s02e01 — Be Right Back

@Nerve33: and I think it's immoral and disgusting to keep the dead in the attic for the sake of human society. It's one thing when there are, say, recordings or something like artificial intelligence on a computer that can tell you who was who. And it's another thing when you erase the boundary between life and death for yourself. Just imagine, your parents and siblings died, but you brought them back thanks to this invention. I did it primarily for myself and my convenience. And so... what's next? You can't leave them in the attic and see them once a month on holidays, you're hardly that strong. Every day you fall more and more into the illusion that they are alive and everything is OK. The rules will be erased, and not only for you, but also for others. Those who loved their relatives very much, after their resurrection (let's say) they will forget about everything and will live with them as they used to live. As a result, the planet will become crowded and generally scary to think about how it will all end.
It's one thing to keep photos of people, and the other is their recreated thinking copy.

And also, would you be able to put the whole family in your attic? Yes, even out of respect for them, you would be ashamed to do it. Would you let your mom gather dust in the attic like some kind of figurine brought back from vacation? Moreover, this is not just a photo of your mother, this is her copy, which also speaks, walks and understands. You will feel as if you are locking a living mother in a cage so that your granddaughters can admire her later. Sit down.

Now everything is much worse: all his photos and videos go with a person, because our gadgets are password-protected.... Photo albums are not even a few.

))))))))))))))))))))0

yeah) I've been rereading it for a long time and trying to figure out what it's about...

I didn't understand why I didn't understand. Spoiler alert, but
I think what are the credits? What is this crying?

@MadMetHead: What kind of series was it intended for?

@lkostikova: s02e02-White Bear

oruu😂😂😂😂😂❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

@local_Konstantin: "Excellence." The Swedish film "She" is also about the problem of human-machine communication.

@halfling: If you mean the one with the Phoenix, then it's American. I also thought about him when I watched, but Spike Jonze was still later, as was superiority.

@halfling: here, too, until the moment when the puppet clone appeared, there was always deja vu with her.

@halfling: I also remembered this movie

@hellen_striped: I reread your comment several times, my brain stubbornly saw the "doll elephant". and I couldn't figure out when, where, and most importantly why there was an elephant)

@halfling: The "Bicentennial Man" is also very similar

@Nesquik: so I also wondered if it was possible to deactivate the guy? I think it's possible, because he's a product that she bought, a machine that had to be activated in the bathroom. Why didn't she do it, I wonder?

@welly-right: because it's scary with him, and it's even scarier without him at all

@FedyX: Then, to better recreate your copy, obviously)

@FedyX: I completely agree with the first paragraph. I think from the point of view of the creators of this "raise the dead" program, it would generally be logical to make one artificial intelligence with many personalities, which hangs somewhere on their servers to control its aptitude, and not a bunch of separate mini-AI, although this is so, thoughts out loud.

As for the second part, it seems to me that people don't leave their whole lives online. It sounds corny, I know, but even if a person tweets every minute of his life, actively rewrites and everything else, he leaves an improved version of himself in plain sight, or what he thinks is an improved version. Just like with Ash's android appearance, which they discussed: recreated from photographs, and only those photos that reflect his appearance at the best moments are saved. So it is with notes, letters and statements in general. It is unlikely that Ash was not really impressed by the Grand Canyon - perhaps he was shocked and did not want to admit it, and it seemed to him that it was cooler to write that it was a "big hole", because it would look nihilistic, and everyone would bark at him for his courage. It's the same with the Bee Gees song, about which he apparently wrote everywhere that it was mawkish, but in fact he knew the song by heart, and when he was still a man he sang to his wife. I mean, it's probably possible to recreate a person the way he wanted to appear, following his trail on the web, but it's impossible to predict his further actions based on this. Because in real life, we can be brought to a boiling point with a couple of phrases that touch something that is not known to the network, that we will never post online, and our actions will depend on these little weaknesses that are not posted on Facebook for everyone to see, and not on a list of favorite quotes and filtered photos of food, the beach and children.
If scientists learn how to create maps of neural networks after death, it would be more useful for creating full-fledged replicants))))

@Scheusalwirt: The second part is exactly like that: a man, not just one mask.
And what is this neural network map for? She is in the memory of her loved ones...

@Scheusalwirt: http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2674622& cid=2161! )

@Scheusalwirt: It is not for nothing that it is explained at the beginning that this is still only a beta test, the whole system is not yet perfect. In future versions, the "focus only on statements" bug could be fixed, and all human actions on the network could be covered and analyzed: for example, he called the song mawkish, but listened to it 4456434 times (he did not learn the text from a piece of paper).

@Cheeky: The death of a loved one before pregnancy is quite a rare phenomenon in society. I doubt that the growth rate of humanity will drop significantly due to those who decided not to "move on"

@Nesquik: не думаю, что причина в ее возрасте, наоборот в такие годы большие эмоциональные всплески, возможно она понимает обыденность аналогичных человеческих чувств, а для подобного возраста это очень особенный фактор.

@Nesquik: да просто идея серии уже не нова, и есть более душещипательные истории, где эмоциональный спектр более полный и яркий. Здесь же действительно немного плосковато, может потому что клон не так хорошо подстраивался под героиню и не был так пугающе похож на живого

@Чертяка: да не, тут и не возраст и не сухость.. я рыдала всю серию просто потому что сама в подобной ситуации (пусть не парень, а мама). И я хотела бы с ней также говорить, тело мне, конечно, может и не нужно было бы, а вот голос, мысли, хоть и обработанные.. в общем, серия для тех, кто может понять эту боль.

@Anzai: Плохое берется из личных переписок и подзамочных записей. Образ, конечно, искривленный, но более-менее похоже.

@Anzai: даже личные переписки не дадут нужного эффекта для раскрытия истинного лица. С каждым человеком ты обычно ведешь себя по разному. Но это не самое главное. Есть ты, которого ты себя считаешь собой, и есть ты, которого видит другой человек и как правило эти две личности не так и схожи, если покопаться)))

@Чертяка: Настоящий ты - это то, как ты ведешь себя наедине с собой.

@local_Константин: наверное, речь идет о фильме "Двухсотлетний человек")

@Scheusalwirt: С этой стороны я на этот вопрос не смотрела) Интересная мысль)

@garinaa_: Потому что он слишком похож на человека.

@Ryazhenka: и я сначала подумала на Билли! (не смотрю Доктора, но как раз за день до просмотра этой серии смотрела спектакль с ней в главной роли)
в конце даже стыдно стало, что не узнала "Пегги Картер"...