I have not read Brown's books and am familiar with his work only thanks to previous film adaptations with Hanks. The first episode came out with high quality, Zuckerman got used to the role very well. I wonder how many tubes of foundation (and time!) it took to disguise the tattoos of the antagonist)). If it's true that only three episodes are expected, it would be nice if they were released in one gulp, but no:with
I watched all the film adaptations with Hank and read all the books. Dan Brown writes, of course, tricky with all the clutter of symbolism, but interesting. It is not clear why they decided to make a mini-series, and not a movie as in the previous books.
@vbkb: they were going to make a movie, but then Inferno came out and rushed to film it, it's written about it in the wiki. The lost symbol is considered (and in my opinion, too, I even read it twice on purpose, but again I don't remember what the book is about) the weakest of the Langdon books.
@ElllaDee: I totally agree! I became interested in Brown at the age of 14, having read Angels and Demons, and since then I have been waiting for the release of every book. Although in my opinion, the Origin is a little weak compared to the others. But really, of the Lost Symbol, I only remember the antagonist who tortured himself. Therefore, I support the opinion that the most boring book in the whole series.
@debaucher: You may be right, I read the Lost Symbol more than 10 years ago, and I don't remember much anymore, so I could have confused it. I only remember that I didn't really like the book)
The pilot looks good. Mysteries, riddles, crushers - atmospheric. It's a pity that they release one episode a week, I want to watch everything in one gulp.
After all these years, it's unexpected to see a series about the book by Dan Brown. I remember the book vaguely, but I think I'll refresh my memory after the series. I liked the first episode, but I noticed a detail, as far as I remember Langdon had a Mickey Mouse watch for children, and then I saw the usual classic((
I love Dan Brown's books, but the latest film adaptations leave much to be desired. Here, Peter's 50-year-old sister Catherine was turned into his young daughter for some reason... Apparently, to bring her together with the same young Langdon) Sato is quite pretty, without throat problems) But overall it's nice to watch. Judging by the added episodes, the timing is being stretched, probably there will still be more than three episodes.
@temnoesolnce: I thought the whole episode that there was something wrong with my memory, because I was sure that Catherine was a sister, and here was a daughter!
And that was just WOW. A gun. I love Brown and Hanks movies, it's love, except Inferno, sorry. I waited for the series with special caution, I was afraid of trash, but damn, bow to the showrunners for their courage and quality. It was shot awesome, the intensity was preserved, the atmosphere of Dan's books, a juicy picture, even small details are in place, and the music wonderfully complements, and it's nice that you didn't skimp on the budget. It's like watching a movie, and it's just a pilot! Definitely one of the best new products of this year and overall one of Peacock's coolest projects. It's even a pity that we have to wait for an episode a week now, but it's really worth it. I take deviations from the book absolutely calmly, on the contrary, I am the kind of viewer who even likes when there is an element of unpredictability and the creators add something of their own so as not to repeat the book word for word. So far, there is a solid 5% for the start, I hope that the bar will only be raised further!
I can't say that I'm in any kind of ecstasy. I love Brown's books and when I saw that there would be a series, I immediately prepared myself that there would be fuzziness. I've been reading the book for a long time, but even without remembering all the details, there are things that catch my eye terribly and are a little disappointing. But! Even despite this, it was shot very well. The actors were picked up perfectly, we will see what happens next
In Brown's film adaptations, the main advantage is that you don't read the author's entire language (at first I thought the translations were like that, but no, the original is just as poor), where he doesn't hesitate to copy entire paragraphs from book to book, just changing titles and names. The scenario is normal, the communication of the characters does not make the debilometer go off scale. Atmospheric, the picture is high-quality and juicy, the actor unexpectedly liked him, I had never met him before, he fits perfectly into the role. A good average guy, you can watch.
Well, I can't really say anything yet, because the pilot didn't catch on. But I didn't like the book either, so if I can separate myself from it and perceive the series as an independent work, it will be better. 7 episodes on this topic is a bit much, but I hope that it will really be 7 episodes, and not 7 more episodes later. There are too many questions about Malakh, about his personality. It looks like he's not going to be who he was in the book. I will definitely finish the season, but so far 3/5
I did not expect a masterpiece in advance, but the series pleased me. Quite cheerfully, firmly, but as usual with Brown, we will mix both historical data and faith, and even from above we will season with Freemasonry, conspiracies and other things. I will watch, the actors and actresses are pleasant, the plot is intriguing.)
I found out about the series completely by accident, but I was immediately bribed. Langdon, after the film adaptation of Hanks, seems like such a sucker with long eyelashes, but still the same smart pain in the ass. And I also really liked the character of Nunez, the guard, who breathed out nervously when he was shown alive after the shot.
After the first film adaptation, I stopped watching movies. You can throw stones at me, but you didn't come in with Hanks either. In the format of the series, it may be possible to decently tell the story of *fingers crossed*. While expectations are being met, the series has flown by quickly 👍🤗
@juzzt: I didn't get in with Hanks either, not the type and energy at all. Here is the other extreme - the actor is too young and frail, but at least more cheerful, and thanks for that. I don't understand why they miss such an important aspect, that Langdon is not only smart, but also a strong athletic man.
I don't even know. When reading the books, I had some idea about Langdon's appearance, and it coincided with the type of actor chosen for the role of Langdon in the series (God forbid, not with Hanks, he was passing by at all, and it's unclear how he got there).
I don't want to find fault, because the series has "gone in", but it seems that the character lacks some kind of obsession with his business and the situation in which he got into. This hero is still a little detached.
@juzzt: The British face of the serial actor also seemed to me much more suitable for Langdon. Only in my mind he is still tall, athletic, broad-shouldered - he was engaged in swimming. I like the redhead too)
It's not a bad start. :) Puzzles, chases, dangers... Everything that we love so much. I think the wounded policeman will still play a role in the future.
I love Dan Brown's books and the story in his "scandalous" performance. The sudden series is a real gift to all connoisseurs of the author's work. There is, of course, something to find fault with in the pilot, but somehow I absolutely do not want to do this. Still, first of all, secrets, riddles and fascinating and informative investigations of the main character are important here, and with this, let's hope, the series will not fail until the very last episode inclusive. Who knows, maybe if the project fires (well, or at least does not fail in ratings), then someday they will get to the film adaptations of other books. "Points of deception," for example. 😇
I love Dan Brown. Mystical riddles, interesting stories. Let's see what happens. Langdon's caste is unexpected. I don't know what kind of actor. But it seems to be similar so far))) on Langdon))) In general, the first episode is not bad, I watched it in one go, let's see how it goes, but there are a lot of episodes ... I really didn't like the moment with the cleaner. I don't like it in TV shows at all. When it seems like the cast is not personally familiar to me, but I know the cleaner))) I've seen it a lot in other TV shows. Just a thought, so it means he's not there for nothing. And so it turned out. Ps. I recommend James Rawlins to Brown fans to read. This is generally a dump of the head. Detective, mystery, adventure.. That's who needs to be filmed!!! But it's not fate yet..
@alex31: I read "The Sand Devil" - a fierce pile of riddles, action, mysticism, antiquities, symbolism. To me personally, and at Brown, this compote always seems to be "on the verge", but here it is completely far away. You can recommend it only to those who like Brown "the same cabbage soup, but pour it thicker."
I didn't have enough of an exhibition, somehow we are immediately thrown into the thick of things, as if we are already in the middle of the season at least
We sat, we sat... And then - bang! The film adaptation of the book by Dan Brown. The pilot is interesting. Masons, mysteries, symbols, riddles, craving for secret knowledge... That's all many of us love. I really hope that the series will not let you down.
Well, I don't know, personally, I was more attracted to the film. Perhaps because Tom Hanks looked more harmonious in the role of Langdon. Well, let's see, maybe it will be better from now on
I was just glad to see Rick Gonzalez, and he ended up getting shot. And judging by the fact that only two episodes are listed on IMDB, they shot well.
Otherwise, it's not bad. The new Langdo did not immediately arouse sympathy. And, frankly, by age, he is much more suitable for this role than Grandpa Hanks. I've been listening to the book for a long time, but I remember that there was a lot of action and here-it-turns, and it all ended in a puff, as it often happens with Dan Brown. Let's see how and what will be changed here to avoid this.
I really love Brown's books, but I don't watch the film adaptations. One was enough to discourage myself from doing it) I consider the lost symbol to be the most boring book in the series (or maybe in principle - for me it is somewhere on the same level as the Point of deception) and I do not remember the book at all. But maybe it's for the best - I won't compare it and you can safely look at it in isolation from the book, as a separate work. I specially waited for the release of several episodes and watched it in one gulp. In general, the series is not bad, it's probably worth watching))
I really liked Zuckerman as Langdon. :3 I don't really like film adaptations of other books, for me the film format is too small to reveal Brown's genius, so I don't have much affection for Hanks either. I hope, I hope very much that it will be just as good from now on. 🙏🙏🙏
Мне дико не понравилось начало серии, где на фоне символов, которым придают негативное значение внезапно показывают ок-знак, вы что, шутите? Как потом это шоу воспринимать серьёзно? А эта показная сцена, где главгад избавляется от улик на глазах полиции, и потом даёт им неиллюзорных, ну очень глупо. Это вот этот вот гений-манипулятор, который всё спланировал и вот так палевно попадается? Я понимаю, хотели добавить экшн сцену какую-никакую, но чёж так коряво? Благо за Ленгдоном и его лекциями по разгадыванию всё ещё интересно наблюдать.
@KiraFrog: возможно, но в США просто на волне истерии с Трампом разнёсся фэйк, что этот знак это якобы три шестёрки, ака число зверя, и что его поддерживают правые и его начали удалять даже из некоторых игр. Я просто разочарован, что такая вот непроверенная информация позиционируется на уровне непреложной истины в сериале, причём очень недавней. Считаю, что такому не место в сериале про знающего символога.
Не фанат, но читала все книги Брауна. В принципе, несмотря на то, что они все написаны по одному шаблону (ГГ и вспомогательный персонаж - умная женщина), читать их достаточно интересно (претензия, кстати, не к тому, что женщина "фоновая", а чисто в плане "ну сколько можно, смени пластинку"). Сюжет таких книг у меня вылетает сразу же, после прочтения, так что на этот сериал были большие надежды: "не помню про что, но будет интересно". Не знаю, что пошло не так, но пилот, несмотря на наличие движухи, вышел достаточно скучным. Книги затягивают с первых страниц, а первая серия через 20 минут превратилась в фоновую. Возможно, отчасти тому виной деревянный Лэнгдон. Никакущий, просто. Даже если не сравнивать с Хэнксом.
Вижу экранизацию романа Дэна Брауна - сразу включаю. Пока что бодренько. Даже измененные детали не так в глаза бросаются. Малах красавчик 🥰 Будем смотреть дальше.
Пилот оставил неоднозначное впечатление. Ленгдон слишком молодой получился. И поэтому Кетрин из 50летней сестры, превратилась в дочку Соломона. Не очень они 30летние тянут на учёных того статуса, какими они были в книге. Да и начальник ЦРУ тут слишком красивая и опять таки молодая. Из Закари сделали агента ЦРУ? Это меняет весь характер персонажа. Интересно как тут будет это обыгрываться? Картинка красивая, но очень мало акцента на символах. В Капитолии их такое количество было рассказано в книге, а тут как-то вскользь.
Это просто кощунство!!! Как можно взять и так искаверкать весь смысл??? А про положенный болт на хронологию я вообще молчу. События в книге развиваются после событий Ангелов и Демонов, Кода Да Винчи и Инферно, какой нахрен молодой профессор???... Какая дочь Соломона???... Негодую!!!
Наконец-то единомышленник 🔥 Я думала, только меня раздражает, что все настолько извращено. Я как человек, который прочел книгу на одном дыхании, негодую…. Сестра стала дочерью Малах … обычный парень Ленгдон вообще юный Сато очаровашка Закари наоборот взрослый мужлан Где коллекционные часы с Микки Маусом, в фильмах они были 🥺
I wonder how many markers went to the makeup artists for tattoos)))
Dan Brown writes, of course, tricky with all the clutter of symbolism, but interesting.
It is not clear why they decided to make a mini-series, and not a movie as in the previous books.
But really, of the Lost Symbol, I only remember the antagonist who tortured himself.
Therefore, I support the opinion that the most boring book in the whole series.
"I wear them to take my time and not take life too seriously."
a very sweet and significant detail of Langdon's image 💔💔💔
I've been looking at the whole series - suddenly the dial will be shown and Mickey will be there, but alas (
I've been reading the book for a long time, but even without remembering all the details, there are things that catch my eye terribly and are a little disappointing. But! Even despite this, it was shot very well. The actors were picked up perfectly, we will see what happens next
7 episodes on this topic is a bit much, but I hope that it will really be 7 episodes, and not 7 more episodes later.
There are too many questions about Malakh, about his personality. It looks like he's not going to be who he was in the book.
I will definitely finish the season, but so far 3/5
Langdon, after the film adaptation of Hanks, seems like such a sucker with long eyelashes, but still the same smart pain in the ass. And I also really liked the character of Nunez, the guard, who breathed out nervously when he was shown alive after the shot.
Good, give me more!
In the format of the series, it may be possible to decently tell the story of *fingers crossed*.
While expectations are being met, the series has flown by quickly 👍🤗
I don't want to find fault, because the series has "gone in", but it seems that the character lacks some kind of obsession with his business and the situation in which he got into. This hero is still a little detached.
Ps I really like the red-haired actress 🥰🥰
I like the redhead too)
Langdon's caste is unexpected. I don't know what kind of actor. But it seems to be similar so far))) on Langdon)))
In general, the first episode is not bad, I watched it in one go, let's see how it goes, but there are a lot of episodes ...
I really didn't like the moment with the cleaner. I don't like it in TV shows at all. When it seems like the cast is not personally familiar to me, but I know the cleaner))) I've seen it a lot in other TV shows. Just a thought, so it means he's not there for nothing. And so it turned out.
Ps. I recommend James Rawlins to Brown fans to read. This is generally a dump of the head. Detective, mystery, adventure.. That's who needs to be filmed!!! But it's not fate yet..
Otherwise, it's not bad. The new Langdo did not immediately arouse sympathy. And, frankly, by age, he is much more suitable for this role than Grandpa Hanks.
I've been listening to the book for a long time, but I remember that there was a lot of action and here-it-turns, and it all ended in a puff, as it often happens with Dan Brown. Let's see how and what will be changed here to avoid this.
I consider the lost symbol to be the most boring book in the series (or maybe in principle - for me it is somewhere on the same level as the Point of deception) and I do not remember the book at all. But maybe it's for the best - I won't compare it and you can safely look at it in isolation from the book, as a separate work.
I specially waited for the release of several episodes and watched it in one gulp. In general, the series is not bad, it's probably worth watching))
I hope, I hope very much that it will be just as good from now on. 🙏🙏🙏
Какой приятный актерский состав и в целом сериал атмосферный. Надеюсь, что не станут слишком растягивать
Не знаю, что пошло не так, но пилот, несмотря на наличие движухи, вышел достаточно скучным. Книги затягивают с первых страниц, а первая серия через 20 минут превратилась в фоновую.
Возможно, отчасти тому виной деревянный Лэнгдон. Никакущий, просто. Даже если не сравнивать с Хэнксом.
Основная сюжетная линия и финал очень слабые.
Начало пошло бодро и сразу с головой без разведения соплей.
Смотрим дальше!
Пока что бодренько. Даже измененные детали не так в глаза бросаются. Малах красавчик 🥰
Будем смотреть дальше.
Ленгдон слишком молодой получился. И поэтому Кетрин из 50летней сестры, превратилась в дочку Соломона. Не очень они 30летние тянут на учёных того статуса, какими они были в книге.
Да и начальник ЦРУ тут слишком красивая и опять таки молодая.
Из Закари сделали агента ЦРУ? Это меняет весь характер персонажа. Интересно как тут будет это обыгрываться?
Картинка красивая, но очень мало акцента на символах. В Капитолии их такое количество было рассказано в книге, а тут как-то вскользь.
Как можно взять и так искаверкать весь смысл???
А про положенный болт на хронологию я вообще молчу.
События в книге развиваются после событий Ангелов и Демонов, Кода Да Винчи и Инферно, какой нахрен молодой профессор???...
Какая дочь Соломона???...
Негодую!!!
Я думала, только меня раздражает, что все настолько извращено.
Я как человек, который прочел книгу на одном дыхании, негодую….
Сестра стала дочерью
Малах … обычный парень
Ленгдон вообще юный
Сато очаровашка
Закари наоборот взрослый мужлан
Где коллекционные часы с Микки Маусом, в фильмах они были 🥺
Начала новый сериал, посмотрим как он меня зацепит🤪