Shows Movies News Community Ratings

The Nun II

The Nun II

My rating

3.47

MyShows

(613)

Released:	06 September 2023
Country of origin:	US
Genre:	Horror/Supernatural, Mystery
Production companies:	New Line Cinema, Atomic Monster, The Safran Company
Watched by:	1 428 of 865 931
Runtime:	1 hour 50 minutes
IMDB rating:	5.6 of 10 58 644

In 1956 France, a priest is violently murdered, and Sister Irene begins to investigate. She once again comes face-to-face with a powerful evil.

Subscription

Purchase

$14.99

$4.19

$14.99

$3.99

$14.99

$3.99

$19.99

$5.99

$19.99

$5.99

$14.99

$3.99

Rent

$14.99

$4.19

$14.99

$3.99

$14.99

$3.99

$19.99

$5.99

$3.99

$19.99

$5.99

$14.99

$3.99

Official Trailer

The Nun

3.52

Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me

4.06

Constantine

4.47

The Devil's Backbone

3.72

Silent Hill

4.1

Wild Things

3.65

Godzilla Raids Again

3.15

The Reaping

3.41

The Ninth Gate

3.95

The Devil's Rejects

3.47

Angel Heart

4

Dawn of the Dead

3.8

The Phantom of the Opera

3.69

Paranormal Whacktivity

2.64

Vampyr

3.43

Along Came a Spider

3.91

Rosemary's Baby

3.82

The Omen

3.56

The Grudge 3

2.69

Se7en

4.56

Gabriel

3.5

Cursed

3.21

Love Is a Stranger Again

0

A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2: Freddy's Revenge

3.75

Tale of the Deaf Man and the Magic Music

1.83

Metus

0

Devil's Harvest

0

Kill or be Killed

0

Feast

3.39

Prey for the Devil

3.31

A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors

3.93

Batman: The Doom That Came to Gotham

3.44

Dawn Breaks Behind the Eyes

1.5

Hell's Tomb

0

The Crow: Salvation

3.41

Ring 2

3.28

Darkness Reigns

0

Discuss this movie 28

Subscribe

Gordey

12 Sep 2023, 13:33 #

A direct sequel to the 2018 film "The Curse of the Nun" and the ninth film in the franchise "The Universe of the Curse", which includes three parts of the "Curse" itself, three parts of "The Curse of Annabel", another "The Curse of the Weeping" and, in fact, the first film about the ghost of a nun. If you look at the chronology, then this film is the third in history, between it and the first part there is a second film about the doll "The Curse of Annabel: The Birth of Evil", the events of which took place just a year ago. In general, the franchise films themselves are not very strongly connected, so there is no difference in which order to watch them. Unless this one is necessary after the first "Curse of the nun", otherwise it is not particularly clear. The film turned out to be intense, atmospheric and sometimes even scary. Anna Popplewell, who played the teacher, was also added to the cast. You may have seen this actress in the Narnia stories. Well, if you haven't watched it, then in the TV series "Kingdom" (which I haven't seen myself). Everything was played at the proper level, there are small logical overlaps, but not so significant as to spoil the film so much. In general, I even liked it, which has been quite rare lately, but alas, I will not call the film a masterpiece, after all, for my taste, there is too much water, and the explanation of the behavior of the nun was given very far. But, again, it doesn't bother much! If you like the whole franchise, then be sure to watch it — a worthy sequel. Well, if you are not very terrible, then you do not need to, because without the first part it will be unclear why you would rape yourself?! The verdict is a good horror movie for an amateur!

Reply

+18

alcalarodney

11 Oct 2023, 01:12 #

What does the curse of the crying woman have to do with it?

Reply

-2

romaro14

15 Oct 2023, 23:52 #

@alcalarodney: "The curse of the weeping one is in the universe " Spells", therefore in the universe "Nuns". The connecting link is the priest from Annabel's Curse.

Reply

+6

faceloveme

23 Oct 2023, 18:52 #

@romaro14: La Yoronna

Reply

Irish_Ethan

25 Sep 2023, 16:13 #

Not a very good movie. Many people write that it's better than the first one, but I don't think so. The denouement is too primitive and the victory over the demons was much easier than in the first nun. Plus, there are very few dramatic moments.

Reply

+19

Nana_insane

10 Nov 2023, 02:27 #

@Irish_Ethan: It's worth noting here that the Roll is somehow very unlucky. There's so much pumping up of his story that Lorraine beat him up in two seconds, and in his two prequels he got twice from the same girl, who sometimes frankly does not shine. Now it looks like "I didn't kill your " relative, but at least I'll drink your blood, oh no, I was expelled from here, well, fuck ".

Reply

+4

bloo_trix

25 Sep 2023, 19:58 #

The first part will definitely be better

Reply

+11

Flerogay

04 Oct 2023, 18:30 #

I liked it more than the first one
But it's a pretty funny movie.

Reply

+2

iron_tooth

06 Oct 2023, 21:32 #

Kakahinya 2 is about as boring as the first one. There are interesting finds like the scene with magazines, the beating of the censer, but in general.... Very bad, and, most importantly, why? How I wish that the films about Valak were more cheerful and interesting.

Reply

-3

oleg2101

06 Oct 2023, 23:31 #

More interesting than the first one. More characters. More locations. Bigger than the nun herself. More screamers. And the plot is more interesting. After the credits, the end of the first part is clear. Otherwise, the ending of the second does not match the ending of the first, I rewound the credits well.

Reply

+2

vk1130714

07 Oct 2023, 20:47 #

The whole movie, I thought that the characters' past and present were being shown here. Since I don't remember the first part. Both the girl and the nun of the main characters are very similar. And I thought that the girl was the nun and the heroine. AHAHAHAHA.

Reply

-1

w1semc

10 Oct 2023, 21:43 #

The film seemed to me much more cheerful than the first part. There are screeners, it looks tense in general.

Reply

+3

bazilesaya3

PRO

22 Oct 2023, 18:11 #

Slag 2, but at least briskly, not as a bore of the first part

Reply

-5

faceloveme

23 Oct 2023, 18:52 #

Sis 2 in action.

Reply

+1

DanechkaK

24 Oct 2023, 21:22 #

A very interesting movie! I personally liked it, especially the finale, the battle between the Nuns was gorgeous and brilliant + wine! I really liked it. I advise you to view it.

Reply

Bairum

01 Nov 2023, 19:48 #

Unlike "Astral" James Wan, who, plus or minus, kept the same quality bar for many years (yes, it was declining, but gradually and not much), his series "The Spell " from the very beginning for me was a kind of American slides. If memory serves, then the road (The Road So Far, as it would be written in the finale of the next season of Supernatural) looked something like this: a great first Spell, then the fig Curse of Annabel, then the normal "Spell 2", followed by the gorgeous second "Curse of Annabel", after the most painful "Curse of the nun ", then the non-existent "Curse of the crying ", then an inarticulate mess called "Annabel's Curse 3" and the most boring "Spell 3 ". And finally "The Curse of the Nun 2", which will be discussed.

What pleased or upset Michael Chavez, who has already entered the cursed cinematic lands three times - on his account "The Curse of the Weeping " and "The Curse of 3 "?

Reply

Bairum

01 Nov 2023, 19:48 #

Firstly, it is at least his best film in the series. Who knows what an achievement for the genre, in general, but for an individual citizen and a franchise, in particular, quite a success. Let the past attempts of Chavez have not been enough stars from the sky, but even with an unarmed glance it is clear that the director has filled his hand. Yes, basically, the film is replete with screamers of one kind or another, but a few scenes were straight good, even if in the end they still ended with a yell of evil spirits at you on the screen. In general, the moment with the magazines in the alley, in my opinion, should go down in history as one of the most memorable in horror. I didn't go into much detail about exactly how it was all done, but the director himself complained that he would never have shot it if he knew how much effort and time it would take. Well, I believe it willingly. I'll forget the whole movie after a couple of weeks (maybe even faster), but I definitely won't forget this scene. Well, hand on heart, they scare here often, so some percentage of horror stories will still catch you by surprise.

Secondly, if you take not the whole franchise, but only the Nun, it's a giant, damn, leap for humanity. The first part was a stupid, fearless, dull piece of ectoplasm (I'm lying a little about boredom: I was at this masterpiece in the cinema and, sorry, I couldn't hold back my laughter from the stupidity of what was happening. I repent. But there is a suspicion that our company didn't spoil the viewing for anyone at that moment, because the chuckles were heard evenly from all corners of the hall). At least the sequel doesn't look like a belch of cinema. It is interesting to watch it from beginning to end, even if the authors sometimes get carried away on turns.

Reply

Bairum

01 Nov 2023, 19:49 #

Third... Well, I guess that's where the pros end. The second "Nun " is a standard horror movie, watching which will not expand the horizons of your consciousness. Moreover, there is a suspicion that the screenwriters not only did not discover something new for the audience, but also confused them and themselves. To be honest, at the time of watching the sequel, I had not reviewed any of the parts of the franchise, but I roughly remembered how the last "Nun" ended. And, no, not a reserve for the continuation. At least, not a full-fledged reserve. It ended with a leap in time, where the main characters of the trilogy "The Spell " dealt with the consequences of the finale "Nuns ". Well, that is, there was nothing else to insert between these two scenes. What happens in the sequel? The authors cram in an absolutely unnecessary fragment of events an hour and a half long, which adds nothing to any of the previous films. Moreover, you begin to experience a sense of deja vu. You won't believe how the movie ends. Yes, in fact, the same as the last part. Up to a time jump. Only this time everything is a little more ambiguous (no, if you remember about the fate of one of the characters exactly according to the Spell). That is, from the point of view of expanding some kind of mythology, this is a dummy.

Reply

Bairum

01 Nov 2023, 19:49 #

I repeat: I have not revised anything and, perhaps, there is some meaning hidden there that is inaccessible to me, but I strongly doubt it. I doubt, among other things, that the mega-artifact found somehow affected or will affect anything. Oh, let's not even start about these nonsense in the style of Indiana Jones and the Da Vinci Code. Well, the best moment of the baptism of drinks in the field conditions was probably only at " From dusk to dawn ". In general, if, within the framework of the general logic, the film does not infuriate, as it was with the original, then within the framework of the lore of the entire series, it is better not to think about what is happening.

P.S. Is it already possible for movie makers to somehow legally prohibit the killing of important characters of past parts behind the scenes? Me too, "died of cholera ".

Rating: 5 babysitters with a child without eyes out of 10

Reply

+1

illealife

24 Feb 20:51 #

@Bairum: so he didn't actually die of cholera, his daughter from the curse of Annabel 2 killed, if it was him

Reply

illealife

24 Feb 20:49 #

@Bairum: as for me, on the contrary, the curses of Annabel and the nun were interesting, and the spells were monotonous, incomprehensible, with a motionless plot and meaningless texts and videos

Reply

MoonRine

PRO

14 Nov 2023, 07:40 #

Well, sometimes you go to a restaurant and try something new and delicious. And more often you eat scrambled eggs for breakfast. Does this make the scrambled eggs bad? No. There's just nothing new about it.
Well, it's the same here. Another movie in the universe. Nothing new, just an ordinary scarecrow.
The actress-Wallack-Nun is great in makeup, creepy as always. The storyline is clear and does not cause bugurt. There are some interesting references to the Warrens (the corridor of their house, a picture, a cameo)..
Not a lobster with truffles, but a well-cooked egg 😁😁

Reply

+3

spartak200808

PRO

16 Dec 2023, 00:25 #

I expected more from the second part , the denouement is kind of logical and primitive

Reply

+1

DruTad

25 Dec 2023, 02:16 #

There are a couple of creepy moments, but some events are illogical, and slightly overplayed.

Reply

+2

Suliiko

25 Dec 2023, 23:14 #

The first part was much better and more mysterious)
But the second one is also nothing)

Reply

+2

g1382764

06 Feb 00:39 #

The film is frankly weak, it's a pity that the plot was leaked. But you can check it out. Waiting for the next part.

Reply

+1

Diwatch

16 Mar 21:29 #

The sequel has failed
I was waiting for more
The idea is not bad, but as for me, the script failed
The graphics are on the level, the moments with the transitions of the images of the demon are at a height, as in other films
But there are a lot of disadvantages

Reply

+1

Margo_Darling

18 Apr 10:58 #

In general, you can watch it. The cast of the film takes out. I love the Enchantment universe because it is one of the few universes of the horror genre, and in general it is well done. In the second part, as in the first, the behavior of all the characters is a solid facepalm. Movies have collected all the cliches of the world)))) But in general, you forgive because you watch the movie as an attraction. Interesting, frightening, but very predictable. I saw the wine trick at the moment of the conversation on the train - there is a cellar of an old winery in a boarding school and faith in the blood of Jesus. Two times two and we understand the outcome of the battle with Wallach.
I understand that the demon did not come out of Frenche completely, since after his reunion with the teacher and her daughter, Ed and Lorraine were called for exile? Maurice is very sorry, a sad fate.
And I also probably listened, but how are Lorraine and Irene related? The whole first movie, I thought Irene was Lorraine in her youth, but it seems not? I tried to watch the movie carefully, but in the end did I miss something? If anyone knows, please write)
In general, the film is normal, he will go to see it once.
I'm waiting for the film about the Hunchback to finally be released, I hope there will be something creepy and high-quality.

Reply

Add a comment: