Ффух, я уже ждал, что Козлов опять из зала уйдёт, но в этот раз всё довольно деликатно разрешили и даже, по меньшей мере, уважительно подискутироали. Да, это не первый случай, когда вопрос снимается с игры при оставлении счёта, но всё же, всё же... И раньше такие дуали бывали, даже подуалистее порой были, и всегда точка зрения автора вопроса превалировала... Здесь получилось так, что создалось впечатление, будто Ведущий извинялся перед командой за прошлую спорную ситуацию, заранее понимая, что в таком состоянии команда обязательно слажает из-за "взято-невзятой" минуты, что они и сделали, к сожалению.
В любом случае игра яркая, а вот именно такие споры, которые не переходят в ругань, а обходятся рамками дискуссии, когда высказались все, кто должен был, а в итоге Ведущий принял довольно взвешенное решение - дорогого стоят! И постфактум уже - команда всё равно проиграла, но эта игра им, я считаю, больше в актив, как минимум, за Байкал, грибы и 13-й сектор. Очень обидно только, что тень недокрутили.
Well, Kozlov is brawling on the air again, as always. Someday, I think he'll finish playing and be kicked out of the club. Well, you can't start digging into the details of a crucial issue every time. Moreover, in the end it still didn't help. By God, the presenter is too soft with experts. Voroshilov is not on them, there was no such kindergarten with him...
Pisses off the Goats. I don't even want to watch his games anymore. It is real that I was not outraged about the microphone and the mirror, the microphone can also be shoved into a rubber sleeve. And most importantly, everyone understands everything... Bakunenko felt sorry for the last answer. I think he was very afraid of Kozlov's reaction.
The Kozlov Circus. Such a discussion can be divided into 50% of questions... it is a pity that the question from Sushchenko's wife did not get to this team.
Kozlov, as usual, decided to make a show out of an intellectual game. You had the correct and logical version, but you chose the planes yourself and pulled the child to the correct answer. The question with the remote seemed less logical, because xs is exactly how you can use it in an armband and if you want to freak out, then you definitely won't insert the remote there before and only then throw it.
What a shame. Why didn't he have a row with luna? And with a microphone? It's even more attracted. It is also important that this is a game. There are bad questions. But it never happens that bad questions are all. You need to be able to accept defeat.
The whole blame for the scandal lies solely with the presenter. I didn't see any big claims from Kozlov, unlike other games. The man laid out the rules for each painting exactly and to the point, and all these rules really fit perfectly under the carry-on luggage. Well, except for the child, who is not in the subject there. It is important to understand what Kozlov himself was trying to convey. He said in plain text: these pictures are suitable for hand luggage. He did not demand that his answer be counted and did not argue with the presenter that the author of the question asked a useless question (sorry for the tautology). My verdict: after listening to Kozlov, the presenter should have calmly and clearly said: "Six four in favor of the viewers." The game ends, everyone is happy. Well, except Kozlov and the Indian.
@senatus: When a presenter tries to make a show and tries in every way to make the program a little longer in time, there is nothing wrong with that. He will sometimes prompt, or vice versa, find fault, ask leading questions. But there is a line to everything.
Circus with the main clown. Kozlov has never been a worthy expert, much less a worthy person. The number of times he is pulled to play on, the same number of times he breaks another bottom. Of course, Hook is afraid of closing the game, and Stetsenko seems to be having trouble with Kozlov, but this mess with his team needs to be finished. I feel sorry for Antokhin and Skipsky. The rest of them are just useless. I feel sorry for Kapustin too, but he's just a pensioner. "I didn't come up with what the child has to do with it, so let's admit the question is bad and remove it." How is it that the author of the question did not think that the question could go to Kozlov, and it would seem to the latter that these are the rules of the permitted (!!!) hand luggage (although, these rules are really on the ban), not the rules of the art gallery! Ladies with dogs go to his galleries, you see... And children under five years old fly for free.
Well, everything is clear with Kozlov. But I would like to draw attention to a new round of his bestial behavior, namely, how Kozlov (and with what intonation) spoke about the viewer. Like, well, you never know what "this" dreamed up there. Like, who is he to come up with his own questions here - a lousy nouname whose logic can be challenged. Ugly, not a gentleman.
But, let's say you can challenge the logic (although specifically here these airports and hand luggage did not fit at all), then let's remember dozens, if not hundreds of questions about "finish haiku". That's where trash is, where far from one option fits, and some options fit much better than what's in the original. Well, let's challenge these Japanese poets, whom no one cares about, too. For whom are they authorities there, eh? For a bunch of samurai who died centuries ago? And these "will you finish the aphorism of the writer? Oh, who's reading there now, right? Who is your Bernard Shaw or Anton Palych Chekhov? And we will give points for any beautiful, even not close answer. Well, the same logic, in theory. The difference is that there is an authority there, and here is an ordinary viewer.
Kozlov tries to open some kind of Pandora's box every time, or the door to the closet leading to Idiocracy, and sifting out a huge number of questions. I've already pulled it up.
В любом случае игра яркая, а вот именно такие споры, которые не переходят в ругань, а обходятся рамками дискуссии, когда высказались все, кто должен был, а в итоге Ведущий принял довольно взвешенное решение - дорогого стоят! И постфактум уже - команда всё равно проиграла, но эта игра им, я считаю, больше в актив, как минимум, за Байкал, грибы и 13-й сектор. Очень обидно только, что тень недокрутили.
Well, you can't start digging into the details of a crucial issue every time. Moreover, in the end it still didn't help.
By God, the presenter is too soft with experts. Voroshilov is not on them, there was no such kindergarten with him...
My verdict: after listening to Kozlov, the presenter should have calmly and clearly said: "Six four in favor of the viewers." The game ends, everyone is happy. Well, except Kozlov and the Indian.
"I didn't come up with what the child has to do with it, so let's admit the question is bad and remove it." How is it that the author of the question did not think that the question could go to Kozlov, and it would seem to the latter that these are the rules of the permitted (!!!) hand luggage (although, these rules are really on the ban), not the rules of the art gallery!
Ladies with dogs go to his galleries, you see... And children under five years old fly for free.
But, let's say you can challenge the logic (although specifically here these airports and hand luggage did not fit at all), then let's remember dozens, if not hundreds of questions about "finish haiku". That's where trash is, where far from one option fits, and some options fit much better than what's in the original. Well, let's challenge these Japanese poets, whom no one cares about, too. For whom are they authorities there, eh? For a bunch of samurai who died centuries ago? And these "will you finish the aphorism of the writer? Oh, who's reading there now, right? Who is your Bernard Shaw or Anton Palych Chekhov? And we will give points for any beautiful, even not close answer. Well, the same logic, in theory. The difference is that there is an authority there, and here is an ordinary viewer.
Kozlov tries to open some kind of Pandora's box every time, or the door to the closet leading to Idiocracy, and sifting out a huge number of questions. I've already pulled it up.