Overview
After being brutally murdered, 14-year-old Susie Salmon watches from heaven over her grief-stricken family -- and her killer. As she observes their daily lives, she must balance her thirst for revenge with her desire for her family to heal.

| Release Date: | |
|---|---|
| Country: | UK, New Zealand, US |
| Genre: | Fantasy, Drama |
| Production Companies: | WingNut Films, DreamWorks Pictures, Film4 Productions |
| Watched by: | 8 082 of 1 007 389 |
| Runtime: |








































The film showed his death very stupidly. Of course, the book doesn't give much more information about him. But at least it mentions that the girl helped him fall into the ravine with the help of that icicle.
Actually, there are also a lot of plot holes in the book, just like in the movie.
I liked how they beat and showed death from the other side.
It was sad to realize that Susan wouldn't be home for dinner and, in general, wouldn't meet the guy of her dreams.
It's a pity that Susie's body was never found, and the killer did not pay for his actions
was given to me on this earth...
just one hour... Just an hour of love...
I would give my love to You."
I can't believe this movie was made by Peter Jackson, from whom we used to expect something else. It is for such directing that the highest awards should be given: incredibly subtly, metaphorically, multifaceted, masterfully he reveals the feelings of the main character and gets into the very depths of the viewer's soul! Bravo. The film is incredibly light, despite the horror of what is happening in it according to the plot. Life-affirming. Movies with a capital letter!
At the end, I didn't understand why, having possessed a brunette girl, it was impossible for a kid to say, "dude, I'm actually there, in the drawer! Pull over that nasty moustache and call the police!" instead of "oh, I got your letter," really? did she choose to be buried in a pile of scrap metal in some kind of safe rather than give her family the opportunity to at least bury herself like a human being?
nothing twitched inside me from this movie, although the subject is very serious and heavy, but the interpretation is disgusting. It was drawn out, dry, without emotion, in no way.
All of his victims deserve, at the very least, to be caught and judged for everything he has done. So that their families can bury their daughters, or at least know that their killer has been punished.
No, girls who are killed by pedophiles are not happy in heaven. It hurts them, it's scary, they suffer when they're killed, and if you make a movie about it, then it's understandable. So that the film would be hard and disgusting, so that it would be scary, so that after the film there would be a leaden residue, which would not be able to shake off immediately. Because that's really how it is: ugly, scary, and hard.
Stanley Tucci created one of the most vivid, creepy and memorable images of maniacs. Just looking at him gives me goosebumps. And the scene with the plaque... My heart skips a beat every time!
If you cut the timing by half an hour, cut out all these bizarre fairy–tale scenes, remove an extra branch from the mother-in-law, do not show Suzy after the cornfield, strengthen the suspense between the maniac and the heroine's family - it would be a perfect thriller, one of the best! Seriously.
As it is, it's just a good movie, the best part of which can definitely be called the antagonist. The actor invested 10/10 in the role.
Do you remember the movie Requiem for a Dream? there was a theme of seals, NOT romanticized. this movie caused the reaction it was supposed to - it was imprinted in my memory, it was disgusting, scary. Yes, no one died there, but you look and think that it would be better if they died, right? Why live like this? such a topic is bound to cause such a reaction that this toggle switch clicks in my head, "it's not allowed, it's forbidden, ugh." people who watched him 20 years ago still remember him, many thanks to him have avoided similar problems with substances and so on.
people were waiting for the same picture on an equally serious topic of pdfilia, most likely. There's nothing romantic about it, it's a disease, a deviation, an aversion. this should be forbidden in the head by default. therefore, many (like me) did not accept the ending and did not understand the meaning of these inserts about "a happy life in heaven"
I have no complaints about the director, he makes awesome fiction, VK, the Hobbit, King Kong, scarecrows, I watched most of his works. But I still haven't figured out who this movie is aimed at.
It's just that I personally love realism in movies and don't always believe in "the villains got what they deserved and everyone lived happily ever after." In reality, it's usually the other way around. And I appreciate when movies aren't afraid to give an honest ending without a happy ending. This allows viewers not to get lost in illusions about the existence of justice from above and to look soberly at reality, where evil often wins and remains unpunished.