@Sagi_UA: No, brother, this is just my first comment here. It happens that way. You answered your own question. The reason for the dismissal of a racer is politics in sports (i.e. out of place).
Let's not talk about her. In the end, everyone will have their own opinion. It is not necessary to switch to insults, it is absolutely unnecessary.
@g1322389: Not politics, but money. Mazepin is the son of an oligarch who is associated with Putin. The decision to disown him is a matter of the team's survival. Other sponsors would have terminated all contracts. And let's be honest. If he had not been the worst driver last season, but, for example, at the level of Leclerc or Verstappen, then the team would have fought for him, and so this is an ideal situation to get out of relations with a sub-sanctioning company and minimal losses
@Sagi_UA: yes, I understand everything perfectly here and in this way I share all your words, both about money and especially about the fact that Mazepin is clearly not a super racer.
It's just that the war with one-sided media clippings is involved in the filing. I just think that you need to be more delicate in such matters. The formula doesn't seem to be about military affairs.
@g1322389: Was there a lie in those clippings? There's only a couple of seconds about the war. Only 2 random attacks were shown, where there were no casualties among the population - Khmelnitsky airport and Kharkiv CHP-5 (which was fired at with cruise missiles as early as September). They chose just the "delicate" shots without wounded and killed civilians. Which side do you need to show more? Do you want to cut out some bullshit about the liberation of the ruins of Marupol?
@Sagi_UA: I just repeat that the formula is not about military affairs and not about politics. About the money is ok. Precisely, so that people do not come to such dialogues as we do, it is not worth showing even two seconds.
I don't want to pour from empty to empty and spoil each other's mood.
как комично выглядят два директора команд формулы 1 в старом маленьком фиатике присоединяюсь к комментариям выше и требую спин-оффа с приключениями на винограднике!
Let's not talk about her. In the end, everyone will have their own opinion.
It is not necessary to switch to insults, it is absolutely unnecessary.
The decision to disown him is a matter of the team's survival. Other sponsors would have terminated all contracts.
And let's be honest. If he had not been the worst driver last season, but, for example, at the level of Leclerc or Verstappen, then the team would have fought for him, and so this is an ideal situation to get out of relations with a sub-sanctioning company and minimal losses
It's just that the war with one-sided media clippings is involved in the filing. I just think that you need to be more delicate in such matters. The formula doesn't seem to be about military affairs.
There's only a couple of seconds about the war. Only 2 random attacks were shown, where there were no casualties among the population - Khmelnitsky airport and Kharkiv CHP-5 (which was fired at with cruise missiles as early as September). They chose just the "delicate" shots without wounded and killed civilians.
Which side do you need to show more? Do you want to cut out some bullshit about the liberation of the ruins of Marupol?
I don't want to pour from empty to empty and spoil each other's mood.
Sane people don't want war.
Have a nice day.
присоединяюсь к комментариям выше и требую спин-оффа с приключениями на винограднике!