Somehow, it's just convenient that these butchers are frozen! And he conveyed the message in a strange way.. And whether he passed it on at all is unknown.. But at least I had sex with my ex, it's already good
In short, someone cut off his penis so that he wouldn't use the children's lottery with the detective's wife. So, the wife has a boyfriend. The boyfriend was actually mentioned in this episode. That's it, the case is solved.
@Zy4: I can't imagine a boyfriend who would cut off his competitor's end. I'd rather just kill him and that's it. Maybe it's stereotypical, but I think the killer is a woman. She cut off the penis, and then chopped it into pieces to make it easier to hide. There must be considerable force, however, to cut off a person's legs so smoothly. Maybe a blonde? She is such a blood with milk :)
@Zy4: The detective's ex-wife has a kind of Swedish family. Anyway, what's the point of cutting off his pipette so that there are no children if he's already a corpse,
Gentlemen, I would like to hear your opinion , how do you feel about people who got into this locomotive like a hare , how do you think they should have rights on a par with those who bought tickets for it and whether the owners of the train act generously that they give them shelter and food , for some reason I asked myself this question and drew an analogy that for example, I or someone else was digging a safe shelter for myself in case of any emergency, and when something happened, a left-handed person jumped into it, while claiming to have prepared food in advance and even started pumping rights, although he himself did not knock a finger on the creation of this shelter. And now let's take that he is not one but several climbed , well, you get the point , I would like to hear your opinion , what do you think .
@dikhunt: the topic was interestingly played out in The 100, when 2 times more people got into the bunker for 5 years. Then they organized slaughterhouses and demonstratively ate their sisters.
@dikhunt: Since they're on the train, they should be useful. I would have provided them with a job. And normal living conditions. Not luxury housing, of course, but also not a beach wagon with cannibalism and hand-wringing like here, so that no one riots. The tail car could be brought into human form. In general, there is such a terrible attitude towards shanks that it is not surprising that they raise riots. Wilford leaves everything as it is, because riots make it possible to reduce the population.
@DeadDanny: secured the job how? they don't have the resources (food, space, electricity) at all. It would be necessary to remove the elite class as such (which, by the way, is logical in the conditions of the death of mankind)
@loki_art: they have resources: in the first episode, they clearly showed how the gentlemen from the first class make cakes and sushi, and collect fruits in abundance in the gardens.
@dikhunt: Well, you can start with the fact that this is not a shelter for "yourself", it is a model of ideals, morality, Noah's ark, but I do not remember Noah taking money from animals...
When the world is dying, you need to understand that all living things will die, so that humanity can live as long as possible, the emphasis should be on social benefits. Each creature has a pair, to let the highest minds, art and spirituality live. It is impossible to decide with money who is worthy to live and who is worthy to die, of course, if we are talking about morality as the foundation of this film. However, I'm not sure that they were very worried about who would continue to live and sit in gilded halls. Why do they need this money now, which can't buy anything?
Well, answering the question, yes, the stowaways got sucked in and they should have been cut off from the rest of the train, but in that case I would have removed 500 more cars, no one would have noticed the difference. Leave only those who benefit from their existence.
@vimazu: The question is not why now this money, this money was invested in advance in the construction of this train, it did not materialize out of thin air, it is a long and time-consuming process to create such projects, and I suppose it is not worth explaining that it is very expensive when money still had weight in society, but how who earned this money to invest in this train is no longer important, the main thing is to invest in the creation of the ark in advance, for this I simplified the model with an emergency bunker so that it was clearly clear that it also needed to invest labor and the same money. It turns out that this ark is someone's personal property with a bunch of investors , and the shanks are just trying to illegally take possession of it.
@vimazu: Why did the train suddenly become a "model of ideals"? This is a stupid box for survivors, in which everyone initially invested as much as they wanted to get on the exhaust. No one owes anything to those who are hooked on the holiday in honor of the decline of human civilization.
@dikhunt: in any case, they could be provided with work, even if it was hard and poorly paid (since they got on the train without tickets), since the end of the world has come and there are basically no other people anymore. Perhaps there were qualified workers among them. It would be possible to slightly change the train plan.
The film said that a balance should always be maintained so that there are enough resources for everyone, but the front cars generally have a great life, as for me it does not fit with the end of the world at all. Let the whole planet be cool, but we will arrange discos, swim in the Jacuzzi, and so on. It's generally illogical.
@ElenaDavydova: I agree: Mrs. W kind of cares about the remnants of humanity, but if she wasn't stupid, and she really cared about the future of people, then redistributing the luxury surpluses of the first classes to everyone is a logical step. Instead, let the tailgates die of hunger /suicides/riots, at the same time taking the guards with them - a great step, we have so many people left on the planet!
@AEE: but then the 1st class will rebel, and these people are even more dangerous. They can certainly lure someone from the security forces to their side - they have something to pay. It may not be money or jewelry, but there must be some kind of "currency" on the train. People from the first class are the type that will immediately take care of the resource in case of an emergency.
@dikhunt: I just spoke out on this issue under the last episode, which is a very controversial issue. If someone had broken into my house to my family during a hypothetical apocalypse, while asking for the same rights and opportunities, I would have kicked them out at the first opportunity. Or she also put me in a closet and severely restricted me. I am a terrible, insensitive person, I have no Christian values. However, morality is morality, but food, water, square, everyday life. Fuck you, in short.
Some write that they do not give food, they say, they do not give birth to children, but put the car in order, give work - everything will be chiki-bamboni! Well, it won't be. Point by point. 1) They are given food. Yes - little, yes - tasteless. But they do. As the aunt in the fur coat said (sorry, I forgot my name): they are given everything and ask for nothing in return, except not to rebel. And if you put aside the immorality of strict observance and pay attention to the essence, then everything will turn out to be true. Yes, in fairness, it turns out to be some kind of shit, but let's do it this way - there are no angels on the train from either side, and in the conditions of Kabzdets, morality recedes into the background, no matter how much we would like the opposite. Let's dig deeper. Did the first carriages leave people in the back? No. Maybe they unhooked the car, although they could? No. Don't they feed them? They are being fed. They don't give you water? They give it. Attention, the question is: why should the first wagons share their pickles? The answer is no matter. In this vein, the reasoning of the heroine in the back car on the theme "I will take revenge on everyone, I will throw everyone off the train and the world of a bright future will come" is the same shit as beating off frostbitten limbs by people from the first. At the same time, it is worth noting that children are taken from there to study, as well as some adults. This means that a gradual outflow of passengers from the last carriages is taking place. It would be very naive to believe that this can be done with all at once. And then there's the item right away...
@AndreRowell: 2) Release, give rights, freedoms and work. I assume that there are not ten people in the last carriage. Not only will it take them a lot of time to socialize (that is, this is a potential threat and generally a criminal element, an embittered and stupid people who want to eat, fuck, reproduce, eat again, avenge an insult and destroy in a limited space (and with a train crash everything is fucked up - let's remember those innocently killed by frost cows)), so you still need to give them something to eat and some kind of business. As for the release into the wild: I believe that because of the above-mentioned social factors, only children and some units of adults are taken, thus cutting off the "old generation" as much as possible. In general, it is a very correct move. Although even here there are their own vindictive little boys with modest aspirations of Genghis Khan. As for food: in order to feed the rear-car passengers, I'm sorry, at a normal level, it is necessary to squeeze the ration of the ENTIRE train. And even if you take away the delicacies from the first wagons (well, how many of these fat cats are there, three percent of the total mass, as always?), there will still be a hundred, for example, ordinary average people who eat noodles. Most of them, that is. Returning to the issue of peddlers. Should they share? They shouldn't. Well, if the food for the rear cars here will be made from the same thing that was made in the film, then everything is much more complicated with it than it might seem from the delicacies served in the rest. As for the job: where do they get it from? To take away positions from others in order to arrange these. Or how does it work? I hope the series will answer this question.
@AndreRowell: 3) Well, to the claim that children are not allowed to give birth. As it turned out, the front cars are not so simple with this either. In general, in conditions of limited space and limited resources, it would be strange if they were ALLOWED to reproduce. This is really justified. Cruel, yes, but it's a fucking apocalypse, ale. 4) About the usefulness of the people from the first wagons. Perhaps most of them are just moneybags. However. A) They invested in this project, which is obviously very expensive. Perhaps they participated in some stages of approval/design, etc. That is, without these people, there would be no train at all. They have earned their right to be here. B) Among them are probably cultural figures, politicians and all sorts of people who understand the management business. And you can consider them just moneybags as much as you like, but we do not live in the bright world of pink unicorns, and such people were and will be needed, especially at such a time. The power of the people and bold slogans are cool, but, but.
And finally. The plot is specially designed so that the viewer asks himself the question of how justified or how immoral everything that is happening is. But in general, it's a little difficult to talk about morality while sitting at home. There will always be those who will drown for the eternal-human, and those who are stupidly for survival. That's how man works. It's not good or bad, it's just the way life is. P.S.: I feel sorry for cows, I feel sorry for people, I feel sorry for everyone. But the manager said everything correctly. With all the secret motives, intrigues, secrets and so on, there are still three thousand souls in an iron box. And the word "box" is the key word.
@vimazu: cut off 500 wagons with utility blocks, gardens, warehouses, etc., etc., in general, with all the necessary junk for existence and with people in suspended animation - and no one would notice? I scream like a seagull.
@AndreRowell: bravo, great debriefing! I generally agree very much. And about the movie, can you remind me how the tailgates got on the train? For some reason it seemed to me that they also bought a ticket, but the cheapest, and eventually found themselves in such hellish conditions. That is, they were stupidly fucked up. And in the series, they are really hares and they have a completely different position. Maybe I'm wrong, of course, I can confuse something.
Their eyes widened a little when they complained that they were forbidden to give birth. In conditions of hunger, cold, crowding and unsanitary conditions, to give birth to children in order to what?
@dikhunt: one more moment, if I understood correctly, in the first episode, a voiceover said that yes, the bagachis invested in the train to save, but at the same time they are partly to blame for the general pizdets and the ice age.
that is, if you dug yourself a bunker, just in case, that's one thing, but if you dug yourself a bunker and simultaneously unleashed a nuclear war yourself.. here, the attitude of those who were able to break through will be completely different.
I thought about it myself, that it wasn't great - some people put their efforts into creating it, while others just "take it away" because they were able to break into an illegal place for them. Another point is that people who could not afford a ticket also wanted to survive and a world in which only the "elite" would survive would be very unfair.
It's kind of boring so far. And in the tail they didn't hear about acting at all. It's strange that the film has given enough time to the tail so that you can get into the characters and creepy scenes, and the series, which is several times longer, cannot do this. Here, compare the freezing of the hand in the movie and here. Here it is shown in general on the dump in a minute. No tension, no emotion from this. After all, the series is a bit weak.
@DeadDanny: I agree with your opinion. I would like to add that without Grandfather Ivan and Pike, the "Single Tail" somehow ceased to be interesting. Stephen Ogg, of course, does not play those guys who want to empathize, but there is a strong charisma in his characters: you remember them. I hope that it will not be frozen in a drawer for a long time, otherwise the dynamics of the series began to really sag.
@DeadDanny: I think that's why they showed the freezing of the hand on the dump, because it was already shown in the film and would not have produced such a wow effect anyway. Although there are probably people who have not seen the film.
the cows had one wagon, it turns out... The whole thousand and one wagons were fed by one wagon of cows.
it seems to be interesting what's next and who is the killer, etc., but even the graphon, actors and dramas do not cling at all. only Connelly asks some kind of question, I wonder if they will reveal her deeper.
in general, it is still interesting with tail children. those took them to study at the place of the dead or just. then why not just take all the children really and give them a job. and I agree with all of the above that it would be wise to use the labor of tailers, and not just keep them like cattle. then why didn't they get kicked off the train at the very beginning? it is logical to benefit from their presence on the train.
@oxana0710: To the question of why not take all the children at once, there are two simple reasons: because of the number of empty seats and because of the mood in the back car. You can't take everyone at once, so that they don't grow up together, supporting each other, not letting them forget and plotting bad things. For example, only three children were taken in this series, and one of them is already with revolutionary sentiments. That's why they don't take it. And for the same reasons, they don't take seniors. Well, plus - where to give them a job? Take it away from others? Only in the course of natural decline. Someone died - someone was taken. Everything is very logical here.
It was unexpected, by the way, to hear Murray Head's song "Say It Ain't So, Joe". I can't say that Lena Hall's performance was somehow hooked, but I really like the track itself.
A huge train and only one carriage with cows? Why did they think to share wagons with plants, but did not think to share wagons with cows? It's kind of weird... maybe there was an explanation in the movie?
@JaneSmile: Neither cows nor other animals were mentioned in the film. Maybe there will be a clue in the comic, but it's unlikely. You probably have to come to terms with the fact that not everything is 100% explicable and some things are just convenient for the script. And maybe there are still pigs and sheep somewhere on the train, they just didn't show it to us.
@JaneSmile: In the translation I was looking at, it said "the whole species died." Perhaps not all cows are meant, but only some kind of them? That is, there is more. Well, yes, there is certainly another animal. Not by cows alone. Although it is a loss, of course. Milk is also a pier.products...
@cat_pavel: I quote: "the whole species died." I wrote above that the phrase put me in a stupor - the kind of cows died as animals, or only a specific type of cows.
@JaneSmile: Most likely the kind of cows as animals. They also said there would be no manure for fertilizers now. If there were other types of cows, there would be no problems with manure.
So. They have a car with a Jacuzzi, a nightclub and who knows what else, but one car with cows. Very "far-sighted", yes. In general, the world depicted in the series is so conventional that one could close one's eyes to some gaps in logic, but when there are so many of them, it simply does not work. Let's say, instead of flying to the space station, people stayed on a dead planet for some reason, let's say that such a train can be designed and live in it for as long as necessary, let's say the paths along which it moves are eternal and do not need to be serviced. Okay. But they have so many people lying in "boxes", how many more have died, has not enough space been freed up in six years to transfer the tailers to the third grade if the birth rate is controlled? How did some toothpick manage to make a hole in the window of a train that can withstand the impact of an avalanche? Why make such luxuries for the first class? We would take a couple of wagons under the library, cinema and gym so that people don't move their heads and that's enough, and fill the rest with resources. If everything is initially fictional, then the details should be so reinforced concrete that the viewer does not even have a thought about how what is happening on the screen happens. The idea is interesting - the execution is clumsy. So far, only Jennifer Connelly's character is of interest.
@Vlue_berry16: Because of all this, I begin to suspect that the train was not originally intended as a means of survival, but only as a temporary shelter so that people could, so to speak, go down in history with dignity. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain such logical failures.
@ShurshX: As I understand it, it generates energy through movement. This became clear from the conversation between Madame and the technician (God, I don't remember a single name!), when he says that we need to slow down the train for repairs, and she replies that the first cars will remain without lights or something like that.
I would like to know more about the hierarchy, otherwise it's not clear what, one charismatic aunt and her tame nerds can't steer everything, don't they have a council that includes people from different industries? What do rich people do, sit in carriages, drink seagulls and look at the snow outside the window every day? I can't believe that people who invested in the train and their own safety would be so negligent about everything. It is also not clear who belongs to which classes. Then it seems to me that in such conditions, those with power, the same military, for example, would seize power, since what would the rich oppose them with? Unless there are non-deviant people in all posts, but they already have cannibalism and murder there, which is already contrary to theory. Why didn't they kick the shanks out right away if they treat them like trash anyway? Anyway, there are more questions than this train has cars.
In general, as in the film, there is only an idea to show the class struggle from another angle, and there are solid holes in the details of the life of the train. Separately, hints are surprising that there is no Wilford anymore or never was, despite the fact that this is a prequel to the film in which Wilford was. At the exit, there is only an average detective with on-duty dialogues.
@peshii: Why isn't Wilfred here? I think this was intended so that no one would guess about Wilfred and not know who he really was for security reasons. If everyone knew that she was Wilfred, then Ude would not be able to walk on the train so freely
The series touches on a very interesting and ambiguous topic, it is getting more interesting. I think that it is also not so easy for "first graders" to take away their benefits in the form of saunas and Jacuzzis, most likely Mr. Wilford has reasons and fears not to "offend" the first class, for example, due to the fact that they have armed personal guards and moles in the staff. It is interesting to observe how the "balance" will continue to be maintained.
Oh, if they had taken the girl's hand away, I would hardly have looked further...It's creepy. it is one thing for an adult who is aware of the consequences of actions, another for a child who is exposed to the influence of adults to cripple the rest of his life... You'd think she'd come up with it herself or could have refused when she was encouraged...
@Draznilla: I don't understand why such punishments are necessary at all, why create disabled people? Well, sleeping, that's another topic, there's nowhere to put energy?
I really like the series so far. I haven't watched the movie, and it's good that I can't compare every scene with it, I only rate the series. I still haven't really got into the shanks. Yes, what happened to the woman's hand is terrible, but so far everything looks very justified on the part of Mrs. Wilford. The rebels killed 6 guards, and it doesn't seem to be the first time. They constantly demand something, threaten, violate the integrity and order of the system, and generally infiltrated in a barbaric way, broke the original plan and forced it to redraw all resources. And, to be honest, I'm scared of the moment when (if that happens) they will get to power. What are their skills? Ideas about the operation of the train, the system? How will they control the 30,000 people on the train who are there legally? Will they provide everyone with an equal utopian life? Yeah, right now. All they really have in mind is revenge, and primary personal needs. Everything will go to one place at once.
I also like the parallel with the detective story. In general, I watch with pleasure, the plot development is interesting.
While they do not climb with the insanity of their world order, you can watch, but it is unrealistic to forget about such idiocy. Well, where did they find the actor for the main role, I don't care about race, but he's no good. And such a hairstyle would be shaved in their conditions, because there is nothing to breed lice
The idea of a closed world and a caste system is not bad, as well as with a detective line, but what the hell is a train? Why not a station on the moon, not an artificial satellite, not an island in the middle of the water, not a giant system of underground bunkers? So that you can at least imagine how it can function at all
Why was it so easy to break a window? Did you really not think during construction that the glasses should be mega durable so that there would be no such situations? Otherwise, it turns out somehow stupidly that a broken window threatens the safety of the entire train....
Why, during construction, did they decide that HUGE windows are generally a good idea for livestock breeding premises? I understand that cows are calmed by the views of nature, but make the windows smaller and simpler. ____________________________________________ And why are there no calves in a separate carriage or a special laboratory for cloning animals? (since rails were laid all over the world, it was possible to attract scientists for this).
There are more and more questions in terms of why such windows are not particularly durable, except for only one car with cows, etc.? But maybe we'll find out later that the cars are scattered all over the train with cattle. Yes, and I look like fiction more, so I can close my eyes to it, as I already said)
Well, of course it's very strange with glasses. Knowing that they were going to circle the earth forever with such a low temperature, it was necessary to worry about them first of all. I understand that we did everything for the sake of action, but I don't know...Although some scenes are downright violent, the atmosphere is kept very well. I haven't watched the movie, so there's nothing to compare it with, so I really like it so far. It was shot accurately and with high quality.
So, the wife has a boyfriend. The boyfriend was actually mentioned in this episode.
That's it, the case is solved.
When the world is dying, you need to understand that all living things will die, so that humanity can live as long as possible, the emphasis should be on social benefits. Each creature has a pair, to let the highest minds, art and spirituality live.
It is impossible to decide with money who is worthy to live and who is worthy to die, of course, if we are talking about morality as the foundation of this film. However, I'm not sure that they were very worried about who would continue to live and sit in gilded halls. Why do they need this money now, which can't buy anything?
Well, answering the question, yes, the stowaways got sucked in and they should have been cut off from the rest of the train, but in that case I would have removed 500 more cars, no one would have noticed the difference. Leave only those who benefit from their existence.
Perhaps there were qualified workers among them.
It would be possible to slightly change the train plan.
The film said that a balance should always be maintained so that there are enough resources for everyone, but the front cars generally have a great life, as for me it does not fit with the end of the world at all. Let the whole planet be cool, but we will arrange discos, swim in the Jacuzzi, and so on. It's generally illogical.
If someone had broken into my house to my family during a hypothetical apocalypse, while asking for the same rights and opportunities, I would have kicked them out at the first opportunity. Or she also put me in a closet and severely restricted me. I am a terrible, insensitive person, I have no Christian values. However, morality is morality, but food, water, square, everyday life. Fuck you, in short.
Some write that they do not give food, they say, they do not give birth to children, but put the car in order, give work - everything will be chiki-bamboni! Well, it won't be.
Point by point.
1) They are given food. Yes - little, yes - tasteless. But they do. As the aunt in the fur coat said (sorry, I forgot my name): they are given everything and ask for nothing in return, except not to rebel. And if you put aside the immorality of strict observance and pay attention to the essence, then everything will turn out to be true. Yes, in fairness, it turns out to be some kind of shit, but let's do it this way - there are no angels on the train from either side, and in the conditions of Kabzdets, morality recedes into the background, no matter how much we would like the opposite.
Let's dig deeper. Did the first carriages leave people in the back? No. Maybe they unhooked the car, although they could? No. Don't they feed them? They are being fed. They don't give you water? They give it. Attention, the question is: why should the first wagons share their pickles? The answer is no matter.
In this vein, the reasoning of the heroine in the back car on the theme "I will take revenge on everyone, I will throw everyone off the train and the world of a bright future will come" is the same shit as beating off frostbitten limbs by people from the first.
At the same time, it is worth noting that children are taken from there to study, as well as some adults. This means that a gradual outflow of passengers from the last carriages is taking place. It would be very naive to believe that this can be done with all at once. And then there's the item right away...
I assume that there are not ten people in the last carriage. Not only will it take them a lot of time to socialize (that is, this is a potential threat and generally a criminal element, an embittered and stupid people who want to eat, fuck, reproduce, eat again, avenge an insult and destroy in a limited space (and with a train crash everything is fucked up - let's remember those innocently killed by frost cows)), so you still need to give them something to eat and some kind of business.
As for the release into the wild: I believe that because of the above-mentioned social factors, only children and some units of adults are taken, thus cutting off the "old generation" as much as possible. In general, it is a very correct move. Although even here there are their own vindictive little boys with modest aspirations of Genghis Khan.
As for food: in order to feed the rear-car passengers, I'm sorry, at a normal level, it is necessary to squeeze the ration of the ENTIRE train. And even if you take away the delicacies from the first wagons (well, how many of these fat cats are there, three percent of the total mass, as always?), there will still be a hundred, for example, ordinary average people who eat noodles. Most of them, that is. Returning to the issue of peddlers. Should they share? They shouldn't.
Well, if the food for the rear cars here will be made from the same thing that was made in the film, then everything is much more complicated with it than it might seem from the delicacies served in the rest.
As for the job: where do they get it from? To take away positions from others in order to arrange these. Or how does it work? I hope the series will answer this question.
4) About the usefulness of the people from the first wagons.
Perhaps most of them are just moneybags. However. A) They invested in this project, which is obviously very expensive. Perhaps they participated in some stages of approval/design, etc. That is, without these people, there would be no train at all. They have earned their right to be here. B) Among them are probably cultural figures, politicians and all sorts of people who understand the management business. And you can consider them just moneybags as much as you like, but we do not live in the bright world of pink unicorns, and such people were and will be needed, especially at such a time. The power of the people and bold slogans are cool, but, but.
And finally. The plot is specially designed so that the viewer asks himself the question of how justified or how immoral everything that is happening is. But in general, it's a little difficult to talk about morality while sitting at home. There will always be those who will drown for the eternal-human, and those who are stupidly for survival. That's how man works. It's not good or bad, it's just the way life is.
P.S.: I feel sorry for cows, I feel sorry for people, I feel sorry for everyone. But the manager said everything correctly. With all the secret motives, intrigues, secrets and so on, there are still three thousand souls in an iron box. And the word "box" is the key word.
@vimazu: cut off 500 wagons with utility blocks, gardens, warehouses, etc., etc., in general, with all the necessary junk for existence and with people in suspended animation - and no one would notice? I scream like a seagull.
that is, if you dug yourself a bunker, just in case, that's one thing,
but if you dug yourself a bunker and simultaneously unleashed a nuclear war yourself.. here, the attitude of those who were able to break through will be completely different.
it seems to be interesting what's next and who is the killer, etc., but even the graphon, actors and dramas do not cling at all. only Connelly asks some kind of question, I wonder if they will reveal her deeper.
in general, it is still interesting with tail children. those took them to study at the place of the dead or just. then why not just take all the children really and give them a job. and I agree with all of the above that it would be wise to use the labor of tailers, and not just keep them like cattle. then why didn't they get kicked off the train at the very beginning? it is logical to benefit from their presence on the train.
You can't take everyone at once, so that they don't grow up together, supporting each other, not letting them forget and plotting bad things. For example, only three children were taken in this series, and one of them is already with revolutionary sentiments. That's why they don't take it. And for the same reasons, they don't take seniors. Well, plus - where to give them a job? Take it away from others? Only in the course of natural decline. Someone died - someone was taken. Everything is very logical here.
Why did they think to share wagons with plants, but did not think to share wagons with cows?
It's kind of weird...
maybe there was an explanation in the movie?
And maybe there are still pigs and sheep somewhere on the train, they just didn't show it to us.
Well, yes, there is certainly another animal. Not by cows alone. Although it is a loss, of course. Milk is also a pier.products...
I wrote above that the phrase put me in a stupor - the kind of cows died as animals, or only a specific type of cows.
Separately, hints are surprising that there is no Wilford anymore or never was, despite the fact that this is a prequel to the film in which Wilford was.
At the exit, there is only an average detective with on-duty dialogues.
I think that it is also not so easy for "first graders" to take away their benefits in the form of saunas and Jacuzzis, most likely Mr. Wilford has reasons and fears not to "offend" the first class, for example, due to the fact that they have armed personal guards and moles in the staff. It is interesting to observe how the "balance" will continue to be maintained.
It's a pleasure to look at Connelly.
Well, yes, he hardly had anything else to offer.
I still haven't really got into the shanks. Yes, what happened to the woman's hand is terrible, but so far everything looks very justified on the part of Mrs. Wilford. The rebels killed 6 guards, and it doesn't seem to be the first time. They constantly demand something, threaten, violate the integrity and order of the system, and generally infiltrated in a barbaric way, broke the original plan and forced it to redraw all resources. And, to be honest, I'm scared of the moment when (if that happens) they will get to power. What are their skills? Ideas about the operation of the train, the system? How will they control the 30,000 people on the train who are there legally? Will they provide everyone with an equal utopian life? Yeah, right now. All they really have in mind is revenge, and primary personal needs. Everything will go to one place at once.
I also like the parallel with the detective story. In general, I watch with pleasure, the plot development is interesting.
____________________________________________
And why are there no calves in a separate carriage or a special laboratory for cloning animals? (since rails were laid all over the world, it was possible to attract scientists for this).