s02e01 — The Lady in the Lake

@Sancho-R: the channel is different, but the studio that comes up with it is all the same)

@Sancho-R: Well, actually, all three series are being filmed by ABC Studios in conjunction with Marvel Television. It's just that in one case they do it essentially for on-air TV (a bunch of all kinds of restrictions), and in the other for a streaming service, which is more like cable TV (and here we not only have more creative freedom, but also allocate more money accordingly). Otherwise, the only difference is in the very different genres.

@Tonybofthedead: Let's start with the fact that Netflix doesn't shoot anything on its own. He's just doing the distribution. And the Netflix Original Series only means that this series is being filmed directly for an exclusive release on Netflix (unlike all other content provided on the service). That is, they can order the production of a particular series from some studio, but of course they will not be directly involved in the production themselves (not their profile).

@Carnage: "Netflix doesn't shoot anything on its own, basically."

From the wiki: "In recent years, Netflix has started its own production of television series that are only available to its customers."

From this we can conclude that they are still filming some series...

@LUXEON: you can use the same Wikipedia, go through several TV series and find at least one of them in the production column with something at least remotely similar to Netflix. Obviously, in the article you cited, it means only ordering, not shooting.

@Carnage: I'm sorry, I'm far from an expert in such nuances, but after Googling for a while, I only found articles that confirm that they sometimes remove their "exclusive", for example, "House of Cards".
But if I'm wrong, I'll be happy to hear your arguments.

@LUXEON: I don't quite understand what arguments you need. For example, take the aforementioned "House of Cards" and go to IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1856010/companycredits?ref_=tt_dt_co
We look carefully at the list of Production Companies and, of course, we do not find Netflix there. We look further and find him among the distributors, and below we find out that he was actually the only sponsor of the series. Yes, this is definitely a Netflix exclusive, but it was shot, like all their other exclusive series, not by them, but commissioned for them. The same goes for the Marvel series, with the only difference being that the budget for them was already allocated from Disney's pocket, which at that time stupidly needed the most convenient platform for distributing their future series that were not suitable for ABC.

@Carnage: Now everything is "on the shelves", thank you.

@LUXEON: In the United States, as in Russia, the channels themselves, and even more so streaming services such as Netflix, do not produce content themselves. All this is ordered from third-party production companies. The channels themselves personally produce very rarely, mostly news.

@Carnage: >> We look carefully at the list of Production Companies and, of course, we do not find Netflix there.

And now it's there. Just an observation.

Production Companies
Media Rights Capital (MRC)
Netflix
Panic Pictures (II)
Trigger Street Productions

@Kostyurik: I would swap "Agents of Shields" for "Daredevil" in your statement and it would be +

@Datik: almost a year ago, I would have agreed with you, because at that time I was wildly hating Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. based on the first few episodes of the first season and was just as wildly waiting for the release of Daredevil, expecting something incredibly magnificent.

After "Daredevil" came out at the end of April, I watched it, and twice! First in the original language, and then, after reading other people's reviews and thinking - "many people can't love this shit so much, I probably didn't understand something in English" - once again in a voice-over from LostFilm. So, after I watched it, I had nothing left in relation to "Daredevil" except complete disappointment, monstrous disgust and great resentment towards the creators of the series.

And then in September, my brother Dimasik persuaded me to watch Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. beyond the first couple of episodes, because "when you get through the first 16-17 episodes, you'll start getting high from this series." I started getting my buzz even before episode 17, and now it's almost the best thing I watch.

@SlKelevro: Well, the sign seems to be the same - an inverted goat.

@Viltis: So it didn't seem to me that the badge that Dottie wanted to take away had the same logo as the patch on the astronaut's clothes.

@id3166697: this is really darkforce, there is information from the wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent_Carter_%28season_2%29#Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_tie-ins
They write the following: the showrunners came up with their own story specifically for the series, here it will be a failed nuclear test conducted by Izodine Energy; "taking information from the comic, we came up with our own description of what Darkforce does and how it affects who in the world"; there was an attempt to explain the phenomenon from a scientific point of view, A physicist was even involved for this purpose.
It also seems that Darkforce will be called Zero Matter in the show.

@svetinka_81: There were suggestions that she would remain a shadow character with an exclusively virtual presence - only in mentions of Mr. Jarvis, as Columbo's wife at one time, for example) But no, she was taken out. The image is beautiful and expected)

@tyrell: + a lot:)

@tyrell: In fact, she is jealous, seeing in Carter what she would like to be herself - a successful, beautiful woman who, oddly enough, turns out to be beyond any attempts to defeat her, which fuels Dottie's unhealthy interest.

I almost agree, but I don't think she would like to be like that herself, in my opinion it's more like that... an unhealthy hobby, yes, of course, but because she sees Peggy as an equal, worthy and interesting opponent who is worth her attention. I don't think she's seen many of them.
Holmes and Moriarty come to mind for comparison, but that would not be a completely correct comparison :)

@distantskyline: Luther and Alice Morgan would be a more appropriate comparison)

@tyrell: I'm sorry, I haven't looked yet)

@distantskyline: they have a very cool hero-villain bond there, without spoilers)

@Singoross: To each his own) I just have a good visual memory, I usually see actors in movies and immediately remember where they were. There's something unusual about "Legend...", but this role seemed more suitable to me for this actress :)

@Kostyurik: BERNARD :) I'm talking about flamingos.

@umka_pumka: Ah, then it's clear :-)

@Yoriko: knshn eats

=)))