Description
A brilliant toy company roboticist uses artificial intelligence to develop M3GAN, a life-like doll programmed to emotionally bond with her newly orphaned niece. But when the doll's programming works too well, she becomes overprotective of her new friend with terrifying results.
Well, for example, if she were holding a refrigerator, her hand would slip and he would roll and kill someone.
I liked the film, kept it in suspense until the last moment.
Of course, there were more worries for the girl, what kind of psychological trauma she received after all this 🫣
I thought it would be a pathetic parody of Chucky, but it turned out to be quite a good movie)
Of course, it's a pity that there is no blood and dismemberment, but okay :)
4/5
The main message of the picture says: be more responsible and do not shift your responsibilities to those in whom, or in this case, what, you are not sure, because there will always be such a Megan who will spoil your life) Don't flirt with something you can't control.
The idea is not bad, but the implementation is weak.
1. Gemma: I don't have a warm relationship with my sister and I don't care about her death. That's why I'm taking her baby to my place and feeding her bread! Although she has grandparents who are interested in it.
2. Gemma: I wrote the code for the robot, but I do not know how it works! Very interesting!(no) "excuse" they say I created it, that it improves itself - it doesn't work that way. Is the film intended for a child or an adult? An explanation for a three-year-old. You either know what you've created, or you've appropriated someone else's invention and don't know what it is from the inside.
3. Are we releasing a robot to the masses that does what it wants and has not passed beta testing? Yes, yes already!
4. The robot was originally programmed for the safety of the child. How was the CEO of the company threatening the child?
In short, very stupid
About all sorts of logic and unreliability, I'm fine, they're not at a critical level to fuck up the movie for it .
But what really got hot was the acting game . What is small, What is the main baryshni . And if there are fewer complaints about a small one due to age (not everyone in their age is conditional on Millie Bobby Brown) , then here is the main Lady of some kind ....just nothing =\
Not in the sense that they were trying to make her a little solved , unsociable and generally as immersed as possible in work , but rather it's about her transfer of emotions . Их just almost not . She looks like an actress and plays :)
It's twice as bad if this movement still shoots and there are sequels , then it would be necessary to reduce her role to almost the main character, and not cause emotions . It would be better to be a link between films and flash in cameos, without interfering with the actors to act. Well, that's just my personal opinion..
Oh, I can't help but notice. Thanks to the children's rating, we couldn't even try to get into the crypt, despite the fact that the theme itself is favorable (for example, use the sinister valley effect in full and half a minute) and there was even one attempt thirty seconds closer to the end of the film . That's the type of moments that would be more done in the next part . Fortunately, now it will not be necessary to waste time on all this production .
Moreover, the Bloomhouse logo is also present here and even James Wan is listed (as a producer, yes, but still ..) .
In short, I see the potential, I look forward to continuing . Just after the topics with ChatGPT in general, you should be able to catch the anger of the day even :)