Overview
Nothing is as it seems when a woman experiencing misgivings about her new boyfriend joins him on a road trip to meet his parents at their remote farm.

| Release Date: | |
|---|---|
| Country: | US |
| Genre: | Mystery, Thriller, Drama |
| Production Companies: | Likely Story, Projective Testing Service |
| Watched by: | 1 296 of 1 019 200 |
| Runtime: |



















Alas, I didn't see anything the first time.
I'm probably too young to spend 2 hours fishing for metaphors with messages.
It succeeded, of course. But without pleasure.
I think this is designed for the sophisticated, not even the average AMERICAN viewer, who has read or watched at least half of the books, productions and films mentioned. It is difficult for us to fully understand this because of a completely different cultural background.
Bad shit and a normal arthouse.
The genre and description here currently simply dooms the film to one star:
"... something strange is going on at Jake's parents' house, and the potential relatives themselves are behaving very suspiciously."
If you look at it with the attitude of "psychological drama with a touch of mysticism", if you know approximately the direction of the plot, then you can praise it for the excellent combination of the script, acting and the completely masterful presentation of the "unreliable narrator" (although this term is not quite applicable here).
But there was still a feeling of incompleteness. As if the aftertaste wasn't bitter enough
Do you want to empathize with him? Definitely not, no tears, no sadness, disgust slips through in places.
Was it well shot? Respect to the cameraman, slap in the face to the screenwriter. It's like a demo version of a book that doesn't allow you to feel yourself without reading the original source.
It's weird, awkward, squeamish, caricatured, tragic, and unreadable without the American cultural code.
I love it when a movie leaves an aftertaste and a desire to be with him a little longer after it's over.
Read the differences between the book and the movie, references, quotes.
What the author wanted to say and what the audience understood/did not understand.
If you are the same person and you are not afraid that not everything is immediately clear, then I recommend watching 👍
Jessie Buckley is amazing 🔥
P. S.
I admire the conceit of some people:
If they didn't understand the movie, then for some reason they think the movie is shit, not them.
😂😂😅
An infinitely sad, dreary, depressing film. Something similar to "Chuck's Life" is only more real, where a person is just a human being, no matter how smart, how talented, or how amazing they are, who remains outside of life, alone, and hating himself endlessly. I understood Jake on many levels, felt a lot, and saw myself in some places. Lots of details, philosophical conversations, as a cover for a story about someone else's life.
The first hour of the movie is intense, like a great horror movie. Watch as the characters change, as the illusion collapses, with all this strange behavior, conversations, clothes. The second hour breaks my heart. I remembered that there was also a minor, third-rate character in the Breakfast Club, the janitor, who, as it turned out, was the best student at the same school twenty years ago. It's the same here.
The actors are dragging, everyone is perfect at their best, the cinematography, editing, soundtrack (this endless tapping of the heels of Toni Collette's heroine when Jessie Buckley's heroine has to go down to the basement), absolutely everything here is adjusted to create this disturbing atmosphere in order to finally understand what the film is about.
Beautiful and, to some extent, cruel.