sixth season caused me a lot of emotions)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+8
Redopera
Redopera
22 Nov 2023, 18:20 #
In a good way, it would be time for them to release real blackies, as they did before. About robot dogs, a black museum, a burned-out kid, a white Christmas, a game test. Missed you already) I am directly captured by hopelessness and tin in this series
Reply
Show
who liked?
+92
myauser
myauser
22 Nov 2023, 19:55 #
@Redopera: "Playtest" still causes alarm.

A "Metalhead" was so much out of the general tone that it was even remembered in a special way.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+15
Little_Girle
Little_Girle
PRO
24 Nov 2023, 03:25 #
@Redopera: I agree, as they left for Netflix, they began to do happyend all the time...
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
andreyck
andreyck
22 Nov 2023, 18:21 #
Will there be any series about technology?
Reply
Show
who liked?
+52
Bairum
Bairum
22 Nov 2023, 18:27 #
It's time for the Bracker to bail out neural networks. And then the quality of recent seasons has already almost (with rare exceptions) approached the level of chatGPT creativity. And so it will be, and the universe will collapse at the same time from the irony of fate.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+32
Пакетик_чая
Пакетик_чая
24 Nov 2023, 08:09 #
@Bairum: didn't he say that he tried this neural network and the neural network gave him a bad script?)
Reply
Show
who liked?
olekolegovich
olekolegovich
24 Nov 2023, 09:28 #
@Paketik_chaya: apparently, I tried the whole 6th season)
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
fiery_matsu
fiery_matsu
PRO
22 Nov 2023, 18:45 #
High 🥰
I hope it will be released soon and you won't have to wait 2-3 years😅
Reply
Show
who liked?
+12
6o4ka
6o4ka
PRO
22 Nov 2023, 22:45 #
@fiery_matsu: 3 maybe not, but 2 for sure
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Элли-Айс
Элли-Айс
22 Nov 2023, 21:06 #
I wonder what topics will be raised in the new season.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+5
m1stakе
m1stakе
03 Dec 2023, 01:29 #
@Ellie-Ice: Judging by the last season, records, steam engines and vampires are waiting for us at 6.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
br1ella
br1ella
PRO
22 Nov 2023, 21:37 #
I want to believe that it will be better than the last one and correspond to the CHZ, and not just be a set of short films.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+20
6o4ka
6o4ka
PRO
22 Nov 2023, 22:48 #
I don't even know how to take this news.
On the one hand, it's nice that one of the most beloved and epic projects has been extended.
On the other hand, the past season 6 has left some kind of incomprehensible game residue. Episode 2, and especially series 4 and 5 - was that what? Experiments, on whom, on the viewer? I would like to apply another word with the letter E to such trends
Reply
Show
who liked?
+7
Хочу_чипсов
Хочу_чипсов
22 Nov 2023, 23:13 #
Oh, good news

I wonder what will be filmed this season, maybe it will be possible to return the format of the first seasons
Reply
Show
who liked?
+7
blacki3
blacki3
23 Nov 2023, 02:17 #
Season 6 was controversial, I actually liked only 2 episodes + another one with a stretch. But I'm still really looking forward to season 7. I hope the writers will find their inspiration again
Reply
Show
who liked?
+9
gangsta_morda
gangsta_morda
23 Nov 2023, 03:21 #
This is the series that, even if it sags, you write it off to the plot of a particular series, because the next one can blow up. Super news!
Reply
Show
who liked?
+9
UlNECУлНЕК
UlNECУлНЕК
23 Nov 2023, 07:21 #
Great news, I wonder what else the writers have in mind.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Gordey
Gordey
23 Nov 2023, 08:34 #
I wonder what else they will come up with and how far they will go from the idea of the first season :))
Reply
Show
who liked?
+3
NickPaulson
NickPaulson
PRO
23 Nov 2023, 10:37 #
Cool news, it's already interesting what they came up with this time
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
x0m1ak
x0m1ak
PRO
23 Nov 2023, 12:10 #
Should I start watching season 6? And then all hands do not reach. After reading the reviews, the desire disappeared a little
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
andreyck
andreyck
23 Nov 2023, 12:39 #
@x0m1ak: watch the first episode, the rest are not on the subject of the series
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
x0m1ak
x0m1ak
PRO
23 Nov 2023, 12:42 #
@andreyck: thank you, I will)
Reply
Show
who liked?
6o4ka
6o4ka
PRO
23 Nov 2023, 14:28 #
@andreyck: well, 3 can still be attributed with a stretch
Reply
Show
who liked?
-1
andreyck
andreyck
23 Nov 2023, 14:35 #
@6o4ka: really, I forgot about this series
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
6o4ka
6o4ka
PRO
23 Nov 2023, 14:35 #
@andreyck: бывает))
Reply
Show
who liked?
-2
olekolegovich
olekolegovich
24 Nov 2023, 09:30 #
@andreyck: there are all series one way or another on the subject of the series. You may not like them, but it is wrong to say that they are not in the subject.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
andreyck
andreyck
24 Nov 2023, 10:06 #
@olekolegovich: seriously? Maybe you can tell us exactly what the evil of technology is in the second, fourth and fifth series. And something I didn't understand where and what technological progress is there
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Bairum
Bairum
24 Nov 2023, 11:42 #
@andreyck: the second episode of the last season personally reminded me of the very first episode about the Prime minister and the pig. The episode, which for me is actually the personification of the CHZ, despite the landiness. It is not necessary to tell the episode about megatechnologies of the near future. The maniacs had a fetish in the form of videography, because at that time there were no thrash streams as an alternative. In addition, the second episode continues in some ways the theme of the streaming services of the previous episode. I will not defend the rest of the episodes, I remember them poorly and did not particularly like them.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+4
olekolegovich
olekolegovich
25 Nov 2023, 21:44 #
@andreyck: the second is truecreams (streaming services, netflix); the fourth is paparazzi, the Internet; the fifth is television. In general, the fifth can be interpreted as the influence of television on people prone to schizophrenia or other psychos. diseases, but I'm too lazy to describe in detail now.

Well, stop spreading the fake, as if the Black Mirror is necessarily about science fiction and the future, this has not been the case since the first episode of the first season)

The last season, for the most part, did not come to me. But not because of the allegedly incorrect theme of the series, but simply because of the performance.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
andreyck
andreyck
25 Nov 2023, 22:09 #
@olekolegovich: that's where exactly I said that Black Mirror is about fiction and the future? A series about the impact of technology on our lives. How does the parody or mimicry of trukraim in the second series relate to the topic of the impact of technology on human society? Okay, the person above said that this is a kind of trash streams in the offline era, I don't really agree with this, but it can somehow be adjusted to the subject.
Werewolf, well, paparazzi and what? It might as well have been a private detective. That is, all the influence of technology is what people have learned to take pictures of? What thought did the series broadcast?
About the end of the world, I even wonder what chain of thoughts can turn a deal with demons into the influence of television on schizophrenics
Reply
Show
who liked?
olekolegovich
olekolegovich
26 Nov 2023, 12:31 #
@andreyck: the first and second series are about streaming services, this is a relatively recent technology.

Cameras, the Internet, social networks and other things that accompany celebrities are also technologies. "Just shoot me"
A private detective does not work here in any way.

I have an alternative interpretation of the last series. But it is most likely incorrect because of one detail. It's been a few months since I watched it, now I'll try to remember.
We were shown that the mother of the main character suffered from schizophrenia. This is a hereditary disease, the heroine has a predisposition. She also faces constant discrimination because of her nationality, sees the growing popularity of a nationalist politician. All this creates an alarming atmosphere that stimulates the development of schizophrenia. On TV on some channels they constantly talk about nuclear war, which finally finishes the heroine. She switches to a colorful music channel and goes into escapism.
It is also noticeable here that hallucinations develop gradually, first auditory, then visual - also as usually happens with problems with the head.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
andreyck
andreyck
26 Nov 2023, 12:56 #
@olekolegovich: the idea is clear, but it smacks of LNG
Reply
Show
who liked?
olekolegovich
olekolegovich
28 Nov 2023, 09:26 #
@andreyck: yes, it is. As I said, this is hardly an author's version. It breaks about one detail: the demon told the heroine the name of the daughter of the first man killed (whom she hit with a stone under the bridge). But she only heard the name from real people after.
So either she could know her (for example, they have already visited this shoe store), or the demon is real.
Reply
Show
who liked?
VictoriaLev
VictoriaLev
23 Nov 2023, 14:34 #
I'll definitely be waiting. the last season is far from my favorite, but it's still insanely relevant and interesting
Reply
Show
who liked?
+4
UliaChayka
UliaChayka
23 Nov 2023, 14:37 #
This is the best news in such a long time. Current topics are filmed in unusual film adaptations 🤭
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
kiprian_zhurov
kiprian_zhurov
PRO
23 Nov 2023, 17:52 #
Netflix ruined the series
Or the creators have run out of steam, with the move it has become something else
Reply
Show
who liked?
+12
vmonstaa
vmonstaa
25 Nov 2023, 05:10 #
We hope that the new season will still be about technology. Also, it would be great if we touched on the topic of AI more. This year this topic is becoming more and more relevant
Reply
Show
who liked?
+4
olekolegovich
olekolegovich
25 Nov 2023, 21:46 #
@vmonstaa: in the first episode of the last season, the topic of generative neural networks was touched upon)
Reply
Show
who liked?
vmonstaa
vmonstaa
26 Nov 2023, 13:56 #
I know, and this is the only series about technology in this season 🫠
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
RitaSamoilo
RitaSamoilo
PRO
25 Nov 2023, 09:00 #
A very relevant series, I wonder what it will be about. In the sixth season, I didn't understand the series about the werewolf.
Reply
Show
who liked?
+2
Little_Girle
Little_Girle
PRO
03 Dec 2023, 13:15 #
To be honest, I liked the series "American Horror Stories" the last season more than this season of CHZ. There was more of the spirit of the black mirror in the AI than in the black mirror itself😅
Reply
Show
who liked?
+1
Add a comment:
Ads