s01e04 — Truth

@LuckyThirteen: The book won't be finished this season anyway. I have also written to the comments on the last series. Judging by the titles of the following episodes and the contents of the book, season 1 will end in the middle of the book.

@LuckyThirteen: did the inscription in the opening "filmed based on" tell you anything?

@LuckyThirteen: are there any films that are not based on motives but in some other way (but based on the book)? 🤔

@alexander444: there are film adaptations (filmed closer to the text), and there are adaptations (filmed based on motives, away from the original text).

@WildBart: Got it. But then we can talk about the degree of proximity to the source, without a clear separation. In the end, everything will be based on motives.

So go read the book and look for where it is discussed.

@LuckyThirteen: Oh, the avotvkizhnikov sect has moved up

@flaxman: well, no one knows that oxygen is poisoned, the doctor did not poison his son on purpose, of course)
But again, this is just an assumption.

@Tatyanich: The first two were so cool that I rushed to read books, but if I had finished watching the fourth series first, I definitely wouldn't have - the series has sunk very much, problems with logic and, in general, with the display of the world.

I agree too . The first two series were interesting, but in 3 and 4 there are other characters and not so much anymore. It's a pity that those first heroes were merged (

@oniXtacie: I understand that the development of the line will follow, since in this episode, in my opinion, they did not give any additional explanations

@oniXtacie: Sheriff's deputy thought they wanted to kill him. Therefore, he began to visit his enemies. The wife of this man threatened the deputy sheriff.

@alexander444: and if from the Tomb Raider?

@alexander444: I don't even remember it from there. And in Resident Evil, he's like the main villain

How else can you rape the declension of the word "abode"?

@vk775121: so I thought too, but such a stupid dialogue and meeting was

@Doctor_13: The dude, in his surprise at the power of Juliet's charisma and benevolence, simply forgot what he wanted to say.

@Saloed: he will probably help her, and then he will become her lover

@Dark_Alice: They've overdone the picture here, kmk. The backlight on the shelves, are they serious? :))

@albinka_: > live in a bunker for 100 years

more than 200, closer to 250ti

@Vescero: well, especially then) thanks for the clarification)
I did not remember exactly how old the Bunker was, but I knew that they had been there for a long time and more than one generation), I wrote "100 years" - as a proverbial variant in the meaning of "whatever": like "100 years have not seen each other" :D

@albinka_: but they, for example, do not know about the video camera, but they know about the fishing line. The fishing line in the bunker is generally not the most obvious item.

@Captain_Icicle: the loss of complex technologies is easier and faster than simple and more obvious ones. The fishing line is used not only for fishing, but also in construction, needlework and clothing manufacture.

But in general, this is a TV series / book, there is only what is convenient for the authors. There are so many questions about "supply": for example, where do they get clothes from, are these really stocks that have not "leaked" over all these years and are simply inherited? making clothes requires either cotton plantations, or synthetic production, or the presence of animals (leather), and judging by the number of people, they need a lot of clothes. It's the same with food: where are the plantations or farms? or are they synthesizing food from something? you can't save any reserves for 200 years, especially for such a horde (according to average estimates, 1 person eats 700-800 kg of food per year).

@albinka_: logically, I agree))

@albinka_: In the first episode, at the very beginning, the first frame was a pasture with cows. What are you watching the series for?

@albinka_: In the first episode, it was shown that they have cows. They were flashing somewhere behind.

@Perfectox: Firstly, the claim in the style of "what are you watching the series for" is very passive-aggressive, now I can also start asking you questions about the details from the first series and "catch you" on inattention (comment, by the way, to the 4th series, more than 2 weeks have passed since watching the first series, and that's it there was not such an emphasis in the series, taking into account all the events that happened next, I do not consider myself obliged to keep in mind all the small details of the series for such a long time). You clung to only one of my questions from the pile, but thank you for reminding me of this fact, I somehow missed the moment about cows, maybe there are pigs, since they were talking about bacon for breakfast (although bacon is an elite product in terms of production and fattening of pigs, which is also strange for a bunker) but the rest It still raises questions.
In any case, I do not think that keeping a farm with cows in conditions of limited space and resources is the easiest solution, because cows need a lot of food, they eat up huge spaces (or they need a lot of feed), leave behind a large amount of waste, of course you can make fertilizers from this, allocate cows can "filter their farts", but still, being vegitarians and growing soybeans in their conditions would be somehow easier, probably. And you can keep goats for milk, they are more unpretentious and do not emit so much methane.

@albinka_: plus metal and wood for the production of everything, not to mention beer in glass bottles)

@ZRaoulDuke: and they drink from ceramic mugs, or they could drink from enameled ones, so they can be used for 300 years)

What kind of artifact is a duck, can you tell me?

Candy dispenser

@Splyushka: I think it is necessary to explain here what a dispenser is, and even better to explain that it is not a dispenser. :))) In the best case, try not to use such words. :))

@Dark_Alice: I thought about depression, as well as endocrinological problems and rickets due to the lack of vitamin D in the first place. People who are prone to depression have probably all died by the campaign, and the most persistent ones have remained

@Dark_Alice: perhaps there are sunlight lamps or something similar in a park with plants, since plants and fields are growing

@Dark_Alice: Specifically, elevators and other lifts are explicitly prohibited by the Charter. I suppose it's in order to make communication between the upper and lower levels more difficult and thus increase social stratification. Well, you know, this is Divide and Conquer.

@Dark_Alice: There will be more information about screens and elevators, everything is very thoughtful there.

Ahahaha, the best comment, crying with laughter :DD district— district in English (this is for @vbkb)

@alexander444: they don't walk on kolidors, but ride lysopede :D

@NoizPitcher: What do they say now? Alternatively white?

@fluffyevil: apparently chocolate))

Dark-skinned

@6o4ka: ...eyes

@NoizPitcher: in Russian, it is correct to say "black". It is incorrect to say "negro"

@bucket_man: Conversely.
In English, and more precisely in the USA, the word niger has been taboo for several decades (VERY MUCH TABOO). And the word black is a neutral name for a representative of this race. Historically, there has been no reason for the word Negro to become a swear word in Russian, as in America, so it has remained a neutral word/term. "Black", used in relation to a negro, has a slight negative connotation, although it depends on how you say it (After all, if desired, even neutral words can be used as swear words). The word "nigger" would be a direct insult.

@WildBart: Well, logically speaking, I look at English where whites and blacks speak calmly, and the n-word is forbidden. well, in Russian, the n-word is somehow already inconvenient to use...

@WildBart: Respectful and neutral addresses are used to avoid offending specific people, not to prove any historical facts. Even if this word has not "acquired an abusive meaning" in Russia, it is consonant with a swear word for English-speaking people, you will not explain every time you communicate: "man, this word is normal in Russia, sorry, I will call you that."
Why do you think brands are renamed where their completely neutral name in their own language becomes abusive or just sounds bad to locals in another country? That's exactly why. Even if you try to prove that this word is neutral or even positive for you, for those to whom it is addressed, it is not very.
Black is a neutral word because it just simply means color. As well as "white". But "nigger" is already an abusive derivative and generally a different word, so don't mix it up.

@albinka_:
We are watching the original message from bucket_man: NoizPitcher: in Russian, it is correct to say "black". It is incorrect to say "Negro.
It's about how to use the Russian language correctly.
Now let's see what you 're arguing
with albinka_: " ... one fig it is consonant with a swear word for English-speaking people, you won't explain every time you communicate: "man, this word is normal in Russia..."
What does communication with English speakers in English have to do with it?
English has its own rules, Russian has its own rules.
And it is in the Russian language that the word Negro is the main name for people of the black race.
If you don't believe me, open Wikipedia or an explanatory dictionary after all.

@WildBart: Did you read me wrong or didn't you understand? I wrote that saying "negro" to black people in Russia is also not very correct, because you say it specifically to these people, who may find it unpleasant. Even though they are "not in America, where they can express their discontent," Russia does not live in a vacuum from the whole world.
I studied with such guys at uni, and the word "negro" was unpleasant to them, regardless of the fact that "it's customary in Russia" - I know what I'm talking about. And there was always increased attention to these guys in Russia, and one was even beaten up a couple of times, just for the color of his skin and because his girlfriend was Russian. It is desirable to respect someone else's culture and needs not only in the country where people with this culture live, but also on their own territory, too, this is just politeness to "guests".
It may be incorrect to say "black" in Russia, but in this case it is just a direct translation of what is happening in America now. In general, it is generally better not to focus on skin color when there is no urgent need for it, and when there is, you can say "dark-skinned."

And as for your "whatever they want, we'll call it the way we do":
For example, in Belarus, calling a Russian "Moskal" is also normal, it's even a historical term, but would it be okay for you if you were called that there?
Appealing to history like "it's always been OK with us" - in the age of globalization and at a time when speech is constantly changing and new generations of people with new ideas about ethics are growing up - is simply stupid.
"Jew" used to be a normal designation and a literary term, but it has acquired a negative connotation, go now and prove that it was once a positive word.

@bucket_man: it was a post-meta-irony, the number of disadvantages from those who did not understand it confirms this :)

@albinka_: let's close this offtopic.
I was just writing how to do it correctly in Russian. And you take theses that are not related to the subject of the dispute and successfully refute them or attribute some statement to me and start arguing with him.
Where, for example, in my post is the following phrase that you allegedly quote from my words
albinka_ "... And about your "it doesn't matter what they want, we'll call it the way we do": ..." ?

@NoizPitcher: eggplant, gutalin

A gathering has been announced for wrestlers and wrestlers for the rights of Negroes in TV series and the permissibility of calling them "niggers."

Their fight is phahahahaha
How pathetic you are, cowards.
Twitter and mayshouse are the only places where the concentration of destructive damage is maximized, but even here you can't prove anything to anyone, let alone change the attitude of normal people towards destructive ones (femmes, fatties, trans people, fags, and blacks).

In the sequel to "eggplant and shoe polish": smoked, black, fried, ethiopian, black beam, white heels, cannibal, southern night....There is such a rich range of choice of names for our smaller "brothers".

Your cause-and-effect relationships are broken.
But this is normal for Liberah supporters.
If there weren't so many faggots and niggers, there wouldn't be a bugurt about them.
But we must pay tribute, so far there are almost no listed degraders in this series.

After all, no one is satisfied with a bugurt under the TV series of the noughties, simply because there are almost no destructive characters listed there, and if they are shown, then casually without focusing attention.
It's been some 20 years, and now everyone (!!!) the series has a whole bucket of subpoenas, eat and don't mess up, as they say.

@PussyDestroier: Lord, how offended you are by life

Well, you're moving like a bingo lefty.
So far, I see only aggrieved fighters and various destructive minorities, who are always being infringed upon.
Even here, you couldn't pass by and got offended.
No need to placky-placky

@ShaMarinka: Elections do not give power, an apparatus of violence is needed. And the sheriff doesn't really answer to the mayor.

@Artchel: In my opinion, everyone just loved her here and chose her again every time. So it turns out that her power was based on LOVE. 🤗

@flaxman: so I'm not talking about the aunt, I'm talking about the position, about the function

@PussyDestroier: точно!