s01e10 — Серия 10

@apolllo_2001: I won't put a Diz, everyone has their own opinion, but I disagree. I wrote under one of the episodes that if you want the canonical "Happy Together", then you can watch them. And this is a new format with familiar characters. "Happy Together" is a sitcom. The specifics of the genre are unchangeable (maybe just a little) the characters and their characters, which even after 500 episodes will be the same as in the first series. The meaning of the sitcom is in the events that occur with images that are understandable to everyone, and not in their development. Bukins is a completely different product. Character development took place behind the scenes and continues in the series. I think for so many years of life, the characters deserve to become more than their images, to develop. But how do we understand that we have the same characters in front of us? To remind you of this and leave characteristic features. Which is what happened. Cartoon dummies have learned to think and feel, which many did not like. But how much longer would they have survived in their old images in our time? Sooner or later, everything gets boring or ceases to be relevant. For me, comparing "Happy together" and "Bukin" is like comparing "Vesti" and "KVN". What's the point? The series is not bad, the characters are native, there is development. Not 10/10, of course, but 4/5 is quite good. Just like the original. I speak as a person who has watched the original very many times and I treat it with warmth. But why want a lack of development and a rigid framework of the original format, I do not understand. About humor.... Yes, it's normal. Not crinkly, but not enchanting either. There are discontinuous ones, and there are those that you just ignore. A flower thief? I don't really care. Maybe I'm not such a connoisseur, but I usually rate a picture based on the plot, not on the work of the operator. With a gorgeous floral pattern and angles, you can also take off a full hat. In short, I liked it. It's nice when your favorite characters have received well-deserved development, and have not remained slaves to images. But what the sequel is inferior to the original is the number of episodes per season.

That's the point, that Bookies are organic in the format of a sitcom, but here they look, one might say, unnatural (in my opinion). Therefore, many predicted, figuratively speaking, a failure for the series already at the production stage (which actually did not happen, but I cannot call the project a success either). That's how you wrote it, imagine if the KVN participants start to lead the plots of the Vesti program, staying in their own images, but "become deeper." Will you have any dissonance?)

@apolllo_2001: "if KVN participants start to lead the stories of the Vesti program," news programs from comedians sometimes come out well. "The Paris Hilton Spotlight" has not yet slipped, for example) If the image did not change, but the world around it became more real, it would be a dissonance)

@apolllo_2001: I will briefly describe my feelings, the series was sarcastic and prickly, but it became soft and warm. And given these feelings of mine, I don't want to get into the structure of the series or any other logic of the process.

Therefore, to your comment (nothing personal)) and like the next one, I'm in such a New Year's mood 😉

And I don't take it personally, putting dizes as a sign of disagreement is more than the norm) I just want to discuss and discuss) I also don't think that the series was a bad one, but for me, Bookies are associated with sarcastic and absurd humor, which has never pretended to drama and serious topics)

@apolllo_2001: and I don't have any more thoughts on this, I don't even know how to expand the field for discussion 😃

There are 0 complex, contradictory personalities, themes of choice too ...
Old age is not a joy, I want to tell you finally, I wanted to look at the faces of the actors with -20 vision.
Well, now I'm being carried away towards criticism 😂