s01e24 — The Final Arrow
My rating
3.357
MyShows(112)
| Duration: | 22 min. |
| Released: | 24.03.202224.03.2022 06:00 |
| Watched by: | 76833.97% |
Subscription
Ads
Sign In
My shows
My movies
Calendar
Friends
Favorites
Recommendations
Ads
Best TV show tracker © 2024 18+
en
Ads
Fin! And that's it!
Now there will be a lot of tedious, partly stupid arguments, you can take a downside. But suddenly I'll find like-minded people)
In fact, the new god did not have any profound ideas. They didn't show it. But he has the knowledge of the previous god. It's a shame. Yes, if we started "into philosophy", then it would be better to show more of the "divine world".
Nass is special, but naive, clearly not a higher mind, at least the author clearly did not give hints about her intelligence.
There were no obvious hints from the author about the "creators" of the Nass, whether there is anyone higher. These inscriptions at the end could have been anyone's. It's like they forgot to reveal this line or let their fantasies run wild, but somehow it's too vague, which doesn't even look like a hint. Like, make up your own story, and I'll sit on the sidelines.
The ending from this author is expected, well, he does not know how to be positive. I tried to get away from angst, who was in the "notebook", because Angst is now like mushrooms made by competitors. There is no Angst. Even in the last episode, but it's not positive either, and I love the positive. That's the kind of subjectivism.
I was afraid all the time that one of the characters I liked would get killed. I'm glad that a couple of policemen with a cat at least lived to the end, at least all at once and together. Well, I don't like it when good secondary Persians are dramatically killed.
The professor didn't say anything original either. Maybe I'm already so full of knowledge of philosophy, both my own and others' (which is unlikely) that for me these statements seem ordinary, but I am more inclined to believe that the title was not taken out.
The same Matrix, I'm sorry, was incredibly admired at the time, even though I watched it at the age of 10. When you think about this really interesting topic as a child, and then it turns out that you are not the only one thinking about it! This is both frightening and seems to bring the probability of your thoughts closer to reality. Well, or it proves that all people really just think the same way and cannot go beyond a certain pattern, even talking about new dimensions, the Cayley procedure, preons, new galaxies and connections ...
And then the creators of this masterpiece suddenly change their gender... Not to say that I am zealously against it, but this is a good indicator of how people do not meet your expectations and are not perfect in principle)
By the way, about the professor's idea that humanity will achieve immortality and self-heal. It just finished me off. He put forward only 1 single option for the development of mankind into immortality. And then immediately find out the future for him. How linear, awesome. Lazy people. They added, at least for the sake of decency, Dr. Strange or something. Only instead of "I looked at 14000605 options for the future" I could say that I calculated. Not much)
Well, he was pleased with the statements that he did not need people. What kind of robot is this, I wonder? And anyway. You see, he regretted that he had talked to this policeman at the time. Don't you know what a statistical error is?
In any case, any person who denies the desire to communicate has problems with communication and suffers without communication. And it is not necessary that communication should be positive. Many people on the Internet arrange sacks in the comments. These people also need communication. And there is no positive smell here. People who are true introverts just have one closest person as a rule, and the loneliest most often turn out to be mega sociable people.
All exceptions fall under a serious diagnosis in psychiatry. Categorically? Yes. Can I write something at the bottom in the style: "I don't need people, and I'm normal," but for some reason you will answer me))