I finished it. I love Germanica's "School" and a short course of a happy life. This work, in my opinion, is frankly weak. I didn't like the way Kozlov played. It was infuriating that whenever flashbacks were shown, they wrote "a month ago" on the full screen. The scene in the club is 3 times per episode, and this inscription every time. Damn, well, the audience is not so stupid, you don't need to be reminded of this every scene! The arch with the son of the hero Kozlov is not closed from the word at all. The arch with the student in love with the teacher is closed with a stretch. The rape scene is not plausibly filmed, imho. I didn't like Stotskaya. The final did not put the squeeze on.
On the plus side, I really liked the game of Svetlana Ivanova, and indeed the entire cast, except for the above, well done. The script is not bad, the first 3 episodes were good, but then somehow everything went downhill. It's great that such topics are raised in our cinema, I liked the way bullying, misogyny and sexism are shown in all their glory. But this is rather a plus for the screenwriters. Allochka Mikheev is the most sorry of all.
I risk earning cons, but I will write. In my opinion, Germanica, as a director, has not grown, but has degraded. Her "corporate identity"- this is something in between Dogma 95 and macumentary, and it implies a certain naturalness. When in episode 1, the heroine of the Dream catches ecstasy a second after intercourse, and the heroine of Ivanova ends up masturbating after 5 seconds, I'm sorry, I don't believe it. Ivanova's fake breasts also look unrealistic from the word at all. I didn't like the soundtrack from so-tok. In my opinion, this is a series at the level of the 1st year of the directing faculty, no more.
@evil_pentagram: And what didn't you like about Kozlov? In my opinion, it is very organic, as in life, without stretching it. The arch with his son is closed, in my opinion, Kozlov was worried if they were putting innocent people in jail, because he felt that there was nothing on the yacht, but he was satisfied with what she told him. Is the rape scene implausible?! In my opinion, very much so... I agree about Germanica, as far as I'm concerned, she's lost...
At times, in my opinion, Kozlov speaks in very learned phrases. Especially for the last episode. I'll make a reservation, I think Kozlov himself is a very cool guy, and I agree that he fit into this project. But I got the impression that in some places he just remembers the text.
According to the Arch with his son - in a conversation with the heroine Snatkina, Kozlov's hero makes it clear that his son could be guilty. In the finale, he tells the heroine Ivanova that he does not distinguish the color of the sea. Which makes it clear that Kozlov's character cannot distinguish truth from lies. Therefore, he decides to score and start a new life. And that's about it. What conclusion did he draw from the whole story? Is the son guilty, not guilty? Therefore, I do not think that this arch is closed. A little more timing to reveal this line and everything would be OK. There is such an emphasis on this part that I, as a spectator, was not satisfied with this arch.
The rape scene- well, there was no violence shown as such, only naked butts. Again, taking into account the corporate identity of Germanica, in my opinion, it did not put the squeeze on. (I'm not at all eager to watch poor girls being bullied, but the scene is weak).
@evil_pentagram: I considered his reasoning about the color of the sea as something that, regardless of the age of the incident, the consequences of the tragedy remained. Agreeing that yes, these ... ahem, comrades, deserve punishment, because it doesn't matter 5 years ago or now - they did it and the consequences for women have not gone anywhere and will not go away, it left a mark in their lives.
@de_javu: Kozlov's problem "as in life" is precisely that he seems to speak in life, from this asso with Skipsky. Although I can't say that I'm definitely against him in the series.
@evil_pentagram: you are confusing in detail and plausibly. The survival game is about something else and victims are less likely to watch it as a revenge movie. And there was no reason to injure even more. It seems like you're just not too empathetic and of the wrong gender.But for other claims, I would rather agree, about Germanics, for example. Perhaps she earned money, and directors have such projects, there is not enough author's handwriting here.
Listen, I've already argued a lot about Kozlov here, so I won't pour from empty to empty. Kozlov is simply not an actor. This is a fact. It's cool that someone got his image, the game, and in general, it's great that he's developing, respect for such guys. This trick of Germanics (and not only) is to take people from the sphere of showbiz, or from TV and shoot in their projects, sometimes it works. It probably didn't work for me here.
So a poorly shot scene indicates that Valeria wanted to protect the victims of violence who decided to watch her creation? The version is working, but it's hard to believe. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar. There are a lot of joints in addition to this scene. I am a woman, and I have been harassed by men (like every 2 women in Russia). Yes, fortunately it did not come to violence. And it doesn't stop me from watching movies, in this case, just because everything is done very clumsily here. If the plot bet is on such a finale, then it should be done normally. My empathy has nothing to do with it. These are movies, props, fictional people and images. I am very sorry for everyone who has experienced violence to one degree or another (not only women, by the way), but it is not necessary to diagnose empathy, we are not in the office of a psychotherapist, and everyone here evaluates the series based on personal preferences. For me, it was a good start here, and then everything went to hell, and it became an absolutely gray passing project. Including because of the under-compressed scenes.
@evil_pentagram: just note that it was only you who was prevented. And you just throw around loud words about a poorly filmed and improbable one. Although, in fact, out of so many messages a year long, I never saw anything but did not put the squeeze on. Although this is a very subjective topic. Often a whisper is louder than a scream, etc. Well, that is, you are talking about Dogma and it seems that you should understand everything yourself. Again, Dogville or Dancing in the Dark. The version seems plausible to me, because this is a sample of rap revenge, and the emphasis in this is usually on the second part. Moreover, one day a conversation on this topic came up in the company and it turned out that absolutely everyone was subjected to this. Perhaps many people don't speak like gg after the first case. Obviously, many less serious series are taken to heart and more clumsily made. So in contrast, your exceptional case seems less empathetic. In my opinion, regardless of the method of showing, awareness of the enormity of the problem no longer gives reason to talk and think about not putting the squeeze on. This does not mean that you never sympathize with anyone in your life. Of course, we are not in the office and this is exclusively a "diagnosis by autarky", or rather an opinion on comments and a contrasting position, I do not pretend to be the truth, it says "it looks like and is not too empathetic." If you are really sure that you are too empathetic, then there are two options: it is really possible to have more in life, or not to notice the contrast with the rest of the audience. In the same way, I was surprised by the digging in your direction about the arches.
Look, well, that's the thing, it's pure subjectivism. Yes, the viewers of myshous did not support me. Or maybe someone, in principle, did not watch this series, and someone does not write comments. And on the other portal, on the contrary, there are opposite opinions. Well, it happens)
So I noted on the plus side that it's great that such topics are being raised, and TV series are being filmed, and if it were the work, conditionally, of a novice director, I wouldn't write a bad word (maybe :). But again, knowing the author's work, for me it is a very passing story made on my knee. Most of the viewers at the lighthouse, apparently, liked it, I'm very happy for them! But my opinion is this, I have every right to it, as well as the opinion of others, to disagree with it.
As for my empathy, I think I'm quite empathic, and it's quite easy to bring me to tears with some snotty plot. But I perceive cinema in three directions: history, visual, acting. That is, if the plot is not very strong, but there is a beautiful picture, some camera tricks, a color palette, etc., I do not pay attention to the plot holes. And vice versa: if the visual is simple, but the plot is for a rupture of the aorta, then fuck it, it's not a perfect picture. Well, if the plot didn't go in, and the picture is nothing, then the acting doesn't matter anymore. Here, returning to my comments, the story is good in fact, but as a fan of getting carried away with arches, I cannot forgive their non-closure :))+ the series went into decline after 3 episodes, but it should be the other way around. Visual- again, we shake the camera twenty-five times, while we cannot make plausible details in the frame. Acting - I wrote all about it above. That's how it is with me, and we didn't match up with the audience of this series. Someone was touched by the story to the depths of their soul, someone watched and got high for the sake of Allochka Mikheeva, someone liked the dialogues. Someone was moved, someone was not. etc. etc. Well, super! I don't want to convince anyone and force them to agree with their opinion, but I don't think it's wrong either. Few people like the movies that I love. What can you do about it)And it's cool that everyone has different tastes, otherwise we would hardly be sitting on this portal and bypassing each other :)
I really want to mention the game of Alla Mikheeva, which I personally used to see in a completely different role, more humorous. And there's such a drama here and she handled it well. The final scenes at the bridge to the soundtrack of Alla goosebumps.
And the phrase about the color of the sea caught on. Deep.
How disgusting these men are. And this Maxim is like a calf, there has never even been an impulse to stand up for the girls, even the thought that what is happening is abnormal.I still did not understand why the line was with the son of the investigator, as a result, it was not really disclosed at all, I was waiting for the girl who allegedly slandered with an apology, or vice versa confirmation that there was violence. At the end there is only a vague phrase about the sea, sit and think about what the trace said it to.
@m_safronova: либо к тому, что никого не насиловал, а жить, когда тебя обвиняют тяжело. К тому, что море синее. И правду узнать и различить, как и цвет, теперь уже, очень сложно.
Я переживала после прошлой серии, что финал меня разочарует. Рада, что их осудили: пусть не в этом эпизоде, но они виновны. А сколько жизней Доринов покалечил.. Кст не думаю, что он вообще когда-то осознает свою вину
Понравились Козлов, его экранная жена и Голубкина. И такса))
Твист максимально слабый и подан плохо. Почему 5 лет назад сёрфер тупо ушёл с места преступления — он не понял, что ли, что происходит?
Школьники играют плохо и не особо были нужны. Из Москвы уезжать из-за романа с учеником? Ну такое. Не особо правдоподобный сценарий, т.к. город большой, могла бы другую работу найти (а сценаристы — более вескую причину возвращения).
Хотелось бы посмотреть на то, что произошло с сыном Козлова. Хочу теперь сериал про него. Даешь российский ремейк True Detective с Козловым и Брейтенбихером!
@Djigman: Главный твист не в этом, а в том что изнасилования по которому ведется дело не было на самом деле. Остальные сцены из прошлого далее уже описывают причину по которой Анна все это устроила, ее мотивацию.
Если ты преподаёшь в Москве и у тебя был/есть роман с учеником, то считай в Москве и ближайшем МО ты работать не сможешь, потому что все все знают. Это родители учеников могут не знать, а вот дирекция/заучи/учителя все знают про такие вот романы
@la_chispa: это как технически осуществляется? если не попадает в соц сеть работала например учительницей в Новокосино, а переехала в Кунцево, люди из разных уголков Москвы физически друг с другом не контактируют (очень малая вероятность), людей много, школ много
@la_chispa: мне не везло, в том плане что я не учительница) но знаю много людей которые в принципе особо за пределы своего района (+ три-четыре станции метро по ветке), не очень перемещаются, и если в соц сети не попадет, то никто не прознает. Вероятность "не повезло" все таки есть, когда кто то по аналогии вдруг переедет в другой район (как учитель, так и ученики-родители) и тогда быстро разнесется. Или есть знакомые и там и там
Но с Мо, с учетом ее размеров, и густонаселенностью, вероятность мала очень. Но все это вероятно через соц сеть, пост-сталкеринг человека в вк и инсте, затем "всем рассказать"
@satanoid_dog: девушки должны были в клубе сидеть книжки читать под чашку чая, чтобы всё так не случилось?
Если девушка выпила и вешается парню на шею, это конечно даёт мужику право увезти её подальше и жёстко нагнуть на столе. Ну камон, их поведение вообще ни на что не должно было намекать.
@satanoid_dog: так девушки же с друзьями поехали просто веселиться, в компании, причем один из этих друзей встречался с героиней Снаткиной, уже в последнюю очередь будешь ожидать нападения от парня подруги да еще и в ее присутсвии
@dinka_sm: не уверена насчёт нападения. Мне парень подруги говорил, что у меня самые красивые ноги, что он видел и тд, так что отношения с подругой не всегда гарант, что не положат глаз, а там может и что похуже.
Сеариал вызвал именно те эмоции, какие я от него и ожидала. Справедливость восторжествовала, наказание пришло к тем, кто его заслужил. Таким "друзьям" нельзя было спустить все с рук
Финал не разочаровал... Вся серия в напряжении... Сериал очень понравился, не смотря на тему которую он затрагивает... Думаю, что Анна винила себя в том, что ничего не сделала в первый раз... И решила исправить свою ошибку... И хочется отметить игру гг... Пробрало до мурашек...
Аллочку весьма не привычно было наблюдать в такой роли, на подсознательном уровне я всё ждал от неё какого нибудь выверта и поведения как в "Урганте". Молодец - растёт. Иванова тоже радует, чем то похожа на бывшую))
Светлана Иванова, как обычно, играет очень хорошо, реалистично. От Аллы Михеевой не ожидала такой глубины и драматургии. Очень неплохой актерский состав, хотя Стоцкой я не поверила, как говорится не дожала. Такие темы стоит подымать, к сожалению, наше общество считает, что именно жертва провоцирует преступника и сама виновата в таких ситуациях, и лучше промолчать, не подымать шум....
Никого не удивило, что после того случая они 5 (ПЯТЬ!!!) лет "дружили" той же компанией? Две жертвы насилия, два насильника, один свидетель насилия(+бывший парень жертвы), и жена насильника (+"подруга" изнасилованной ее мужем) . С такими друзьями врагов не надо.
@Tatoshchik: вот после сцены в заброшенном лагере сразу подумала об этом. Зачем было после произошедшего 5 лет назад сохранять эту "дружбу?" Что это бл за друзья такие... Как-то странно и неправдоподобно
@Tatoshchik: а еще Михеева говорила, что не может общаться со Снаткиной без Ивановой. Видимо, всё-таки не так легко было, хотя и на Иванову есть за что обижаться, но все же общее горе и не родство с насильниками сильнее.более странно, что именно после второго насилия суицид. Понимаю депрессию, но по мне несколько натянуто, киношно.
@Googlee: по-моему как раз понятно, после первого эпизода они разделили всю боль с Анной, поддержали друг друга. А вот после второго помочь Алине было уже некому.
Весь сериал, как гадание на ромашке: Аня врет, нет, не врет, нет, врет. И наконец финал, который не разочаровывает (наконец-то), и дает пояснение. Сначала показана одна сторона Ани, потом другая, и это действительно интересно наблюдать, будто слои отпадают, чтобы обнажить суть. Фемида прозрела и, пусть с отстрочкой, но наказала ублюдков. Плюс наконец становятся понятны некоторые мотивы героев: почему Ане нравятся школьники, почему Катя бухает, почему Алина так поступила. Безусловно, очень жаль Алину, что никто не помог, не понял..
Всегда поражала такая "дружба" женская, как у Ани и Кати. На чем это все базируется - не понятно. Одни оскорбления, косые взгляды и недоверие. Сперва ты клеишься к мужику "подруги", затем он тебя насилует, а после вы делаете вид, как будто все норм. На мой взгляд, это отвратительно. А ведь можно было всего этого избежать, просто вычеркнув этих "друзей" из своей жизни и действовать сообща с Алиной против них, как просила ее мать.
Сериал понравился, на мой взгляд все более чем раскрыто, понятно, все логично, все получили по заслугам. Сюжет конечно "все как в жизни", однако, очень хотелось бы, чтобы в реальной жизни такой грязи было как можно меньше.
@_Obscene_show: она все же не клеилась,а пыталась проучить/вызывать ревность. Если бы реально опасалась и знала на что способен. .. а делать вид что норм один из вариантов психзащиты, вывозить статус жертвы и переживать тяжелее многим
Сейчас дошло, почему Аня встала и ушла, когда на группе поддержки девушка стала извиняться перед ней и говорить, что это из-за нее произошло с Аней. А по сути наоборот. Сколько жизней искалечено потому, что его тогда не посадили…
Самый прикол, что здесь сыграл Козлов. Тот самый Козлов, который затыкал рты журналистам и разруливал скандалы с обвинениями в изнасилованиях и домогательствах в сторону Скифского и Друзя. Видимо, решил, что снимется в положительной роли на эту тему и тем самым обелит себя. Но козёл он и останется козлом.
Сериал удивил. Показал изнанку таких историй, где принято молчать, потому что "сама виновата", потому что стыдно, потому что бесполезно пытаться кого-то наказать и женщины живут с этой болью внутри. Теперь понятно, почему брат Кати сказал, что он виноват. Он всё видел, всё понимал и ушел, смотря как друг который парень сестры насилует его девушку. Жесть. Со школьниками действительно стало всё понятно, безопасные мальчики после такой травмы, которую сама Аня пыталась отрицать при событиях 5 летней давности, что сами пили, сами поехали, всё сами, а то что не хотели, ну... Алину очень жаль, Михеева великолепно сыграла всю драму персонажа, как её окончательно сломило повторение травмы, что вся жизнь потеряла смысл. Получается на полиграфе Ане не врала.
И интересно, Аня рассказала Кате о событиях 5летней давности, или Катя с братом сами решили свидетельствовать в защиту жертв?🤔 Ну и самый мерзкий персонаж, попытались немного объяснить его мотивы, что отец ради секса с разными женщинами плохо обращался с сыном, отсюда у него такое отношение и пренебрежение и жестокость, но как-то совсем не тронуло. И его нянька для отца какая то отбитая, что "верю, утешу, уеду с вами", как эти фанатки, которые выходят замуж за маньяков😐
Surprisingly, I liked the series, I swallowed the whole season in an evening. They twisted it well, until the last there were doubts whether there was a rape or not. And there was a contradictory impression about Anya until the last one. An ambiguous character. But it's good that it is. It makes you think and dig further into the problem of such rapes. Unconditionally positive characters certainly cause pity. And it is deserved. But just a step aside and that's it, the victim is to blame, provoked, and therefore wanted and deserved. The series reveals this issue well.
I watched the series for the evening. The theme of violence, victims, society, rapists and police actions are shown plausibly. Golubkina played very naturally, as did Kozlov. For example, when Katya came to him at the very beginning, and he told her that it was just difficult for her to accept that a loved one could do such a thing. The stories of the other victims were touching. When the taxi driver's wife cried, saying that everyone who told her had divorced, how scared she was. And, probably, some basic understanding of psychology and motives is needed for viewing. When Anya was shown from an ambiguous side a couple of episodes ago, I had no doubt that this was a consequence of the injury. We knew that she was dating Katya's brother and was completely normal. If suddenly the behavior changed so much, then there was a reason... it was interesting to look at the reaction of the mothers separately. Alina's mother understood everything at once. I wanted to help the girls. It's a pity that I didn't take Alina to a specialist to work on the injury... I just didn't know it was necessary. And it was also interesting that at first Alina was shown as if she were some kind of simpleton, stupid. But in fact, absolutely not! It feels like we were looking at her through the eyes of men. In the last episode, I felt so sorry for her. That's right very much. Anya's mother was at first completely at a loss, but eventually supported her daughter. And, of course, the conversation between Anya and the investigator. The rapists didn't even realize that they had ruined the girls' lives. The attitude is worse than the thing. And what's the big deal, just forget it. She hung herself. Big deal, what nonsense. And the same attitude can be traced from almost all the characters who hear about violence. A complete lack of empathy for everyone! Someone else more or less saw the light, but the rest, and especially the rapists, did not understand anything. I'm sure Belov's hero did not understand why he was imprisoned for 4 years.
On the plus side, I really liked the game of Svetlana Ivanova, and indeed the entire cast, except for the above, well done.
The script is not bad, the first 3 episodes were good, but then somehow everything went downhill. It's great that such topics are raised in our cinema, I liked the way bullying, misogyny and sexism are shown in all their glory. But this is rather a plus for the screenwriters. Allochka Mikheev is the most sorry of all.
I risk earning cons, but I will write. In my opinion, Germanica, as a director, has not grown, but has degraded. Her "corporate identity"- this is something in between Dogma 95 and macumentary, and it implies a certain naturalness. When in episode 1, the heroine of the Dream catches ecstasy a second after intercourse, and the heroine of Ivanova ends up masturbating after 5 seconds, I'm sorry, I don't believe it. Ivanova's fake breasts also look unrealistic from the word at all. I didn't like the soundtrack from so-tok. In my opinion, this is a series at the level of the 1st year of the directing faculty, no more.
According to the Arch with his son - in a conversation with the heroine Snatkina, Kozlov's hero makes it clear that his son could be guilty. In the finale, he tells the heroine Ivanova that he does not distinguish the color of the sea. Which makes it clear that Kozlov's character cannot distinguish truth from lies. Therefore, he decides to score and start a new life. And that's about it. What conclusion did he draw from the whole story? Is the son guilty, not guilty? Therefore, I do not think that this arch is closed. A little more timing to reveal this line and everything would be OK. There is such an emphasis on this part that I, as a spectator, was not satisfied with this arch.
The rape scene- well, there was no violence shown as such, only naked butts. Again, taking into account the corporate identity of Germanica, in my opinion, it did not put the squeeze on. (I'm not at all eager to watch poor girls being bullied, but the scene is weak).
So I noted on the plus side that it's great that such topics are being raised, and TV series are being filmed, and if it were the work, conditionally, of a novice director, I wouldn't write a bad word (maybe :). But again, knowing the author's work, for me it is a very passing story made on my knee. Most of the viewers at the lighthouse, apparently, liked it, I'm very happy for them! But my opinion is this, I have every right to it, as well as the opinion of others, to disagree with it.
As for my empathy, I think I'm quite empathic, and it's quite easy to bring me to tears with some snotty plot. But I perceive cinema in three directions: history, visual, acting. That is, if the plot is not very strong, but there is a beautiful picture, some camera tricks, a color palette, etc., I do not pay attention to the plot holes. And vice versa: if the visual is simple, but the plot is for a rupture of the aorta, then fuck it, it's not a perfect picture. Well, if the plot didn't go in, and the picture is nothing, then the acting doesn't matter anymore.
Here, returning to my comments, the story is good in fact, but as a fan of getting carried away with arches, I cannot forgive their non-closure :))+ the series went into decline after 3 episodes, but it should be the other way around. Visual- again, we shake the camera twenty-five times, while we cannot make plausible details in the frame. Acting - I wrote all about it above.
That's how it is with me, and we didn't match up with the audience of this series. Someone was touched by the story to the depths of their soul, someone watched and got high for the sake of Allochka Mikheeva, someone liked the dialogues. Someone was moved, someone was not. etc. etc. Well, super! I don't want to convince anyone and force them to agree with their opinion, but I don't think it's wrong either. Few people like the movies that I love. What can you do about it)And it's cool that everyone has different tastes, otherwise we would hardly be sitting on this portal and bypassing each other :)
And the phrase about the color of the sea caught on. Deep.
Very rarely are you satisfied with the actors' performance, Kion makes high-quality content once again, thank you.
Твист максимально слабый и подан плохо. Почему 5 лет назад сёрфер тупо ушёл с места преступления — он не понял, что ли, что происходит?
Школьники играют плохо и не особо были нужны. Из Москвы уезжать из-за романа с учеником? Ну такое. Не особо правдоподобный сценарий, т.к. город большой, могла бы другую работу найти (а сценаристы — более вескую причину возвращения).
Хотелось бы посмотреть на то, что произошло с сыном Козлова. Хочу теперь сериал про него. Даешь российский ремейк True Detective с Козловым и Брейтенбихером!
работала например учительницей в Новокосино, а переехала в Кунцево, люди из разных уголков Москвы физически друг с другом не контактируют (очень малая вероятность), людей много, школ много
Но с Мо, с учетом ее размеров, и густонаселенностью, вероятность мала очень. Но все это вероятно через соц сеть, пост-сталкеринг человека в вк и инсте, затем "всем рассказать"
Если девушка выпила и вешается парню на шею, это конечно даёт мужику право увезти её подальше и жёстко нагнуть на столе. Ну камон, их поведение вообще ни на что не должно было намекать.
Думаю, что Анна винила себя в том, что ничего не сделала в первый раз... И решила исправить свою ошибку...
И хочется отметить игру гг... Пробрало до мурашек...
Иванова тоже радует, чем то похожа на бывшую))
Фемида прозрела и, пусть с отстрочкой, но наказала ублюдков.
Плюс наконец становятся понятны некоторые мотивы героев: почему Ане нравятся школьники, почему Катя бухает, почему Алина так поступила. Безусловно, очень жаль Алину, что никто не помог, не понял..
Сперва ты клеишься к мужику "подруги", затем он тебя насилует, а после вы делаете вид, как будто все норм. На мой взгляд, это отвратительно.
А ведь можно было всего этого избежать, просто вычеркнув этих "друзей" из своей жизни и действовать сообща с Алиной против них, как просила ее мать.
Сериал понравился, на мой взгляд все более чем раскрыто, понятно, все логично, все получили по заслугам. Сюжет конечно "все как в жизни", однако, очень хотелось бы, чтобы в реальной жизни такой грязи было как можно меньше.
Сериал неплохой получился. Актеры все сыграли отлично.
Теперь понятно, почему брат Кати сказал, что он виноват. Он всё видел, всё понимал и ушел, смотря как друг который парень сестры насилует его девушку. Жесть.
Со школьниками действительно стало всё понятно, безопасные мальчики после такой травмы, которую сама Аня пыталась отрицать при событиях 5 летней давности, что сами пили, сами поехали, всё сами, а то что не хотели, ну...
Алину очень жаль, Михеева великолепно сыграла всю драму персонажа, как её окончательно сломило повторение травмы, что вся жизнь потеряла смысл.
Получается на полиграфе Ане не врала.
Ну и самый мерзкий персонаж, попытались немного объяснить его мотивы, что отец ради секса с разными женщинами плохо обращался с сыном, отсюда у него такое отношение и пренебрежение и жестокость, но как-то совсем не тронуло. И его нянька для отца какая то отбитая, что "верю, утешу, уеду с вами", как эти фанатки, которые выходят замуж за маньяков😐
I didn't regret the time I spent. It clings to the soul.
Golubkina played very naturally, as did Kozlov. For example, when Katya came to him at the very beginning, and he told her that it was just difficult for her to accept that a loved one could do such a thing.
The stories of the other victims were touching. When the taxi driver's wife cried, saying that everyone who told her had divorced, how scared she was.
And, probably, some basic understanding of psychology and motives is needed for viewing. When Anya was shown from an ambiguous side a couple of episodes ago, I had no doubt that this was a consequence of the injury. We knew that she was dating Katya's brother and was completely normal. If suddenly the behavior changed so much, then there was a reason...
it was interesting to look at the reaction of the mothers separately. Alina's mother understood everything at once. I wanted to help the girls. It's a pity that I didn't take Alina to a specialist to work on the injury... I just didn't know it was necessary. And it was also interesting that at first Alina was shown as if she were some kind of simpleton, stupid. But in fact, absolutely not! It feels like we were looking at her through the eyes of men. In the last episode, I felt so sorry for her. That's right very much.
Anya's mother was at first completely at a loss, but eventually supported her daughter.
And, of course, the conversation between Anya and the investigator. The rapists didn't even realize that they had ruined the girls' lives. The attitude is worse than the thing. And what's the big deal, just forget it. She hung herself. Big deal, what nonsense. And the same attitude can be traced from almost all the characters who hear about violence. A complete lack of empathy for everyone! Someone else more or less saw the light, but the rest, and especially the rapists, did not understand anything. I'm sure Belov's hero did not understand why he was imprisoned for 4 years.